Book a demo

Turbine Blade Internal Cooling Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Turbine Blade Internal Cooling Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Turbine Blade Internal Cooling Patents: Filing Trends and Who Actually Holds the Claim Space

52.1% of the field sits with the top five assignees out of 674 records in scope — a tight core, not a fragmented one. Filings rose to a peak of 52 in 2017, then declined through the early 2020s. From 2021 to 2024 — the most recent year that can be treated as complete — filings fell 94%, from 35 to 2. The 2025-2026 figures are not yet reliable signals of a continued decline, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months; they simply have not finished arriving.

Filing trend: a sharp rise-and-fall pattern
Complete Incomplete
Filing trend: a sharp rise-and-fall pattern015304560522017522018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
674
Published Records
52%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-94%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Top filers · published records
  1. 1RTX CORP103
  2. 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO86
  3. 3UNITED TECH CORP70
  4. 4HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC50
  5. 5FLORIDA TURBINE TECHNOLOGIES INC42
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full turbine blade internal cooling analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Who holds the most turbine blade internal cooling patents?+

Ownership in this dataset is concentrated: the top five assignees among the 54 ranked companies account for 52.1% of the 674 records in scope, and the leading assignee alone holds 103 records. That said, the field is not a single-company monopoly — by tenth place, holdings drop to 20 records, showing a long tail of smaller filers below the concentrated top. Anyone doing competitive tracking should watch the leader’s continuation filings closely, since that portfolio is disproportionately large relative to the rest of the ranking.

Why have turbine blade cooling patent filings dropped so sharply since 2017?+

Filings peaked at 52 in 2017 and fell to 2 by 2024, a 94% decline over the 2021-2024 span for which the data is considered complete. This does not necessarily mean the underlying R&D has slowed to the same degree — patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in this dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as continued decline. A more likely explanation is that core geometric claims in serpentine passages and rib turbulators have already been heavily filed, pushing new work toward narrower process or manufacturing claims that may not show up as strongly in this specific search string.

What patent classes cover turbine blade internal cooling technology?+

The overwhelming majority of records, 88.1% of 674, fall under IPC class F01D covering turbines and non-positive-displacement engines. Secondary classes include F02C for gas-turbine plants at 11.7% and F23R for combustion chambers at 7.4%, reflecting how cooling claims often extend into the surrounding engine architecture. Manufacturing-related classes such as additive manufacturing (B33Y) and powder metallurgy (B22F) each appear in under 3% of records, marking them as comparatively under-claimed relative to the core turbine classification.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turbine Blade Internal Cooling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.