Book a demo

Tungsten Carbide Powder Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Tungsten Carbide Powder Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/tungsten-carbide-powder-and-recycling-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling
Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling Patents
  • 37.5% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees account for 359 of 958 records in scope — a tight cluster followed by a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2017 peak. Activity peaked at 67 records in 2017; from 2021 to 2024, the last complete filing years, volume fell 30%, from 37 to 26 records.
  • Drilling applications pull hard on powder metallurgy. E21B (earth & rock drilling) touches 21.4% of records alongside C22C alloys (39.6%) and B22F powder metallurgy (34.1%), pointing to cutting-element and downhole-tool use as a major driver.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
958
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-30%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (37 records) with 2024 (26) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 958 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape maps 958 published patent records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine tungsten carbide powder production, carbide scrap recycling and related recovery chemistry with process controls such as carburization, particle size distribution, ammonium paratungstate intermediates and cobalt recovery. The scope spans both the powder-making side of the value chain — reduction, carburization, milling to target particle size — and the reclaim side, where scrap carbide is broken down to recover tungsten and cobalt units for re-use.

Because the search terms span both virgin powder synthesis and secondary recovery, the record set captures how closely upstream powder metallurgy and downstream recycling chemistry are claimed together. Readers should treat patent families, not raw document counts, as the fairer unit of comparison, since continuation practice and multi-jurisdiction filing can inflate document totals without adding new technical content.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC184
  2. 2SUMITOMO ELECTRIC HARDMETAL CORP54
  3. 3SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD46
  4. 4HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC39
  5. 5TOSHIBA MATERIALS CO LTD36
  6. 6H C STARCK GMBH36
  7. 7OERLIKON METCO (US) INC31
  8. 8NITERRA MATERIALS CO LTD30
  9. 9PROTERIAL LTD27
  10. 10OMG AMERICAS INC25
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The figures below are drawn directly from the 958 records in scope: a filing-year trend and a breakdown by IPC subclass. Because a single record can carry more than one IPC class, the class shares sum to well over 100% of the record total — that is expected and reflects how broadly these filings are classified.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a cooling

Filings peaked at 67 records in 2017. Using 2021 to 2024 as the last complete filing years — publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 are still filling in — volume dropped from 37 to 26 records, a 30% decline. That pattern points to a maturing, well-claimed core rather than an expanding frontier, though it says nothing about whether the underlying demand for tungsten carbide is shrinking.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a cooling0204060806720172018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology mix: alloys and powder metallurgy dominate

C22C (alloys) appears in 39.6% of the 958 records and B22F (powder metallurgy) in 34.1%, confirming that most activity sits squarely in carbide composition and powder processing. E21B (drilling) at 21.4% and C01B (inorganic compounds) at 19.5% show the two largest downstream and upstream pulls: cutting tools for wells, and the chemical intermediates — like ammonium paratungstate — that feed powder synthesis. Smaller classes such as C23C (coatings, 6.8%) and B23B (turning/boring, 7.0%) mark narrower, more specialised niches.

Technology mix: alloys and powder metallurgy dominateC22C · Alloys37939.6%B22F · Powder metallurgy32734.1%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)20521.4%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…18719.5%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories12613.2%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …10110.5%B23B · Turning & boring677.0%C23C · Coating & surface deposition656.8%Other62765.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 958 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about tungsten carbide powder and recycling and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US20030053947A12003-03-20

Fine tungsten carbide powder and process for producing the same (Mitsubishi Materials, 2003)

MITSUBISHI MATERIALS CORPORATION

The process dries a slurry of aqueous ammonium tungstate solution mixed with carbon powder to form a precursor, reduces and partially carburizes that precursor, then mixes the result with additional carbon powder in a proportion designed to carburize essentially the entire tungsten content into tungsten carbide (WC). The output is a fine WC powder with an average particle size of 0.8 micrometres or less, free of coarse particles.Filed by Mitsubishi Materials Corporation, published 2003-03-20 as US20030053947A1.

View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080179104A1Nano-reinforced WC-co for improved properties616
2US3617358AFlame spray powder and process297
3US6287360B1High-strength matrix body240
4US6649682B1Process for making wear-resistant coatings200
5US20100294571A1Cutting elements, methods for manufacturing such cutting elements, and tools incorporating such cutting eleme…187
6US20060191723A1Thermally stable polycrystalline diamond materials, cutting elements incorporating the same and bits incorpor…158
7US20080073127A1Atomic layer deposition nanocoatings on cutting tool powder materials144
8US6040087APowdery material, electrode member, and method for manufacturing same for a secondary cell141
9US7572315B2Process for the synthesis, separation and purification of powder materials122
10US7017677B2Coarse carbide substrate cutting elements and method of forming the same113

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older records; they are a signal of technical reach, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the assignee ranking, technology mix and filing trend are read together: a concentrated top tier, a drilling-heavy application layer, and a filing rate that has already passed its peak.

Concentration
37.5%
of 958 records held by the top 5 assignees

A tight leading cluster, then a long tail

The five leading assignees combined account for 359 of the 958 records in scope, with the leader alone at 184. The tenth-ranked assignee sits at 25, a steep drop-off that suggests most of the ranked field files occasionally rather than systematically.

Ranking covers 100 assignees, counted in records.
Application pull
21.4%
of records touch E21B drilling

Downhole tooling is a major demand driver

Earth and rock drilling classifications appear in over a fifth of records, alongside the much larger C22C and B22F shares. That combination points to cutting elements and wear-resistant components for wells as a persistent, well-claimed application rather than a niche.

Class shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Filing momentum
-30%
change from 2021 (37) to 2024 (26)

Volume has cooled from its 2017 high

After peaking at 67 records in 2017, filing activity has declined through the last fully-reported years. This is consistent with a field where core claim space around powder synthesis and recovery chemistry is already well occupied.

2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in due to publication lag.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to tungsten carbide powder and recycling, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee ranking is dominated by materials and oilfield-services companies with long histories in carbide tooling, but several sub-areas within the search scope carry comparatively few dedicated filings.

Leader
184
records

A single dominant filer

The top-ranked assignee holds 184 records, more than the next several competitors combined, reflecting a sustained, decades-long filing programme across carbide powder and hardmetal chemistry.

Out of 958 records in scope.
Mid-tier
36
records at fifth place

A defined second tier

Fifth place sits at 36 records and tenth place at 25, marking a clear mid-tier of assignees with active but smaller programmes rather than a single challenger to the leader.

Top 10 combined hold 53.0% of all records.
Co-filing
52
shared records, strongest pair

Corporate-group co-assignment is common

The strongest co-assignee pair in this dataset shares 52 records, consistent with parent-subsidiary filing structures rather than arm's-length collaboration between independent competitors.

10 co-assignee pairs identified overall.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches sit inside the search scope but carry comparatively thin dedicated coverage in the ranked assignee set.
Zinc reclaim process routesImpurity carryover control in reclaimed powderCobalt recovery from carbide scrapAmmonium paratungstate intermediate purityCoating-grade WC particle sizing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Smith International Inc.0
Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp.0-100%
Toshiba Corporation0
Toshiba Materials Co., Ltd.0
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.0
H.C. Starck GmbH0
Oerlikon Metco (US) Inc.0
Proterial, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a well-occupied core and a handful of narrower branches with thinner coverage. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or identifying a filing opening.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leading cluster

With 37.5% of records held by five assignees, a targeted claim review against that cluster is more efficient than screening the full ranked field before committing engineering resources.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Track recovery-chemistry filings specifically

Zinc reclaim and cobalt recovery processes sit inside this search scope but are thinner in the ranked assignee data than powder synthesis, making them worth a closer, separate pull.

Build a focused alert in Eureka

Watch for the next filing-year update

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures will keep rising; re-checking the trend in two quarters will give a more reliable read on whether the 2021–2024 decline continues.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Tungsten Carbide Powder and Recycling in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole tungsten carbide powder and recycling corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.