Book a demo

TSV Formation & Filling Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

TSV Formation & Filling Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/through-silicon-via-formation-and-filling-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductor Packaging & Test · Patent Landscape
Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling Patents: Who Holds the Ground
  • Filing activity has plateaued, not grown. Filings peaked at 35 in 2022 and have declined every year since, with the latest full year showing zero net growth among the leading assignees.
  • The US is the dominant filing venue by a wide margin. 314 of the 474 families were filed at the USPTO, more than five times the volume filed in China (57).
  • Momentum has stalled across every major holder at once. TSMC, IBM, SK Hynix, GlobalFoundries, ChangXin Memory and Samsung all show 0 filings in the latest tracked year, several with -100% YoY.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
474
Published Records
30%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-29%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Through-silicon via (TSV) formation and filling sits at the core of 3D IC integration: etching a vertical channel through a silicon wafer, lining it, and filling it with a conductor to connect stacked dies. This landscape tracks 474 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine TSV-specific search terms with process-control language such as Bosch etch process, void-free plating, thinning and reveal, keep-out zone, and stress, filtered to the core semiconductor device and electrodeposition IPC classes.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent drop-off in the most recent year understates real filing activity; the more reliable signal is the sustained decline from the 2022 peak rather than the final data point itself.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD58
  2. 2SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD25
  3. 3GLOBALFOUNDRIES US INC22
  4. 4SK HYNIX INC21
  5. 5CHANGXIN MEMORY TECH INC18
  6. 6SEMICON MFG INT (SHANGHAI) CORP17
  7. 7GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC16
  8. 8INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION15
  9. 9GLOBALFOUNDRIES SINGAPORE PTE LTD13
  10. 10AMKOR TECH SINGAPORE HLDG PTE LTD12
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

474 patent families across the tracked window show a technology that expanded through the late 2010s, peaked in 2022, and has been contracting since — while the underlying claim space remains almost entirely concentrated in one IPC subclass.

A peak-and-decline filing curve

Filings rose from 16 in 2017 toward a peak of 35 in 2022, then declined in each subsequent year, with the final partial year showing 0 — consistent with either a genuine slowdown or a reporting lag that has not yet caught up.

A peak-and-decline filing curve010203040162017201820192020202135202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentration in H01L, with secondary interest in packaging-adjacent classes

H01L (semiconductor devices) covers 472 of 474 records, essentially the entire dataset. Secondary classes — H10W, H10P and H10D — capture packaging and device-structure variants, while MEMS-related B81B/B81C and measurement class G01R appear only in the low double digits, marking them as smaller, more specialised branches rather than mainstream filing targets.

Concentration in H01L, with secondary interest in packaging-adjacent classesH01L · Semiconductor devices47299.6%H10W10021.1%H10P8317.5%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)7716.2%H10N · Other electric solid-state dev…204.2%B81B · Microstructural devices (MEMS)143.0%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement122.5%B81C · MEMS manufacturing112.3%Other7415.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 474 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about through-silicon via formation and filling and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US9640490B22017-05-02

Through silicon via keep out zone formation method and system (US9640490B2)

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.

Keep-out zones (KOZ) are formed around a TSV so that devices placed outside a defined stress threshold experience reduced stress impact. The patent describes forming a first and second KOZ based on differing performance thresholds, and placing TSVs along orientations — such as crystal directions [010] or [100] — where the KOZ radius to the via center is smallest, alongside use of TSV stress plugs.Filed by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, published 2017-05-02.

US9640490B2 — patent drawing 1US9640490B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20090032951A1Small Area, Robust Silicon Via Structure and Process325
2US20120211885A1Semiconductor package having through silicon via (TSV) interposer and method of manufacturing the semiconduct…307
3US20150021785A1Hybrid bonding with through substrate via (TSV)291
4US8153520B1Thinning tungsten layer after through silicon via filling222
5US20100297844A1Integrated circuit system with through silicon via and method of manufacture thereof217
6US20120018871A1Stack package and semiconductor package including the same214
7US20090014843A1Manufacturing process and structure of through silicon via137
8US20190363079A1Through silicon via design for stacking integrated circuits127
9US20140131856A1Semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof121
10US20100213600A1Apparatus having thermal-enhanced and cost-effective 3D IC integration structure with through silicon via int…121

Citation counts accumulate over time within the searched corpus, so older filings are structurally favoured; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current competitive strength.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data says about the state of the field

Three patterns stand out once the raw filing counts are set against IPC composition and assignee momentum: a maturing core process, a narrow claim footprint, and a filing slowdown shared by every major holder.

Filing trajectory
35 in 2022, 0 by 2026
peak to latest year

Growth has already peaked

The filing curve rose from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 35 in 2022 and has fallen every year since. Even allowing for an 18-month publication lag, the trend line points to a technology whose foundational claim territory is largely staked out rather than one still in a land-grab phase.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Venue concentration
314 of 474 filings
at the USPTO

The US is where the disputes will happen

Two-thirds of all families in this dataset were filed in the United States, more than five times the China total (57) and nearly ten times the EPO total (34). Freedom-to-operate work that skips a thorough US search misses the majority of the enforceable claim base.

Receiving office distribution
IPC footprint
472 of 474 in H01L
single-class concentration

Nearly the entire dataset sits in one class

H01L accounts for 472 of 474 records, with H10W, H10P and H10D as the only secondary classes of any size. MEMS-specific classes (B81B, B81C) and measurement class G01R each sit in the low teens, suggesting these adjacent applications of TSV technology remain comparatively unclaimed.

IPC subclass distribution
Assignee momentum
0 filings, -100% YoY
across leading holders

Every major holder has gone quiet at once

TSMC, IBM, SK Hynix, GlobalFoundries, ChangXin Memory and Samsung all report zero filings in the latest tracked year. A simultaneous pause across the entire leaderboard is unusual and more likely reflects publication lag or a shift toward trade-secret practice than a genuine industry-wide halt.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to through-silicon via formation and filling, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where the gate sits

Filing activity concentrates among a small group of large integrated device manufacturers and foundries, with co-assignee pairs revealing internal corporate structure (parent-subsidiary filing splits) more than external collaboration.

Leaderboard shape
10 co-assignee pairs
mostly intra-group

Concentration at the top, thin collaboration below

The strongest co-assignee pairs link related legal entities of the same corporate group — GlobalFoundries' own subsidiaries, and SMIC's Shanghai and Beijing manufacturing arms — rather than cross-company joint filings. Genuine inter-company collaboration on TSV process patents is rare in this dataset.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Momentum reversal
-100% YoY
at multiple leaders

A synchronized pullback among incumbents

TSMC and Samsung both show a full -100% year-on-year drop to zero filings, matched by IBM, SK Hynix, GlobalFoundries and ChangXin Memory. This pattern is worth checking against publication lag before concluding these firms have stopped R&D investment in TSV process work.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Filing venue
314 US filings
vs. 57 in China

US filing dominance shapes enforcement risk

With 314 of 474 families filed in the United States against 57 in China, 34 at the EPO, 18 via WIPO/PCT, 13 in Taiwan and 11 in South Korea, any competitive clearance exercise centred outside the US will materially undercount the active claim base.

Receiving office distribution
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing volume is low relative to the core H01L cluster, based on IPC composition
MEMS-integrated TSV interposersin-line stress metrology for TSV arrayskeep-out zone design rules for [010]/[100] orientationsvoid-free copper plating chemistry variantswafer thinning-and-reveal endpoint control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC)0-100%
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)0
SK Hynix Inc.0
GlobalFoundries Inc.0
ChangXin Memory Technologies, Inc.0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea)0-100%
Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corporation (SMIC)0
Intel Corporation0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing plateau and single-class concentration raise questions that a static landscape report cannot answer on its own — they call for claim-level and competitor-level follow-up.

Check the recent-year drop against publication lag

Before concluding that TSV filing activity has genuinely stalled, pull raw application (not publication) dates for the last 18-24 months to separate a real slowdown from a reporting artifact.

Run a filing-lag check in Eureka

Map claim scope inside the H10W/H10P/H10D secondary classes

These packaging-adjacent classes carry meaningful volume but sit outside the core H01L cluster — worth a targeted claim chart to see whether they extend or merely restate the core TSV claims.

Build a claim chart in Eureka

Track whether US filing dominance is narrowing

With two-thirds of families filed in the US, a shift in filing share toward China or the EPO would be an early signal of where enforcement and licensing activity is heading next.

Monitor venue shifts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about TSV formation and filling patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Through-Silicon Via Formation and Filling in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole through-silicon via formation and filling corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.