Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
- 26 records, 16 ranked assignees. the field is small and still concentrated at the top, with the leader holding 6 records against a fifth-place count of 2.
- Every record touches C12N. all 26 records in scope sit in microorganisms and genetic engineering, and 76.9% also carry A01H plant-breeding claims — the two classes define the field almost entirely.
- Filing has gone quiet at the top. the leading assignees each show 0 filings in the latest tracked year, even as the most-cited prior art dates back to the mid-2000s.
What this landscape covers
Tissue-culture-independent transformation methods aim to move a transgene into a plant genome without the regeneration step that conventional tissue culture requires — in planta delivery to meristem, embryo or germline tissue instead of callus. The appeal is practical: tissue culture is slow, labour-intensive, and genotype-restrictive, so a route that avoids it opens transformation to elite lines and species that respond poorly in culture. This dataset covers 26 published records across a search window from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, filtered to documents that explicitly claim transformation efficiency, culture avoidance, germline transmission, or facility-requirement reduction as an outcome.
The corpus is small enough that individual assignees, not broad trend lines, carry most of the signal. Receiving-office spread and IPC composition below give the clearest read on where the claim space actually sits.
Filing trend and technology composition
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year on the trend chart is understated by construction — read the last one or two bars as a floor, not a ceiling.
Filing activity, 2017–2026
Filings peaked so far in 2020 at 5 records; growth cannot be computed reliably from a run this short once the publication lag is accounted for, so no rate is stated. The flat recent years should be read against that lag rather than as a slowdown in the underlying science.
IPC subclass composition
C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) appears in all 26 records in scope, and A01H (plant breeding) appears in 76.9% of them — between them these two classes describe almost the entire field. C07K (peptides and proteins) appears in 15.4% of records and G06F (digital data processing) in a single record; because records can carry more than one class these shares do not sum to 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 26 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about tissue-culture-independent plant transformation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited prior art
Methods of in planta transformation using axillary meristem (US20220389437A1, Syngenta Crop Protection AG)
Conventional gene transformation requires tissue culture, and some elite lines have very low transformation efficiency in tissue culture. The disclosure relates to methods of in planta transformation. In some aspects, an axillary meristem of a plant is wounded and contacted with a transformation agent. The wounded axillary meristem is then regenerated and treated with a selection step, resulting in transformed tissue that can produce transgenic seeds.Filed by Syngenta Crop Protection AG, published 2022-12-08.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20050044595A1 | In planta transformation by embryo imbibition of agrobacterium | 46 |
| 2 | WO1999014348A1 | In planta transformation of plants | 43 |
| 3 | WO2003017752A1 | In planta transformation by embryo imbibition of agrobacterium | 36 |
| 4 | WO2016184989A1 | Methods for the in planta transformation of plants and manufacturing processes and products based and obtaina… | 26 |
| 5 | US20180142248A1 | Methods for the in planta transformation of plants and manufacturing processes and products based and obtaina… | 25 |
| 6 | EP3095870A1 | Methods for the in planta transformation of plants and manufacturing processes and products based and obtaina… | 3 |
| 7 | WO2024030442A1 | Efficient genotype-independent in planta transformation of cereals | 2 |
| 8 | WO2021108336A1 | Methods of in planta transformation using axillary meristem | 1 |
| 9 | US20140068818A1 | Method for stable expression of suppressors of rnai in plants by direct genetic transformation of seeds | 1 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not as evidence of current commercial relevance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (9 of 9 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the IPC composition and the citation table are read together.
A short list holds most of the claim density
With 16 assignees ranked across 26 records, the leader's 6 records against a fifth-place count of 2 shows the field is led by a small group rather than spread evenly. A long tail of single- and double-filing entrants — individuals and smaller institutes among them — fills out the rest of the ranking.
The field is defined by two overlapping classes
Every record in scope carries a C12N genetic-engineering class, and more than three-quarters also carry an A01H plant-breeding class. C07K peptide claims and the single G06F record suggest occasional adjacent filing into protein-delivery chemistry or computational selection tools, but neither is a substantial branch yet.
The most-cited art predates the current filing window
The highest-cited records in this landscape — including the two embryo-imbibition filings and the original in planta transformation patent — were published well before 2015 and sit outside the current search window's peak filing years. Newer filings from 2016 onward build on that vocabulary rather than displacing it.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to tissue-culture-independent plant transformation, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| TAYLOR G & CO LTD | MCKERSIE BRYAN | 2 |
| TAYLOR G & CO LTD | ARIAS DIANA | 2 |
| MCKERSIE BRYAN | ARIAS DIANA | 2 |
| BASF Plant Science GmbH | TAYLOR G & CO LTD | 1 |
| BASF Plant Science GmbH | MCKERSIE BRYAN | 1 |
| BASF Plant Science GmbH | ARIAS DIANA | 1 |
| Performance Plants Inc. | TREMBLAY LINDA | 1 |
| Performance Plants Inc. | LEFEBVRE DANIEL D | 1 |
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest being a repeated three-way link between TAYLOR G & CO LTD, MCKERSIE BRYAN and ARIAS DIANA, each pairing appearing twice — a pattern consistent with a single research group filing under multiple named inventors or a shared corporate entity rather than a joint venture between separate companies.
The ranked assignees and where momentum has gone
The ranking returned by this dataset covers 16 assignees in total, from a leader with 6 records down through single-record entrants. It is the complete list the data endpoint returns for this topic, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
One assignee sets the filing pace
The top-ranked assignee holds 6 of the 26 records in scope, more than double the count at fifth place. That gap is the clearest concentration signal this dataset supports.
The leading names have gone quiet in the most recent year
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum — including the leader — shows 0 filings in the latest year, with one showing a -100% year-on-year change. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true filing activity rather than showing an actual stop.
Europe leads the receiving-office count
The EPO receives the most filings in this dataset at 8, ahead of the US and WIPO/PCT route at 5 each, Canada at 4, Australia at 2 and India at 1. That spread points to European and North American markets as the primary commercial targets for these methods.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Purdue Research Foundation | 0 | -100% |
| KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA | 0 | — |
| BASF Plant Science GmbH | 0 | — |
| Syngenta Crop Protection AG | 0 | — |
| Performance Plants Inc. | 0 | — |
| TAYLOR G & CO LTD | 0 | — |
| MCKERSIE BRYAN | 0 | — |
| ARIAS DIANA | 0 | — |
Where to take this from here
This landscape is a starting point for freedom-to-operate and whitespace work, not a substitute for it.
Check the axillary meristem and embryo-imbibition claim boundaries
The most-cited records in this dataset cluster around embryo imbibition and axillary meristem delivery. Before designing a new protocol around either route, map the exact claim language of the highest-cited filings.
Explore claims in EurekaWatch the leader's next move
The top-ranked assignee's filings have gone to zero in the latest tracked year, against a publication lag of roughly 18 months. A jump in filings once that lag clears would be the clearest signal of renewed investment.
Track assignee activity in EurekaTest the under-claimed branches
Facility-requirement reduction and computational target selection each show thin coverage in this corpus. Either could support a defensible first claim if the broader prior art outside this search string does not already cover it.
Run a whitespace search in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
It is a group of methods for introducing a transgene into a plant genome without passing through the tissue-culture and regeneration step that conventional Agrobacterium-mediated transformation relies on. Instead, the transformation agent is delivered directly to living plant tissue in situ, in planta, such as an embryo during imbibition or an axillary meristem after wounding. The motivation is that tissue culture is slow, labour-intensive, and works poorly on many elite or recalcitrant genotypes, so avoiding it broadens which lines and species can be transformed at all.
This dataset ranks 16 assignees across 26 records, with the leading assignee holding 6 records — more than double the count at fifth place. The ranking includes both corporate filers, such as agricultural biotechnology companies, and individually named inventors, some of whom appear together as repeated co-assignee pairs. It is the complete ranking this dataset returns, not a filtered top-tier list, so the tail includes several single-record entrants.
Patent publication typically lags the actual filing date by around 18 months, so any year close to the data cut-off will always understate true filing activity. In this dataset the leading assignees all show 0 filings in the latest tracked year, which is consistent with that lag rather than a genuine halt in research. The peak filing year so far in this dataset is 2020, with 5 records.
Embryo imbibition with Agrobacterium and axillary meristem wounding are the two routes with the most-cited records in this dataset, including filings dating back to the mid-2000s that still anchor much of the field's vocabulary. Nearly every record in scope also carries a C12N genetic-engineering classification, and over three-quarters carry an A01H plant-breeding classification, showing the field is defined almost entirely by the overlap of those two disciplines rather than by a wide spread of distinct technical branches.
Facility-requirement reduction claims and computational or data-driven selection of transformation targets show thin coverage in this dataset — only one record carries a G06F digital-data-processing classification, for example. Germline-transmission verification and peptide-based delivery chemistry (C07K, 15.4% of records) also look under-claimed relative to the core embryo and meristem delivery methods. None of this guarantees novelty on its own; it only shows where this particular search string finds less prior art, so a proper freedom-to-operate check against a broader search is still necessary before filing.
Research Tissue-Culture-Independent Plant Transformation in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole tissue-culture-independent plant transformation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.