Book a demo

UHPC Precast & Prefab Patent Landscape 2026

UHPC Precast & Prefab Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
UHPC Precast & Prefab Patent Landscape in 2026

UHPC precast and prefabricated construction is an expanding field on a multi-year basis, though annual filing volume has eased from its 2021 peak; China accounts for the overwhelming share of jurisdictional activity, and a Shanghai-based design firm leads a ranking dominated by Chinese universities and state-owned construction groups. The competitive structure is moderately concentrated, with the top five filers holding roughly one quarter of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, and multiple universities have entered the ranking only recently, signalling broadening academic engagement.

410
Patent families in scope
26%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+50%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

A Chinese-university-led field with a clear commercial front-runner

Shanghai Tongjee Architectural Engineering Design Co., Ltd. leads the ranking with 36 patent families — nearly twice the output of the second-ranked Hunan University (21 patent families) — making it the single dominant commercial applicant in a landscape otherwise shaped by academic institutions.

The top five filers account for roughly 26% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, reflecting moderate concentration: a clear leader exists, but the remainder of the top tier is spread across universities with broadly comparable portfolios, and no second commercial challenger approaches the leader’s scale.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Shanghai Tongjee Architectural Engineering Design Co., Ltd.36
2Hunan University21
3Tongji University19
4Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology15
5Shanghai Construction Group No. 2 Construction Co., Ltd.9
6Beijing University of Technology9
7Southeast University9
8Holcim Technology Ltd.9
9Shanghai Urban Construction Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd.8
10Huaqiao University8
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Henan University of Technology6
12Roman Cement LLC5
13UNIV OF SHANGHAI FOR SCI & TECH5
14Fuzhou University5
15Harbin Institute of Technology4
16South China University of Technology4
17Wuhan University of Technology4
18Qingdao University of Technology4
19Central South University4
20Zhejiang Communications Construction Group Co., Ltd.4
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leadership position of Shanghai Tongjee, paired with its technology focus on building structures, structural components, and specialised buildings, suggests a practitioner-oriented strategy aimed at protecting system-level UHPC prefab solutions rather than upstream material science — a posture distinct from the university applicants, who cover similar structural classes but with greater breadth.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are understated due to patent publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth anchored in structural building classes, with material science and bridge applications as secondary branches

The annual filing trend reveals rapid scale-up from 2020 onward, while the technology composition chart shows that building-structure and structural-component classes dominate, with cement-chemistry and bridge-specific classes present but comparatively sparse.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew sharply from 2019 to a peak in 2021, then settled at a sustained elevated level through 2022–2024; the apparent decline in 2025–2026 is attributable to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a real contraction. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with recent three-year activity running well above the prior three-year window.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 90 in 2021.7201712201812201930202090202162202260202376202452202592026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

E04B (building structures and elements) is the dominant branch by a wide margin, followed by E04C (structural building components) and E04G (scaffolding and formwork), confirming that protective activity centres on the assembled system rather than the material itself. C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) and B28B (shaping clay and cement products) represent meaningful but secondary coverage, and E01D (bridges) is present but sparse despite UHPC’s well-established bridge applications.

Technology compositionE04B · Building structures & elements leads with 337; E04C · Structural building components 196.E04B · Building structur…337E04C · Structural buildi…196E04G · Scaffolding & for…157E04H · Specialised build…117C04B · Ceramics, cement …84B28B · Shaping clay & ce…41E01D · Bridges26E02D · Foundations & ear…21↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
AU2025203345A1Published 2025-11-27

Prefabricated Modular Building System with Large F…

KEN,KINGSTON

Publication Abstract A modular building system incorporating large-format compound arched roof segments is disclosed. The system includes precast roof elements and cast in-situ foundation stones, structurally connected using post-tensioned cables and sealed with interlocking shiplap joints. No temporary propping is required during assembly. The invention… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1New concrete composition40
2一种抗裂免蒸养超高强高韧性混凝土及其制备方法32
3一种预制UHPC壳局部增强装配式混凝土框架结构30
4一种基于UHPC的预制混凝土框架结构体系及其施工方法27
5Lightweight aggregate ultra-high performance concr…22
6一种防爆防冲击的装配式梁柱节点设计方法21
7一种超高性能混凝土及预制PC的制备方法20
8White cementitious compositions20

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D strategy

China shapes both the risk profile and the entry opportunities for new participants.

Growth

Growth stage, eased from 2021 peak

The field is classified as Growth: recent three-year filings sit well above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year expansion. Annual volume has, however, eased from its 2021 peak, and the most recent years are further understated by publication lag. For R&D planners, this indicates a window where differentiated filings can still establish strong positions before the field matures into consolidation.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a single dominant commercial player

The top five filers hold 26% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderately concentrated field. Shanghai Tongjee’s lead of 36 patent families over Hunan University’s 21 represents the sharpest tier gap in the ranking; below that, the top universities are closely bunched. A challenger seeking to displace the leader would need to close a roughly 70% portfolio gap while competing against a practitioner with established deployment experience.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

University–industry co-filing is the dominant partnership model

The most active co-filing pair is Shanghai Tongjee with Tongji University (9 joint families), reinforcing the leader’s academic ties. Beijing University of Technology co-files with three distinct industry partners — China Construction First Building Group’s Third Construction Co., China Construction First Building (Group) Corp., and Beijing Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute — across 4 joint families each, indicating a hub-and-spoke collaboration pattern. Shanghai Construction Group’s Second Construction Co. maintains parallel co-filing relationships with Henan University of Technology and University of Shanghai for Science and Technology (4 joint families each), suggesting active technology transfer from campus to site.

University–industry links
Geography

China-dominant with thin international coverage

China accounts for the overwhelming share of jurisdictional filings, with the United States a distant second, followed by Canada, Australia, and WIPO PCT entries. European Patent Office and South Korean filings are minimal. This geographic concentration means that outside China, freedom-to-operate risk is relatively low — but it also signals that most innovation is being protected only in the home market, leaving international markets potentially open to new entrants willing to file abroad.

China-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Shanghai Tongjee Architectural Engineering Design Co., Ltd.Tongji University9
Beijing University of TechnologyChina Construction First Building Group Third Construction Co., Ltd.4
Beijing University of TechnologyChina Construction First Building (Group) Corp., Ltd.4
Shanghai Construction Group No. 2 Construction Co., Ltd.Henan University of Technology4
Shanghai Construction Group No. 2 Construction Co., Ltd.University of Shanghai for Science and Technology4
Xi’an University of Architecture and TechnologyChina Railway Construction Engineering Design Institute Co., Ltd.2
Xi’an University of Architecture and TechnologyChina Railway 20th Bureau Group Co., Ltd.2
Beijing University of TechnologyBeijing General Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd.2
Beijing University of TechnologyChina Railway First Group Second Engineering Co., Ltd.2
Hunan UniversityHunan Baoyue New Building Materials Co., Ltd.1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are drawn from lifecycle classification, applicant ranking, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution.Explore insights →
Leaders

Shanghai Tongjee leads with a structural-systems focus; universities are new entrants building breadth

The leader holds a substantial portfolio advantage grounded in building-structure applications, while the most active challenger universities have entered the ranking recently and are expanding across overlapping structural classes.

Leader · Shanghai Tongjee Architectural Engineering Design Co., Ltd.

Shanghai Tongjee Architectural Engineering Design Co., Ltd.

With 36 patent families, Shanghai Tongjee leads the ranking and concentrates its portfolio entirely in building structures and elements (E04B1), structural building components (E04C3), and specialised buildings and structures (E04H9) — each recorded at 36 entries — indicating a tightly integrated system-level protection strategy. The firm co-files actively with Tongji University (9 joint families), anchoring its R&D in leading academic expertise. No momentum data is available for the leader in the recent-period comparison, so trajectory is evidence pending.

patent families: 36
Challenger · Hunan University

Hunan University

Hunan University ranks second with 21 patent families, focusing on building structures and elements (E04B1, 20 entries), specialised buildings (E04H9, 12 entries), and scaffolding and formwork (E04G21, 7 entries). Recent-period momentum shows a trend of –79% versus the prior period, indicating that filing activity has contracted sharply in the most recent window — though publication lag may understate the most recent filings. The university co-files with Hunan Baoyue New Building Materials (1 joint family), suggesting early-stage industry linkage.

patent families: 21
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, momentum scores, and technology profiles for all top filers in the UHPC precast and prefab landscape.
Tongji UniversityXi’an University of Architecture and Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Hunan University3▼ -79%
Tongji University6▲ new entrant
Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology11▲ new entrant
Beijing University of Technology8▲ new entrant
Southeast University2▲ new entrant
Shanghai Construction Group No. 2 Construction Co., Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Huaqiao University5▲ new entrant
Shanghai Urban Construction Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd.7▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player counts are at the patent-family level; technology emphasis reflects IPC sub-class distribution per applicant.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in material science and bridge infrastructure

Relative to the dominant structural-assembly classes, several adjacent IPC branches show sparse coverage despite clear technical relevance to UHPC precast applications; these represent observations of relative sparsity rather than validated commercial gaps.

E01D · Bridges

Bridge applications represent one of UHPC’s most established performance advantages — high compressive strength, durability, and reduced cross-section — yet E01D accounts for only 26 patent-record entries against 337 in E04B. This relative sparsity may reflect the dominance of building-frame applicants in the corpus rather than a true absence of bridge innovation, but it does suggest that bridge-specific UHPC prefab systems (deck panels, girder segments, connection details) are under-protected relative to their deployment in practice. An entrant with bridge infrastructure expertise could file in this branch with limited direct competition from current top-ranked applicants.

Search this in Eureka →

C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories (material formulation)

C04B covers the cement chemistry and binder systems underpinning UHPC mix design, yet it appears in only 84 patent-record entries — roughly one quarter of the E04B count — and is concentrated in a handful of filers (notably Lafarge and Holcim Technology Ltd.). This branch sits adjacent to the dominant structural classes and is the point where novel binder systems, supplementary cementitious materials, or low-carbon UHPC formulations would be protected. The sparse academic presence in C04B relative to the structural classes indicates that upstream material innovation for precast applications is under-served by the current applicant base.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all sparse IPC branches, entry-path analysis, and overlap with competitor portfolios across the UHPC precast and prefab landscape.
E02D · Foundations & earth drillingB28B · Shaping clay & cement products+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is measured at the patent-record level relative to dominant classes; low count alone does not confirm a commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerE04B 1 · Building structures & elementsE04G 21 · Scaffolding & formworkE04C 3 · Structural building componentsE04H 9 · Specialised buildings & structuresC04B 28 · Ceramics, cement & refractories
Shanghai Tongjee Architectural Engineering Design Co., Ltd.Strong · 36Moderate · 18Strong · 36Strong · 36Absent
Tongji UniversityStrong · 17Strong · 9Strong · 10Strong · 11Absent
Hunan UniversityStrong · 20Moderate · 7Moderate · 6Strong · 12Absent
Xi’an University of Architecture and TechnologyStrong · 12Moderate · 5Moderate · 5Moderate · 6Absent
Beijing University of TechnologyStrong · 7Strong · 6Moderate · 2Moderate · 3Absent
Southeast UniversityStrong · 7Strong · 5Strong · 4AbsentAbsent
Shanghai Construction Group No. 2 Construction Co., Ltd.Strong · 9Moderate · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own UHPC precast and prefab landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.