Book a demo

Turbofan Erosion & Environmental Durability Patent Landscape

Turbofan Erosion & Environmental Durability Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Turbofan Erosion & Environmental Durability Patent Landscape in 2026

This field is dominated by a small group of established aerospace OEMs — General Electric, RTX, and Rolls-Royce together account for the majority of activity — with filing volume having eased back from its 2019 peak. The competitive structure is highly concentrated, with the top five filers holding a commanding share among the largest filers, leaving limited room for new entrants without differentiated coating or materials approaches.

322
Patent families in scope
69%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-48%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

General Electric leads a tightly held, OEM-dominated field

General Electric holds the top position in the applicant ranking with 281 patent records, well ahead of RTX Corp at 169 and United Technologies Corp at 124. Rolls-Royce PLC follows with 93 patent records, forming a clear first tier of four dominant incumbents.

The top five filers account for 69% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, signaling a highly concentrated competitive structure. The gap between the first tier and the next group — Honeywell International at 41, IHI Corp at 27 — is substantial, pointing to a pronounced two-tier hierarchy.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1General Electric Company281
2RTX Corporation169
3United Technologies Corporation124
4Rolls-Royce PLC93
5Rolls-Royce Corporation45
6Honeywell International Inc.41
7IHI Corporation27
8Rolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc.21
9Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites Inc.20
10PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP20
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Chromalloy Gas Turbine LLC17
12Mitsubishi Electric Corporation12
13Cannon-Muskegon Corporation12
14GE Technology GmbH9
15Oerlikon Surface Solutions AG8
16Praxair Technology Inc.8
17Massachusetts Institute of Technology7
18Siemens AG7
19Praxair Surface Technologies Inc.7
20N.V. Interturbine6
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect decades of vertically integrated investment in turbine blade metallurgy, thermal barrier coatings, and environmental protection systems. Challenging incumbents directly in core F01D and C23C technology branches would require significant foundational IP or a differentiated materials platform.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and are likely under-reported; trend readings for 20242025 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2019 and has eased; coatings and ceramics dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals a field that built rapidly to a 2019 peak before contracting, while the technology composition chart shows that turbine component engineering and surface coating deposition together account for the overwhelming majority of IPC classifications.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings climbed from 34 in 2017 to a peak of 79 in 2019, then declined to the 25–40 range through 2022 before softening further. Figures for 2024 and 2025 reflect publication lag and should not be read as a confirmed structural decline; the overall multi-year window still reflects a meaningful body of activity relative to the pre-2019 base.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 79 in 2019.34201749201879201940202025202132202226202317202420202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F01D (Turbines & non-positive engines) dominates the IPC mix with 828 records, followed by C23C (Coating & surface deposition) at 487 and F02C (Gas-turbine plants) at 230. C04B (Ceramics, cement & refractories) at 192 and C22C (Alloys) at 85 round out the core technical cluster, confirming that durability in this field is addressed primarily through protective coating chemistry and ceramic materials science.

Technology compositionF01D · Turbines & non-positive engines leads with 828; C23C · Coating & surface deposition 487.F01D · Turbines & non-po…828C23C · Coating & surface…487F02C · Gas-turbine plants230C04B · Ceramics, cement …192C22C · Alloys85B32B · Layered products …82F23R · Combustion chambers68F04D · Non-positive-disp…45↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US11692274B2Published 2023-07-04

Environmental barrier coating with oxygen-scavengi…

Rtx Corporation

A gas turbine engine article includes a substrate and an environmental barrier coating disposed on the substrate. The environmental barrier coating includes oxygen-scavenging particles. Each oxygen-scavenging particle includes a silicon-containing core particle encased in an oxygen barrier shell. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Environmental barrier coating with oxygen-scavengi… — patent drawingEnvironmental barrier coating with oxygen-scavengi… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Method for thermally spraying crack-free mullite c…558
2Microturbomachinery326
3Thermal/environmental barrier coating for silicon-…243
4Protective coating for thermal barrier coatings an…219
5Ceramic thermal barrier coating with alumina inter…218
6Erosion resistant surface protection204
7Repair of gas turbine engine component coated with…184
8High-temperature oxidation-resistant coating alloy180

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of a maturing lifecycle, high concentration among aerospace OEMs, and active cross-entity collaboration within the Rolls-Royce group shapes where independent innovators can realistically compete or partner.

Decline

Field has moved past its peak filing year

The lifecycle stage is Decline, with annual filing volume easing back from the 2019 peak of 79 records. The field is not nascent — foundational coating and metallurgy IP is well established — meaning new entrants should expect to navigate dense prior art in core branches. Incremental improvements to existing thermal barrier or erosion-resistant coating architectures face a high freedom-to-operate burden.

Post-peak · 2019 apex
Concentration

Top five hold 69% of the largest-filer total

The top five filers among the hundred largest hold 69% of that group’s combined patent records, a level of concentration that indicates the core technological space is well staked out by incumbents. Smaller specialists such as Chromalloy Gas Turbine and Oerlikon Surface Solutions occupy narrow, differentiated niches — repair processes and PVD coatings respectively — which illustrates the viable entry model for non-OEMs.

High concentration
Collaboration

IHI and Mitsubishi Electric are the most active co-filers; Rolls-Royce co-files within its own group

The most active co-filing pair is IHI Corp and Mitsubishi Electric Corp with 23 joint records, concentrated in the C23C coating deposition space. Rolls-Royce PLC and Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites Inc account for the next most active pairing at 14 records, reflecting intra-group technology integration. These collaboration patterns suggest that materials-science partnerships — particularly in coating process development — are the primary mechanism for capability sharing outside pure OEM R&D.

Intra-group + bilateral
Geography

US and EPO filings dominate; China is a thin but present jurisdiction

The United States leads with 374 patent records and Europe (EPO) follows with 302, together accounting for the majority of jurisdictional coverage. Canada at 60 and WIPO PCT at 47 reflect the international prosecution strategies of North American OEMs. China holds only 11 records, a markedly low figure for a jurisdiction of its aerospace manufacturing scale, which may indicate either a deliberate prosecution gap by incumbents or an emerging window for domestic Chinese filers.

US/EP centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
IHI CorporationMitsubishi Electric Corporation23
Rolls-Royce PLCRolls-Royce High Temperature Composites Inc.14
Rolls-Royce CorporationRolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc.8
Rolls-Royce CorporationRolls-Royce High Temperature Composites Inc.6
Rolls-Royce PLCRolls-Royce Corporation4
Rolls-Royce PLCRolls-Royce North American Technologies Inc.3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Card data drawn from applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, jurisdiction record counts, and lifecycle stage in evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

General Electric and RTX lead on volume; their technology emphases diverge at the coating layer

Both top players concentrate heavily in F01D turbine component IP, but General Electric extends more broadly into C23C multi-layer coating deposition while RTX Corp shows relatively stronger positioning in C04B ceramic refractories, signaling different material system bets for next-generation durability.

Leader · General Electric

General Electric Co

General Electric leads the ranking with 281 patent records. Its technology focus clusters in F01D turbine components (233 records), C23C thermal spray coatings (85 records), and C23C multi-layer coating architectures (83 records), indicating a comprehensive systems approach from substrate to topcoat. Recent momentum is up 80% versus the prior period, bucking the broader field trend and suggesting continued active prosecution.

281 patent records
Challenger · RTX Corp

RTX Corp

RTX Corp holds 169 patent records and shows a trajectory down 24% in recent filings versus the prior period, consistent with the field’s broader post-peak pattern. Its technology emphasis spans F01D turbine components (50 records), F01D nozzle and guide vane structures (24 records), and C04B ceramic refractories (21 records), suggesting a differentiated bet on ceramic matrix composite durability relative to GE’s coating-heavy strategy.

169 patent records
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top filers including Rolls-Royce, Honeywell, IHI, and beyond.
Rolls-Royce PLCHoneywell International Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
General Electric Company18▲ +80%
Rolls-Royce PLC14▼ -74%
RTX Corporation22▼ -24%
Rolls-Royce Corporation5▼ -58%
Honeywell International Inc.7▲ new entrant
Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites Inc.5▼ -50%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards are based on patent record counts from the applicant ranking and technology focus data from the top IPC sub-class analysis.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant coating and turbine core

Several IPC branches appear at lower relative share alongside the dominant F01D and C23C cluster. Two of these — ceramics for refractory applications and combustion chamber engineering — carry plausible technical value in the durability context and are noted here as observations of relative sparsity.

C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories

C04B records number 192 but represent only 8% of the overall IPC distribution, making it one of the sparser branches relative to the dominant F01D and C23C clusters despite ceramics being central to environmental barrier coating (EBC) systems for silicon carbide composites. The most-cited patents in the corpus include EBC and thermal barrier ceramic references, confirming technical relevance. A focused entry path exists through novel rare-earth silicate EBC chemistries or processing routes not yet covered by incumbent filings from GE or RTX.

Search this in Eureka →

F23R · Combustion chambers

F23R (Combustion chambers) records number 68 and carry only a 3% share of the IPC distribution, yet combustion liner erosion and hot-section environmental durability are direct engineering challenges in modern turbofan development. The low count relative to the overall field size suggests that liner-specific protective coating solutions — particularly for additive-manufactured combustor walls — remain comparatively under-addressed. Entry through metal additive manufacturing combined with in-situ coating processes (B33Y has only 3 records) represents a plausible and technically grounded niche.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See relative sparsity scores and entry-path analysis for all adjacent IPC branches in this landscape.
B32B · Layered products & laminatesF04D · Non-positive-displacement pumps+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures represent each IPC class’s record count as a proportion of all IPC records assigned across patents in scope.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerF01D 5 · Turbines & non-positive enginesC23C 4 · Coating & surface depositionC23C 28 · Coating & surface depositionF02C 7 · Gas-turbine plantsF01D 25 · Turbines & non-positive engines
General Electric CompanyStrong · 233Moderate · 85Moderate · 83Moderate · 64Moderate · 64
United Technologies CorporationStrong · 160Strong · 100Moderate · 48Moderate · 61Moderate · 57
Rolls-Royce PLCStrong · 80Emerging · 7AbsentModerate · 21Emerging · 15
RTX CorporationStrong · 50Emerging · 9Emerging · 9Emerging · 8Moderate · 15
Honeywell International Inc.Strong · 36AbsentModerate · 16AbsentAbsent
Chromalloy Gas Turbine LLCStrong · 17AbsentStrong · 16Strong · 17Absent
IHI CorporationStrong · 26Moderate · 6AbsentStrong · 15Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map the erosion-durability landscape for your own technology?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.