Book a demo

Transparent Display Backplane Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Transparent Display Backplane Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/transparent-display-backplane-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Displays & Optoelectronics · Patent Landscape
Transparent Display Backplane Patents: Who's Filing and Where It's Going
  • Filing peaked in 2017 at 9 records and has not recovered since, with the 2022 midpoint at zero — this is a flat-to-declining field, not a growth story.
  • H01L carries 143 of 240 families, nearly six times the smallest tracked subclass, so most claim density sits on backplane transistor material rather than optical integration.
  • Every top-ranked assignee, including Canon and Samsung, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, while Corning's 2026 cover-filter filing is one of the only recent, forward-looking claims in the set.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
240
Published Records
49%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+67%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Landscape Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape tracks 240 patent families filed against transparent display backplane technology — the oxide-semiconductor and OLED-driven transistor layers that let a display remain see-through when off. The search spans transparent TFT, oxide semiconductor backplane and transparent backplane claims layered against transparent OLED and see-through display use cases, covering filings from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off.

Filing activity in this space peaked in 2017 and has not returned to that level since, with the flat-to-declining trend running through the most recent recorded year. Claim density concentrates heavily on the backplane semiconductor material itself, with optical integration and display-control circuitry occupying a smaller, less contested share of the filing record.

Filing volume by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO LTD32
  2. 2CANON KK31
  3. 3SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD28
  4. 4EASTMAN KODAK CO14
  5. 5CORNING INC12
  6. 6LUMILEDS LLC10
  7. 7APPLIED MATERIALS INC10
  8. 8SUMITOMO METAL MINING CO LTD8
  9. 9KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV7
  10. 10MIELIKUVA SOLUTIONS LLC6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Transparent Display Backplane covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 240-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which technical subclasses carry the claim volume.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 9 in 2017 and have not returned to that level since; the 2022 midpoint sits at 0 and the trend line stays flat to declining through the most recent recorded year. Publication lag means the last one to two years understate true filing activity, but even accounting for that the overall shape is stagnation rather than growth.

Filing activity, 2017-20260358109201720182019202020212022920232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H01L (semiconductor devices) accounts for 143 of 240 records, roughly six times the smallest tracked subclass, confirming that most claim activity sits on the backplane transistor material itself. G02B, H10K, H10D and G02F each carry a meaningful but much smaller share, and G08G's presence signals a vehicle-display crossover that has not yet attracted heavy filing.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH01L · Semiconductor devices14359.6%G02B · Optical elements & systems4820.0%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…4217.5%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)3916.3%G02F · Optical control & modulation2912.1%G09G · Display control circuits2912.1%H10P197.9%G08G · Traffic control systems187.5%Other17773.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 240 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Transparent Display Backplane covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Transparent Display Backplane with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about transparent display backplane and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Filing

A representative recent filing

Filed 2026-04-02 · Corning Incorporated
WO2026072373A12026-04-02

A cover filter for a transparent display including LEDs

CORNING INCORPORATED

There is provided a cover filter for a transparent display, the transparent display comprising a transparent backplane and one or more light sources positioned on the transparent backplane. The cover filter comprises an optical filter layer positioned on or over the one or more light sources, the optical filter layer comprising one or more transparent areas and one or more absorptive areas, the one or more absorptive areas absorbing light reflected from the one or more light sources, the one or more absorptive areas configured to be positioned to cover the one or more light sources; a first transparent layer positioned on the optical filter layer; and an anti-reflection layer optionally positioned over the stack.Abstract trimmed to the operative claim language; see the full record for complete claim text.

WO2026072373A1 — patent drawing 1WO2026072373A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20070054507A1Method of fabricating oxide semiconductor device4,273
2US7468304B2Method of fabricating oxide semiconductor device4,022
3JP1985198861AThin film transistor3,831
4US20080277656A1METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ZnO SEMICONDUCTOR LAYER FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND THIN FILM TRANSISTOR INCLUDING THE …395
5US20120050140A1Head-mounted display control308
6US8148721B2Bottom gate type thin film transistor, method of manufacturing the same, and display apparatus303
7WO2012058175A1Method of operating a head-mounted display for prevention of motion sickness292
8US20120062444A1Switchable head-mounted display transition272
9WO2008069056A1Bottom gate type thin film transistor, method of manufacturing the same, and display apparatus269
10US20080291350A1Electron device using oxide semiconductor and method of manufacturing the same268

Citation counts favour older records simply by being searchable longer; treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Transparent Display Backplane covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the numbers actually indicate

Three read-throughs from the filing data that matter for deciding where to file, and where not to.

Filing Momentum
9 → 0
peak (2017) to latest year

A field past its filing peak

Filings peaked at 9 in 2017 and the midpoint year of 2022 recorded zero. Recent-year momentum across every top-ranked assignee, including Canon, Samsung Electronics and Samsung Display, is also zero. Publication lag explains part of the most recent gap but not the multi-year decline before it.

Trend basis: 2017-2026 filing counts
Claim Concentration
143 of 240
H01L subclass share

Backplane material still dominates claim volume

H01L alone accounts for roughly 60% of all records, well ahead of G02B (48), H10K (42) and H10D (39). That concentration means the core transistor material space is heavily occupied, while optical integration and display-control claims (G02F, G09G) remain comparatively lighter.

IPC composition across 240 families
Filer Structure
10 pairs
total co-assignee pairs recorded

A fragmented inventor base, not a locked oligopoly

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole corpus, the strongest being Fedorovskaya Elena A with Cok Ronald S at 15 shared filings. That thin collaboration network, combined with a long tail of single-filer entrants, suggests less defensive clustering than the H01L concentration alone would imply.

Co-filing network across 240 families
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to transparent display backplane, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Transparent Display Backplane covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filer Landscape

Who holds the claims, and where the gaps sit

The ranked table skews toward a handful of display manufacturers and a cluster of individual co-filing inventors, but recent-year momentum is flat across the board — this is a field where the incumbents have stopped filing rather than one they still actively defend.

Display Manufacturers
0 in latest year
recent-year filings, top assignees

Incumbents have gone quiet

Canon, Samsung Electronics and Samsung Display all appear high in the assignee ranking but show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, consistent with the corpus-wide decline from its 2017 peak.

Momentum basis: latest recorded filing year
Individual Co-Filers
15 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

A dense inventor pair inside a thin network

Fedorovskaya Elena A and Cok Ronald S form the strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset at 15 shared filings, with Fedorovskaya and Wang Sen and Fedorovskaya and Border John N also appearing among the top pairs — a concentrated pocket inside an otherwise sparse ten-pair network.

Co-assignee network, 10 pairs total
Recent Entrants
2026-04-02
most recent filing date in evidence

Corning's cover-filter filing stands out as recent

Against a backdrop of zero filings in the latest year across the top-ranked assignees, Corning's cover-filter filing is one of the few recent, forward-looking claims in the set, focused on optical integration rather than backplane material.

Representative record: WO2026072373A1
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches carry the lowest filing volume in the IPC breakdown and sit adjacent to denser claim clusters.
Automotive head-up transparent backplane integrationVehicle glazing display control circuitryAbsorptive cover-filter patterning alternativesTransparent OLED and optical-filter co-designAnti-reflective encapsulation for oxide TFT
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Canon Inc.0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.0
FEDOROVSKAYA ELENA A0
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.0
COK RONALD S0
Lumileds LLC0
Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.0
Corning Incorporated0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Transparent Display Backplane covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The filing data points to a field with settled backplane material claims and lighter, more recent activity in optical integration — here is how to act on that.

Check freedom-to-operate against the Corning filing

Before building any cover-filter or anti-reflective assembly for a transparent backplane, compare your layer architecture against WO2026072373A1's specific absorptive-area and filter-layer claims.

Run a freedom-to-operate search

Track the automotive display crossover

G08G's low filing volume alongside transparent-display claims signals an under-claimed vehicle head-up display application worth monitoring before it fills in.

Set up a monitoring alert

Reassess incumbents' quiet period

Canon, Samsung and other top-ranked assignees show zero recent filings; confirm whether that reflects a strategic pause or a shift to trade secret protection before assuming the space is open.

Explore assignee activity
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Transparent Display Backplane covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Transparent Display Backplane covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Transparent Display Backplane in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole transparent display backplane corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.