https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/titanium-alloy-surface-modification-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials
Titanium alloy surface modification patents: who is filing, what they claim, and where the field is still open

A data-backed view of titanium alloy surface modification patents: filing trends through 2026, leading assignees, coating and corrosion technology splits, and where claim space is still open.

800
Published Records
12%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+21%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (48 records) → 2024 (58); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 800 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Titanium alloy surface modification sits at the intersection of coating chemistry, alloy metallurgy and corrosion science. The 800 records in scope span C23C coating and deposition, C22C alloy composition, and narrower classes covering non-ferrous metal treatment, electroplating, corrosion resistance and sterilisation-grade surface work for medical implants. China's receiving office accounts for the largest share of filings, with Japan, the United States, Europe and South Korea trailing behind.

The mix of assignees runs from aerospace primes and steelmakers to university labs and single-product medical device makers, which is why the field reads as broad rather than cornered by a handful of players.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1TAIYUAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY33
  2. 2INST OF METAL RESEARCH - CHINESE ACAD OF SCI19
  3. 3CITIZEN WATCH CO LTD18
  4. 4KOBE STEEL LTD13
  5. 5THE BOEING CO13
  6. 6NANJING UNIV OF AERONAUTICS & ASTRONAUTICS11
  7. 7NORTHEASTERN UNIV CHINA10
  8. 8MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP10
  9. 9BIOMET 3I LLC9
  10. 10TM TECH CO LTD8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Titanium Alloy Surface Modification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Filing volumes and IPC class distribution for the 800 records in scope, drawn directly from the underlying dataset.

A decade of steady growth, not a sudden surge

Annual filings rose from 23 in 2017 to a peak of 58 in 2024, with the 2021-2024 span alone showing 21% growth. 2025 and 2026 counts will continue to fill in as publications catch up with filing dates, so the apparent tail-off in the most recent two years is a lag artefact, not a slowdown.

A decade of steady growth, not a sudden surge0153045602320172018201920202021202220235820242025202026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Coating and deposition claims dominate, corrosion and cleaning are thinner

C23C coating and surface deposition touches 74.8% of the 800 records, far ahead of C22C alloy composition at 25.8% and C22F non-ferrous treatment at 15.5%. Corrosion and metal removal (C23F, 13.9%) and cleaning of metal surfaces (C23G, 6.3%) carry the lightest claim density among the tracked classes, which is where new entrants have more room to stake distinct claims.

Coating and deposition claims dominate, corrosion and cleaning are thinnerC23C · Coating & surface deposition59874.8%C22C · Alloys20625.8%C22F · Non-ferrous metal treatment12415.5%C23F · Corrosion & metal removal11113.9%C25D · Electroplating & electroforming10212.8%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting10012.5%B22F · Powder metallurgy597.4%C23G · Cleaning of metal surfaces506.3%Other53867.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 800 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Titanium Alloy Surface Modification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Titanium Alloy Surface Modification Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about titanium alloy surface modification patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
CN106811753A2017-06-09

CN106811753A — Surface treatment method for nitinol material used in left atrial appendage occluder devices

湘潭大学

This filing from Xiangtan University discloses a biomedical nitinol surface treatment sequence: substrate pretreatment, electrochemical polishing, heat-set shaping, then a passivation step. The stated aim is improved surface finish and corrosion resistance for small, structurally complex nitinol parts, at lower processing cost than alternatives.Filed 2017-06-09; assignee Xiangtan University.

CN106811753A — patent drawing 1CN106811753A — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5869140ASurface pretreatment of metals to activate the surface for sol-gel coating171
2US5939197ASol-gel coated metal142
3US5814137ASol for coating metals139
4US6605365B1Pigmented alkoxyzirconium sol133
5US6037060ASol for bonding epoxies to aluminum or titanium alloys133
6US5849110ASol coating of metals123
7US5958578AHybrid laminate having improved metal-to-resin adhesion121
8US5869141ASurface pretreatment for sol coating of metals100
9US20040265780A1Surface treatment process for implants made of titanium alloy89
10JP2008195994ASurface modification method for titanium product, and surface modified titanium product56

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more years to accumulate references; treat them as a signal of influence on downstream sol-gel and coating work, not as evidence that these are the most commercially active patents today.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Titanium Alloy Surface Modification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the concentration and class data imply

Four read-throughs from the ranking, the trend line and the IPC split that matter for filing strategy.

Concentration
12.0% top 5
share of all 800 records

No single assignee controls the field

The leading assignee holds 33 records, but the top 5 combined account for only 12.0% of all 800 records in scope, and the top 10 for 18.0%. That leaves the majority of filing activity spread across a long tail of universities, component makers and mid-size manufacturers.

Implication: freedom-to-operate risk is diffuse rather than concentrated on one blocking portfolio.
Growth
+21%
2021 to 2024 filings

Steady build, not a spike

Filings grew from 48 in 2021 to 58 in 2024, the last year with a complete count. The climb from 23 filings in 2017 shows sustained, multi-year investment in the field rather than a reaction to a single event.

2025-26 figures will rise further as publication catches up with filing.
Technology mix
74.8%
of records touch C23C coating/deposition

Coating claims are the densest ground

Nearly three-quarters of the 800 records carry a C23C coating or deposition classification, well ahead of C22C alloy composition (25.8%) and C22F treatment (15.5%). Corrosion (C23F, 13.9%) and cleaning (C23G, 6.3%) are comparatively lighter, which is where narrower, well-drafted claims are more likely to clear.

Multiple classes per record mean these shares overlap, not sum to 100%.
Geography
477 China
of records by receiving office

Filing activity is concentrated in China's office

China's receiving office accounts for the largest single share of the 800 records, with Japan, the United States, Europe and South Korea each holding smaller shares. A filing strategy built only around US or EPO coverage misses most of the documented activity.

Receiving office reflects where protection was sought, not where R&D originated.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to titanium alloy surface modification patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Titanium Alloy Surface Modification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with real growth but no dominant blocker. These are the practical next moves for teams acting on it.

Map your own claim against the corrosion and cleaning classes

C23F and C23G carry the lightest documented claim density of the tracked classes. A narrower novelty search focused there is more likely to surface genuine white space than a broad C23C search.

Run a targeted search in Eureka

Track the long tail, not just the leader

With the top 10 assignees holding only 18.0% of records, competitive monitoring needs to cover dozens of smaller filers, not one incumbent's portfolio.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Re-check citation-heavy prior art before drafting

The most-cited records in this corpus date back years; confirm they are still enforceable and read their claims directly rather than relying on citation count as a proxy for relevance.

Pull full-text claims in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Titanium Alloy Surface Modification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Titanium Alloy Surface Modification Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Titanium Alloy Surface Modification Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole titanium alloy surface modification patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.