https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ultrafiltration-and-diafiltration-concentration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Biopharma Purification
Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration Patents
  • A single hybrid-membrane filing dominates citation influence. WO2019236811A1's staged, differing-cutoff single-pass configuration carries the highest citation count in the 14-record set, making it the reference claim others file around.
  • Filing is fully concentrated among four assignees. The ranked leaders account for 100.0% of all 14 records in scope, with the top filer alone holding 9 — there is no unranked fifth player in this exact space.
  • Upstream biology integration is almost untouched. Only 7.1% of records touch C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering), against 92.9% for C07K, leaving process-to-biology integration claims largely open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
14
Published Records
WO
Leading Jurisdiction
2024
Peak Filing Year
C07K
Lead IPC Subclass

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers patent filings addressing ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration of biological macromolecules, focusing on records that discuss flux excursion, concentration polarization, buffer exchange volume, viscosity limits, protein aggregation or hold time alongside single-pass tangential flow filtration methods. The dataset spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off and totals 14 published records, all attributable to four ranked assignees.

Patent families, rather than raw document counts, are the fairer unit for reading this field because they neutralise multi-jurisdiction filing and continuation practice. With only 14 records and a single technical configuration carrying the bulk of citation weight, the picture here is one of a narrow, recently active niche rather than a broad established art.

Scope and coverage
  1. 1Genentech, Inc.9
  2. 2Bristol-Myers Squibb Company2
  3. 3Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.2
  4. 4Amgen Inc.1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The dataset spans 2015 to the 2026 data cut-off and covers 14 published records tied to ultrafiltration/diafiltration concentration methods, with filings concentrated in a small number of technical branches.

Filing activity by year

Filings rise from zero in 2017 to a peak of 8 in 2024, with 2026 still partial because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months; treat the most recent year as an undercount rather than a slowdown.

Filing activity by year024680201720182019202020212022202382024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C07K (peptides and proteins) appears in 92.9% of the 14 records in scope, B01D (separation processes) in 42.9%, and C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) in just 7.1% — since records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC07K · Peptides & proteins1392.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…642.9%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…17.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 14 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Filing

The filing that anchors this space

Representative Record
US20210253633A12021-08-19

Single pass tangential flow filtration hybrid configurations for enhancing concentration of macromolecule solutions

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

This disclosure provides a method for concentrating a solution of a macromolecule that is retained on at least two semi-permeable membranes that have different molecular weight cutoffs (MWCOs), the method comprising passing the solution through a hybrid configuration of said semi-permeable membranes staged in series in a single pass tangential flow filtration (SPTFF) apparatus. The method is applicable to the efficient concentration of biological macromolecules such as proteins, antibodies and nucleic acids.Filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, published 2021-08-19; family shares its claim shape with the most-cited record in this dataset, WO2019236811A1.

US20210253633A1 — patent drawing 1US20210253633A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2019236811A1Single pass tangential flow filtration hybrid configurations for enhancing concentration of macromolecule sol…5
2IN201617041890AProcess control systems and methods for use with filters and filtration processes2

Ranked by citation count within the 14 records returned by this search; older filings accumulate citations more readily, so treat this as an influence signal rather than a current-relevance ranking.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (2 of 2 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing pattern signals

Reading citation weight, technology composition and jurisdiction spread together points to where claim pressure is real and where it is thin.

Citation Influence
5 citations
WO2019236811A1

One filing anchors the field

WO2019236811A1 and its US counterpart US20210253633A1 describe a hybrid staged-membrane single-pass configuration and carry the highest citation count in the 14-record set. That concentration of citation weight on one claim shape means later filers are largely building on or around it rather than proposing distinct mechanisms.

Most-cited record in scope
Technology Composition
92.9%
of 14 records carry C07K

Peptide and protein claims dominate

C07K appears in 92.9% of the 14 records in scope, far ahead of B01D at 42.9% and C12N at 7.1%. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these figures do not sum to 100% — they show where claim density actually sits rather than a clean split.

IPC subclass shares, all 14 records
Filing Concentration
100.0%
of 14 records held by ranked leaders

No fragmentation among filers

The four ranked assignees account for the top 4 combined and the top 5 combined at the same figure — 100.0% of all 14 records in scope. There is no long tail of small filers in this exact search scope; activity sits entirely with the ranked companies.

Assignee ranking, 4 companies
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

Filing activity in this dataset sits entirely with four ranked assignees, with one clear leader and a set of technically specific branches that none of them have claimed deeply yet.

Filing Leader
9 records
leading assignee

One assignee holds the bulk of activity

The leading assignee accounts for 9 of the 14 records in scope, well ahead of the other three ranked companies. Recent-year momentum for this leader shows 1 filing in the latest year, while the other three show none, suggesting prosecution activity is not evenly spread even among the ranked group.

Assignee ranking, 4 companies total
Full Concentration
100.0%
of 14 records

No filers outside the ranked four

Top 4 combined and top 5 combined both land at 100.0% of all 14 records in scope, meaning this search scope returns no long tail of smaller or single-filing entrants. Anyone entering this space is filing directly into contact with one of four existing holders.

Top 4 and top 5 combined share
Momentum Signal
-100% YoY
one assignee's latest-year change

Momentum is uneven across the leaders

One ranked assignee shows a -100% year-on-year change in the latest year, while the filing leader shows continued activity with 1 record. This split suggests some of the ranked companies may be shifting focus or filing through other channels rather than exiting the space outright.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a freedom-to-operate check
These sub-areas show thin or no direct coverage in the 14-record set and are worth checking before assuming clear space.
Upstream cell-culture-linked flux controlGenetic-construct-driven diafiltration tuningMulti-pass (non-single-pass) staged membrane systemsHold-time-triggered aggregation mitigationViscosity-limit-adaptive buffer exchange
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Genentech, Inc.1—
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company0—
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0-100%
Amgen Inc.0—
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The filing pattern here raises specific questions about claim scope and open territory that are worth running down directly in the underlying records.

Trace the citation network around WO2019236811A1

Follow forward and backward citations from the most-cited record to see exactly which later filings build on the staged-membrane configuration and which propose genuinely different mechanisms.

Open citation network in Eureka

Check freedom to operate against the four ranked holders

With 100.0% of the 14 records held by four assignees, any new filing strategy should start with a claim chart against each of their granted claims rather than assuming open space.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Scope a filing in the upstream biology gap

C12N coverage sits at just 7.1% of records, suggesting a claim tying UF/DF parameters to host-cell or genetic-construct data has not been staked out yet.

Draft claim scope in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ultrafiltration and Diafiltration Concentration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.