Book a demo

Topical Semisolid Formulation Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Topical Semisolid Formulation Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/topical-semisolid-formulation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Topical Semisolid Formulation
Topical Semisolid Formulation Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Open
  • Ownership is thin at the top. the leading assignee holds 130 records and the ranked leaders' combined top 5 is just 10.5% of all 4,229 records in scope — no single player controls the field.
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 295 records and fell to 121 by 2024, a -59% swing over three years — a real pull-back, not a data artefact, though 2025-26 figures are still filling in.
  • A61K dominates claim language at 91.7% of records while A61Q cosmetics-use claims sit far behind at 14.0%, pointing to where formulation claims are thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
4,229
Published Records
10%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-59%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (295 records) with 2024 (121) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,229 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the dataset covers

This landscape draws on 4,229 published patent records filed against topical cream, semisolid formulation and topical ointment terms, cross-referenced against emulsion stability, rheology profile, skin feel, preservative system, penetration enhancer and in vitro release language. The scope runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, so the most recent one to two years are still being published and will under-report true filing volume.

Records are drawn from six major receiving offices, led by the United States with 1,113 filings, followed by WIPO's PCT route at 582 and the European Patent Office at 559. Australia, Canada and India each carry over 200 records, indicating this is a field prosecuted across multiple jurisdictions rather than concentrated in one home market.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1ALLERGAN INC130
  2. 2PROCTER & GAMBLE CO106
  3. 3RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA77
  4. 4DERMATRENDS INC68
  5. 5GILEAD SCIENCES INC61
  6. 6ARCUTIS BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC60
  7. 7INCYTE CORP57
  8. 8AVANIR PHARMACEUTICALS INC57
  9. 9OTONOMY INC50
  10. 10ANGIOTECH INT AG (CH)46
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Topical Semisolid Formulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 4,229-record corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim language.

Filing rose to a 2021 peak, then pulled back

Annual filings climbed from 264 in 2017 to a peak of 295 in 2021, then declined to 121 by 2024 — a -59% move over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts shown are still incomplete and should not be read as a continuation of the decline.

Filing rose to a 2021 peak, then pulled back075150225300264201720182019202029520212022202320242025242026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

A61K medicinal preparations dominates class assignment

A61K appears on 91.7% of the 4,229 records, confirming most filings are framed as medicinal preparations rather than cosmetic formulations. A61P therapeutic-activity classification follows at 43.5%, while A61Q cosmetics-use sits at just 14.0% — a gap worth noting for filers working on skin-feel or cosmetic-only claims. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to well over 100% and should be read against the full record count, not against each other.

A61K medicinal preparations dominates class assignmentA61K · Medicinal preparations3,87791.7%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…1,83943.5%A61Q · Cosmetics use59314.0%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds1984.7%A01N · Biocides / agrochemicals1794.2%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…1573.7%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting1543.6%C07K · Peptides & proteins1413.3%Other1,07925.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 4,229 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Topical Semisolid Formulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Topical Semisolid Formulation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about topical semisolid formulation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in the field

Representative Filing
US5698589A1997-12-16

US5698589A — Water-based topical cream containing nitroglycerin

INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, INC.

A stable, uniform, water-based topical cream containing nitroglycerin, a penetration enhancer, water, a thickener and an emulsifier is provided. Also provided are the method of preparing the cream and the use of the cream for treating male erectile dysfunction or female anorgasmia. The present invention also relates to treating patients suffering from microvascular diseases or from injured tissue.Filed by International Medical Innovations, Inc. and granted 1997-12-16, this record illustrates how early semisolid vehicle claims combined a penetration enhancer with a defined emulsifier-thickener system — a template still visible in later filings in this corpus.

View full record
Highest-citation patents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6153209AArticle having a transferable breathable skin care composition thereon795
2US5869090ATransdermal delivery of dehydroepiandrosterone347
3US4996193ACombined topical and systemic method of administration of cyclosporine285
4US20030199538A1Pharmaceutical formulation comprising an immune response modifier260
5US6689803B2Compositions and methods for treating surgical adhesions247
6US20030072814A1Topical pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of warts239
7US6211250B1Percutaneous delivery system228
8US20020111603A1Device for local administration of solid or semi-solid formulations and delayed-release formulations for prop…226
9US20020055666A1Compositions and methods for treating disease utilizing a combination of radioactive therapy and cell-cycle i…200
10US20090041680A1Wax Foamable Vehicle and Pharmaceutical Compositions Thereof199

Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of time in the corpus; treat them as a signal of historical influence on claim drafting, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Topical Semisolid Formulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three read-outs from the composition and citation data that matter for anyone deciding where to file next.

Concentration
10.5% of 4,229
top 5 assignees combined

No single owner controls the space

The leading assignee holds 130 records against a total of 4,229, and the top 5 combined reach only 10.5% of all records in scope. That is a fragmented field: freedom-to-operate risk sits in specific claim families rather than a single blocking portfolio.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Filing momentum
295 → 121
2021 peak to 2024

Volume pulled back sharply after 2021

Annual filings fell from a peak of 295 in 2021 to 121 in 2024, a -59% move over three years. The pull-back predates the current data-lag window, so it reflects real filer behaviour rather than incomplete recent publication.

Filing trend, 2017-2024 complete years
Class composition
14.0% vs 91.7%
A61Q vs A61K share

Cosmetic-use claims are thin relative to medicinal framing

A61Q cosmetics-use classification appears on just 14.0% of the 4,229 records, compared with 91.7% for A61K medicinal preparations. Filers positioning purely cosmetic skin-feel or rheology claims face far less crowded prior art than those filing therapeutic formulations.

IPC composition, all records
Citation influence
795 citations
leading cited record

Old transdermal and skin-barrier patents still anchor prior art

The most-cited record in the corpus, on a transferable breathable skin care composition, carries 795 citations — far ahead of the next tier. That weight of citation sits on older filings, a reminder that influence in this dataset skews toward age rather than current filing activity.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to topical semisolid formulation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Topical Semisolid Formulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum has gone quiet

The ranked leaders span pharmaceutical majors, a consumer-products company and university-affiliated assignees, but recent-year filing activity across nearly all of them has slowed to a trickle.

Leader by volume
130 records
leading assignee

The top filer's lead is real but not commanding

At 130 records, the leading assignee sits well ahead of the field's tenth-place entrant at 46, but even that lead amounts to a small fraction of the 4,229-record total — this is not a winner-take-most portfolio.

Assignee ranking, position 1
Momentum check
0 in latest year
across several major assignees

Recent-year filing has gone quiet across leaders

Several of the ranked leaders, including a major consumer-products filer and a university system, show zero filings in the latest tracked year, with one large filer down -100% year over year. This is consistent with the broader post-2021 pull-back rather than isolated to one company.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair: 48 shared records

Collaboration is concentrated in a few pairings

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, but the strongest — a university system paired with a specialist therapeutics firm — spans 48 shared records, far ahead of the next pairings in single digits.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas to watch
Branches where class density is comparatively low relative to the core medicinal-preparation claims.
cosmetic-use rheology claims (A61Q)biocide-compatible preservative systems (A01N)heterocyclic penetration enhancers (C07D)peptide-carrier semisolid vehicles (C07K)microbial stability testing methods (C12N)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Filing momentum by assignee, latest tracked year
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Incyte Corp2-50%
Allergan Inc0
Procter & Gamble Co0-100%
The Regents of the University of California0
Dermatrends Inc0
Gilead Sciences Inc0
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd0
Arcutis Biotherapeutics Inc0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Topical Semisolid Formulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The composition and concentration data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for filing headroom.

Map claim language against the leading cited records

Start from the highest-citation patents in this corpus and trace how their emulsifier, thickener and penetration-enhancer claims have been narrowed or designed around in later filings.

Explore citation chains in Eureka

Test claim drafts against the under-claimed IPC branches

A61Q cosmetic-use and C07D heterocyclic classes carry comparatively low density relative to A61K — draft and stress-test claims there before committing to already-dense medicinal-preparation language.

Run a claim scope check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Topical Semisolid Formulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on topical semisolid formulation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Topical Semisolid Formulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Topical Semisolid Formulation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole topical semisolid formulation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.