https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ultrasonic-cleaning-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Industrial Cleaning
Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems Patents: Filing Trends and Where the White Space Sits
  • A 1990 patent still anchors the field. US4909266A, the earliest record in scope, carries 62 citations — far ahead of any other document in this set.
  • Filing peaked in 2017 and has not returned. The trend shows 9 records in 2017 against 0 in the most recent year, though publication lag means the latest year is always undercounted.
  • Radiation-hardened cleaning is a distinct, well-populated branch. G21F (radiation protection) appears in 75.0% of the 12 records in scope, alongside the general B08B cleaning class at 83.3%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
12
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
5
Active Filers Ranked
2017
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the ultrasonic cleaning system patent record shows

Ultrasonic cleaning system patents in this dataset cluster tightly around two ideas: raising cavitation intensity through transducer placement and switching, and adapting cleaning hardware to survive radiation exposure. The record set is small — 12 published records in total — which makes individual documents, rather than statistical trends, the more reliable signal.

The search scope pulls together general cleaning claims (B08B) with radiation protection and nuclear reactor classifications (G21F, G21C), pointing to a field shaped as much by decontamination and nuclear-adjacent servicing as by conventional parts washing.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1Control Engineering Corporation9
  2. 2East China University of Science and Technology2
  3. 3MASSA FRANK1
  4. 4MASSA DONALD P1
  5. 5KURLAT GITTA M1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 12-record dataset: how filing activity moved over time, and which IPC subclasses the records fall under.

Filing trend: a single peak year

Filings in scope rose to 9 in 2017, the peak year so far, and have not repeated that level since. The most recent year shows 0, but publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year counts understate real activity.

Filing trend: a single peak year035810920172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition: cleaning meets radiation protection

B08B (general cleaning) appears in 83.3% of the 12 records and G21F (radiation protection and shielding) in 75.0%, with G21C (nuclear reactors) and H01L (semiconductor devices) each present in 16.7%. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100%.

IPC composition: cleaning meets radiation protectionB08B · Cleaning (general)1083.3%G21F · Radiation protection & shieldi…975.0%G21C · Nuclear reactors216.7%H01L · Semiconductor devices216.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ultrasonic cleaning systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents shaping this field

Foundational Filing
US4909266A1990-03-20

US4909266A — Ultrasonic cleaning system

MASSA, FRANK

An improved ultrasonic cleaning system employs a plurality of electroacoustic transducers located at different positions on the wall surfaces of a tank containing a cleaning liquid, in combination with a source of electrical power and a selective switching system. The switching system applies power selectively, sequentially and intermittently to specified transducers to achieve substantially increased cavitation intensity and improve cleaning efficiency over conventional ultrasonic cleaners.Filed by MASSA, FRANK; granted 1990-03-20. With 62 citations, it is by far the most-cited record in this dataset.

US4909266A — patent drawing 1US4909266A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4909266AUltrasonic cleaning system62
2WO2017203451A2Radiation hardened ultrasonic cleaning system3
3US20190217345A1Radiation hardened ultrasonic cleaning system1

Citation counts favour older documents in any searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence rather than of current relevance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (3 of 3 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings that shape where a new application would land relative to existing claims.

Prior art density
62 citations
on US4909266A

Transducer-switching claims sit on dense prior art

US4909266A's multi-position transducer switching approach to raising cavitation intensity is the most-cited document in scope by a wide margin. Any claim built around selective, sequential transducer activation should be checked against it first.

Source: citation count, evidence summary
Sector split
75.0% of 12 records
carry G21F classification

Radiation-hardened cleaning is not a niche add-on

Three-quarters of the records in scope classify under radiation protection and shielding alongside general cleaning codes, suggesting decontamination and nuclear-servicing use cases drive a substantial share of filing activity in this space.

Source: IPC composition, evidence summary
Filing activity
9 in 2017
peak year filings

Activity peaked once and has not repeated

The trend line shows a single spike at 9 filings in 2017 with no comparable year since. With fewer than four complete years once lag is accounted for, no growth rate can be stated from this evidence.

Source: filing trend, evidence summary
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ultrasonic cleaning systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claims

The ranking below covers 5 companies — the whole ranking this dataset returns, not a top-50 or top-100 list. The leader holds 9 of the ranked records; fifth place holds 1.

Leader
9 records
ranked records

One assignee accounts for most ranked activity

The leading assignee in the ranking holds 9 records against a fifth-place holder of 1, a steep drop-off inside a ranking of only 5 companies. Co-assignee pairs among individual inventors suggest much of this activity traces to a small, related filing group rather than a large corporate portfolio.

Source: assignee ranking, evidence summary
Momentum
0 in latest year
for every ranked assignee

No ranked assignee shows recent-year filing

Every one of the five ranked assignees shows 0 filings in the most recent year on record. Given publication lag, this does not necessarily mean the field has gone quiet, but it does mean no current leader is visibly accelerating.

Source: recent-year momentum, evidence summary
Filing routes
6 receiving offices
in scope

Filing is spread across offices, not concentrated in one

Records in scope were filed across the United States, Canada, China, the EPO, WIPO/PCT and Austria, with the US, Canada, China and EPO each accounting for 2-3 records. No single office dominates the small dataset.

Source: receiving offices, evidence summary
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas that appear thinly in the current IPC composition relative to the core cleaning and radiation-protection claims.
Bath degassing control loopsSemiconductor-wafer fixturing under H01LNuclear reactor component decontamination (G21C)Frequency-selection algorithms for cavitation tuningSurface erosion monitoring sensors
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Control Engineering Corporation0—
East China University of Science and Technology0—
MASSA FRANK0—
MASSA DONALD P0—
KURLAT GITTA M0—
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a small, concentrated field with one dominant historical filing and a distinct radiation-hardened branch. These are reasonable next steps for a team deciding where to file.

Map the transducer-switching claim boundary

Before drafting around cavitation intensity or transducer layout, trace exactly what US4909266A's switching claims cover and where they stop.

Explore claims in Eureka

Check the radiation-hardened branch separately

With G21F present in three-quarters of records, a filing aimed at nuclear-adjacent decontamination should be searched against that branch specifically, not the general cleaning class alone.

Run a focused search in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing after the lag window closes

The apparent drop to zero in the latest year is partly a publication-lag artefact; revisit the trend once another 18 months of data have cleared.

Track this space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about ultrasonic cleaning system patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ultrasonic Cleaning Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ultrasonic cleaning systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.