Book a demo

Ultrasonic NDT Patents: Who Leads, Where Filing Plateaued 2026

Ultrasonic NDT Patents: Who Leads, Where Filing Plateaued 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ultrasonic-non-destructive-testing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape Brief
Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing Patents: Where Filing Has Plateaued
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 173 records and has since flattened toward decline, with several long-standing assignees showing zero filings in the latest year.
  • G01N material-testing claims dominate at 3,436 records while adjacent classes touching digital processing, structural monitoring and diagnostic use each sit near only 90 records.
  • The most-cited record, US4495587A, carries 173 citations anchoring a citation pattern where foundational inspection-architecture claims still outrank most newer filings.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
3,582
Published Records
11%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-53%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (173 records) with 2024 (81) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,582 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A mature field with a thin, still-open processing layer

Ultrasonic non-destructive testing covers transducer design, coupling media, time-of-flight measurement and phased array inspection systems used across pipe, weld, rail and structural inspection. The dataset spans 3,582 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawing primarily on G01N material-testing claims alongside G01S, G01B, G10K and B06B classes covering positioning, dimensional measurement, acoustics and vibration generation respectively.

Filing rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since flattened — a pattern more consistent with claim consolidation than active expansion. The clearest opportunity in this dataset is not in the dense transducer and coupling-hardware space but in the thinner adjacent classes covering digital signal processing, structural-health monitoring and diagnostic applications, where filing volume sits an order of magnitude below the core.

Filing volume by technology class, 2015–2026
  1. 1GE SENSING & INSPECTION TECH GMBH103
  2. 2NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION88
  3. 3GENERAL ELECTRIC CO78
  4. 4THE BOEING CO67
  5. 5BAYLOR UNIVERSITY57
  6. 6LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP52
  7. 7PERMASENSE47
  8. 8SIEMENS AG44
  9. 9COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES44
  10. 10EVIDENT CANADA INC43
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Filing activity in ultrasonic non-destructive testing peaked mid-decade and has since flattened, while the underlying technology mix shows the field is still anchored in core material-testing claims rather than adjacent digital or diagnostic applications.

A decade of flat-to-declining filing after a 2021 peak

Filings rose from 124 in 2017 to a peak of 173 in 2021, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 127 and continued declining into the most recent, still-incomplete year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years understate true activity, but the multi-year trend before that is consistent enough to call the field mature rather than expanding.

A decade of flat-to-declining filing after a 2021 peak05010015020012420172018201920201732021202220232024202592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Material analysis dominates; adjacent classes stay thin

G01N (material analysis and testing) accounts for the large majority of records, with G01S (radar, sonar and positioning), G01B (dimensional measurement) and G10K (acoustics) forming a secondary tier. Classes touching digital processing (G06F), structural monitoring (G01M) and diagnostic/surgical use (A61B) each sit near 90 records — an order of magnitude below the core, marking them as the least-claimed adjacent branches.

Material analysis dominates; adjacent classes stay thinG01N · Material analysis & testing3,43695.9%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning3249.0%G01B · Measuring length & dimensions2868.0%G10K · Acoustics & sound generation2426.8%B06B · Generating mechanical vibratio…1895.3%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery942.6%G01M · Testing machine & structure ba…942.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…872.4%Other97627.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,582 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ultrasonic non-destructive testing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records anchoring this field

Representative Filing
US11351628B22022-06-07

On-line phased array ultrasonic testing system for friction stir welding applications

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE

A wedge for on-line inspection of a weld includes a wedge body defining a coolant channel and at least one couplant channel, and a coolant input port in fluid connection with a first end of the coolant channel. The wedge body has a surface for disposing a phased array ultrasonic transducer comprising an array of ultrasonic elements. The coolant channel is formed in proximity to the surface for disposing the phased array ultrasonic transducer such that coolant flowing through the coolant channel maintains the phased array ultrasonic transducer below a predetermined temperature without obstructing the array of ultrasonic elements.US11351628B2 · Louisiana State University · published 2022-06-07

US11351628B2 — patent drawing 1US11351628B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4495587AAutomatic nondestructive roll defect inspection system173
2US20110167914A1Integrated multi-sensor non-destructive testing160
3US6789427B2Phased array ultrasonic inspection method for industrial applications135
4US5814731AUltrasonic scanning apparatus for nondestructive site characterization of structures using a planar based aco…128
5US20100307249A1Non-destructive testing, in particular for pipes during manufacture or in the finished state125
6US9121817B1Ultrasonic testing device having an adjustable water column119
7US5677490AUltrasonic testing device for weld seams in pipes, sheets and containers115
8US5203335APhased array ultrasonic beam forming using oversampled A/D converters113
9US4658649AUltrasonic method and device for detecting and measuring defects in metal media111
10US5948985AMethod and apparatus for ultrasonic testing of aluminum billet108

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older records; treat them as a signal of architectural influence rather than current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing pattern tells you

Beyond raw counts, three patterns in this dataset matter for deciding where to file and where to watch: a maturing core, a thin adjacent layer, and citation strength concentrated in older records.

Filing Trend
124 → 173 → 9
2017 → 2021 peak → latest year

A decade past its expansion phase

Filings rose steadily to a 2021 peak, held near the 2022 midpoint of 127, and have declined since — a pattern consistent with a field consolidating existing claim positions rather than opening new ones. The last one to two years are understated by publication lag, but the multi-year direction is clear.

Trend, 2017–2026
Technology Mix
3,436 vs 87–94
G01N core vs G06F/G01M/A61B adjacents

Core hardware claims are dense; the processing layer is not

Material-analysis and testing claims (G01N) outnumber the thinnest adjacent classes — digital processing, structural monitoring and diagnostic use — by roughly a factor of 35 to 1. That gap is the clearest available marker of where claim space is still open.

IPC composition
Citation Strength
173 citations
Top-cited record, US4495587A

Foundational architecture claims still lead

The most-cited records date from earlier in the corpus and describe integrated or automatic inspection systems rather than single-component designs, meaning later filings tend to build on, rather than avoid, this architecture.

Citation ranking
Assignee Activity
0 in latest year
Multiple major assignees

Historic leaders have gone quiet

Several assignees with strong filing histories, including large industrial and aerospace names, show no filings in the most recent year and negative year-on-year momentum, suggesting the incumbents' claim positions were set earlier rather than being actively extended now.

Momentum, latest year
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ultrasonic non-destructive testing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignees

Who is filing, and who has stopped

Filing in ultrasonic NDT is led by large industrial, energy, aerospace and specialist inspection-equipment groups, with universities and research institutes filing selectively through co-assignment. Several of the longest-standing filers show no activity in the latest year, which changes how a freedom-to-operate check should be weighted.

Concentration
10 co-assignee pairs
Across the dataset

Collaboration is narrow and specific

Co-filing is limited to a small number of pairings, the strongest linking a steel producer with an oil-and-gas tubular specialist — a pattern consistent with joint development tied to a specific inspection application (pipe and tubular manufacturing) rather than broad research partnership.

Co-assignee pairs, full corpus
Momentum
0 in latest year
Multiple major assignees

Historic leaders are not filing currently

Large industrial and aerospace assignees with strong historical filing records — including names associated with sensing and inspection technology, aircraft manufacturing and defense — show zero filings in the most recent year, several with negative year-on-year momentum.

Recent-year filing activity
Institutional filers
5 citations
Boeing + University of Sheffield pairing

Aerospace-academic pairing among the collaborative filings

Beyond the strongest industrial pairing, aerospace and public-research collaborations appear at similar scale, suggesting inspection method development for aerospace structures continues via academic partnership even as standalone aerospace filing has slowed.

Co-assignee activity
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense core and show materially thinner coverage in this dataset.
defect-classification signal processingstructural-health monitoring integrationdiagnostic/surgical ultrasonic adaptationon-line high-temperature couplingmulti-sensor data fusion for inspection
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies0
General Electric Company0
The Boeing Company0-100%
Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd.0
Verifi Technologies, LLC0
Lockheed Martin Corporation0
Siemens AG0
Mannesmann AG0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The filing and citation patterns above point to specific follow-up work depending on whether you are clearing a new filing or watching incumbents.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the most-cited records

The highest-cited patents in this corpus describe foundational inspection architectures that later filings consistently build on. Before filing in phased array or integrated multi-sensor inspection, check claim scope against these specifically rather than against recent filings alone.

Start a claim check in Eureka

Track the assignees that have gone quiet

Several historically dominant filers show zero activity in the latest year. That can mean a claim position is settled and stable, or that a portfolio is being wound down or sold — worth monitoring before assuming continued enforcement.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Scope a filing in the under-claimed processing layer

Digital signal processing and structural-health monitoring classes remain thin relative to the sensing hardware they support. A claim combining an established sensing configuration with a specific classification or monitoring method has more open space than a hardware-only claim.

Draft a claim scope in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about ultrasonic NDT patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ultrasonic non-destructive testing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.