Book a demo

Type II Superlattice Detector Patents: Who Leads 2026

Type II Superlattice Detector Patents: Who Leads 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Type II superlattice and quantum well infrared detector patents

One assignee holds 91 records while the next four ranked leaders combine for the rest of a top-five group that covers 35.4% of all 879 records in scope. Filings peaked at 47 in 2017. The tracked 2021-to-2024 window shows a 67% drop, from 21 down to 7. Treat 2025 and 2026 as undercounted rather than as evidence of further decline, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a documented decline
Complete Incomplete
Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a documented decline0132538504720172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
879
Published Records
35%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Top filers · published records
  1. 1SLT TECH91
  2. 2SEMICON DEVICES AN ELBIT SYSTEMSRAFAEL PARTNERSHIP IL75
  3. 3FUJITSU LTD60
  4. 4CALIFORNIA INST OF TECH49
  5. 5RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA36
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full type ii superlattice and quantum well detectors analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Common questions about this patent landscape

What is the difference between a type II superlattice detector and a quantum well infrared photodetector?+

A type II superlattice detector uses alternating thin layers of two different semiconductors, typically from the InAs/GaSb material system, arranged so that the conduction and valence bands overlap in a way that lets the effective bandgap be tuned by layer thickness. A quantum well infrared photodetector instead relies on intersubband transitions within a single well material, usually GaAs-based, to absorb infrared light. Both are used to reach cutoff wavelengths not easily achieved with bulk narrow-gap semiconductors like HgCdTe. In this dataset the two families are searched together because patent claims frequently address shared problems such as dark current suppression and cutoff wavelength tuning across both structures.

Why has patent filing in this field declined since 2017?+

The dataset shows filings peaking at 47 in 2017 and falling in the tracked window that follows, with the 2021-to-2024 span down 67% from 21 to 7. This does not necessarily mean the underlying research has slowed; it may reflect consolidation of filing activity into fewer, more targeted applications, or a shift toward trade secret protection for process know-how like molecular beam epitaxy recipes. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in any such dataset are structurally incomplete and should not be read as continuing evidence of decline.

Who are the leading patent holders in type II superlattice and barrier infrared detector technology?+

The ranking in this dataset covers 100 companies and research organisations, with the leading assignee holding 91 of the 879 records in scope — well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 36. The top five combined account for 35.4% of all records, and the top ten reach 48.8%, meaning close to half of the field’s activity sits outside these ranked leaders in a long tail of smaller filers. The group includes a mix of research institutions, government-linked defence entities and industrial semiconductor manufacturers, rather than being dominated by a single sector.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Type II Superlattice and Quantum Well Detectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.