Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 382 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Top gas recycling and carbon reduction in blast furnace ironmaking covers the routes steelmakers use to reclaim, clean and reinject blast furnace top gas — shaft tuyere injection, pressure swing adsorption, carbon dioxide removal and top gas cleaning among them — rather than simply venting or combusting it. The search set combines process claims (oxygen blast furnace operation, gas recirculation loops) with the separation and purification hardware that makes recycling workable at furnace scale. It spans 382 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off.
The technology sits at the intersection of ironmaking process engineering and industrial gas separation, which is why the IPC composition below spreads across furnace classes (C21B, F27B, F27D) as well as separation and gas-purification classes (B01D, C10K).
Two views of the same 382 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and how those records classify across the IPC subclasses that matter to this field.
Filings peaked at 50 in 2020, then fell from 29 in 2021 to 10 in 2024 — a 66% drop over that span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as undercounted: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years will keep filling in as more records publish.
C21B (iron production) touches 89.8% of the 382 records, confirming this is fundamentally a blast-furnace-process field. F27B and F27D (furnace and furnace-detail hardware) each cover roughly a quarter of records, and B01D (separation processes) appears in 9.2% — the gas-cleaning hardware side of the field is real but secondary to process claims. Shares add to more than 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Shares are the percentage of the 382 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about top gas recycling and carbon reduction and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing discloses a long-process blast furnace and chemical co-production route built entirely around gas handling: pressure swing adsorption decarbonizes blast furnace gas into a desorbed stream and a decarbonized stream, the desorbed stream is liquefied and rectified into liquid carbon dioxide, and the decarbonized gas is split — part returned to the blast furnace, part blended with purified converter gas and light-hydrocarbon-converted coke oven gas ahead of low-temperature methanol wash and temperature swing adsorption.Filed by CISDI Engineering Co., Ltd, published 2026-02-18 — near the data cut-off, so still early in its prosecution life.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US8133298B2 | Blast furnace iron production with integrated power generation | 74 |
| 2 | US20100064855A1 | Blast Furnace Iron Production with Integrated Power Generation | 48 |
| 3 | US5238487A | Process for the production of pig iron and sponge iron | 36 |
| 4 | US20100146982A1 | Blast furnace iron production with integrated power generation | 34 |
| 5 | WO2010133476A1 | Method for operating a regenerative heater | 26 |
| 6 | WO2010049536A1 | Method for operating a blast furnace and blast furnace installation | 21 |
| 7 | EP2886666A1 | Method for operating a top gas recycling blast furnace installation | 19 |
| 8 | US20160326604A1 | Method for operation of blast furnace | 18 |
| 9 | US20200149124A1 | Method for operating an iron- or steelmaking- plant | 17 |
| 10 | EP3425070A1 | Method for operating an iron-or steelmaking-plant | 16 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate them inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.
Top 5 combined account for 317 of 382 records — 83.0% of everything in scope. That leaves the sixth-ranked entrant and beyond fighting over a small remainder, and the top 10 combined (99.0%) shows there is almost no field left outside the ranked leaders.
2020 was the peak year at 50 filings; by 2024, the last year the trend can treat as complete, annual filings had fallen to 10 — down from 29 in 2021. That is a real pullback in new claim activity, not a data artefact, though 2025-2026 counts will still rise as publications catch up.
Only 35 of 382 records (9.2%) sit in B01D separation processes, versus 89.8% in C21B iron production. Most protected ground is process-level control of the furnace and gas loop, not the filtration or adsorption hardware itself — a gap worth checking before assuming hardware claims are blocked.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to top gas recycling and carbon reduction, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | JFE Steel Corporation | 13 |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. | 13 |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd. | 13 |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP | 13 |
| JFE Steel Corporation | Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. | 13 |
| JFE Steel Corporation | Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd. | 13 |
| JFE Steel Corporation | NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP | 13 |
| Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. | Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd. | 13 |
Several assignee pairs recur at 13 shared records each, pointing to established joint-development relationships around furnace and gas-cleaning integration rather than one-off co-filings.
The ranked field covers 41 companies, counted in records, with activity heavily front-loaded to a small group of steelmakers and industrial gas majors.
The top-ranked assignee holds 158 of the 382 records in scope, far ahead of fifth place at 13 — a gap that signals a portfolio built over years rather than a recent land grab.
Fifth place sits at 13 records and tenth at 10 — a compressed mid-field of steelmakers and engineering firms each holding a modest, defensible slice rather than one runaway second player.
Several previously active assignees show zero filings in the latest year, and even a challenger still filing is down 83% year over year — consistent with the broader 2021-2024 pullback rather than any single company retreating alone.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| ArcelorMittal | 1 | -83% |
| Paul Wurth SA | 0 | -100% |
| L'Air Liquide, Societe Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procedes Georges Claude | 0 | — |
| Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH | 0 | — |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| JFE Steel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a mature, concentrated core and a thinner set of adjacent branches. Two directions are worth pursuing depending on your position.
With 83.0% of records held by five assignees, any new filing in the C21B core needs a claim-by-claim check against their existing portfolios before drafting.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaB01D separation hardware and gas-blending control sit at a fraction of the density of the process core — worth a targeted prior-art pull before assuming the space is closed.
Explore white space in EurekaOne assignee leads the ranked field with 158 of the 382 records in scope, a wide margin over the next four ranked companies, who together bring the top 5 combined to 317 records, or 83.0% of everything in the dataset. Fifth place sits at only 13 records, showing how sharply filing activity drops off after the leader. This concentration means most of the process-level claim space in this exact search scope is already occupied by a handful of companies rather than spread across the 41 ranked assignees.
No — filings peaked in 2020 at 50 and had fallen to 10 by 2024, down from 29 in 2021, a 66% decline over that three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year the trend can treat as complete; 2025 and 2026 figures will keep rising as publications catch up, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Read the recent slowdown as real but not final — it reflects a cooling wave of filing activity after the 2020 peak, not a dead field.
The scope combines blast furnace top gas handling — reducing gas injection, shaft tuyere injection, gas recirculation loops, oxygen blast furnace operation — with the carbon capture and gas cleaning side: pressure swing adsorption, carbon dioxide removal and top gas cleaning. IPC data shows 89.8% of the 382 records classify under C21B iron production, with F27B and F27D furnace-hardware classes each covering roughly a quarter of records and B01D separation processes at 9.2%. It is primarily a process-claims field with a secondary hardware layer.
The IPC composition points to lighter claim density outside the C21B core: B01D separation processes cover only 9.2% of records, and specific sub-steps like desorbed-gas liquefaction to liquid CO2, light-hydrocarbon conversion of coke oven gas, and multi-stream gas blending control appear less consolidated than the main furnace-process claims. These are the branches worth a targeted prior-art search before assuming the space is closed, particularly since the leading assignees' portfolios concentrate on furnace-level process control rather than this downstream gas-handling detail.
EP4696788A1, filed by CISDI Engineering Co., Ltd and published 2026-02-18, discloses a near-zero-carbon co-production process combining pressure swing adsorption decarbonization of blast furnace gas, liquefaction and rectification of the desorbed stream into liquid CO2, and a split decarbonized-gas stream — part returned to the furnace, part blended with purified converter and coke oven gas ahead of low-temperature methanol wash and temperature swing adsorption. Because it is so close to the 2026 data cut-off, its prosecution status and eventual claim scope are still unsettled, so anyone designing a similar multi-stream gas-blending or PSA-to-liquefaction route should track its file history rather than treat it as settled art yet.
Go past this page: query the whole top gas recycling and carbon reduction corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.