Book a demo

Time-of-Flight Sensor Patent Landscape 2026

Time-of-Flight Sensor Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Time-of-Flight Sensor Patent Landscape in 2026

Sony Semiconductor Solutions dominates a moderately concentrated field, holding the largest single portfolio among the top hundred filers. Activity peaked in 2020 and has since eased, with the most recent filing years subject to publication lag.

6,590
Patent families in scope
32%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-25%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Sony leads a field where the top five filers account for nearly a third of the largest-filer pool

Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp ranks first with 739 patent families, more than twice the second-ranked Samsung Electronics (322 patent families), establishing a clear tier-one lead in the time-of-flight sensor space.

The top five applicants — Sony Semiconductor Solutions, Samsung Electronics, Microsoft Technology Licensing, Innoviz Technologies, and Infineon Technologies — together represent 32% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, signaling moderate-to-high concentration at the top with meaningful activity across a broad mid-tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp739
2Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.322
3Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC230
4Innoviz Technologies Ltd186
5Infineon Technologies AG175
6STMICROELECTRONICS (RES & DEV) LTD168
7Sony DepthSensing Solutions SA/NV118
8Sony Group Corp109
9Magic Leap Inc107
10Zoox Inc106
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11STMicroelectronics (Grenoble 2) SAS100
12ams OSRAM Asia Pacific Pte Ltd98
13Ricoh Co., Ltd.89
14BlackBerry Ltd86
15STMicroelectronics International NV82
16ams AG (formerly austriamicrosystems AG)79
17Qualcomm Inc68
18ams International AG66
19Canon Inc62
20Shenzhen Goodix Technology Co., Ltd.61
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Sony’s position is reinforced by its ecosystem of affiliated entities (Sony DepthSensing Solutions, Sony Group Corp), suggesting a deliberate platform strategy rather than isolated product filings. Challengers such as Innoviz Technologies (186 patent families) and STMicroelectronics entities collectively represent credible second-tier competition, particularly in LiDAR and sensor pixel design.

Filing counts for 20242026 are materially under-counted due to the 18–24 month patent publication lag; apparent declines in those years should not be interpreted as reduced R&D investment. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity peaked in 2020; G01S radar and positioning dominates the technology mix

Two lenses — annual filing volume and IPC technology composition — reveal both the maturity trajectory of the field and the relative depth of individual technical branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings climbed from 623 families in 2017 to a peak of 1,071 in 2020, then eased to 937 in 2022 before declining further through 2023. Counts for 2024 (492) and 2025 (294) are heavily suppressed by publication lag and should not be read as a continued structural decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,071 in 2020.6232017669201889920191,071202087820219372022700202349220242942025272026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G01S (radar, sonar and positioning) overwhelmingly dominates, reflecting the core ranging and LiDAR function of ToF sensors. Secondary branches — H04N (video/imaging), G06T (image processing), G01N (material analysis), and H01L (semiconductor devices) — each hold meaningful but much smaller shares, pointing to application diversification beyond pure ranging.

Technology compositionG01S · Radar, sonar & positioning leads with 6,705; H04N · Pictorial communication (video/TV) 1,522.G01S · Radar, sonar & po…6,705H04N · Pictorial communi…1,522G06T · Image data proces…853G01N · Material analysis…710H01L · Semiconductor dev…675G01C · Distance, navigat…537G01B · Measuring length …477G06V · Image/video recog…423↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250138161A1Published 2025-05-01

Single photon avalanche diodes based time-of-fligh…

Bharat Semi Systems Private Limited

The present invention relates to a single photon avalanche diodes-based time-of-flight sensor (<b>100</b>). The single photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) based time-of-flight (ToF) sensor (<b>100</b>) includes an Nx N single photon avalanche diode (SPAD) photodetector (<b>101</b>), a front-end (FE) unit (<b>103</b>), a pulse shaping (PS) unit (<b>105</b>), a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Single photon avalanche diodes based time-of-fligh… — patent drawingSingle photon avalanche diodes based time-of-fligh… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Component for a lidar sensor system, lidar sensor …990
2Solid-state image sensor432
3Variable flux allocation within a lidar FOV to imp…379
4Time-of-flight radio location system293
5Method and apparatus for combining data to constru…243
6Remote distance estimation system and method217
7Method of determining range data in a time-of-flig…214
8Method for constructing a map while performing work205

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural readings — maturity, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic coverage — frame the strategic context for teams evaluating entry or expansion in time-of-flight sensing.

Decline

Post-peak field with consolidating core technology

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2020 peak of 1,071 families. Core G01S ranging claims are densely populated, meaning new entrants face a crowded prior-art landscape in the dominant branch. Adjacent application branches (medical, robotics, agriculture) remain comparatively sparse and may offer more accessible claim space.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Two-tier structure with a dominant platform player

Sony Semiconductor Solutions holds more than twice the portfolio of second-ranked Samsung Electronics, creating a distinct tier-one gap. The mid-tier — Innoviz, Infineon, STMicroelectronics entities, Magic Leap, Zoox — is active but fragmented, with individual players at 100230 patent families. New entrants are unlikely to close the gap through volume alone; differentiation via novel application domains or device architectures is more tractable.

High concentration at top
Collaboration

Co-filing concentrated within corporate families; limited cross-industry partnering

The most active co-filing pair is Sony Semiconductor Solutions and Sony DepthSensing Solutions (84 joint families), followed by STMicroelectronics R&D and STMicroelectronics Grenoble 2 (39 joint families) — both reflecting intra-group coordination rather than open ecosystem collaboration. The most notable cross-group pairing is Samsung Electronics and the University of Michigan Board of Regents (4 joint families), the only prominent academic linkage in the top collaboration list. Infineon and pmdtechnologies also co-file (7 joint families), reflecting Infineon’s acquisition-driven ToF strategy.

Intra-group dominant
Geography

US-centric filing with Europe as a strong secondary market

The United States leads patent filings by a wide margin, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT). China ranks fourth, notably below its typical share in other semiconductor fields, suggesting either deliberate market choice or export-control sensitivity among key filers. South Korea and Japan — home to Samsung and Canon respectively — show comparatively modest direct filing volumes, with protection likely routed through PCT and EPO channels.

US-led; China under-indexed
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Sony Semiconductor Solutions CorpSony DepthSensing Solutions SA/NV84
STMicroelectronics (R&D) LtdSTMicroelectronics (Grenoble 2) SAS39
Sony Semiconductor Solutions CorpSony Group Corp19
Sony Semiconductor Solutions CorpSony Europe BV16
STMicroelectronics (R&D) LtdSTMicroelectronics Inc15
Infineon Technologies AGpmdtechnologies GmbH7
Sony Semiconductor Solutions CorpSony Advanced Visual Sensing AG5
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.University of Michigan Board of Regents4
STMicroelectronics (R&D) LtdSTMicroelectronics SA (France)4
Sony Group CorpSony Europe BV4

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration data reflects co-applicant filings within the time-of-flight sensor corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Sony anchors the field; Sony DepthSensing is the standout momentum player

The top two ranked applicants share a focus on core G01S ranging and positioning IPC codes but differ markedly in recent filing trajectory, with Sony’s main entity contracting while its dedicated depth-sensing subsidiary accelerates.

Leader · Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp

Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp

Ranked first with 739 patent families, Sony Semiconductor Solutions focuses heavily on G01S17 and G01S7 (LiDAR ranging and signal processing) and H01L27 (semiconductor image sensors), reflecting a vertically integrated sensor platform strategy. Recent momentum shows a contraction of –43% versus the prior three-year window, consistent with the field’s post-peak consolidation phase.

patent families: 739
Challenger · Sony DepthSensing Solutions SA/NV

Sony DepthSensing Solutions SA/NV

Ranked seventh with 118 patent families, Sony DepthSensing Solutions is the strongest momentum player in the ranked field, posting +42% recent filing growth versus its prior three-year window. Its technology emphasis mirrors the parent — G01S17 and G01S7 — but as a purpose-built depth-sensing subsidiary it represents a focused, accelerating bet on dedicated ToF solutions. It is also the top co-filing partner of Sony Semiconductor Solutions (84 joint families).

patent families: 118
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology-route breakdowns for all 100 tracked filers.
Innoviz Technologies LtdInfineon Technologies AG+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corp214▼ -43%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.122▬ -4%
Infineon Technologies AG45▼ -57%
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC14▼ -81%
Innoviz Technologies Ltd51▼ -25%
STMicroelectronics (R&D) Ltd29▼ -38%
Sony Group Corp29▼ -40%
Sony DepthSensing Solutions SA/NV51▲ +42%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Family counts are drawn from the applicant ranking within the time-of-flight sensor corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served technical branches adjacent to the dominant G01S core

Several IPC branches capture ToF-relevant applications with materially lower patent density relative to the dominant G01S class, suggesting areas where claim space may be more accessible for targeted R&D.

G01N · Material Analysis & Testing

With 710 patent records — roughly 10% of the G01S count — G01N covers ToF applications in non-destructive material characterization, thickness gauging, and subsurface inspection. The technical value is plausible: ToF-based photon-counting and LIDAR backscatter are increasingly applied to food quality, pharmaceutical inspection, and industrial NDT. Entry paths exist via integration with existing G01S sensor hardware and application-specific signal processing, with limited dominant incumbents in this sub-domain visible in the corpus.

Search this in Eureka →

A61B · Diagnosis & Surgery

The A61B branch holds 244 patent records, representing ToF use in clinical depth imaging, surgical navigation, wound measurement, and patient monitoring. Density is low relative to the core ranging branches, and no single applicant from the ranked top-20 appears to dominate this sub-space based on available data. The entry path is technically demanding — regulatory and biocompatibility requirements add barriers — but the combination of low patent density and high clinical value makes this an observation worth monitoring for teams with medtech adjacency.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See claim-level density analysis across all IPC branches, including G01C navigation, G01B dimensional measurement, and robotics applications.
G01C · Distance, navigation & gyroscopesG01B · Measuring length & dimensions+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are patent records; lower share relative to G01S indicates relative sparsity, not confirmed commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by IPC technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerG01S 17 · Radar, sonar & positioningG01S 7 · Radar, sonar & positioningG06T 7 · Image data processing & generationH04N 25 · Pictorial communication (video/TV)H04N 5 · Pictorial communication (video/TV)
Sony Semiconductor Solutions CorpStrong · 546Strong · 510Emerging · 33Moderate · 159Emerging · 106
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 201Strong · 163Emerging · 38Moderate · 67Moderate · 47
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLCStrong · 174Strong · 138Moderate · 42Emerging · 26Moderate · 45
Innoviz Technologies LtdStrong · 178Strong · 172AbsentAbsentAbsent
Infineon Technologies AGStrong · 146Strong · 147AbsentEmerging · 20Emerging · 15
STMicroelectronics (R&D) LtdStrong · 139Strong · 132AbsentAbsentAbsent
Sony DepthSensing Solutions SA/NVStrong · 97Strong · 83AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own time-of-flight sensor landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.