https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/time-sensitive-networking-tsn-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Industrial Automation
Time-Sensitive Networking patents: who holds the bounded-latency claims and where filing has stalled
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 25 families, then flattened through the 2022 midpoint of 18 — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • H04L dominates at 87 of 103 records, with H04W wireless convergence (38) and H04J multiplexing (27) layered on top — most value sits at the digital-transmission and wireless intersection.
  • The most-cited family, US20210219357A1, draws 67 citations, nearly double the next-ranked record — control-plane configuration for TSN is the anchor claim territory to clear before filing nearby.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
103
Published Records
38%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-67%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the TSN patent record actually shows

Time-Sensitive Networking sits at the junction of deterministic Ethernet and wireless convergence: bounding latency, reserving bandwidth for streams, and synchronizing clocks across bridged network segments. The 103 patent families captured here span time synchronization, traffic shaping, stream reservation and industrial convergence claim language, filtered against the core H04L12, H04J3 and H04L47 classification codes that define wired and converged deterministic networking.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2020, and has since leveled off — a pattern consistent with a technology whose foundational claims are largely staked out, even as 5G-TSN convergence keeps drawing wireless players into the space.

Annual filing trend, 2017–2026
  1. 1INTEL CORP10
  2. 2ZTE CORP8
  3. 3TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK8
  4. 4ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST7
  5. 5TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)6
  6. 6NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY5
  7. 7OFINNO LLC5
  8. 8QUALCOMM INC5
  9. 9SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD5
  10. 10MEIDENSHA CORP4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 103-family dataset: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A 2020 peak followed by a flat-to-declining run

Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 25 in 2020, held near 18 at the 2022 midpoint, and have trended down since — bearing in mind that the most recent year is always undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.

A 2020 peak followed by a flat-to-declining run0613192512017201820192520202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Digital transmission carries the claim load

H04L (digital information transmission) appears in 87 of 103 records, far ahead of H04W wireless networks (38) and H04J multiplex communication (27). Smaller counts in G06F, G11B, H01L, H03M and H04N mark peripheral touchpoints — storage, semiconductor and coding claims that ride alongside a core TSN filing rather than define one.

Digital transmission carries the claim loadH04L · Digital information transmissi…8784.5%H04W · Wireless communication networks3836.9%H04J · Multiplex communication2726.2%G06F · Electric digital data processi…43.9%G11B · Information storage (magnetic/…21.9%H01L · Semiconductor devices21.9%H03M · Coding & code conversion21.9%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…21.9%Other32.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 103 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about time-sensitive networking (tsn) and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records set the boundaries

Representative Filing
WO2021219227A12021-11-04

Mechanism for stream reservation control in communication network for time sensitive networking system

NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY

An apparatus for use by a network element or function configured to conduct control processing for enabling transmission of a data stream between at least one talker party and at least one listener party, using processing circuitry and memory to receive a declaration message related to a stream reservation procedure via a communication network forming a bridge element.Filed by Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, published 2021-11-04 as WO2021219227A1.

WO2021219227A1 — patent drawing 1WO2021219227A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited TSN patent families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20210219357A1Control Plane Based Configuration For Time Sensitive Networking67
2US20200028791A1Changing a time sensitive networking schedule implemented by a softswitch34
3US10044524B1Ethernet controller with integrated TSN/AVB control point and time slave30
4WO2020150333A1Control plane based configuration for time sensitive networking27
5US20220216932A15g system signaling methods to convey TSN synchronization information24
6US10511455B1Time sensitive networking control circuitry23
7JP2020017877ANetwork apparatus22
8US20200351752A1Integration of communication network in time sensitive networking system21
9US20230068462A1Time sensitive communication support information updating method and device in mobile communication system20
10US20210377150A1Memory pooled time sensitive networking based architectures13

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour earlier-filed records; treat them as a signal of influence on later filings, not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the citation table, framed for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision.

Filing Momentum
25 → 0
peak year (2020) vs 2026 partial

The core claim space is largely staked

Volume climbed steadily to a 2020 peak of 25 families, held near 18 through 2022, then declined. That trajectory says foundational TSN mechanisms — scheduling, stream reservation, clock sync — are already claimed by incumbents; new entrants are more likely to find room in application-specific extensions than in the base protocol.

Based on the 2017–2026 filing trend
Classification Split
87 vs 38 vs 27
H04L vs H04W vs H04J record counts

Wired and wireless claims are converging

H04L still anchors the field, but 38 records also carry H04W wireless-network classification alongside it — evidence that 5G-TSN convergence, not classic industrial Ethernet alone, is where active claim-writing continues.

Based on IPC subclass composition
Citation Concentration
67 citations
top record, US20210219357A1

One control-plane family anchors the rest

The leading record draws roughly double the citations of the next entry, and a related WO filing from the same family sits close behind. Anything touching control-plane configuration for TSN should be checked against this family before drafting claims in the same territory.

Based on the most-cited records table
Filing Geography
47 US filings
of 103 records

The US and EPO carry most of the record

United States filings (47) lead, with Europe (24) and WIPO PCT filings (10) next; India, Japan and China each contribute single-digit shares. A freedom-to-operate check weighted toward US and EPO prosecution history will cover most of the documented art.

Based on receiving-office counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to time-sensitive networking (tsn), with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum has cooled

The named assignees in the recent-momentum data all show zero filings in the latest tracked year — consistent with the broader post-2020 slowdown rather than any single firm's retreat.

Momentum Signal
0 in latest year
across all six tracked assignees

A sector-wide pause, not a company-specific one

Intel, Fibocom (Ofinno), ZTE, ETRI, Ericsson and Qualcomm each show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, with Intel recording a -100% year-on-year change. This lines up with the overall filing decline after 2020 rather than signalling any one company exiting the field.

Based on recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration Pattern
4 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Cross-entity filing is rare and concentrated

The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset — two related Airbus filing entities — links four shared families, the densest collaboration signal in the set. Outside that pairing, co-filing across separate organisations is sparse, suggesting most TSN claim-writing happens inside a single corporate group.

Based on co-assignee pair analysis
Citation Leaders
67 & 34 citations
top two most-cited records

Control-plane and scheduling claims lead influence

The two most-cited records both concern control-plane configuration and schedule-switching for TSN, together drawing over 100 citations. Any new filing on dynamic TSN configuration should map its claims against this pair first.

Based on the most-cited records table
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Sub-100-record classification counts (G06F, G11B, H01L, H03M, H04N) point to claim territory that has not been heavily worked.
Cross-domain clock sync for storage bridgesTSN-aware video/pictorial stream shapingSemiconductor-level TSN timestamp hardwareCoding schemes for bounded-latency error correction
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Intel Corporation0-100%
Ofinno, LLC0
ZTE Corporation0
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)0
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson0
Qualcomm Incorporated0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.0
Marvell Semiconductor Israel Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next checks depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing or competitive tracking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the top-cited cluster

Before drafting claims on control-plane TSN configuration or schedule switching, clear against the two highest-cited families and their related WO filing — they anchor most of the downstream citation activity.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed IPC branches

G06F, G11B, H01L, H03M and H04N each carry only a handful of records against a 103-family total. Test whether a storage-, semiconductor- or coding-adjacent TSN claim can be drafted without colliding with the dense H04L core.

Map white space in Eureka

Track whether filing re-accelerates

Volume has declined since the 2020 peak, but publication lag means the last one to two years are understated. Re-check the trend once 2025–2026 filings finish publishing before concluding the field has cooled for good.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on TSN patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Time-Sensitive Networking (TSN) in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole time-sensitive networking (tsn) corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.