Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Ultrasonic cleaning system patents in this dataset cluster tightly around two ideas: raising cavitation intensity through transducer placement and switching, and adapting cleaning hardware to survive radiation exposure. The record set is small — 12 published records in total — which makes individual documents, rather than statistical trends, the more reliable signal.
The search scope pulls together general cleaning claims (B08B) with radiation protection and nuclear reactor classifications (G21F, G21C), pointing to a field shaped as much by decontamination and nuclear-adjacent servicing as by conventional parts washing.
Two views of the same 12-record dataset: how filing activity moved over time, and which IPC subclasses the records fall under.
Filings in scope rose to 9 in 2017, the peak year so far, and have not repeated that level since. The most recent year shows 0, but publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year counts understate real activity.
B08B (general cleaning) appears in 83.3% of the 12 records and G21F (radiation protection and shielding) in 75.0%, with G21C (nuclear reactors) and H01L (semiconductor devices) each present in 16.7%. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ultrasonic cleaning systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn improved ultrasonic cleaning system employs a plurality of electroacoustic transducers located at different positions on the wall surfaces of a tank containing a cleaning liquid, in combination with a source of electrical power and a selective switching system. The switching system applies power selectively, sequentially and intermittently to specified transducers to achieve substantially increased cavitation intensity and improve cleaning efficiency over conventional ultrasonic cleaners.Filed by MASSA, FRANK; granted 1990-03-20. With 62 citations, it is by far the most-cited record in this dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4909266A | Ultrasonic cleaning system | 62 |
| 2 | WO2017203451A2 | Radiation hardened ultrasonic cleaning system | 3 |
| 3 | US20190217345A1 | Radiation hardened ultrasonic cleaning system | 1 |
Citation counts favour older documents in any searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence rather than of current relevance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (3 of 3 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings that shape where a new application would land relative to existing claims.
US4909266A's multi-position transducer switching approach to raising cavitation intensity is the most-cited document in scope by a wide margin. Any claim built around selective, sequential transducer activation should be checked against it first.
Three-quarters of the records in scope classify under radiation protection and shielding alongside general cleaning codes, suggesting decontamination and nuclear-servicing use cases drive a substantial share of filing activity in this space.
The trend line shows a single spike at 9 filings in 2017 with no comparable year since. With fewer than four complete years once lag is accounted for, no growth rate can be stated from this evidence.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ultrasonic cleaning systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking below covers 5 companies — the whole ranking this dataset returns, not a top-50 or top-100 list. The leader holds 9 of the ranked records; fifth place holds 1.
The leading assignee in the ranking holds 9 records against a fifth-place holder of 1, a steep drop-off inside a ranking of only 5 companies. Co-assignee pairs among individual inventors suggest much of this activity traces to a small, related filing group rather than a large corporate portfolio.
Every one of the five ranked assignees shows 0 filings in the most recent year on record. Given publication lag, this does not necessarily mean the field has gone quiet, but it does mean no current leader is visibly accelerating.
Records in scope were filed across the United States, Canada, China, the EPO, WIPO/PCT and Austria, with the US, Canada, China and EPO each accounting for 2-3 records. No single office dominates the small dataset.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Control Engineering Corporation | 0 | — |
| East China University of Science and Technology | 0 | — |
| MASSA FRANK | 0 | — |
| MASSA DONALD P | 0 | — |
| KURLAT GITTA M | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a small, concentrated field with one dominant historical filing and a distinct radiation-hardened branch. These are reasonable next steps for a team deciding where to file.
Before drafting around cavitation intensity or transducer layout, trace exactly what US4909266A's switching claims cover and where they stop.
Explore claims in EurekaWith G21F present in three-quarters of records, a filing aimed at nuclear-adjacent decontamination should be searched against that branch specifically, not the general cleaning class alone.
Run a focused search in EurekaThe apparent drop to zero in the latest year is partly a publication-lag artefact; revisit the trend once another 18 months of data have cleared.
Track this space in EurekaThe assignee ranking for this dataset covers five companies, with the leading assignee holding 9 records and the fifth-ranked holder just 1. This is a small ranking, not a top-50 or top-100 list, so it should be read as the complete set the data endpoint returns rather than a sample. Several of the individual inventors named in the ranking also appear together as co-assignees on shared filings, suggesting a tightly connected filing group rather than a broad competitive field.
US4909266A, titled 'Ultrasonic cleaning system' and granted in 1990, is the most-cited document in this dataset at 62 citations — far ahead of any other record. It covers a multi-transducer tank design with a selective switching system that sequentially activates transducers to raise cavitation intensity. Anyone drafting claims around transducer placement or switching logic should review it closely, since later documents in this space cite it heavily.
In this dataset, G21F (radiation protection and shielding) appears in 75.0% of the 12 records in scope, nearly as often as the general cleaning class B08B at 83.3%. This reflects a distinct use case: ultrasonic cleaning systems adapted for decontaminating radioactive or nuclear-adjacent components, evidenced by titles like 'Radiation hardened ultrasonic cleaning system'. It is a separate technical branch from conventional parts washing, not a coincidental overlap.
The filing trend in this dataset peaked at 9 records in 2017 and has not reached that level again, falling to 0 in the most recent year. However, publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year understates real activity and should not be read as a definite slowdown. With fewer than four complete years once that lag is accounted for, no reliable growth rate can be stated from this evidence.
The IPC composition shows dense coverage in general cleaning (B08B) and radiation protection (G21F), but comparatively thin representation in areas like semiconductor-wafer fixturing (H01L) and nuclear reactor component servicing (G21C), each at 16.7% of the 12 records. Frequency-selection algorithms for cavitation tuning and bath degassing control are named in the search scope but do not dominate any single IPC class, suggesting room for more specific claims. A first filing there would need to tie a concrete mechanism, such as a closed-loop degassing sensor, to a defined cleaning outcome rather than restating the general cavitation-intensity approach already covered by earlier art.
Go past this page: query the whole ultrasonic cleaning systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page