Book a demo

Top Drives and Rotary Systems Patents: Who Leads 2026

Top Drives and Rotary Systems Patents: Who Leads 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/top-drives-and-rotary-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Land Rigs & Hoisting
Top Drives and Rotary Systems Patents: Filing Trends and Leading Assignees
  • Top 5 hold 40.6% of the field. 908 of 2,234 records sit with the five leading assignees, with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them.
  • Filing pace has pulled back sharply. From 53 filings in 2021 to 21 in 2024 — a 60% drop over the complete three-year window, before the most recent, still-incomplete years.
  • E21B dominates the class map. 78.6% of records carry an earth and rock drilling classification, leaving control systems, gearing and electric motor claims as comparatively thin secondary bands.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,234
Published Records
41%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-60%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (53 records) with 2024 (21) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,234 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent activity at the intersection of top drive and rotary table mechanisms with specific subsystem claims: output torque control, internal blowout preventer valves, wash pipe seals, link tilt assemblies, spindle bearings and make-up torque management. It spans 2,234 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawing from drilling equipment manufacturers, oilfield service majors and independent hardware specialists.

The field is functionally narrow but mechanically dense: most records sit inside a single IPC subclass tied to wellbore drilling equipment, with smaller clusters in control systems, gearing and electric motor claims that describe the actuation and monitoring hardware wrapped around the core rotary mechanism.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC325
  2. 2NAT OILWELL VARCO LP241
  3. 3HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC144
  4. 4MAKO RENTALS INC105
  5. 5VARCO I P INC93
  6. 6NABORS DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA INC79
  7. 7SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV71
  8. 8BAKER HUGHES CO46
  9. 9CANRIG DRILLING TECHNOLOGY LTD45
  10. 10SCHLUMBERGER TECH CORP44
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Drives and Rotary Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

The two figures below track when top drive and rotary system patents were filed and what technical ground they cover, using the full 2,234-record scope.

A field that peaked and has since contracted

Filings ran from 73 in 2017 to a peak of 87 in 2018, then declined toward 21 by 2024 — a 60% drop across that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the apparent tail-off in the newest years should not be read as the field's current pace.

A field that peaked and has since contracted0255075100732017872018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

One dominant class, several secondary bands

E21B (earth and rock drilling) covers 78.6% of all records, reflecting the wellbore-equipment core of this dataset. Control and regulating systems (G05B, 3.6%), gearing and transmissions (F16H, 3.5%) and non-electric control variables (G05D, 2.8%) form a secondary layer around actuation and monitoring, with machine tool fittings, electric motors, hand tools and pipe fittings each below 3% — records can carry multiple classes, so these shares add up past 100%.

One dominant class, several secondary bandsE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)1,75678.6%G05B · Control & regulating systems813.6%F16H · Gearing & transmissions793.5%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…632.8%B23Q · Machine tool fittings622.8%H02K · Electric motors & generators552.5%B25B · Hand tools & wrenches452.0%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings421.9%Other81236.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,234 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Drives and Rotary Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Top Drives and Rotary Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about top drives and rotary systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative record
US20240401435A12024-12-05

Systems and methods for condition monitoring of top drive internal blowout preventer valves

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

The filing describes a top drive handling ring assembly built around a main shaft that engages an internal blowout preventer (IBOP) valve through a two-piece actuator sleeve — one rotating, one static — driven by a hydraulic cylinder. Left and right crank assemblies carry wireless encoders that report position back to a monitoring system, turning a mechanical valve-actuation path into one with condition feedback.Filed by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, published 2024-12-05.

US20240401435A1 — patent drawing 1US20240401435A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20150366585A1Tension-limiting temporary epicardial pacing wire extraction device845
2US5265682ASteerable rotary drilling systems519
3US5547382ARiding simulation system for motorcycles453
4US20100003904A1High speed flat lapping platen, raised islands and abrasive beads381
5US4800968AWell apparatus with tubular elevator tilt and indexing apparatus and methods of their use296
6US6679333B2Top drive well casing system and method272
7US4997042ACasing circulator and method236
8US6769969B1Raised island abrasive, method of use and lapping apparatus225
9US4878546ASelf-aligning top drive214
10US5563512AWell logging apparatus having a removable sleeve for sealing and protecting multiple antenna arrays186

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence rather than current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Drives and Rotary Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are read against each other: concentration at the top, a class map with one dominant subclass, and a filing pace that has cooled from its 2018 peak.

Concentration
40.6%
of 2,234 records held by top 5

The top of the field is settled

The five leading assignees hold 908 of the 2,234 records in scope, with the leader alone at 325. That leaves a long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants competing for the remaining claim space around subsystem detail rather than the core mechanism.

Top 5 combined, all records in scope
Filing pace
-60%
2021 to 2024 filings

Activity has pulled back from its peak

Filings peaked at 87 in 2018 and have since fallen to 21 by 2024, a 60% drop across that three-year window. The most recent years are still filling in due to publication lag, so this should be read as a real slowdown through the last complete filing year, not a current cliff.

2021 = 53 filings, 2024 = 21 filings
Technology mix
78.6%
of records in E21B

One class carries almost all the volume

E21B drilling-equipment claims account for 78.6% of all records, dwarfing the next largest class, control and regulating systems at 3.6%. That imbalance means most competitive pressure sits inside a single classification, while adjacent control, gearing and motor claims remain comparatively open.

Record-level share, classes overlap
Geography
732
US receiving-office records

Filing is US-centred with a European and Canadian tier

The United States receives the largest share of filings at 732 records, followed by the EPO at 313 and Canada at 263, with WIPO PCT filings at 195. This geographic spread points to North America and Europe as the primary venues to watch for enforcement and freedom-to-operate risk.

By receiving office, all records in scope
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to top drives and rotary systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Drives and Rotary Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who is filing

Leading assignees and where momentum sits

The ranking covers 100 companies across the full 2,234-record scope. The leader holds 325 records outright; by the tenth position that figure has fallen to 44, and the field spreads into a long tail beyond that.

Leader
325
records

A clear single leader

The top-ranked assignee holds 325 records, nearly four times the fifth-place total of 93. That gap suggests a company with a broad, defensible position across multiple top drive subsystems rather than one narrow niche filing.

Leader vs. fifth place: 325 vs. 93
Mid-field
44
records at 10th place

A steep drop by mid-table

By the tenth-ranked assignee, holdings have fallen to 44 records — less than half the fifth-place count of 93. The field thins out quickly outside the leading handful, which is where smaller specialists and service companies compete on subsystem-level claims.

Top 10 combined: 1,193 records, 53.4% of scope
Momentum
0
latest-year filings, several leaders

Recent-year activity has gone quiet at the top

Several of the most active historical filers, including major oilfield service and drilling equipment names, show zero recorded filings in the latest year, with year-over-year drops of -100% where prior-year activity existed. This is consistent with the broader pullback seen in the 2021-to-2024 trend rather than a signal specific to any one company.

Recent-year momentum, ranked assignees
🔍
Under-claimed subsystem areas
Secondary IPC bands with comparatively thin coverage relative to the E21B core
Wash pipe seal wear monitoringLink tilt indexing mechanismsSpindle bearing condition sensingMake-up torque feedback controlElectric motor integration for top drives
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC0
National Oilwell Varco, L.P.0
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.0-100%
Weatherford Lamb, Inc.0
MAKO RENTALS INC0-100%
Varco I/P, Inc.0
Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.0
Canrig Drilling Technology Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Drives and Rotary Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or identifying open claim space.

Map freedom-to-operate against the top 10

With 53.4% of all records held by ten assignees, a freedom-to-operate review should start with those portfolios before widening to the long tail.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Test claim language in the under-claimed bands

Control systems, gearing and electric motor classes each sit under 4% of records despite sitting adjacent to the dominant E21B core, suggesting room for narrowly drafted claims there.

Run a claim search in Eureka

Watch for the next filing cycle

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true 2025-2026 filing rate will not be visible in this data for some time; a follow-up pull is the only way to confirm whether the slowdown continues.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Drives and Rotary Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Drives and Rotary Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Top Drives and Rotary Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole top drives and rotary systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.