https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/top-gas-recycling-and-carbon-reduction-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Blast Furnace Ironmaking · Patent Landscape
Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction Patents in Blast Furnace Ironmaking
  • 83.0% of all 382 records sit with just five assignees — this field is about as concentrated as ironmaking IP gets.
  • Filings fell 66% from 29 in 2021 to 10 in 2024, the last year the data can treat as complete.
  • C21B carries 89.8% of records, but F27B and F27D furnace-hardware classes still cover roughly a quarter each — the claim space is not one narrow trick.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
382
Published Records
83%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-66%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 382 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Top gas recycling and carbon reduction in blast furnace ironmaking covers the routes steelmakers use to reclaim, clean and reinject blast furnace top gas — shaft tuyere injection, pressure swing adsorption, carbon dioxide removal and top gas cleaning among them — rather than simply venting or combusting it. The search set combines process claims (oxygen blast furnace operation, gas recirculation loops) with the separation and purification hardware that makes recycling workable at furnace scale. It spans 382 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off.

The technology sits at the intersection of ironmaking process engineering and industrial gas separation, which is why the IPC composition below spreads across furnace classes (C21B, F27B, F27D) as well as separation and gas-purification classes (B01D, C10K).

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1PAUL WURTH SA158
  2. 2LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PROCEDES GEORGES CLAUDE73
  3. 3ARCELORMITTAL SA51
  4. 4PRIMETALS TECH AUSTRIA GMBH22
  5. 5JFE STEEL CORP13
  6. 6KOBE STEEL LTD13
  7. 7NISSHIN STEEL CO LTD13
  8. 8NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN ENGINEERING CO LTD13
  9. 9AIR PROD & CHEM INC12
  10. 10NIPPON KOKAN KK10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 382 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and how those records classify across the IPC subclasses that matter to this field.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings peaked at 50 in 2020, then fell from 29 in 2021 to 10 in 2024 — a 66% drop over that span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as undercounted: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years will keep filling in as more records publish.

Filing trend, 2017–202601325385092017201820195020202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

C21B (iron production) touches 89.8% of the 382 records, confirming this is fundamentally a blast-furnace-process field. F27B and F27D (furnace and furnace-detail hardware) each cover roughly a quarter of records, and B01D (separation processes) appears in 9.2% — the gas-cleaning hardware side of the field is real but secondary to process claims. Shares add to more than 100% because records carry multiple classes.

IPC subclass compositionC21B · Iron production (blast furnace)34389.8%F27B · Furnaces & kilns10427.2%F27D · Furnace details & accessories9524.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…359.2%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…195.0%C10B · Coke & destructive distillation123.1%C21C · Steelmaking92.4%C10K · Purifying fuel gases82.1%Other4010.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 382 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about top gas recycling and carbon reduction and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative Recent Filing
EP4696788A12026-02-18

Near-zero carbon co-production process and system (EP4696788A1)

CISDI ENGINEERING CO., LTD

The filing discloses a long-process blast furnace and chemical co-production route built entirely around gas handling: pressure swing adsorption decarbonizes blast furnace gas into a desorbed stream and a decarbonized stream, the desorbed stream is liquefied and rectified into liquid carbon dioxide, and the decarbonized gas is split — part returned to the blast furnace, part blended with purified converter gas and light-hydrocarbon-converted coke oven gas ahead of low-temperature methanol wash and temperature swing adsorption.Filed by CISDI Engineering Co., Ltd, published 2026-02-18 — near the data cut-off, so still early in its prosecution life.

EP4696788A1 — patent drawing 1EP4696788A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing in Eureka
Most-cited records in this search set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US8133298B2Blast furnace iron production with integrated power generation74
2US20100064855A1Blast Furnace Iron Production with Integrated Power Generation48
3US5238487AProcess for the production of pig iron and sponge iron36
4US20100146982A1Blast furnace iron production with integrated power generation34
5WO2010133476A1Method for operating a regenerative heater26
6WO2010049536A1Method for operating a blast furnace and blast furnace installation21
7EP2886666A1Method for operating a top gas recycling blast furnace installation19
8US20160326604A1Method for operation of blast furnace18
9US20200149124A1Method for operating an iron- or steelmaking- plant17
10EP3425070A1Method for operating an iron-or steelmaking-plant16

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate them inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three signals worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.

Concentration
83.0% / 382
top 5 share of all records

Five assignees hold most of the occupied claim space

Top 5 combined account for 317 of 382 records — 83.0% of everything in scope. That leaves the sixth-ranked entrant and beyond fighting over a small remainder, and the top 10 combined (99.0%) shows there is almost no field left outside the ranked leaders.

Concentration data, this search set
Momentum
-66%, 2021→2024
filings, last complete years

Filing activity has cooled from its 2020 peak

2020 was the peak year at 50 filings; by 2024, the last year the trend can treat as complete, annual filings had fallen to 10 — down from 29 in 2021. That is a real pullback in new claim activity, not a data artefact, though 2025-2026 counts will still rise as publications catch up.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Composition
9.2% B01D
share of 382 records

Separation hardware is a minority claim, not the core

Only 35 of 382 records (9.2%) sit in B01D separation processes, versus 89.8% in C21B iron production. Most protected ground is process-level control of the furnace and gas loop, not the filtration or adsorption hardware itself — a gap worth checking before assuming hardware claims are blocked.

IPC composition, this search set
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to top gas recycling and carbon reduction, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Recurring co-filing pairs
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Kobe Steel, Ltd.JFE Steel Corporation13
Kobe Steel, Ltd.Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.13
Kobe Steel, Ltd.Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd.13
Kobe Steel, Ltd.NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP13
JFE Steel CorporationNisshin Steel Co., Ltd.13
JFE Steel CorporationNippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd.13
JFE Steel CorporationNIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORP13
Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd.13

Several assignee pairs recur at 13 shared records each, pointing to established joint-development relationships around furnace and gas-cleaning integration rather than one-off co-filings.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active and where the gaps sit

The ranked field covers 41 companies, counted in records, with activity heavily front-loaded to a small group of steelmakers and industrial gas majors.

Leader
158 records
leading assignee

One assignee dominates the ranking

The top-ranked assignee holds 158 of the 382 records in scope, far ahead of fifth place at 13 — a gap that signals a portfolio built over years rather than a recent land grab.

Assignee ranking, 41 companies
Mid-field
13 at fifth, 10 at tenth
records

A tight cluster below the leader

Fifth place sits at 13 records and tenth at 10 — a compressed mid-field of steelmakers and engineering firms each holding a modest, defensible slice rather than one runaway second player.

Assignee ranking, this search set
Momentum
-83% YoY
leading challenger, latest year

Recent-year activity has slowed across the board

Several previously active assignees show zero filings in the latest year, and even a challenger still filing is down 83% year over year — consistent with the broader 2021-2024 pullback rather than any single company retreating alone.

Recent-year momentum, this search set
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where the IPC composition and citation pattern suggest lighter claim density than the C21B core.
Desorbed-gas liquefaction and rectification to liquid CO2Light-hydrocarbon conversion of coke oven gas ahead of methanol washTemperature swing adsorption paired with PSA decarbonizationRegenerative heater operation methodsMulti-stream gas blending control (converter + coke oven + BF gas)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ArcelorMittal1-83%
Paul Wurth SA0-100%
L'Air Liquide, Societe Anonyme pour l'Etude et l'Exploitation des Procedes Georges Claude0
Primetals Technologies Austria GmbH0
Kobe Steel, Ltd.0
JFE Steel Corporation0
Nisshin Steel Co., Ltd.0
Nippon Steel & Sumikin Engineering Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, concentrated core and a thinner set of adjacent branches. Two directions are worth pursuing depending on your position.

Map freedom-to-operate against the top 5

With 83.0% of records held by five assignees, any new filing in the C21B core needs a claim-by-claim check against their existing portfolios before drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

B01D separation hardware and gas-blending control sit at a fraction of the density of the process core — worth a targeted prior-art pull before assuming the space is closed.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Top Gas Recycling and Carbon Reduction in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole top gas recycling and carbon reduction corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.