Turboexpander & Cryogenic NGL Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery Patents
310 vs. 50. the leading assignee holds 310 of the ranked records, more than six times the fifth-place company's 50 — concentration sits almost entirely at the very top. Filings rose from 23 in 2017 to a peak of 35 in 2018. Using only the years complete enough to compare, filings fell from 10 in 2021 to 7 in 2024, a -30% change over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publication catches up with filing, so they should not be read as a continued decline yet.
- 1ORTLOFF ENGINEERS310
- 2S M E PROD196
- 3FLUOR TECH CORP176
- 4UOP LLC143
- 5HOWE BAKER ENGINEERS LTD50
See the full turboexpander and cryogenic ngl recovery analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions on turboexpander and cryogenic NGL recovery patents
Who holds the most patents in cryogenic NGL recovery and turboexpander technology?
Across the 76 companies in the ranked assignee list, one applicant leads with 310 records, well ahead of the fifth-ranked company at 50 and the tenth-ranked at 26. That gap suggests a single applicant family has filed continuously on this technology rather than a cluster of similarly sized competitors. The ranking covers only the entities the data endpoint returns, not every company that has ever touched the space, so smaller or newer entrants may not show up prominently yet.
What is the difference between ethane recovery and ethane rejection mode in NGL processing, from a patent standpoint?
Both modes appear in the search scope for this dataset, and they are typically claimed as switchable operating states within the same demethanizer and reflux architecture rather than as separate plants. Patents in this space tend to claim the column-overhead reflux and residue-gas compression control logic that lets an operator toggle between the two modes depending on ethane market value. Because the underlying hardware overlaps heavily, freedom-to-operate analysis usually needs to look at the control and reflux claims rather than treating recovery and rejection as distinct technology families.
Why did turboexpander and NGL recovery patent filings peak in 2018?
The dataset shows filings climbing from 23 in 2017 to a peak of 35 in 2018, the highest single year recorded in this scope. Filings compared on complete years fell from 10 in 2021 to 7 in 2024, a -30% change, though this should not be read as the technology losing relevance — dense early filing on core cryogenic separation architectures can itself reduce the number of clearly patentable follow-on filings. Readers should also note that 2025 and 2026 counts are still incomplete because publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.