Transparent Display Backplane Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing peaked in 2017 at 9 records and has not recovered since, with the 2022 midpoint at zero — this is a flat-to-declining field, not a growth story.
- H01L carries 143 of 240 families, nearly six times the smallest tracked subclass, so most claim density sits on backplane transistor material rather than optical integration.
- Every top-ranked assignee, including Canon and Samsung, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, while Corning's 2026 cover-filter filing is one of the only recent, forward-looking claims in the set.
What this dataset covers
This landscape tracks 240 patent families filed against transparent display backplane technology — the oxide-semiconductor and OLED-driven transistor layers that let a display remain see-through when off. The search spans transparent TFT, oxide semiconductor backplane and transparent backplane claims layered against transparent OLED and see-through display use cases, covering filings from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off.
Filing activity in this space peaked in 2017 and has not returned to that level since, with the flat-to-declining trend running through the most recent recorded year. Claim density concentrates heavily on the backplane semiconductor material itself, with optical integration and display-control circuitry occupying a smaller, less contested share of the filing record.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 240-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which technical subclasses carry the claim volume.
Filing activity, 2017-2026
Filings peaked at 9 in 2017 and have not returned to that level since; the 2022 midpoint sits at 0 and the trend line stays flat to declining through the most recent recorded year. Publication lag means the last one to two years understate true filing activity, but even accounting for that the overall shape is stagnation rather than growth.
Technology composition by IPC subclass
H01L (semiconductor devices) accounts for 143 of 240 records, roughly six times the smallest tracked subclass, confirming that most claim activity sits on the backplane transistor material itself. G02B, H10K, H10D and G02F each carry a meaningful but much smaller share, and G08G's presence signals a vehicle-display crossover that has not yet attracted heavy filing.
Shares are the percentage of the 240 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Transparent Display Backplane with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about transparent display backplane and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative recent filing
A cover filter for a transparent display including LEDs
There is provided a cover filter for a transparent display, the transparent display comprising a transparent backplane and one or more light sources positioned on the transparent backplane. The cover filter comprises an optical filter layer positioned on or over the one or more light sources, the optical filter layer comprising one or more transparent areas and one or more absorptive areas, the one or more absorptive areas absorbing light reflected from the one or more light sources, the one or more absorptive areas configured to be positioned to cover the one or more light sources; a first transparent layer positioned on the optical filter layer; and an anti-reflection layer optionally positioned over the stack.Abstract trimmed to the operative claim language; see the full record for complete claim text.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20070054507A1 | Method of fabricating oxide semiconductor device | 4,273 |
| 2 | US7468304B2 | Method of fabricating oxide semiconductor device | 4,022 |
| 3 | JP1985198861A | Thin film transistor | 3,831 |
| 4 | US20080277656A1 | METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ZnO SEMICONDUCTOR LAYER FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND THIN FILM TRANSISTOR INCLUDING THE … | 395 |
| 5 | US20120050140A1 | Head-mounted display control | 308 |
| 6 | US8148721B2 | Bottom gate type thin film transistor, method of manufacturing the same, and display apparatus | 303 |
| 7 | WO2012058175A1 | Method of operating a head-mounted display for prevention of motion sickness | 292 |
| 8 | US20120062444A1 | Switchable head-mounted display transition | 272 |
| 9 | WO2008069056A1 | Bottom gate type thin film transistor, method of manufacturing the same, and display apparatus | 269 |
| 10 | US20080291350A1 | Electron device using oxide semiconductor and method of manufacturing the same | 268 |
Citation counts favour older records simply by being searchable longer; treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers actually indicate
Three read-throughs from the filing data that matter for deciding where to file, and where not to.
A field past its filing peak
Filings peaked at 9 in 2017 and the midpoint year of 2022 recorded zero. Recent-year momentum across every top-ranked assignee, including Canon, Samsung Electronics and Samsung Display, is also zero. Publication lag explains part of the most recent gap but not the multi-year decline before it.
Backplane material still dominates claim volume
H01L alone accounts for roughly 60% of all records, well ahead of G02B (48), H10K (42) and H10D (39). That concentration means the core transistor material space is heavily occupied, while optical integration and display-control claims (G02F, G09G) remain comparatively lighter.
A fragmented inventor base, not a locked oligopoly
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole corpus, the strongest being Fedorovskaya Elena A with Cok Ronald S at 15 shared filings. That thin collaboration network, combined with a long tail of single-filer entrants, suggests less defensive clustering than the H01L concentration alone would imply.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to transparent display backplane, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claims, and where the gaps sit
The ranked table skews toward a handful of display manufacturers and a cluster of individual co-filing inventors, but recent-year momentum is flat across the board — this is a field where the incumbents have stopped filing rather than one they still actively defend.
Incumbents have gone quiet
Canon, Samsung Electronics and Samsung Display all appear high in the assignee ranking but show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, consistent with the corpus-wide decline from its 2017 peak.
A dense inventor pair inside a thin network
Fedorovskaya Elena A and Cok Ronald S form the strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset at 15 shared filings, with Fedorovskaya and Wang Sen and Fedorovskaya and Border John N also appearing among the top pairs — a concentrated pocket inside an otherwise sparse ten-pair network.
Corning's cover-filter filing stands out as recent
Against a backdrop of zero filings in the latest year across the top-ranked assignees, Corning's cover-filter filing is one of the few recent, forward-looking claims in the set, focused on optical integration rather than backplane material.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc. | 0 | — |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| FEDOROVSKAYA ELENA A | 0 | — |
| Samsung Display Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| COK RONALD S | 0 | — |
| Lumileds LLC | 0 | — |
| Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | 0 | — |
| Corning Incorporated | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The filing data points to a field with settled backplane material claims and lighter, more recent activity in optical integration — here is how to act on that.
Check freedom-to-operate against the Corning filing
Before building any cover-filter or anti-reflective assembly for a transparent backplane, compare your layer architecture against WO2026072373A1's specific absorptive-area and filter-layer claims.
Run a freedom-to-operate searchTrack the automotive display crossover
G08G's low filing volume alongside transparent-display claims signals an under-claimed vehicle head-up display application worth monitoring before it fills in.
Set up a monitoring alertReassess incumbents' quiet period
Canon, Samsung and other top-ranked assignees show zero recent filings; confirm whether that reflects a strategic pause or a shift to trade secret protection before assuming the space is open.
Explore assignee activityFrequently asked questions
A transparent display backplane is the layer of thin-film transistors and wiring that drives individual pixels while remaining optically clear enough to see through, typically built from oxide semiconductors such as indium-gallium-zinc-oxide rather than the opaque silicon used in conventional LCD or OLED backplanes. It needs its own search because the relevant claims sit across several IPC subclasses at once, including H01L for the semiconductor structure, H10K for OLED-specific integration, and G02B or G02F for the optical layers built on top of it. Searching only one subclass misses the cover-filter and optical-control claims that increasingly sit alongside the transistor claims in this dataset.
The ranked assignee table for this 240-family dataset shows filing concentrated among a handful of display manufacturers and individual inventors, with named entities including Canon, Samsung Electronics, Samsung Display and Corning appearing alongside individual inventors such as Fedorovskaya Elena A and Cok Ronald S, who also show up as a strong co-filing pair. None of the top-ranked assignees recorded filings in the most recent tracked year, which is consistent with the corpus's overall flat-to-declining trend rather than indicating those companies have exited the field.
Oxide-TFT technology, filed mostly under H01L and H10D, is the larger cluster at 143 and 39 records respectively, while OLED-specific integration under H10K accounts for 42 records. The heaviest-cited prior art in the whole dataset also belongs to the oxide-semiconductor fabrication route, some records carrying thousands of citations, which points to oxide TFT as the more established and heavily prior-arted backplane architecture. OLED integration claims are comparatively newer and less dense, but they increasingly overlap with optical-filter claims rather than standing alone.
The smallest tracked subclasses, G08G (traffic-control systems, 18 records) and H10P (19 records), point to under-claimed territory around vehicle head-up and automotive glazing applications of transparent backplanes. The co-assignee network is thin, with only 10 recorded pairs across the entire corpus, suggesting little defensive clustering around any single application. Filing a claim that ties a transparent oxide-TFT backplane specifically to automotive display integration, rather than to general consumer display use, is one concrete way to stake out this less-contested area.
WO2026072373A1 claims a specific cover-filter stack — an optical filter layer with absorptive and transparent areas, a first transparent layer, and an anti-reflection layer, positioned over a transparent backplane's light sources. It blocks designs that reproduce that particular layer combination and function, but it does not claim the underlying oxide-semiconductor backplane transistor technology, which remains open given how old the foundational fabrication patents in this corpus are. New entrants building cover-filter or anti-reflective assemblies should check their layer architecture against this claim specifically, while backplane transistor work itself faces a much more open landscape.
Research Transparent Display Backplane in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole transparent display backplane corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.