Book a demo

Titanium Alloy NDT / Inspection Patent Snapshot 2026

Titanium Alloy NDT / Inspection Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Titanium Alloy NDT / Inspection Patent Snapshot in 2026

The titanium alloy NDT and inspection patent field is a small, still-growing niche dominated by a tight cluster of materials and aerospace specialists — Kobe Steel and Howmet Aerospace share the top rank, together with ATI Properties and General Electric forming a concentrated leading tier. Activity has accelerated sharply on a multi-year basis, with China and the United States the primary filing destinations.

18
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

A concentrated niche with two co-leading applicants and a clear aerospace/materials core

Kobe Steel and Howmet Aerospace each hold the top position in the applicant ranking, followed by ATI Properties, General Electric, and a group of individual inventors and research institutes. The top five filers account for 51% of the combined output of the ranked applicants visible in this query, confirming a high degree of concentration in what remains a compact corpus.

The tier gap between the two leaders and the rest of the field is notable: the third-ranked applicant ATI Properties holds less than half the patent records of either leader, and the ranking falls away quickly below that point. This suggests the field has a small number of deeply committed incumbents rather than a broad, distributed competitive base.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Kobe Steel Ltd11
2Howmet Aerospace Inc11
3ATI Properties Inc5
4General Electric Co4
5Davis Mark R3
6Arnold Matthew J3
7Harbin Institute of Technology at Weihai3
8JX NIPPON MINING & METALS CORP2
9Korea Institute of Materials Science2
10BAE Systems PLC2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Wuchang Shipbuilding Industry Group Co Ltd2
12Baimtec Material Co Ltd1
13Baoji Yongshengtai Titanium Industry1
14Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution (Russia)1
15Hitachi Engineering Co Ltd1
16Hitachi Ltd1
17Nippon Kokan KK1
18Shenyang Liming Aero-Engine Group Corporation1
19AVIC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials1
20Baoji Tongrun Metal Materials Co Ltd1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect long-standing industrial commitments to titanium product quality and structural integrity — Kobe Steel’s emphasis on alloy composition and non-ferrous treatment, and Howmet Aerospace’s focus on ultrasonic testing and welding-adjacent inspection, signal that the core technical challenge is ensuring flaw detectability in high-value aerospace forgings and billets.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and will be revised upward as more applications publish; trend readings for 20242026 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Rising annual activity and a technology mix anchored in alloy science and ultrasonic testing

Two charts together capture the pace of competitive entry and the breadth of technical approaches: the annual filing trend shows when interest intensified, while the IPC branch breakdown reveals where innovation effort is concentrated and where it remains thin.

Annual filing trend

Filing volume was negligible before 2018, picked up gradually through 2022, and reached its highest recorded annual level in 2023 and 2024 with four records each. The recent-window growth rate of 200% confirms a genuine acceleration on a multi-year basis. Years 2024–2026 are likely undercounted due to publication lag, so the apparent plateau at the right edge of the chart should not be read as a slowdown.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2023.02017220181201902020220211202242023420242202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

The IPC branch mix is led by C22C (alloys), followed closely by G01N (material analysis and testing) — together these two branches account for the majority of records and confirm that alloy specification and ultrasonic/analytical inspection are the field’s twin technical pillars. C22F (non-ferrous metal treatment) is the third-largest branch, reflecting the importance of thermomechanical processing to flaw detectability. Branches such as G06T (image data processing), G06F (digital data processing), and G06N (AI models) are present but small, marking an early-stage digitization layer on top of the physical inspection core.

Technology compositionC22C · Alloys leads with 37; G01N · Material analysis & testing 32.C22C · Alloys37G01N · Material analysis…32C22F · Non-ferrous metal…24C21D · Heat treatment of…7B21K · Forged metal prod…5B23K · Welding, solderin…5G06T · Image data proces…5G06F · Electric digital …4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Fine grain titanium forgings and a method for thei…119
2Titanium alloys, methods of forming the same, and …66
3一种钛合金管材及制造方法28
4Titanium alloy billet having excellent flaw detect…16
5Forged titanium alloy material and method for manu…14
6一种增材钛合金激光超声缺陷检测系统及激光超声相位相干成像检测方法12
7一种纤维增强钛基复材界面结合质量的超声检测方法12
8一种钛合金构件中夹杂缺陷尺寸的分析和统计方法8

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Kobe Steel

Kobe Steel Ltd

Kobe Steel leads the ranking with 11 patent records, concentrated in alloy composition (C22C), non-ferrous metal treatment (C22F), and ultrasonic material testing (G01N 29). This breadth across both material specification and inspection protocol reflects a vertically integrated approach — controlling flaw detectability from alloy design through to billet qualification. Applicant momentum data are not available for the recent period, but the corpus depth suggests a long-standing and sustained filing program.

patent records: 11
Challenger · Howmet Aerospace

Howmet Aerospace Inc

Howmet Aerospace (previously RTI International Metals) is co-ranked at 11 patent records, with its technology emphasis weighted toward G01N 29 (ultrasonic material analysis and testing), alloy composition (C22C), and welding/brazing methods (B23K 35). This profile positions Howmet as the leading specialist in inspection-method innovation, particularly for forged and welded titanium components used in aerospace structures. Momentum data for the recent window are not separately available.

patent records: 11
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
ATI Properties IncGeneral Electric Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.