Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape covers patent filings addressing ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration of biological macromolecules, focusing on records that discuss flux excursion, concentration polarization, buffer exchange volume, viscosity limits, protein aggregation or hold time alongside single-pass tangential flow filtration methods. The dataset spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off and totals 14 published records, all attributable to four ranked assignees.
Patent families, rather than raw document counts, are the fairer unit for reading this field because they neutralise multi-jurisdiction filing and continuation practice. With only 14 records and a single technical configuration carrying the bulk of citation weight, the picture here is one of a narrow, recently active niche rather than a broad established art.
The dataset spans 2015 to the 2026 data cut-off and covers 14 published records tied to ultrafiltration/diafiltration concentration methods, with filings concentrated in a small number of technical branches.
Filings rise from zero in 2017 to a peak of 8 in 2024, with 2026 still partial because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months; treat the most recent year as an undercount rather than a slowdown.
C07K (peptides and proteins) appears in 92.9% of the 14 records in scope, B01D (separation processes) in 42.9%, and C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) in just 7.1% — since records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 14 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThis disclosure provides a method for concentrating a solution of a macromolecule that is retained on at least two semi-permeable membranes that have different molecular weight cutoffs (MWCOs), the method comprising passing the solution through a hybrid configuration of said semi-permeable membranes staged in series in a single pass tangential flow filtration (SPTFF) apparatus. The method is applicable to the efficient concentration of biological macromolecules such as proteins, antibodies and nucleic acids.Filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, published 2021-08-19; family shares its claim shape with the most-cited record in this dataset, WO2019236811A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2019236811A1 | Single pass tangential flow filtration hybrid configurations for enhancing concentration of macromolecule sol… | 5 |
| 2 | IN201617041890A | Process control systems and methods for use with filters and filtration processes | 2 |
Ranked by citation count within the 14 records returned by this search; older filings accumulate citations more readily, so treat this as an influence signal rather than a current-relevance ranking.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (2 of 2 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Reading citation weight, technology composition and jurisdiction spread together points to where claim pressure is real and where it is thin.
WO2019236811A1 and its US counterpart US20210253633A1 describe a hybrid staged-membrane single-pass configuration and carry the highest citation count in the 14-record set. That concentration of citation weight on one claim shape means later filers are largely building on or around it rather than proposing distinct mechanisms.
C07K appears in 92.9% of the 14 records in scope, far ahead of B01D at 42.9% and C12N at 7.1%. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these figures do not sum to 100% — they show where claim density actually sits rather than a clean split.
The four ranked assignees account for the top 4 combined and the top 5 combined at the same figure — 100.0% of all 14 records in scope. There is no long tail of small filers in this exact search scope; activity sits entirely with the ranked companies.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity in this dataset sits entirely with four ranked assignees, with one clear leader and a set of technically specific branches that none of them have claimed deeply yet.
The leading assignee accounts for 9 of the 14 records in scope, well ahead of the other three ranked companies. Recent-year momentum for this leader shows 1 filing in the latest year, while the other three show none, suggesting prosecution activity is not evenly spread even among the ranked group.
Top 4 combined and top 5 combined both land at 100.0% of all 14 records in scope, meaning this search scope returns no long tail of smaller or single-filing entrants. Anyone entering this space is filing directly into contact with one of four existing holders.
One ranked assignee shows a -100% year-on-year change in the latest year, while the filing leader shows continued activity with 1 record. This split suggests some of the ranked companies may be shifting focus or filing through other channels rather than exiting the space outright.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Genentech, Inc. | 1 | — |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 0 | — |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Amgen Inc. | 0 | — |
The filing pattern here raises specific questions about claim scope and open territory that are worth running down directly in the underlying records.
Follow forward and backward citations from the most-cited record to see exactly which later filings build on the staged-membrane configuration and which propose genuinely different mechanisms.
Open citation network in EurekaWith 100.0% of the 14 records held by four assignees, any new filing strategy should start with a claim chart against each of their granted claims rather than assuming open space.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaC12N coverage sits at just 7.1% of records, suggesting a claim tying UF/DF parameters to host-cell or genetic-construct data has not been staked out yet.
Draft claim scope in EurekaSingle-pass tangential flow filtration (SPTFF) concentrates a macromolecule solution by passing it once through one or more membrane stages, rather than recirculating it in a batch loop. It matters for patent purposes because the most-cited filing in this dataset, WO2019236811A1 and its US counterpart, claims a specific hybrid configuration where membranes of different molecular weight cutoffs are staged in series within a single pass. That specific staging is the element competitors need to design around, not the general concept of single-pass filtration.
This dataset's assignee ranking covers four companies and all 14 records in scope — the leader holds 9 records, with the remaining three splitting the rest. Because the ranked list is short, describing it as a 'top 50' or similar would be misleading; it is the complete set the data endpoint returns for this search. Recent-year filing activity is thin across all four, with only one record attributed to any assignee in the latest year.
The clearest gap is C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering), which appears in only 1 of the 14 records against 13 for C07K and 6 for B01D. That points to under-claimed territory around tying UF/DF process parameters directly to upstream cell-culture or expression-system characteristics, rather than treating concentration as a purely downstream physical step. Filing activity in India, Canada and Australia is also limited to a single record each, which is comparatively open ground relative to the WIPO/PCT and EPO filings.
No — high filing density in a narrow branch, such as C07K at 92.9% of the 14 records, means that particular claim space is occupied, not that the underlying technology has stopped evolving. It signals where existing claims are dense and where a new filer faces more prior art to clear. Growth rate is not computable for this dataset because there are fewer than four complete filing years once the roughly 18-month publication lag is accounted for, so filing counts alone should not be read as a maturity signal either.
US20210253633A1, assigned to Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and published 2021-08-19, claims a method of concentrating a macromolecule solution using a hybrid configuration of at least two semi-permeable membranes with different molecular weight cutoffs staged in series in a single-pass tangential flow filtration apparatus. It blocks that specific staged, differing-cutoff, single-pass combination, applicable to proteins, antibodies and nucleic acids. It does not block conventional single-membrane UF/DF or multi-pass staged systems, since those fall outside the single-pass and differing-cutoff limitations of the claim.
Go past this page: query the whole ultrafiltration and diafiltration concentration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page