Topical Semisolid Formulation Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Ownership is thin at the top. the leading assignee holds 130 records and the ranked leaders' combined top 5 is just 10.5% of all 4,229 records in scope — no single player controls the field.
- Filing peaked in 2021 at 295 records and fell to 121 by 2024, a -59% swing over three years — a real pull-back, not a data artefact, though 2025-26 figures are still filling in.
- A61K dominates claim language at 91.7% of records while A61Q cosmetics-use claims sit far behind at 14.0%, pointing to where formulation claims are thin.
Filing growth compares 2021 (295 records) with 2024 (121) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,229 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the dataset covers
This landscape draws on 4,229 published patent records filed against topical cream, semisolid formulation and topical ointment terms, cross-referenced against emulsion stability, rheology profile, skin feel, preservative system, penetration enhancer and in vitro release language. The scope runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, so the most recent one to two years are still being published and will under-report true filing volume.
Records are drawn from six major receiving offices, led by the United States with 1,113 filings, followed by WIPO's PCT route at 582 and the European Patent Office at 559. Australia, Canada and India each carry over 200 records, indicating this is a field prosecuted across multiple jurisdictions rather than concentrated in one home market.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 4,229-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim language.
Filing rose to a 2021 peak, then pulled back
Annual filings climbed from 264 in 2017 to a peak of 295 in 2021, then declined to 121 by 2024 — a -59% move over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts shown are still incomplete and should not be read as a continuation of the decline.
A61K medicinal preparations dominates class assignment
A61K appears on 91.7% of the 4,229 records, confirming most filings are framed as medicinal preparations rather than cosmetic formulations. A61P therapeutic-activity classification follows at 43.5%, while A61Q cosmetics-use sits at just 14.0% — a gap worth noting for filers working on skin-feel or cosmetic-only claims. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to well over 100% and should be read against the full record count, not against each other.
Shares are the percentage of the 4,229 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Topical Semisolid Formulation with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about topical semisolid formulation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in the field
US5698589A — Water-based topical cream containing nitroglycerin
A stable, uniform, water-based topical cream containing nitroglycerin, a penetration enhancer, water, a thickener and an emulsifier is provided. Also provided are the method of preparing the cream and the use of the cream for treating male erectile dysfunction or female anorgasmia. The present invention also relates to treating patients suffering from microvascular diseases or from injured tissue.Filed by International Medical Innovations, Inc. and granted 1997-12-16, this record illustrates how early semisolid vehicle claims combined a penetration enhancer with a defined emulsifier-thickener system — a template still visible in later filings in this corpus.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6153209A | Article having a transferable breathable skin care composition thereon | 795 |
| 2 | US5869090A | Transdermal delivery of dehydroepiandrosterone | 347 |
| 3 | US4996193A | Combined topical and systemic method of administration of cyclosporine | 285 |
| 4 | US20030199538A1 | Pharmaceutical formulation comprising an immune response modifier | 260 |
| 5 | US6689803B2 | Compositions and methods for treating surgical adhesions | 247 |
| 6 | US20030072814A1 | Topical pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of warts | 239 |
| 7 | US6211250B1 | Percutaneous delivery system | 228 |
| 8 | US20020111603A1 | Device for local administration of solid or semi-solid formulations and delayed-release formulations for prop… | 226 |
| 9 | US20020055666A1 | Compositions and methods for treating disease utilizing a combination of radioactive therapy and cell-cycle i… | 200 |
| 10 | US20090041680A1 | Wax Foamable Vehicle and Pharmaceutical Compositions Thereof | 199 |
Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of time in the corpus; treat them as a signal of historical influence on claim drafting, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for filing strategy
Three read-outs from the composition and citation data that matter for anyone deciding where to file next.
No single owner controls the space
The leading assignee holds 130 records against a total of 4,229, and the top 5 combined reach only 10.5% of all records in scope. That is a fragmented field: freedom-to-operate risk sits in specific claim families rather than a single blocking portfolio.
Volume pulled back sharply after 2021
Annual filings fell from a peak of 295 in 2021 to 121 in 2024, a -59% move over three years. The pull-back predates the current data-lag window, so it reflects real filer behaviour rather than incomplete recent publication.
Cosmetic-use claims are thin relative to medicinal framing
A61Q cosmetics-use classification appears on just 14.0% of the 4,229 records, compared with 91.7% for A61K medicinal preparations. Filers positioning purely cosmetic skin-feel or rheology claims face far less crowded prior art than those filing therapeutic formulations.
Old transdermal and skin-barrier patents still anchor prior art
The most-cited record in the corpus, on a transferable breathable skin care composition, carries 795 citations — far ahead of the next tier. That weight of citation sits on older filings, a reminder that influence in this dataset skews toward age rather than current filing activity.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to topical semisolid formulation, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where momentum has gone quiet
The ranked leaders span pharmaceutical majors, a consumer-products company and university-affiliated assignees, but recent-year filing activity across nearly all of them has slowed to a trickle.
The top filer's lead is real but not commanding
At 130 records, the leading assignee sits well ahead of the field's tenth-place entrant at 46, but even that lead amounts to a small fraction of the 4,229-record total — this is not a winner-take-most portfolio.
Recent-year filing has gone quiet across leaders
Several of the ranked leaders, including a major consumer-products filer and a university system, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with one large filer down -100% year over year. This is consistent with the broader post-2021 pull-back rather than isolated to one company.
Collaboration is concentrated in a few pairings
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, but the strongest — a university system paired with a specialist therapeutics firm — spans 48 shared records, far ahead of the next pairings in single digits.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Incyte Corp | 2 | -50% |
| Allergan Inc | 0 | — |
| Procter & Gamble Co | 0 | -100% |
| The Regents of the University of California | 0 | — |
| Dermatrends Inc | 0 | — |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 0 | — |
| Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd | 0 | — |
| Arcutis Biotherapeutics Inc | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The composition and concentration data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for filing headroom.
Map claim language against the leading cited records
Start from the highest-citation patents in this corpus and trace how their emulsifier, thickener and penetration-enhancer claims have been narrowed or designed around in later filings.
Explore citation chains in EurekaTest claim drafts against the under-claimed IPC branches
A61Q cosmetic-use and C07D heterocyclic classes carry comparatively low density relative to A61K — draft and stress-test claims there before committing to already-dense medicinal-preparation language.
Run a claim scope check in EurekaCommon questions on topical semisolid formulation patents
The dataset's assignee ranking covers 100 companies drawn from 4,229 records, with the leading assignee holding 130 records and the fifth-ranked holding 61. The combined top 5 account for 10.5% of all records in scope, which is a modest share for a field leader — ownership is spread across pharmaceutical majors, a consumer-products company and university-affiliated filers rather than concentrated in one hand. This means freedom-to-operate analysis needs to check several portfolios individually rather than relying on a single dominant player's claims.
Filing rose from 264 records in 2017 to a peak of 295 in 2021, then fell to 121 by 2024 — a decline of 59% over that three-year span, using only complete filing years. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the lower counts shown for 2025 and 2026 in raw data are not yet reliable evidence of a continuing trend. Based on the complete-year data, the field has genuinely cooled since its 2021 peak, but it has not disappeared — 121 records in 2024 is still a substantial base.
A61K, medicinal preparations, appears on 91.7% of the 4,229 records in scope, making it by far the dominant classification. A61P, covering therapeutic activity of compounds, follows at 43.5%, while A61Q cosmetics-use classification trails at 14.0%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these percentages overlap and sum to more than 100% — they describe how claim language is framed, not mutually exclusive categories of invention.
The lower-density IPC classes in this corpus — A61Q cosmetics-use at 14.0%, C07D heterocyclic compounds at 4.7%, and C07K peptides and proteins at 3.3% — carry comparatively less claim density than the dominant A61K medicinal-preparations class at 91.7%. That gap suggests cosmetic-only skin-feel claims and peptide-carrier semisolid vehicles are less crowded than therapeutic formulation claims generally. High density in A61K signals occupied claim space, not necessarily a mature or exhausted technology, so a narrowly drafted claim there can still succeed.
US5698589A covers a water-based topical cream combining nitroglycerin, a penetration enhancer, water, a thickener and an emulsifier, along with methods of preparation and specific therapeutic uses including erectile dysfunction and microvascular disease treatment. Its claims are tied to that specific active-ingredient and vehicle combination rather than to penetration enhancers or emulsifier systems generally, so it does not block semisolid formulations built around other actives. Anyone formulating nitroglycerin-based topical creams with a similar penetration-enhancer and emulsifier-thickener structure should review its claim scope closely; formulations using different actives or vehicle chemistries sit outside its direct reach.
Research Topical Semisolid Formulation in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole topical semisolid formulation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.