Book a demo

Turbofan Engine Digital Twin Patent Landscape 2026

Turbofan Engine Digital Twin Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Turbofan Engine Digital Twin Patent Landscape in 2026

The turbofan engine digital twin space is highly concentrated, with RTX Corp and a handful of incumbent propulsion OEMs controlling the dominant share of filings, anchored in turbine mechanics and control-systems IP. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with a 250% rise in recent-window filings, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent years carry additional undercount from publication lag.

41
Patent families in scope
70%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+250%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

RTX Corp leads a tightly held, OEM-dominated field

RTX Corp holds the top position with 19 patent records, followed by Honeywell International with 10 and Rolls-Royce North American Technologies with 7, establishing a clear three-tier separation from the rest of the ranking.

The top five filers account for 70% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, indicating a strongly concentrated competitive structure where a small group of established aerospace OEMs and systems integrators define the IP frontier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1RTX Corp19
2Honeywell International Inc10
3Rolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc7
4General Electric Co6
5United Technologies Corp6
6Rolls-Royce PLC4
7Meggitt SA4
8Rolls-Royce Corp2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
9Harbin Institute of Technology2
10NANJING UNIV OF AERONAUTICS & ASTRONAUTICS2
11Dassault Systemes Americas Corp2
12University of South Carolina1
13Qingdao University of Technology1
14Northwestern Polytechnical University1
15Pandit Deendayal Energy University1
16Beihang University1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

This concentration suggests that any new entrant faces a well-fortified incumbent position in core turbine monitoring and control IP; differentiation likely requires moving into adjacent technical branches rather than directly challenging the dominant classes.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data should be treated as incomplete due to patent publication lag; observed filing volumes for 20242026 will increase as pending applications publish. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2023 surge anchors multi-year growth; technology mix centers on turbine mechanics and control

Annual filing data reveals a sharp acceleration starting in 2023, while the technology composition shows the field is dominated by turbine-specific and control-systems IP, with data-processing and AI branches remaining materially smaller.

Annual filing trend

Filings were modest and relatively flat from 2017 through 2022, then surged to a peak in 2023 before easing. The 2024 and 2025 figures will grow as pending applications clear examination; 2026 data is not yet meaningful. The multi-year recent window is up 250% versus the prior window, confirming genuine expansion rather than noise.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 11 in 2023.420174201822019320201202112022112023920246202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F01D (Turbines and non-positive displacement engines) and G05B (Control and regulating systems) are the dominant branches, reflecting a field primarily concerned with real-time turbine state monitoring and closed-loop control. F02C (Gas-turbine plants) ranks third. Notably thinner branches include G06F (digital data processing), G06N (AI models), and G01N (material analysis), pointing to adjacent areas that remain comparatively sparse.

Technology compositionF01D · Turbines & non-positive engines leads with 36; G05B · Control & regulating systems 29.F01D · Turbines & non-po…36G05B · Control & regulat…29F02C · Gas-turbine plants24G01M · Testing machine &…16G06F · Electric digital …13G01N · Material analysis…6B64D · Aircraft equipment4G06N · Computing based o…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250298946A1Published 2025-09-25

Predicting Turbofan Engine Properties

Dassault Systemes Americas CORP.

Embodiments determine physical properties of turbofan engines. An embodiment, in memory, obtains: (i) a computer-aided design (CAD) model representing a turbofan engine and (ii) an indication of flow conditions. In turn, a solver input file is automatically determined based on the CAD model and the indication of flow conditions. Responsively, a simulation… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Predicting Turbofan Engine Properties — patent drawingPredicting Turbofan Engine Properties — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Methods and systems for turbine line replaceable u…22
2Engine wireless sensor system with energy harvesting15
3Wireless sensor for an aircraft propulsion system13
4飞机涡扇发动机的剩余使用寿命预测方法及系统9
5Bleed air compensated continuous power assurance a…9
6Methods and systems for turbine line replaceable u…9
7Method for health monitoring and gas turbine engine7
8Method to control electric starter generator for g…7

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D prioritization

Four structural dimensions — maturity stage, filer concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic distribution — collectively shape where investment can create differentiated IP positions.

Growth

Growth stage, past its 2023 filing peak

The field sits in a Growth lifecycle stage: recent three-year filings sit well above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year expansion. However, annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak, suggesting the initial wave of foundational IP filings may be settling while the underlying technology continues to develop. New entrants should expect established claim frameworks in core turbine health-monitoring and control classes.

Growth stage
Concentration

Top five filers hold 70% share among the top 100

The top five filers — RTX Corp, Honeywell International, Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, General Electric, and United Tech Corp — collectively account for 70% of the combined filing volume across the hundred largest filers. This tier gap is substantial and reflects the deep incumbent advantage held by established propulsion OEMs. Challengers such as Meggitt SA and Dassault Systems Americas have entered recently but at significantly smaller scales.

High concentration
Collaboration

Rolls-Royce entities are the only identified co-filers

The evidence identifies one co-filing relationship: Rolls-Royce North American Technologies and Rolls-Royce Corp, with two jointly filed records. This is an intra-corporate collaboration rather than a cross-industry partnership. No cross-company or university–industry co-filing relationships appear in the evidence, suggesting the field has not yet developed the open collaborative structures seen in earlier-stage deep-tech domains.

Limited collaboration
Geography

Europe (EPO) leads; US is a strong secondary jurisdiction

Europe via the EPO is the leading filing jurisdiction, followed by the United States, with China and WIPO (PCT) as secondary routes. Canada and Germany show smaller but notable presence. The European lead aligns with the strong filing activity of Rolls-Royce entities and Meggitt, while US dominance reflects RTX Corp and Honeywell. Chinese filings come primarily from academic institutions, pointing to an emerging research base rather than a commercial IP bloc.

EPO-led
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Rolls-Royce North American Technologies IncRolls-Royce Corp2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family may appear under multiple jurisdictions.Explore insights →
Leaders

RTX Corp dominates turbine health monitoring; Rolls-Royce North American Technologies focuses on control and gas-turbine plant IP

Two clear leaders emerge from the ranking, separated by technology emphasis and recent trajectory. RTX Corp entered as a new entrant in the recent window and now holds the largest single-filer position, while Rolls-Royce North American Technologies concentrates on control-systems and gas-turbine plant regulation.

Leader · RTX Corp

RTX Corp

RTX Corp leads with 19 patent records, concentrated in F01D turbine mechanics and structural monitoring (F01D 21, F01D 25) and G01M testing and machine structure balance. Its momentum is marked as a new entrant in the recent window, meaning its entire visible portfolio has been filed recently — a rapid consolidation of foundational turbine-state digital-twin IP that now places it ahead of all peers.

patent records: 19
Challenger · Rolls-Royce North American Technologies

Rolls-Royce North American Technologies

Rolls-Royce North American Technologies holds 7 patent records, with its strongest emphasis on G05B 23 (control and regulating systems), H05B 44 (electric heating and lighting circuits — likely related to sensor and thermal management integration), and F02C 9 (gas-turbine plant control). It collaborates intra-group with Rolls-Royce Corp, which adds 2 further records to the broader Rolls-Royce cluster.

patent records: 7
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of all filers, their technology emphasis, and momentum scores.
Honeywell International IncGeneral Electric Co+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
RTX Corp10▲ new entrant
Rolls-Royce PLC1▲ new entrant
Meggitt SA4▲ new entrant
Dassault Systemes Americas Corp1▲ new entrant
Harbin Institute of Technology1▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Rankings are by patent records among the top-100 filers; family-level counts may differ.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant cluster

Several IPC branches appear at materially lower filing counts than the dominant F01D/G05B/F02C cluster. These are observations of relative sparsity; where a branch also has plausible technical value and a realistic entry path, that context is noted.

G06N · AI and Machine-Learning Models

With only 4 patent records tagged to G06N, AI-model-driven digital twin inference — covering neural-network-based degradation prediction, physics-informed machine learning, and reinforcement-learning control policies — is comparatively sparse relative to the classical control and turbine-mechanics branches. Harbin Institute of Technology and Dassault Systems Americas are the only filers showing G06N co-assignments, suggesting academic and simulation-software entry paths are open. An R&D team with strength in physics-informed ML applied to turbomachinery could build differentiated IP here with limited direct incumbent overlap.

Search this in Eureka →

G01N · Material Analysis and Testing

G01N (material analysis and testing) carries only 6 patent records in this corpus, representing roughly 3% of the branch-level distribution. Digital twin applications that model material degradation, fatigue crack propagation, or thermal barrier coating performance at the microstructural level sit here, and no single dominant filer has staked out clear territory in this sub-space. The technical value is significant — remaining useful life prediction tied to material state is a high-value maintenance outcome — though entry requires cross-disciplinary expertise in materials characterization and real-time sensing.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse branches with claim-level gap analysis and recommended search strategies.
B64D · Aircraft equipment integrationG06F · Digital data processing frameworks+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is assessed relative to dominant-branch filing counts within this topic corpus.Explore emerging →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.