Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 168 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Trailing edge flap mechanisms sit at the intersection of high-lift aerodynamics and mechanical actuation: flap tracks, carriages, hinge moment management, skew detection and gap control all fall inside this search. The scope spans 168 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, drawn primarily from aerospace filings but with a meaningful secondary cluster in wind turbine blade flaps and the bearing hardware that supports both.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend understate real activity — treat 2024 as the last year with a reasonably complete picture, not 2025 or 2026.
Two views of the same 168-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the underlying mechanical claims.
Filings peaked at 15 in 2017, fell through the early 2020s to 3 in 2021, then climbed back to 8 by 2024 — a +167% rise across that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown.
B64C (aeroplanes & helicopters) covers 81.0% of the 168 records, confirming this is primarily an airframe mechanism question. F03D (wind motors) at 10.1% and F16C (shafts, bearings & couplings) at 8.3% mark the two clearest adjacent clusters — one application-driven, one component-driven. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 168 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about trailing edge flap mechanisms and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn extreme STOL airplane with port and starboard wing sections carrying Fowler flaps and flap tracks external to the wing body, extending aftward beyond the trailing edge so the flaps can rotate, deflect, translate, extend and retract; flap coves and Frise-type elements are also integrated into the wing sections.Filed by Sherpa Aircraft Group Inc., published 2025-10-09 — the only assignee in this dataset with activity recorded in the latest year.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4441675A | High lift surface actuation system | 131 |
| 2 | US5374011A | Multivariable adaptive surface control | 120 |
| 3 | US4576347A | Flap torque tube slot seal | 104 |
| 4 | US20110038727A1 | Method and apparatus for pressure adaptive morphing structure | 100 |
| 5 | US6382566B1 | Method and apparatus for detecting skew and asymmetry of an airplane flap | 95 |
| 6 | US4448375A | Folding truss mechanism for trailing edge flaps | 95 |
| 7 | US5096382A | Ring-shrouded propeller | 87 |
| 8 | US6299108B1 | Method and apparatus for detecting skew and asymmetry of an airplane flap | 76 |
| 9 | US4669687A | Airfoil flap member with flap track member | 61 |
| 10 | US5294080A | Lift enhancing tabs for airfoils | 58 |
Citation counts reward age inside a searched corpus — the top entries here date from the 1980s–2000s and should be read as markers of foundational influence, not current filing priority.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings that shape how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace review of this field should be scoped.
With the leader alone credited 46 records and the top 5 combined holding 61.3% of all 168 records in scope, a design-around review has a short, known list of assignees to check first — before the long tail of single- and double-filing entrants.
Filings bottomed at 3 in 2021 and rose to 8 by 2024. That is a real recovery in claim activity, not a plateau — treat the still-incomplete 2025–2026 counts as understated rather than as a fresh slowdown.
F03D and F16C classifications appear alongside the dominant B64C aerospace code often enough to suggest bearing and track hardware developed for aircraft flaps is migrating into wind blade flap systems, not the reverse.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to trailing edge flap mechanisms, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked list covers 61 companies counted in records — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the whole set the data endpoint returns for this search.
The leading assignee holds 46 of the 168 records in scope, well ahead of fifth place at 10 and tenth place at 4 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-long-tail field rather than a genuinely crowded one.
Only 10 co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a wind turbine systems firm with an individual inventor, and a business-jet maker with its jet subsidiary — narrow, named partnerships rather than a broad collaboration network.
None of the historically dominant assignees show activity in the latest year in this dataset; the only recorded latest-year filing belongs to a newer aircraft developer working on short take-off and landing designs, a signal worth tracking rather than dismissing as noise given publication lag.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SHERPA AIRCRAFT GROUP INC | 1 | — |
| The Boeing Company | 0 | — |
| Vestas Wind Systems A/S | 0 | — |
| Roller Bearing Company of America, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Airbus Operations GmbH | 0 | — |
| Bombardier Inc. | 0 | — |
| British Aerospace PLC | 0 | — |
| Airbus Operations Limited | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a small set of next questions for anyone scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for open claim space.
With one assignee holding 46 of 168 records, a clause-level read of its flap track and hinge moment claims will tell you more about where competitors can file than the ranking alone.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaF03D and F16C classes suggest airframe bearing and track designs are migrating into wind blade flaps — worth tracking before that space fills in.
Track cross-domain filings in EurekaThe only latest-year filing in this dataset comes from a short take-off and landing aircraft developer outside the historical leaderboard — a candidate worth monitoring going forward.
Set up assignee alerts in EurekaOne assignee leads with 46 of the 168 records in scope, far ahead of the rest of the ranked field — fifth place holds 10 records and tenth place holds 4. This is a leader-plus-long-tail structure rather than an evenly distributed field, so a freedom-to-operate review should start with that leader's claim scope before working down the ranking. The full ranking covers 61 companies counted in records, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
Filings dipped to 3 records in 2021 and recovered to 8 by 2024, a +167% increase over that span, which points to renewed activity rather than decline. The historical peak was 15 records in 2017. Figures for 2025 and 2026 look lower only because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so those years are still filling in and should not be read as a genuine slowdown.
The large majority of records, 81.0% of the 168 in scope, sit under IPC class B64C for aeroplanes and helicopters, confirming this is primarily an airframe mechanism topic. A smaller but consistent cluster falls under F03D for wind turbines (10.1%) and F16C for shafts, bearings and couplings (8.3%), pointing to component and application overlap between aircraft flap hardware and wind blade flap systems. Smaller shares touch aircraft equipment, jet propulsion, digital processing and surface treatment classes.
US20250313329A1, filed by Sherpa Aircraft Group Inc. and published 2025-10-09, describes an extreme short take-off and landing airplane with Fowler flaps mounted on external flap tracks that extend aft of the trailing edge, enabling both rotation and translation of the flap, alongside flap coves and Frise-type elements. Its claims are specific to that combined geometry rather than to Fowler flaps or flap tracks generally, so the blocking effect is narrower than the abstract might suggest. Anyone designing a similar STOL wing should check the exact track geometry and kinematic claim language rather than assume Fowler-flap-plus-track designs are broadly blocked.
The clearest gaps sit in branches that appear only thinly across the 168 records: flap skew sensing integrated with digital monitoring, flap gap control tuned for cruise rather than takeoff and landing, and wind-blade-specific flap track bearing designs. These areas show enough activity to confirm the problem is recognised, but not enough dense filing to suggest the claim space is occupied. A first claim there would likely combine a specific sensing or control method with a named flap geometry rather than claim the mechanism broadly.
Go past this page: query the whole trailing edge flap mechanisms corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.