Book a demo

Turboexpander & Cryogenic NGL Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Turboexpander & Cryogenic NGL Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/turboexpander-and-cryogenic-ngl-recovery-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Gas Dehydration & NGL
Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery Patents
  • 310 vs. 50. the leading assignee holds 310 of the ranked records, more than six times the fifth-place company's 50 — concentration sits almost entirely at the very top.
  • 89.6% in one class. F25J gas liquefaction and separation covers 878 of the 980 records in scope, confirming nearly the entire field is classified under a single cryogenic-separation subclass.
  • -30% on complete years. filings fell from 10 in 2021 to 7 in 2024; 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag, so this is not evidence the field is winding down.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
980
Published Records
-30%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
76
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A field anchored by one classification and one applicant

Turboexpander and cryogenic NGL recovery patenting covers the equipment and process control used to chill natural gas, separate ethane and heavier liquids, and manage the resulting demethanizer and residue-gas streams. The 980 records in this dataset run from 2015 through a partial 2026, and nearly all of them — 89.6% — carry the F25J classification for gas liquefaction and separation, confirming that cryogenic separation process claims are the centre of gravity for this field rather than a peripheral topic.

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has eased since on the years complete enough to compare, while classification data shows several adjacent branches — thermal power integration, catalytic processes, pressure-vessel design — that receive only a fraction of the attention the core separation claims do.

Filing volume and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1ORTLOFF ENGINEERS310
  2. 2S M E PROD196
  3. 3FLUOR TECH CORP176
  4. 4UOP LLC143
  5. 5HOWE BAKER ENGINEERS LTD50
  6. 6FLUOR CORP42
  7. 7PATEL ROHIT N39
  8. 8PATEL KIRTIKUMAR NATUBHAI38
  9. 9MAK JOHN27
  10. 10WILKINSON JOHN D26
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The 980 records in scope span 2015 through the partial 2026 filing year, with classification concentrated tightly around cryogenic gas separation and a long tail of secondary subclasses that touch fuels, refining and pressure-vessel engineering.

A peak in 2018, then a documented pullback

Filings rose from 23 in 2017 to a peak of 35 in 2018. Using only the years complete enough to compare, filings fell from 10 in 2021 to 7 in 2024, a -30% change over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publication catches up with filing, so they should not be read as a continued decline yet.

A peak in 2018, then a documented pullback010203040232017352018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

F25J dominates; secondary classes mark adjacent claim territory

F25J (gas liquefaction and separation) appears on 89.6% of the 980 records, confirming this is the anchor classification for the field. C10L, B01D, C10G and C07C each cover roughly a tenth of records, reflecting overlap with fuel processing, filtration, refining and hydrocarbon chemistry. F17C, B01J and F01K sit under 3% each — these are the thinnest-claimed adjacent branches in the dataset.

F25J dominates; secondary classes mark adjacent claim territoryF25J · Gas liquefaction & separation87889.6%C10L · Fuels & firelighters14514.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…11711.9%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining10410.6%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds949.6%F17C · Pressure vessels & gas storage252.6%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …151.5%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants60.6%Other181.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 980 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about turboexpander and cryogenic ngl recovery and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Most-cited records shaping this field

Representative filing
US20210156613A12021-05-27

Methods and systems for removing nitrogen from natural gas (US20210156613A1)

LINDE ENGINEERING NORTH AMERICA INC.

Describes a pressure-management sub-system connecting an NGL recovery unit's demethanizer column to a nitrogen rejection unit through a separator and pump, letting recovered pressure drive part of the nitrogen-removal process rather than relying solely on external compression.Filed 2021-05-27 by Linde Engineering North America Inc.

US20210156613A1 — patent drawing 1US20210156613A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation patents in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6182469B1Hydrocarbon gas processing352
2US4171964AHydrocarbon gas processing294
3US6712880B2Cryogenic process utilizing high pressure absorber column228
4US4185978AMethod for cryogenic separation of carbon dioxide from hydrocarbons218
5US20060283207A1Hydrocarbon gas processing214
6US7191617B2Hydrocarbon gas processing212
7US6116050APropane recovery methods205
8US20080078205A1Hydrocarbon Gas Processing184
9US20090100862A1Hydrocarbon Gas Processing160
10US6526777B1LNG production in cryogenic natural gas processing plants149

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings; they signal influence on later drafting, not present-day commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern signals

Reading citation weight, IPC spread and recent filing pace together shows a field with a settled core architecture and several under-explored edges.

Citation concentration
352 citations
top-cited record

Two records still anchor examiner reasoning

US6182469B1 (352 citations) and US4171964A (294 citations) sit well above the rest of the most-cited list, both describing core hydrocarbon gas processing architecture. New filings in cryogenic separation are likely being compared against these two regardless of filing year.

Citation counts favour older records; treat this as influence, not current relevance.
Filing pace
35 in 2018
peak filing year

Filing peaked in 2018, then eased

Volume climbed from 23 filings in 2017 to 35 in 2018 before settling lower; on complete-year data, 2021's 10 filings dropped to 7 by 2024, a -30% change.

2025-2026 counts will rise as publication catches up with filing activity.
Classification spread
89.6% F25J
share of 980 records

One subclass, several thin adjacents

F25J covers the overwhelming majority of records, while F17C, B01J and F01K each sit under 3% — these are the branches with room for a first-mover claim rather than a crowded one.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Applicant concentration
310 vs 26
leader vs tenth place

A steep drop after the top filer

The leading assignee's 310 records dwarf the tenth-ranked company's 26, out of 76 companies in the ranked list — a long tail of smaller filers sits beneath one dominant applicant.

Ranking reflects only the 76 companies the data endpoint returns.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to turboexpander and cryogenic ngl recovery, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked list covers 76 companies. One applicant's 310 records dwarf the rest, and recent-year momentum figures across the top names show filing activity has slowed broadly rather than shifting toward a new leader.

Leader
310 records
of the ranked list

One applicant dominates the ranking

The top-ranked assignee holds 310 records versus 50 at fifth place and 26 at tenth, out of 76 companies ranked. This is a concentrated field at the top with a long tail beneath it.

Counts are by patent family, the fairer unit across jurisdictions.
Momentum
0 in latest year
across leading assignees

Recent-year filing has gone quiet at the top

Every leading assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including one showing a -100% year-on-year change, recorded zero filings in the latest year captured. This is consistent with publication lag rather than a definitive stop.

Recent-year counts understate true filing activity due to the ~18-month publication delay.
Co-filing
205 shared records
strongest pair

One applicant pair co-files far more than any other

Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest shares 205 records — an order of magnitude above the next pairs at 38 and 27. This points to a long-running joint filing relationship rather than one-off collaboration.

Co-assignee pairs indicate joint ownership on the same filings.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
IPC branches with filing shares under 3% of the 980 records, alongside the dominant F25J class:
Waste-heat/steam integration with expander trainsCatalytic guard-bed process claimsCryogenic pressure-vessel geometryCO2 freezing mitigation subsystemsNitrogen-rejection pressure-management routing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Ortloff Engineers, Ltd.0
S.M.E. Products LLP0
Fluor Technologies Corporation0-100%
UOP LLC0
Howe Baker Engineers, Ltd.0
Fluor Corporation0
PATEL ROHIT N0
PATEL KIRTIKUMAR NATUBHAI0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The filing and classification data point to a field with a settled core and several specific edges worth deeper diligence before drafting or clearing a new filing.

Clear against the dense absorber-column and reflux cluster

Before drafting in the core cryogenic separation space, check new claims against the highest-cited records, which continue to anchor examiner reasoning years after filing.

Run a citation-aware search

Scope a claim in an under-claimed branch

F17C, B01J and F01K each carry a small share of the 980 records and no dominant incumbent, making them a lower-risk starting point for a first claim.

Explore white space by IPC class

Watch for renewed filing once publication lag clears

Recent-year counts near zero across leading assignees reflect the ~18-month gap between filing and publication, not necessarily reduced activity — revisit this trend once 2025-2026 data settles.

Track filing trends over time
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on turboexpander and cryogenic NGL recovery patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Turboexpander and Cryogenic NGL Recovery in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole turboexpander and cryogenic ngl recovery corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.