https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/trailing-edge-flap-mechanisms-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Wing Aerodynamics & High Lift
Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms Patents: Filing Trends and Leading Assignees
  • 61.3% concentration. The top 5 assignees hold 103 of the 168 records in scope (61.3%), with a long tail of single-digit filers behind them.
  • Filings are climbing again. After a low in 2021 (3 records), filings rose to 8 in 2024 — a +167% increase over that span, before the always-partial most recent years.
  • Aerospace dominates, wind energy trails. B64C aeroplane and helicopter classifications cover 81.0% of records; wind turbine flap kinematics under F03D account for just 10.1%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
168
Published Records
61%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+167%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 168 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Trailing edge flap mechanisms sit at the intersection of high-lift aerodynamics and mechanical actuation: flap tracks, carriages, hinge moment management, skew detection and gap control all fall inside this search. The scope spans 168 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, drawn primarily from aerospace filings but with a meaningful secondary cluster in wind turbine blade flaps and the bearing hardware that supports both.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend understate real activity — treat 2024 as the last year with a reasonably complete picture, not 2025 or 2026.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1THE BOEING CO46
  2. 2VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS18
  3. 3ROLLER BEARING OF AMERICA INC15
  4. 4AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH14
  5. 5BOMBARDIER INC10
  6. 6MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD7
  7. 7SHERPA AIRCRAFT GROUP INC7
  8. 8BRITISH AEROSPACE PLC6
  9. 9UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS5
  10. 10LEARJET INC4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 168-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the underlying mechanical claims.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings peaked at 15 in 2017, fell through the early 2020s to 3 in 2021, then climbed back to 8 by 2024 — a +167% rise across that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing trend, 2017–202604811151520172018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

B64C (aeroplanes & helicopters) covers 81.0% of the 168 records, confirming this is primarily an airframe mechanism question. F03D (wind motors) at 10.1% and F16C (shafts, bearings & couplings) at 8.3% mark the two clearest adjacent clusters — one application-driven, one component-driven. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB64C · Aeroplanes & helicopters13681.0%F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)1710.1%F16C · Shafts, bearings & couplings148.3%B64D · Aircraft equipment74.2%F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion53.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…42.4%B24C · Abrasive blasting31.8%C23C · Coating & surface deposition31.8%Other1911.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 168 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about trailing edge flap mechanisms and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a recent filing

Recent filing
US20250313329A12025-10-09

US20250313329A1 — Machine and apparatus for ultra-short take off and landing fixed wing aircraft

SHERPA AIRCRAFT GROUP INC.

An extreme STOL airplane with port and starboard wing sections carrying Fowler flaps and flap tracks external to the wing body, extending aftward beyond the trailing edge so the flaps can rotate, deflect, translate, extend and retract; flap coves and Frise-type elements are also integrated into the wing sections.Filed by Sherpa Aircraft Group Inc., published 2025-10-09 — the only assignee in this dataset with activity recorded in the latest year.

US20250313329A1 — patent drawing 1US20250313329A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4441675AHigh lift surface actuation system131
2US5374011AMultivariable adaptive surface control120
3US4576347AFlap torque tube slot seal104
4US20110038727A1Method and apparatus for pressure adaptive morphing structure100
5US6382566B1Method and apparatus for detecting skew and asymmetry of an airplane flap95
6US4448375AFolding truss mechanism for trailing edge flaps95
7US5096382ARing-shrouded propeller87
8US6299108B1Method and apparatus for detecting skew and asymmetry of an airplane flap76
9US4669687AAirfoil flap member with flap track member61
10US5294080ALift enhancing tabs for airfoils58

Citation counts reward age inside a searched corpus — the top entries here date from the 1980s–2000s and should be read as markers of foundational influence, not current filing priority.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

Reading the numbers

Three findings that shape how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace review of this field should be scoped.

Concentration
61.3%
of 168 records held by top 5 assignees

The field is led, not fragmented

With the leader alone credited 46 records and the top 5 combined holding 61.3% of all 168 records in scope, a design-around review has a short, known list of assignees to check first — before the long tail of single- and double-filing entrants.

Top 5 of 61 ranked assignees
Momentum
+167%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Activity is rebuilding after a dip

Filings bottomed at 3 in 2021 and rose to 8 by 2024. That is a real recovery in claim activity, not a plateau — treat the still-incomplete 2025–2026 counts as understated rather than as a fresh slowdown.

2024 is the last complete filing year
Cross-domain overlap
10.1% / 8.3%
F03D wind motors / F16C bearings share of 168 records

Wind turbine flaps borrow airframe mechanics

F03D and F16C classifications appear alongside the dominant B64C aerospace code often enough to suggest bearing and track hardware developed for aircraft flaps is migrating into wind blade flap systems, not the reverse.

Shares overlap; records can carry multiple IPC codes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to trailing edge flap mechanisms, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's filing

Leading assignees and where the gaps sit

The ranked list covers 61 companies counted in records — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the whole set the data endpoint returns for this search.

Leader
46
records

A single assignee sets the pace

The leading assignee holds 46 of the 168 records in scope, well ahead of fifth place at 10 and tenth place at 4 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-long-tail field rather than a genuinely crowded one.

Leader vs. 5th (10) vs. 10th (4)
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and specific

Only 10 co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a wind turbine systems firm with an individual inventor, and a business-jet maker with its jet subsidiary — narrow, named partnerships rather than a broad collaboration network.

Strongest pairs recur at 4 shared records
Latest activity
1
filing in the latest year

Momentum has shifted to a new entrant

None of the historically dominant assignees show activity in the latest year in this dataset; the only recorded latest-year filing belongs to a newer aircraft developer working on short take-off and landing designs, a signal worth tracking rather than dismissing as noise given publication lag.

Compare against 18-month publication lag
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin coverage relative to the core flap-track and hinge-moment claims
flap skew detection sensingflap gap control at cruisewind-blade flap track bearingsmorphing trailing-edge structuresdigital flap deployment monitoring
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SHERPA AIRCRAFT GROUP INC1
The Boeing Company0
Vestas Wind Systems A/S0
Roller Bearing Company of America, Inc.0
Airbus Operations GmbH0
Bombardier Inc.0
British Aerospace PLC0
Airbus Operations Limited0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a small set of next questions for anyone scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for open claim space.

Map the leader's claim boundaries

With one assignee holding 46 of 168 records, a clause-level read of its flap track and hinge moment claims will tell you more about where competitors can file than the ranking alone.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Watch the wind-turbine crossover

F03D and F16C classes suggest airframe bearing and track designs are migrating into wind blade flaps — worth tracking before that space fills in.

Track cross-domain filings in Eureka

Follow the newest entrant

The only latest-year filing in this dataset comes from a short take-off and landing aircraft developer outside the historical leaderboard — a candidate worth monitoring going forward.

Set up assignee alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Trailing Edge Flap Mechanisms in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole trailing edge flap mechanisms corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.