Ultrafiltration & Diafiltration Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration Patents
A single hybrid-membrane filing dominates citation influence. WO2019236811A1's staged, differing-cutoff single-pass configuration carries the highest citation count in the 14-record set, making it the reference claim others file around. Filings rise from zero in 2017 to a peak of 8 in 2024, with 2026 still partial because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months; treat the most recent year as an undercount rather than a slowdown.
- 1健泰科生物技术公司64.3%
- 2百时美施贵宝公司14.3%
- 3再生元制药公司14.3%
- 4安进公司7.1%
See the full ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Frequently asked questions
What is single-pass tangential flow filtration and why does it matter for patents?
Single-pass tangential flow filtration (SPTFF) concentrates a macromolecule solution by passing it once through one or more membrane stages, rather than recirculating it in a batch loop. It matters for patent purposes because the most-cited filing in this dataset, WO2019236811A1 and its US counterpart, claims a specific hybrid configuration where membranes of different molecular weight cutoffs are staged in series within a single pass. That specific staging is the element competitors need to design around, not the general concept of single-pass filtration.
Who are the leading patent holders in ultrafiltration/diafiltration concentration?
This dataset’s assignee ranking covers four companies and all 14 records in scope — the leader holds 9 records, with the remaining three splitting the rest. Because the ranked list is short, describing it as a ‘top 50’ or similar would be misleading; it is the complete set the data endpoint returns for this search. Recent-year filing activity is thin across all four, with only one record attributed to any assignee in the latest year.
Where is the white space in this field?
The clearest gap is C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering), which appears in only 1 of the 14 records against 13 for C07K and 6 for B01D. That points to under-claimed territory around tying UF/DF process parameters directly to upstream cell-culture or expression-system characteristics, rather than treating concentration as a purely downstream physical step. Filing activity in India, Canada and Australia is also limited to a single record each, which is comparatively open ground relative to the WIPO/PCT and EPO filings.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.