Book a demo

Traction Motor for Agricultural Vehicles Patent Landscape

Traction Motor for Agricultural Vehicles Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Traction Motor for Agricultural Vehicles Patent Landscape in 2026

The traction motor for agricultural vehicles space is highly concentrated, with Transportation IP Holdings LLC alone accounting for the majority of ranked patent records and the top five filers holding nearly four-fifths of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent years are further understated by publication lag.

103
Patent families in scope
79%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+72%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

A heavily consolidated field led by Transportation IP Holdings LLC

Transportation IP Holdings LLC commands the top position in this space, with 73 patent records — far ahead of every other ranked filer. Westinghouse Air Brake Tech Corp (18 records) and GM Global Technology Operations LLC (12 records) occupy the second and third ranks, respectively.

Concentration is extreme: the top five filers — Transportation IP Holdings LLC, Westinghouse Air Brake Tech Corp, GM Global Technology Operations LLC, General Electric Co, and Deere & Co — together hold 79% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. A steep drop-off separates the top tier from all subsequent entrants, who individually account for single-digit patent record counts.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Transportation IP Holdings LLC73
2Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation18
3GM Global Technology Operations LLC12
4General Electric Company11
5DEERE & CO8
6ABB (Schweiz) AG6
7ARC Energy Recovery4
8Nidec SR Drives Ltd3
9Switched Reluctance Drives Ltd3
10KUMAR AJITH KUTTANNAIR2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Volvo Construction Equipment AB2
12GE Grid Solutions LLC2
13DAIGLE JEFFREY LOUIS1
14Zoox Inc1
15WORDEN BRET DWAYNE1
16GUPTA SUDHIR KUMAR1
17MR NANJAIAH LAKKANNA GOWDA1
18MR SURESH NANJAIAH1
19Tecnomatic1
20Lely Patent NV1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply deep, entrenched portfolio control over electric vehicle propulsion and motor design fundamentals. New entrants face a dense IP perimeter in the core B60L and H02K classes, making differentiated positioning in adjacent or application-specific branches the more viable R&D pathway.

Data for the most recent 18–24 months is subject to publication lag, so apparent slowdowns in 20242025 should not be interpreted as real activity declines. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth with a 2023 peak and a broad B60L core

Filing volume grew substantially from 2019 onward, peaking in 2023 before easing — a pattern consistent with a maturing growth phase rather than a decline. The technology mix is anchored by electric vehicle propulsion (B60L), with motor hardware (H02K) and vehicle drivetrain integration (B60K) as secondary themes.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from single digits in 2017–2018 to a peak of 27 records in 2023, then eased to 17 in 2024. The near-zero counts for 2025–2026 reflect publication lag, not a real collapse in activity. The three-year recent window sits 72% above the prior three-year window, confirming net expansion on a multi-year basis.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 27 in 2023.2201712018620191420201620211820222720231720242202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) dominates the technology mix by a wide margin, reflecting the field’s orientation toward full-system powertrain electrification rather than motor hardware alone. H02K (electric motors and generators) and B60K (vehicle propulsion and drive) form the next tier, while branches such as H02J (power supply and grid systems), B60W (hybrid/joint vehicle control), and agriculture-specific classes (A01B, A01C) appear at much lower counts, signaling relatively open territory.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 124; H02K · Electric motors & generators 34.B60L · Electric vehicle …124H02K · Electric motors &…34B60K · Vehicle propulsio…26H02J · Power supply & gr…21B60W · Hybrid/joint vehi…15G01R · Electric & magnet…11H01M · Batteries, cells …8B61L · Railway traffic c…7↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20180242517A1Published 2018-08-30

Adjustable row unit and vehicle with adjustable ro…

Deere & Company

An agricultural vehicle comprises a left frame and a right frame. A first leg extends upward from the left frame and a second leg extends upward from the right frame to connect the legs to the beam. One or more satellite navigation receivers are associated with beam to determine a position and an attitude of the beam. In on configuration, at least one row… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Adjustable row unit and vehicle with adjustable ro… — patent drawingAdjustable row unit and vehicle with adjustable ro… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1System and Method For Managing An Amount of Stored…88
2Energy recovery drive system and vehicle with ener…78
3Energy recovery drive system and vehicle with ener…63
4Hybrid Vehicle With Multiple Electric Drive Systems47
5Adjustable row unit and vehicle with adjustable ro…46
6Hybrid vehicle with multiple electric drive systems41
7D-ring implementation in skewed rotor assembly40
8Interior permanent magnet machine having offset ro…32

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of high concentration, a growth-phase lifecycle, and narrow geographic focus creates both risks and entry points for R&D teams evaluating this space.

Growth

Growth stage — annual volume eased from 2023 peak

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth: the recent three-year filing window sits 72% above the prior three-year window, confirming net expansion. However, annual volume eased from its 2023 peak of 27 records, and the most recent years carry additional undercount from publication lag. Teams entering now are joining a field that has passed its inflection point but has not yet plateaued.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Single-entity dominance creates a high IP barrier at the core

Transportation IP Holdings LLC alone holds 73 patent records — more than four times the next-largest filer. The top five collectively represent 79% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total. This concentration means the dominant propulsion-control and energy-management claims are largely locked up, pushing later entrants toward differentiated sub-domains such as motor hardware variants, agricultural-specific integration, or power electronics.

High concentration
Collaboration

General Electric Co is the anchor of the limited co-filing activity

Collaboration activity is sparse but identifiable. The most active co-filing relationship links individual inventor Kumar Ajith Kuttannair with General Electric Co (two joint filings). Single joint filings also connect General Electric Co with individuals Gray Steven, Dineen John, and Daum Wolfgang. No multi-party consortium or cross-institutional co-filing was detected, suggesting the ecosystem has not yet formed the kind of pre-competitive research alliances common in more mature electrification fields.

Limited co-filing
Geography

US-centric filings with limited international coverage

The United States accounts for 87 patent records — the overwhelming majority of all jurisdictional filings. Europe (EPO) and Australia follow at 22 and 18 records respectively, with WIPO (PCT) at 8, India at 6, and Canada at 4. Germany holds 3 records and South Africa 1. The thin PCT and non-US coverage signals that many portfolio holders have not fully internationalized their protection, which may create freedom-to-operate windows in markets outside the US and EPO zones.

US-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
KUMAR AJITH KUTTANNAIRGeneral Electric Company2
GRAY STEVENGeneral Electric Company1
DINEEN JOHNGeneral Electric Company1
DAUM WOLFGANGGeneral Electric Company1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data for this topic.Explore insights →
Leaders

Transportation IP Holdings LLC dominates; ABB enters as a new challenger

The leader-challenger gap in this field is unusually wide. The top filer’s patent record count exceeds the combined totals of the next several ranked players, while a new entrant from the power electronics sector has recently joined the field.

Leader · Transportation IP Holdings LLC

Transportation IP Holdings LLC

The clear leader with 73 patent records, focused heavily on B60L electric vehicle propulsion sub-classes covering energy management, charging, and drive control. Its momentum trend shows a 135% increase in recent filings versus the prior period, indicating an actively expanding portfolio rather than a static legacy position.

patent records: 73
Challenger · ABB (Schweiz) AG

ABB (Schweiz) AG

ABB (Schweiz) AG holds 6 patent records and is classified as a new entrant in momentum terms, having no meaningful prior-period baseline in this specific corpus. Its technology emphasis centers on B60L sub-classes covering pantograph/current-collection propulsion and charging interfaces — a distinct niche from the dominant energy-management focus of the leader, suggesting ABB is targeting the infrastructure-interface layer of agricultural vehicle electrification.

patent records: 6
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology emphasis, and momentum trends for all 20 identified filers in this space.
Westinghouse Air Brake Tech CorpDeere & Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
GM Global Purchasing LLC47▲ +135%
GM Global Technology Operations LLC2▼ -80%
ABB (Schweiz) AG6▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards are based on applicant ranking and recent-vs-prior momentum data for this topic.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant B60L core carry relatively low patent record counts in this corpus, suggesting they are under-represented relative to their potential relevance to agricultural vehicle electrification. These are observations of relative sparsity; whether they represent actionable opportunities depends on technical fit and freedom-to-operate analysis.

H02J · Power supply and grid systems

H02J appears in 21 patent records — a modest share relative to the dominant B60L cluster. For agricultural vehicles, on-board power management, vehicle-to-grid (V2G) integration, and field-charging infrastructure are technically adjacent and commercially relevant as farm electrification scales. The relatively low count suggests this systems-level integration layer has not been claimed densely in the agricultural vehicle context, offering a plausible entry path for filers with power electronics or energy-storage expertise.

Search this in Eureka →

A01B / A01C · Agricultural soil working and planting

Agriculture-specific IPC classes A01B (soil working) and A01C (planting and sowing) each appear in only 2 patent records in this corpus — a striking absence given the topic’s explicit agricultural framing. The combination of traction motor technology with implement-level control and soil-engagement mechanics represents a technically grounded and relatively unclaimed area. Entry would require linking electric drivetrain innovations directly to implement operation, a path accessible to OEMs such as Deere & Co that already hold both powertrain and implement IP.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See the complete adjacency analysis across all identified sparse branches, including B60W hybrid control and H01M battery systems.
B60W · Hybrid/joint vehicle controlH01M · Batteries, cells and fuel cells+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch analysis is based on IPC class counts and relative share within this topic corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB60L 58 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 50 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 53 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 3 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 15 · Electric vehicle propulsion
GM Global Purchasing LLCStrong · 38Strong · 21Strong · 20Moderate · 17Moderate · 12
GM Global Technology Operations LLCStrong · 6Moderate · 3Moderate · 2Strong · 4Moderate · 2
ABB (Schweiz) AGAbsentEmerging · 1Strong · 5AbsentEmerging · 1
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies CorporationStrong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsentStrong · 2
General Electric CompanyAbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 1Strong · 4
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map the traction motor landscape for your own R&D focus?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.