Book a demo

Thyristor Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Thyristor Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/thyristors-and-power-rectifier-devices-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Discrete & Analog Devices
Thyristors and power rectifier device patents: who leads, and where filing has flattened
  • Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees hold 611 of 1,214 records in scope (50.3%), and the leading ten hold 772 (63.6%) — a small group controls most of the documented claim space.
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. Annual filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 25 in 2021, then fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of 7 — the field is not expanding at the rate the peak year suggests.
  • Japan dominates the receiving-office mix. 575 of the tracked filings were received in Japan, more than double the 266 in the United States and far ahead of the 139 filed at the EPO.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,214
Published Records
50%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-96%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
JP
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 1,214 published records at the intersection of thyristor, silicon-controlled-rectifier and power-rectifier-device claims with specific technical limitations — surge current capability, turn-off time, press-pack housing, HVDC valve application and dv/dt withstand — inside IPC classes covering semiconductor devices and power conversion. It spans filings from 2015 through the mid-2026 data cut-off, so the most recent year is necessarily undercounted: publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months.

The scope favours devices engineered for high-voltage, high-current switching duty rather than small-signal or logic-level parts, which is why power conversion and protective-circuit classes sit alongside the core semiconductor-device classification.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP176
  2. 2KK TOSHIBA159
  3. 3HITACHI LTD104
  4. 4FUJI ELECTRIC CO LTD103
  5. 5MEIDENSHA CORP69
  6. 6SIEMENS AG39
  7. 7WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP33
  8. 8GENERAL ELECTRIC CO32
  9. 9PANASONIC ELECTRIC WORKS CO LTD29
  10. 10TOYO DENKI SEIZO KK28
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,214 records: the year-by-year filing count, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than 100% of the record total — that is expected and is not a data error.

A peak in 2021, then a pullback

Annual filings climbed from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 25 in 2021, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 7. Read the tail end of the chart cautiously: the 2026 count of 1 reflects the partial year and publication lag, not a sudden stop in activity.

A peak in 2021, then a pullback0613192582017201820192020252021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Semiconductor-device claims dominate, power conversion is the strongest secondary class

H01L (semiconductor devices) appears in 884 of the 1,214 records in scope (72.8%), far ahead of H02M (power conversion, 365 records, 30.1%). Pulse-technique claims under H03K (112 records, 9.2%) and protective-circuit claims under H02H (33 records, 2.7%) sit well behind, marking areas of comparatively thin coverage relative to the device-structure core.

Semiconductor-device claims dominate, power conversion is the strongest secondary classH01L · Semiconductor devices88472.8%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)36530.1%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…1129.2%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)736.0%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…413.4%H10P403.3%H02P · Control of motors & generators352.9%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements332.7%Other1189.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,214 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about thyristors and power rectifier devices and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited and most representative filings

Representative filing
US4281336A1981-07-28

US4281336A — Thyristor element with short turn-off time and method for producing such element

LICENTIA PATENT-VERWALTUNGS-G.M.B.H.

A fast switching thyristor uses a shorted-emitter structure where charge-carrier lifetime is deliberately lowered via recombination centers to shorten turn-off time. The control base zone lifetime is set homogeneously low to match a target firing resistance beneath the emitter zone, with a further-reduced lifetime in the partial region beneath the control electrode, targeting fast recovery without sacrificing forward-voltage stability.Filed by Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-G.m.b.H., granted 1981-07-28 — one of the earliest structural approaches to turn-off time reduction still cited across this landscape.

US4281336A — patent drawing 1US4281336A — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4060757AInverters having a transformer-coupled commutating circuit254
2US4151387AMetal base cookware induction heating apparatus having improved power control circuit for insuring safe opera…148
3US3710062AMetal base cookware induction heating apparatus having improved power supply and gating control circuit using…130
4US5369291AVoltage controlled thyristor110
5US20030183838A1Solid-state DC circuit breaker101
6US4078247AInverter circuit control circuit for precluding simultaneous conduction of thyristors90
7US5489787ASemiconductor device having an insulated gate field effect transistor and exhibiting thyristor action89
8US6084253ALow voltage four-layer device with offset buried region81
9US3953783ALow cast chopper inverter power supply and gating circuit therefor71
10US6054728AInsulated gate thyristor59

Citation counts inside this corpus skew toward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations — treat them as a signal of influence on later work, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

The concentration, technology mix and geography together point to a mature but narrowly held field where the core device structure is heavily claimed and the surrounding control and protection circuitry is comparatively open.

Concentration
50.3%
of 1,214 records held by the top 5 assignees

A small group controls the core claim space

Five assignees hold 611 of the 1,214 records in scope, and the leading ten extend that to 772 records (63.6%). New entrants are filing into device-structure territory that a handful of established electrical-equipment makers have already occupied for decades.

Top 5 vs top 10 combined share
Filing momentum
25 in 2021
peak annual filings, since receded

Growth peaked mid-decade and has not been sustained

Filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 25 in 2021, then fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of 7. That pattern reads as a field responding to a specific demand cycle — likely HVDC and grid-scale power-conversion investment — rather than one on a sustained growth trajectory.

2017 vs 2021 vs 2022 filing counts
Technology mix
72.8%
of records carry an H01L semiconductor-device class

Device structure dominates; control circuitry is thinner

H01L claims appear in 884 of 1,214 records, more than double the 365 records touching H02M power-conversion claims. Protective-circuit claims (H02H, 33 records) and motor/generator control claims (H02P, 35 records) are present but far less contested.

H01L vs H02M vs H02H record counts
Geography
575 filings
received in Japan, the largest single office

Japan anchors the filing base, the US and Europe trail

Japan's receiving-office count of 575 is more than double the 266 filed in the United States and well ahead of the 139 filed at the EPO. Any freedom-to-operate check on device-structure claims should start with Japanese-office filings before extending to US or European counterparts.

Japan vs United States vs EPO receiving-office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to thyristors and power rectifier devices, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where filing has gone quiet

The ranked leaders are longstanding electrical-equipment and semiconductor manufacturers rather than recent entrants, and recent-year momentum data suggests filing activity from the largest historical assignees has slowed markedly.

Leader
176 records
held by the top-ranked assignee

One assignee holds nearly a third of the top-5 total

The leading assignee's 176 records sit well ahead of the fifth-place holder's 69, showing a steep drop-off even within the top tier rather than a smooth gradient.

Leader vs 5th-place record count
Long tail
28 records
held by the 10th-ranked assignee

The drop from top 5 to top 10 is steep

Combined records held by the leading ten reach 772 (63.6% of all 1,214 records), but the 10th-place assignee alone holds only 28 — most of that combined share is still concentrated in the top few positions.

10th-place record count vs top-10 combined share
Momentum
0 in latest year
for every one of the tracked legacy leaders

Recent-year filing from historical leaders has gone quiet

Recent-year momentum figures show the tracked legacy assignees registering zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the post-2021 pullback in overall filings, this points to a field where the incumbents' claim positions are largely locked in rather than actively expanding.

Latest-year filing count across tracked legacy assignees
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches sit inside the same IPC scope but carry noticeably fewer records than the core device-structure classes — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming they are occupied.
dv/dt withstand circuit topologiespress-pack housing thermal interfacessolid-state DC circuit breaker integrationprotective-circuit coordination (H02H)HVDC valve gate-drive control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Mitsubishi Electric Corp0
Toshiba Corp0
Fuji Electric Co., Ltd.0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Meidensha Corp0
Siemens AG0
General Electric Co0
Westinghouse Electric Corp0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Turning this landscape into a filing decision

The dataset shows where claim density sits and where it thins out; the next step is testing a specific claim idea against that landscape rather than reading the field in the abstract.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top holders

Before drafting around device-structure improvements, run a targeted search against the leading assignees' portfolios — the top 5 alone hold half of all records in scope, so structural claims are the most crowded starting point.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Draft into the thinner protective-circuit branches

H02H protective-circuit claims and H02P motor-control claims carry far fewer records than the H01L device-structure core, suggesting more room to stake a defensible first claim there.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track whether the 2021 peak was a one-off cycle

Filings fell from a 2021 peak of 25 back toward single digits; watching whether that recovers alongside HVDC and grid investment cycles will tell you whether this is a rebound field or a maturing one.

Set up trend monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about thyristor and power rectifier patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Thyristors and Power Rectifier Devices in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole thyristors and power rectifier devices corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.