Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-backed look at traction inverter gate driver patents: who leads the 65-record field, how filings trended from 2017 to 2026, and where the claim space is still open.
Filing growth = 2021 (4 records) → 2024 (1); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 65 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
Traction inverter gate driver patents sit at the intersection of power conversion, pulse-logic circuitry and vehicle propulsion control. Across the 65 published records in scope, filing activity is dominated by circuits that switch and protect the power devices inside an EV traction inverter — bootstrap supplies, isolated high/low-side drive stages, and increasingly digitally configurable interfaces. Ownership of this space is concentrated: a handful of filers hold the majority of records, leaving a long tail of companies with one or a few filings each.
The technology composition leans heavily on two IPC subclasses — power conversion circuitry and pulse-technique/logic circuits — with vehicle-specific and semiconductor-device classes present but comparatively thin. That thinness is where the more interesting competitive-intelligence questions sit: not in the crowded core, but in the packaging and drivetrain-integration branches that few filers have claimed so far.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
The dataset spans 65 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, filed across six receiving offices with the United States dominant. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years understate actual filing activity.
Filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2020, then declined to 4 by 2021 and 1 by 2024 — a -75% move over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as evidence the field has stopped.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
H02M (power conversion) appears on 89.2% of the 65 records and H03K (pulse technique & logic circuits) on 52.3%, confirming that most filings sit at the intersection of drive-circuit topology and switching logic. Vehicle-specific classes (H02P, B60L, B60K) and semiconductor-device classes (H10D, H01L) are present but each cover well under half of the record set, since a single record can carry multiple IPC codes.
Shares are the percentage of the 65 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about traction inverter gate driver patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA gate driver includes a drive signal input terminal, a drive signal output terminal, a gate drive circuit, and a serial communication interface. The drive signal input terminal is configured to receive a gate drive signal. The gate drive circuit is coupled to the drive signal input terminal and the drive signal output terminal. The gate drive circuit is configured to provide the gate drive signal to the drive signal output terminal. The serial communication interface is coupled to the drive signal input terminal.Filed by Texas Instruments, published 2018-11-29 — illustrates the shift toward digitally configurable gate-drive interfaces within the core H02M/H03K claim space.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20070159866A1 | Solar array inverter with maximum power tracking | 417 |
| 2 | US7324361B2 | Solar array inverter with maximum power tracking | 339 |
| 3 | US20190238062A1 | Enhanced performance hybrid three-level inverter/rectifier | 65 |
| 4 | US20160099665A1 | Dynamic IGBT Gate Drive For Vehicle Traction Inverters | 64 |
| 5 | US11342911B2 | Gate driver bootstrap circuits and related methods | 47 |
| 6 | US11108389B2 | Adaptive gate drivers and related methods and systems | 41 |
| 7 | US20180099574A1 | Gate driver with short circuit protection | 28 |
| 8 | US10525841B2 | Gate driver with short circuit protection | 27 |
| 9 | CN107947538A | 具有短路保护的栅极驱动器 | 25 |
| 10 | US20160211772A1 | Power converter with selective dead-time insertion | 24 |
Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of being in the corpus longer — read them as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a measure of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the 65 records are broken down by assignee, class and year: a concentrated leadership group, a post-2020 filing pullback that needs careful reading, and a technology mix still anchored in core drive-circuit topology rather than device-specific variants.
The leading filer alone accounts for 16 of the 65 records, and the top 5 combined hold 73.8% of the field. Anyone entering this space needs to map their circuit against these filers' claims before assuming open ground.
Filings peaked at 18 in 2020 and dropped to 1 by 2024, a -75% move across that span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, this should be read as a real pullback from the peak rather than a current stop in activity.
H02M and H03K together describe the great majority of filings, meaning most patent activity still targets the core bootstrap and switching-logic circuitry rather than device-specific or packaging variants.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to traction inverter gate driver patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Magna International Inc. | University of Windsor | 5 |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | Texas Instruments Japan Ltd. | 2 |
| Magna International Inc. | SCHLAGER GERD | 1 |
| Magna International Inc. | KUNDU ANIMESH | 1 |
| Magna International Inc. | KORTA PHILIP | 1 |
| Magna International Inc. | KAR NARAYAN CHANDRA | 1 |
| Magna International Inc. | IYER LAKSHMI VARAHA | 1 |
| Magna International Inc. | DHULIPATI HIMAVARSHA | 1 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest pairing links a single vehicle OEM with a university research partner — most filers in this space patent solo rather than jointly.
The class-level and assignee-level view here is a starting point. Turning it into a filing or licensing decision means checking specific claims against a specific circuit design.
Run your bootstrap, isolated-gate or serial-configurable driver design against the leading filers' claim sets before committing to a layout.
Explore in EurekaPackaging-integration and drivetrain-specific classes are thin today; monitoring them over the next few publication cycles will show whether that gap closes.
Set up monitoring in EurekaWith the top 10 filers holding 96.9% of records, a credible design-around usually means moving to an adjacent architecture rather than reworking the core circuit.
Draft a claim strategy in EurekaThe ranked assignee list contains 26 companies, with the leading filer holding 16 of the 65 records in scope. The top 5 filers together account for 73.8% of all 65 records, and the top 10 account for 96.9%, so the field is heavily concentrated at the top with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants below it. That concentration means most of the foundational drive-circuit claim space is already occupied by a small number of assignees rather than spread evenly across the field.
Filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 18 in 2020, then fell toward 1 by 2024, a -75% move across that three-year span. That looks like a slowdown, but publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as the field going quiet. The safest read is that the initial wave of foundational filing has passed its peak, not that new work has stopped.
The core classes are H02M (power conversion, 89.2% of the 65 records) and H03K (pulse technique & logic circuits, 52.3%), reflecting that most filings describe both the power-switching circuit and the logic that drives it. Vehicle-specific classes — H02P (motor control, 35.4%), B60L (EV propulsion, 26.2%) and B60K (vehicle propulsion & drive, 7.7%) — and semiconductor-device classes H10D and H01L (10.8% and 9.2%) appear on a meaningful minority of records, since a single filing typically carries several IPC codes at once.
US20180343009A1, filed by Texas Instruments and published 2018-11-29, claims a gate driver with a drive signal input and output terminal, a gate drive circuit between them, and a serial communication interface coupled to the drive-signal input terminal. That scope blocks designs where a serial bus sits between the drive-signal input and the gate-drive circuit itself. It does not reach architectures where serial communication is used only for separate telemetry that never touches the drive-signal path, which is the most direct design-around.
The thinnest documented branches are H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) and B60K (vehicle propulsion & drive), each covering only 7.7% of the 65 records, well below the 89.2% and 52.3% carried by the core H02M/H03K drive-circuit classes. That gap points to packaging- and drivetrain-integration claims — for example, a gate-drive stage physically integrated onto the power-module substrate — as an area with comparatively little claimed prior art relative to how much engineering effort actually goes into that part of a real traction inverter.
Go past this page: query the whole traction inverter gate driver patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.