Book a demo

Titanium Alloy Simulation Patent Landscape 2026

Titanium Alloy Simulation Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Titanium Alloy Simulation Patent Landscape in 2026

The titanium alloy simulation field is in active growth, with annual filings rising steadily and 88% expansion recorded in the recent window. ATI Properties Inc. holds the single largest position, but Chinese universities and aerospace institutes are rapidly closing the gap.

104
Patent families in scope
28%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+88%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

ATI Properties leads a fragmented field dominated by Chinese academic filers

ATI Properties Inc. ranks first with 19 patent records, nearly double the second-ranked Titanium Metals Corp. at 9, establishing a clear but not insurmountable lead. The top five filers account for 28% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, signaling a moderately fragmented competitive landscape rather than a tightly consolidated one.

Below the top two commercial players, the ranking is densely populated by Chinese universities — Northwestern Polytechnical University (8), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (6), and National Cheng Kung University (6) — reflecting a strong institutional research base that could convert into industrial patents in coming years.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1ATI Properties Inc.19
2Titanium Metals Corp.9
3Northwestern Polytechnical University8
4NANJING UNIV OF AERONAUTICS & ASTRONAUTICS6
5National Cheng Kung University6
6Shanghai Jiao Tong University4
7Beihang University4
8China Erzhong Group Deyang Wanhang Die Forging Co. Ltd.3
9Dalian Maritime University3
10Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics3
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Yanshan University3
12Beijing Institute of Technology3
13Tianjin University of Technology3
14HUAZHONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH3
15Changsha University of Science and Technology3
16Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences3
17Lovely Professional University2
18CHINA UNIV OF MINING & TECH2
19General Electric Company2
20Northwestern Polytechnical University Chongqing Science and Innovation Center2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

ATI Properties’ concentration in alloy composition and non-ferrous metal treatment (C22C, C22F) contrasts sharply with the simulation-focused digital data processing (G06F) emphasis of Chinese universities, suggesting two distinct innovation clusters within the same topic: materials IP versus computational process IP.

Filings from 2025 and 2026 are under-counted due to standard patent publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown; the growth trend is best assessed through 2024 data. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filings accelerating since 2020, underpinned by digital simulation methods

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that moved from negligible activity before 2020 to sustained high-volume output, with computational methods firmly at the core.

Annual filing trend

Filings were minimal from 2017 through 2019 (1–3 records per year), then jumped sharply from 2020 onward, reaching 23 records in 2024. The 2025 and 2026 figures are materially understated by publication lag and should be treated as lower bounds, not trend reversals.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 28 in 2025.120173201832019620201520214202218202323202428202532026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G06F (electric digital data processing) dominates at 93 records, reflecting the simulation-first nature of the corpus. C22C (alloys) at 48 and C22F (non-ferrous metal treatment) at 33 confirm that process-informed materials IP remains substantial. G16C (computational chemistry) at 30 and G06N (AI-based computing) at 13 signal growing adoption of physics-based and machine-learning simulation approaches.

Technology compositionG06F · Electric digital data processing leads with 93; C22C · Alloys 48.G06F · Electric digital …93C22C · Alloys48C22F · Non-ferrous metal…33G16C · Computational che…30G06N · Computing based o…13G06T · Image data proces…13B21J · Forging & hammering6G01N · Material analysis…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250229365A1Published 2025-07-17

Modeling method and system of crystal plasticity f…

Huazhong University Of Science And Technology

The invention relates to the technical field of metal material processing engineering, discloses a full-automatic full-process modeling method and system of crystal plasticity finite element model for laser welding weld, which adopts MATLAB to call ABAQUS and PYTHON for co-simulation programming. In this text, a full-automatic modeling method of the crystal… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Modeling method and system of crystal plasticity f… — patent drawingModeling method and system of crystal plasticity f… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Biocompatible low modulus titanium alloy for medic…104
2Method for the manufacture of alpha-beta Ti-Al-V-M…23
3结合有限元数值模拟程序的钛合金锻造工艺参数优化方法18
4钛合金整体叶盘等温锻造工艺的优化方法17
5基于有限元分析的钛合金疲劳裂纹两阶段全寿命预测方法16
6一种基于数值模拟的钛合金锻造工艺优化方法15
7一种冲击载荷下Ti/CFRP层合板结构的数值模拟方法10
8一种TC4钛合金焊接熔池固态相变的模拟方法9

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural signals — lifecycle stage, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic reach — together frame where risk and opportunity sit for teams entering or expanding in this space.

Growth

Growth stage: annual filings still rising

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings still rising and recent-window expansion of 88%. Early movers are still establishing positions, and the corpus of 104 patent families indicates that comprehensive freedom-to-operate is achievable for well-scoped entrants. The window for foundational filing is open but narrowing.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate fragmentation with a two-player commercial lead

The top five filers hold 28% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating meaningful but not extreme concentration. ATI Properties Inc. and Titanium Metals Corp. hold the strongest commercial positions, while the remainder of the top ten is composed of universities whose patents may be more easily licensed. Challengers have clear room to establish differentiated portfolios.

Moderate fragmentation
Collaboration

University–industry co-filing concentrated in Chinese aerospace ecosystem

Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics and Beijing Institute of Technology are the most active co-filers, with three joint records. Northwestern Polytechnical University co-files with its own Chongqing Science and Innovation Center. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics has co-filed with both Tianjin Aerospace Changzheng Rocket Manufacturing and Beihang University, linking academic simulation capability directly to aerospace manufacturing. These collaborations suggest that industrial access to university simulation IP flows primarily through partnership agreements.

Academic–industrial links
Geography

China dominates filings; U.S. and European coverage is thin

China accounts for 90 patent records, compared with 10 in the United States and 9 via the EPO, creating a pronounced geographic asymmetry. India (6) and Australia (5) show secondary but non-trivial activity. PCT filings number only 3, suggesting most applicants are not yet pursuing broad multinational protection — leaving protection gaps in key manufacturing jurisdictions outside China that could be exploited by non-Chinese entrants.

China-concentrated
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Zhengzhou University of AeronauticsBeijing Institute of Technology3
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityNorthwestern Polytechnical University Chongqing Science and Innovation Center1
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsTianjin Aerospace Changzheng Rocket Manufacturing Co. Ltd.1
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsBeihang University1
Yanshan UniversityChina Erzhong Group Deyang Wanhang Die Forging Co. Ltd.1
Beihang UniversityTianjin Aerospace Changzheng Rocket Manufacturing Co. Ltd.1
Beihang UniversityAVIC Beijing Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology Research Institute1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Collaboration data reflects co-applicant relationships recorded in the patent corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

ATI Properties anchors the commercial tier; Chinese universities are the fastest-moving challengers

The top two commercial players focus on alloy composition and metallurgical process IP, while Chinese universities are building portfolios squarely in computational simulation methods — a strategic divergence that defines two coexisting competitive arenas.

Leader · ATI Properties Inc.

ATI Properties Inc.

ATI Properties Inc. leads with 19 patent records, concentrated in alloy composition (C22C) and non-ferrous metal treatment (C22F), with one forging and hammering (B21J) record. Its portfolio reflects a materials-science-first simulation approach tied to process optimization rather than pure digital modeling. Momentum data is not separately reported for ATI in the recent-period breakdown, indicating its position is established rather than newly surging.

patent records: 19
Challenger · Northwestern Polytechnical University

Northwestern Polytechnical University

Northwestern Polytechnical University holds 8 patent records and is flagged as a new entrant in the recent filing period, with 5 recent records, indicating that its portfolio is being built almost entirely in the current growth wave. Its technology focus is exclusively in G06F digital data processing sub-classes, covering finite-element and numerical simulation workflows — directly complementing aerospace manufacturing partners.

patent records: 8
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers, including technology focus maps and collaboration links.
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNational Cheng Kung University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Northwestern Polytechnical University5▲ new entrant
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics2▲ new entrant
Shanghai Jiao Tong University3▲ new entrant
Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics3▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player counts are patent records from the applicant ranking; momentum reflects recent-period filing activity.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in AI simulation and powder metallurgy warrant monitoring

Several IPC classes appear in the corpus at low density relative to the dominant G06F core, representing areas where existing simulation expertise could be extended with limited direct competition.

G06N · AI and machine-learning simulation models

G06N (computing based on AI models) appears in only 13 patent records — 5% of the corpus — despite the heavy G06F base that already underpins the field. Integrating machine-learning surrogate models with conventional finite-element titanium alloy simulation is a technically plausible next step, and the sparse filing density means entry positions could be established without displacing existing dominant filers. Teams with existing G06F or G16C portfolios are best placed to extend into this branch.

Search this in Eureka →

B22F · Powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing

B22F (powder metallurgy) and the adjacent B33Y (additive manufacturing) each appear in only 3 patent records, despite titanium alloys being a primary material for metal additive manufacturing. Simulation of powder-bed fusion and directed energy deposition processes for titanium is an active engineering challenge, yet the patent coverage is minimal. Changsha University of Science and Technology is the sole filer active in both branches simultaneously, leaving room for industrial entrants to build defensible positions in process simulation for additive manufacturing of titanium components.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See branch-level filing density, key claimants, and entry-path analysis for all adjacent IPC classes.
G01N · Material analysis and testing simulationB21J · Forging process simulation+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Branch counts reflect patent records; branches with low counts relative to the dominant class are flagged as under-served, not necessarily as validated commercial opportunities.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerG06F 30 · Electric digital data processingG06F 119 · Electric digital data processingC22C 14 · AlloysG06F 111 · Electric digital data processingC22F 1 · Non-ferrous metal treatment
ATI Properties Inc.AbsentAbsentStrong · 19AbsentStrong · 15
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityStrong · 9Strong · 7AbsentStrong · 8Absent
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsStrong · 6Strong · 6AbsentModerate · 3Absent
Titanium Metals Corp.AbsentAbsentStrong · 9AbsentModerate · 3
National Cheng Kung UniversityAbsentAbsentStrong · 5AbsentStrong · 5
Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityStrong · 4Strong · 4AbsentModerate · 1Absent
Dalian Maritime UniversityStrong · 3Strong · 3AbsentStrong · 3Absent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.