Ultrasonic NDT Patents: Who Leads, Where Filing Plateaued 2026
- Filing peaked in 2021 at 173 records and has since flattened toward decline, with several long-standing assignees showing zero filings in the latest year.
- G01N material-testing claims dominate at 3,436 records while adjacent classes touching digital processing, structural monitoring and diagnostic use each sit near only 90 records.
- The most-cited record, US4495587A, carries 173 citations anchoring a citation pattern where foundational inspection-architecture claims still outrank most newer filings.
Filing growth compares 2021 (173 records) with 2024 (81) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,582 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
A mature field with a thin, still-open processing layer
Ultrasonic non-destructive testing covers transducer design, coupling media, time-of-flight measurement and phased array inspection systems used across pipe, weld, rail and structural inspection. The dataset spans 3,582 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawing primarily on G01N material-testing claims alongside G01S, G01B, G10K and B06B classes covering positioning, dimensional measurement, acoustics and vibration generation respectively.
Filing rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since flattened — a pattern more consistent with claim consolidation than active expansion. The clearest opportunity in this dataset is not in the dense transducer and coupling-hardware space but in the thinner adjacent classes covering digital signal processing, structural-health monitoring and diagnostic applications, where filing volume sits an order of magnitude below the core.
Filing trends and technology composition
Filing activity in ultrasonic non-destructive testing peaked mid-decade and has since flattened, while the underlying technology mix shows the field is still anchored in core material-testing claims rather than adjacent digital or diagnostic applications.
A decade of flat-to-declining filing after a 2021 peak
Filings rose from 124 in 2017 to a peak of 173 in 2021, then eased back toward the 2022 midpoint of 127 and continued declining into the most recent, still-incomplete year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years understate true activity, but the multi-year trend before that is consistent enough to call the field mature rather than expanding.
Material analysis dominates; adjacent classes stay thin
G01N (material analysis and testing) accounts for the large majority of records, with G01S (radar, sonar and positioning), G01B (dimensional measurement) and G10K (acoustics) forming a secondary tier. Classes touching digital processing (G06F), structural monitoring (G01M) and diagnostic/surgical use (A61B) each sit near 90 records — an order of magnitude below the core, marking them as the least-claimed adjacent branches.
Shares are the percentage of the 3,582 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ultrasonic non-destructive testing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records anchoring this field
On-line phased array ultrasonic testing system for friction stir welding applications
A wedge for on-line inspection of a weld includes a wedge body defining a coolant channel and at least one couplant channel, and a coolant input port in fluid connection with a first end of the coolant channel. The wedge body has a surface for disposing a phased array ultrasonic transducer comprising an array of ultrasonic elements. The coolant channel is formed in proximity to the surface for disposing the phased array ultrasonic transducer such that coolant flowing through the coolant channel maintains the phased array ultrasonic transducer below a predetermined temperature without obstructing the array of ultrasonic elements.US11351628B2 · Louisiana State University · published 2022-06-07


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4495587A | Automatic nondestructive roll defect inspection system | 173 |
| 2 | US20110167914A1 | Integrated multi-sensor non-destructive testing | 160 |
| 3 | US6789427B2 | Phased array ultrasonic inspection method for industrial applications | 135 |
| 4 | US5814731A | Ultrasonic scanning apparatus for nondestructive site characterization of structures using a planar based aco… | 128 |
| 5 | US20100307249A1 | Non-destructive testing, in particular for pipes during manufacture or in the finished state | 125 |
| 6 | US9121817B1 | Ultrasonic testing device having an adjustable water column | 119 |
| 7 | US5677490A | Ultrasonic testing device for weld seams in pipes, sheets and containers | 115 |
| 8 | US5203335A | Phased array ultrasonic beam forming using oversampled A/D converters | 113 |
| 9 | US4658649A | Ultrasonic method and device for detecting and measuring defects in metal media | 111 |
| 10 | US5948985A | Method and apparatus for ultrasonic testing of aluminum billet | 108 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older records; treat them as a signal of architectural influence rather than current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern tells you
Beyond raw counts, three patterns in this dataset matter for deciding where to file and where to watch: a maturing core, a thin adjacent layer, and citation strength concentrated in older records.
A decade past its expansion phase
Filings rose steadily to a 2021 peak, held near the 2022 midpoint of 127, and have declined since — a pattern consistent with a field consolidating existing claim positions rather than opening new ones. The last one to two years are understated by publication lag, but the multi-year direction is clear.
Core hardware claims are dense; the processing layer is not
Material-analysis and testing claims (G01N) outnumber the thinnest adjacent classes — digital processing, structural monitoring and diagnostic use — by roughly a factor of 35 to 1. That gap is the clearest available marker of where claim space is still open.
Foundational architecture claims still lead
The most-cited records date from earlier in the corpus and describe integrated or automatic inspection systems rather than single-component designs, meaning later filings tend to build on, rather than avoid, this architecture.
Historic leaders have gone quiet
Several assignees with strong filing histories, including large industrial and aerospace names, show no filings in the most recent year and negative year-on-year momentum, suggesting the incumbents' claim positions were set earlier rather than being actively extended now.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ultrasonic non-destructive testing, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and who has stopped
Filing in ultrasonic NDT is led by large industrial, energy, aerospace and specialist inspection-equipment groups, with universities and research institutes filing selectively through co-assignment. Several of the longest-standing filers show no activity in the latest year, which changes how a freedom-to-operate check should be weighted.
Collaboration is narrow and specific
Co-filing is limited to a small number of pairings, the strongest linking a steel producer with an oil-and-gas tubular specialist — a pattern consistent with joint development tied to a specific inspection application (pipe and tubular manufacturing) rather than broad research partnership.
Historic leaders are not filing currently
Large industrial and aerospace assignees with strong historical filing records — including names associated with sensing and inspection technology, aircraft manufacturing and defense — show zero filings in the most recent year, several with negative year-on-year momentum.
Aerospace-academic pairing among the collaborative filings
Beyond the strongest industrial pairing, aerospace and public-research collaborations appear at similar scale, suggesting inspection method development for aerospace structures continues via academic partnership even as standalone aerospace filing has slowed.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| The Boeing Company | 0 | -100% |
| Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Verifi Technologies, LLC | 0 | — |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation | 0 | — |
| Siemens AG | 0 | — |
| Mannesmann AG | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis next
The filing and citation patterns above point to specific follow-up work depending on whether you are clearing a new filing or watching incumbents.
Run a freedom-to-operate check against the most-cited records
The highest-cited patents in this corpus describe foundational inspection architectures that later filings consistently build on. Before filing in phased array or integrated multi-sensor inspection, check claim scope against these specifically rather than against recent filings alone.
Start a claim check in EurekaTrack the assignees that have gone quiet
Several historically dominant filers show zero activity in the latest year. That can mean a claim position is settled and stable, or that a portfolio is being wound down or sold — worth monitoring before assuming continued enforcement.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaScope a filing in the under-claimed processing layer
Digital signal processing and structural-health monitoring classes remain thin relative to the sensing hardware they support. A claim combining an established sensing configuration with a specific classification or monitoring method has more open space than a hardware-only claim.
Draft a claim scope in EurekaCommon questions about ultrasonic NDT patents
Filing in this field is concentrated among a handful of large industrial, energy and aerospace groups alongside specialist inspection-equipment makers, with a long tail of universities and single-filing entrants behind them. Several of the historically dominant assignees show no filings in the most recent year, which points to consolidation of claim scope earlier in the decade rather than active expansion now. Checking assignee-level filing history alongside citation counts gives a clearer picture than raw patent totals alone, since older holders' patents are often the most-cited even without recent activity.
Conventional ultrasonic testing patents typically claim a single transducer element and its coupling or scanning mechanism, while phased array patents claim an array of elements with electronically controlled timing to steer and focus the beam. In this dataset phased array approaches appear consistently among the most-cited records and span multiple IPC classes at once (material testing, positioning and vibration generation), reflecting that they are claimed as integrated systems rather than single components. That system-level claiming is also why phased array freedom-to-operate work needs to check several IPC classes together, not just G01N alone.
The thinnest coverage relative to the core sits where ultrasonic sensing overlaps digital signal processing, structural-health monitoring and diagnostic or surgical use — IPC classes G06F, G01M and A61B each carry roughly a tenth of the record count seen in the core material-testing class. This suggests the transducer and coupling hardware claim space is largely occupied, but the processing and classification layer built on top of that hardware is comparatively open. A new filing combining an established sensing configuration with a specific defect-classification or monitoring method is more likely to find clear space than one claiming sensing hardware alone.
Filings rose from 124 in 2017 to a peak of 173 in 2021 before easing back and continuing to decline through the most recent years in the dataset. Some of that apparent decline is a data artefact: publication normally lags filing by around 18 months, so the last one to two years are always undercounted at the point of measurement. Even accounting for that lag, the plateau around the 2022 midpoint of 127 suggests the field had already moved from an expansion phase into incremental refinement of existing claim positions.
US11351628B2, assigned to Louisiana State University and published in 2022, claims a wedge body for a phased array ultrasonic transducer with a built-in coolant channel and separate couplant channel, designed to keep the array below a set temperature during friction stir welding inspection. Anyone building an on-line, high-temperature inspection fixture that cools a mounted transducer array through a channel inside the wedge body needs to check this claim specifically. It does not block phased array inspection or coupling-medium delivery generally — those elements are claimed independently elsewhere in the corpus — so the exposure is narrow but directly relevant to hot-process weld inspection tooling.
Research Ultrasonic Non-Destructive Testing in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole ultrasonic non-destructive testing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.