Turbine Blade Repair Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Turbine blade repair and welding patents: who holds the claim space
77.6% concentration. The top five assignees account for 38 of the 49 records in scope, leaving a thin tail below them. Filings show no clean multi-year climb. The peak so far is 7 records in 2022, with 2017 and the 2026 partial year both at zero; the gap between complete years is too irregular to support a stated growth rate.
- 1SIEMENS ENERGY INC10
- 2LIBURDI ENG10
- 3GKN AEROSPACE SWEDEN AB9
- 4TURBINE BLADING6
- 5STRESSWAVE3
See the full turbine blade repair and welding analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on turbine blade repair and welding patents
Who holds the most patents in turbine blade repair and welding?
Within this 49-record dataset, one assignee leads with 10 records, roughly one-fifth of all filings in scope. The top five assignees together hold 38 records, or 77.6% of the total, so the field is concentrated rather than fragmented. Anyone assessing freedom-to-operate should prioritise a detailed review of that leading group before searching the smaller, long-tail filers.
What technologies are covered by turbine blade repair patents?
The dataset centres on restoring damaged turbine blades through welding and related metalworking processes, with search terms spanning laser cladding, single crystal weldability, heat-affected zone control, dimensional restoration, repair-limit determination, and post-weld heat treatment. IPC data shows B23P (general metal working) and F01D (turbines) as the two most common classes, each appearing on roughly six in ten records, with welding-specific B23K present on 40.8%. Alloy composition claims under C22C are comparatively rare at 18.4%, suggesting most patents protect process sequence rather than metallurgical chemistry.
Is the turbine blade repair patent field growing?
The trend data does not support a stated growth figure: filing activity peaked at 7 records in 2022 but does not show a consistent multi-year climb, and fewer than four complete years remain once the roughly 18-month publication lag is accounted for. The most recent filing years, including 2026, are necessarily understated because not all filings from those years have published yet. Readers should treat any apparent recent dip as a data artefact rather than a real slowdown until later publications catch up.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turbine Blade Repair and Welding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.