Book a demo

Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026

Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/tissue-culture-independent-plant-transformation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Plant & Animal Breeding
Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation Patents: Who Holds the Route to Market
  • 26 records, 16 ranked assignees. the field is small and still concentrated at the top, with the leader holding 6 records against a fifth-place count of 2.
  • Every record touches C12N. all 26 records in scope sit in microorganisms and genetic engineering, and 76.9% also carry A01H plant-breeding claims — the two classes define the field almost entirely.
  • Filing has gone quiet at the top. the leading assignees each show 0 filings in the latest tracked year, even as the most-cited prior art dates back to the mid-2000s.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
26
Published Records
EP
Leading Jurisdiction
16
Active Filers Ranked
2020
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Tissue-culture-independent transformation methods aim to move a transgene into a plant genome without the regeneration step that conventional tissue culture requires — in planta delivery to meristem, embryo or germline tissue instead of callus. The appeal is practical: tissue culture is slow, labour-intensive, and genotype-restrictive, so a route that avoids it opens transformation to elite lines and species that respond poorly in culture. This dataset covers 26 published records across a search window from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, filtered to documents that explicitly claim transformation efficiency, culture avoidance, germline transmission, or facility-requirement reduction as an outcome.

The corpus is small enough that individual assignees, not broad trend lines, carry most of the signal. Receiving-office spread and IPC composition below give the clearest read on where the claim space actually sits.

Filing activity and technology composition
  1. 1PURDUE RES FOUND6
  2. 2BASF PLANT SCI GMBH6
  3. 3KWS SAAT SE & CO KGAA5
  4. 4SYNGENTA CROP PROTECITON AG5
  5. 5PERFORMANCE PLANTS INC2
  6. 6INT CENT FOR GENETIC ENG & BIOTECH1
  7. 7TREMBLAY LINDA1
  8. 8LEFEBVRE DANIEL D1
  9. 9ARIAS DIANA1
  10. 10KO ZDENKA W1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year on the trend chart is understated by construction — read the last one or two bars as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017–2026

Filings peaked so far in 2020 at 5 records; growth cannot be computed reliably from a run this short once the publication lag is accounted for, so no rate is stated. The flat recent years should be read against that lag rather than as a slowdown in the underlying science.

Filing activity, 2017–20260134502017201820195202020212022520232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) appears in all 26 records in scope, and A01H (plant breeding) appears in 76.9% of them — between them these two classes describe almost the entire field. C07K (peptides and proteins) appears in 15.4% of records and G06F (digital data processing) in a single record; because records can carry more than one class these shares do not sum to 100%.

IPC subclass compositionC12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…26100.0%A01H · New plants / plant breeding2076.9%C07K · Peptides & proteins415.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…13.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 26 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about tissue-culture-independent plant transformation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative record
US20220389437A12022-12-08

Methods of in planta transformation using axillary meristem (US20220389437A1, Syngenta Crop Protection AG)

SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG

Conventional gene transformation requires tissue culture, and some elite lines have very low transformation efficiency in tissue culture. The disclosure relates to methods of in planta transformation. In some aspects, an axillary meristem of a plant is wounded and contacted with a transformation agent. The wounded axillary meristem is then regenerated and treated with a selection step, resulting in transformed tissue that can produce transgenic seeds.Filed by Syngenta Crop Protection AG, published 2022-12-08.

US20220389437A1 — patent drawing 1US20220389437A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20050044595A1In planta transformation by embryo imbibition of agrobacterium46
2WO1999014348A1In planta transformation of plants43
3WO2003017752A1In planta transformation by embryo imbibition of agrobacterium36
4WO2016184989A1Methods for the in planta transformation of plants and manufacturing processes and products based and obtaina…26
5US20180142248A1Methods for the in planta transformation of plants and manufacturing processes and products based and obtaina…25
6EP3095870A1Methods for the in planta transformation of plants and manufacturing processes and products based and obtaina…3
7WO2024030442A1Efficient genotype-independent in planta transformation of cereals2
8WO2021108336A1Methods of in planta transformation using axillary meristem1
9US20140068818A1Method for stable expression of suppressors of rnai in plants by direct genetic transformation of seeds1

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not as evidence of current commercial relevance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (9 of 9 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the IPC composition and the citation table are read together.

Concentration
Leader: 6 records
vs. 2 at fifth place

A short list holds most of the claim density

With 16 assignees ranked across 26 records, the leader's 6 records against a fifth-place count of 2 shows the field is led by a small group rather than spread evenly. A long tail of single- and double-filing entrants — individuals and smaller institutes among them — fills out the rest of the ranking.

Ranking basis: 16 assignees, all counted in records.
Technology core
C12N: 100% of records
A01H: 76.9% of records

The field is defined by two overlapping classes

Every record in scope carries a C12N genetic-engineering class, and more than three-quarters also carry an A01H plant-breeding class. C07K peptide claims and the single G06F record suggest occasional adjacent filing into protein-delivery chemistry or computational selection tools, but neither is a substantial branch yet.

Shares sum above 100% because records can carry multiple IPC classes.
Prior art age
Top cite: 46
US20050044595A1

The most-cited art predates the current filing window

The highest-cited records in this landscape — including the two embryo-imbibition filings and the original in planta transformation patent — were published well before 2015 and sit outside the current search window's peak filing years. Newer filings from 2016 onward build on that vocabulary rather than displacing it.

Citation counts are influenced by document age within the searched corpus.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to tissue-culture-independent plant transformation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-assignee activity
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
TAYLOR G & CO LTDMCKERSIE BRYAN2
TAYLOR G & CO LTDARIAS DIANA2
MCKERSIE BRYANARIAS DIANA2
BASF Plant Science GmbHTAYLOR G & CO LTD1
BASF Plant Science GmbHMCKERSIE BRYAN1
BASF Plant Science GmbHARIAS DIANA1
Performance Plants Inc.TREMBLAY LINDA1
Performance Plants Inc.LEFEBVRE DANIEL D1

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest being a repeated three-way link between TAYLOR G & CO LTD, MCKERSIE BRYAN and ARIAS DIANA, each pairing appearing twice — a pattern consistent with a single research group filing under multiple named inventors or a shared corporate entity rather than a joint venture between separate companies.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

The ranked assignees and where momentum has gone

The ranking returned by this dataset covers 16 assignees in total, from a leader with 6 records down through single-record entrants. It is the complete list the data endpoint returns for this topic, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.

Leader
6 records
highest in the ranking

One assignee sets the filing pace

The top-ranked assignee holds 6 of the 26 records in scope, more than double the count at fifth place. That gap is the clearest concentration signal this dataset supports.

Based on the full 16-assignee ranking.
Momentum
0 filings
latest tracked year, leading assignees

The leading names have gone quiet in the most recent year

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum — including the leader — shows 0 filings in the latest year, with one showing a -100% year-on-year change. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true filing activity rather than showing an actual stop.

Momentum measured on the latest complete filing year available.
Receiving offices
EPO: 8
highest of the tracked offices

Europe leads the receiving-office count

The EPO receives the most filings in this dataset at 8, ahead of the US and WIPO/PCT route at 5 each, Canada at 4, Australia at 2 and India at 1. That spread points to European and North American markets as the primary commercial targets for these methods.

Counts are by receiving office, not by applicant nationality.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
None of these show dense prior art in this dataset — that is an opening, not a guarantee of novelty.
axillary meristem wounding protocolsembryo imbibition delivery chemistrygermline transmission verification assaysfacility-requirement reduction claimscomputational selection of transformation targets
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Purdue Research Foundation0-100%
KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA0
BASF Plant Science GmbH0
Syngenta Crop Protection AG0
Performance Plants Inc.0
TAYLOR G & CO LTD0
MCKERSIE BRYAN0
ARIAS DIANA0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this from here

This landscape is a starting point for freedom-to-operate and whitespace work, not a substitute for it.

Check the axillary meristem and embryo-imbibition claim boundaries

The most-cited records in this dataset cluster around embryo imbibition and axillary meristem delivery. Before designing a new protocol around either route, map the exact claim language of the highest-cited filings.

Explore claims in Eureka

Watch the leader's next move

The top-ranked assignee's filings have gone to zero in the latest tracked year, against a publication lag of roughly 18 months. A jump in filings once that lag clears would be the clearest signal of renewed investment.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Facility-requirement reduction and computational target selection each show thin coverage in this corpus. Either could support a defensible first claim if the broader prior art outside this search string does not already cover it.

Run a whitespace search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole tissue-culture-independent plant transformation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.