Book a demo

Uncooled Microbolometer Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Uncooled Microbolometer Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/uncooled-microbolometer-detectors-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Sensors & Actuators
Uncooled Microbolometer Detector Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Open
  • One leader, then a steep drop. the top-ranked assignee holds 18 records against a fifth-place count of just 2, and a tenth-place count of 1 — a long tail of single- or low-filing entrants follows.
  • Filing peaked in 2018 at 7 records and has not returned to that level since, though the two most recent years are understated by publication lag.
  • Claim activity is concentrated in radiation measurement and imaging, with G01J present in 93.5% of the 46 records and H04N in 37.0% — MEMS-specific B81B claims appear in only 8.7%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
46
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
11
Active Filers Ranked
2018
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the uncooled microbolometer patent record shows

Uncooled microbolometer detectors convert incident infrared radiation into a measurable resistance change in a thermally isolated pixel, avoiding the cost and bulk of cryogenic cooling used in older infrared sensor designs. The patent record in scope here — 46 published records spanning 2015 through mid-2026 — sits almost entirely inside radiation measurement claims, with a substantial overlap into video/imaging pictorial communication and semiconductor device structure. That overlap reflects how the field is actually engineered: a microbolometer patent rarely stands alone on the sensing element, it usually also claims the readout, the packaging vacuum level, or the imaging pipeline built on top of the pixel array.

The assignee ranking is short — 11 companies — and dominated early by defense-oriented and national-lab filers, with individual inventor names appearing as co-assignees rather than corporate entities. That pattern, along with a filing peak in 2018 that has not been repeated, suggests a technology where the foundational claim space was staked out early and later activity has been narrower, more incremental filing rather than a second wave of broad platform claims.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026 (2026 partial)
  1. 1OPGAL18
  2. 2BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION ANDELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC10
  3. 3RAYTHEON CO8
  4. 4INSTITUT NATIONAL D'OPTIQUE7
  5. 5BLACKWELL RICHARD2
  6. 6GENECZKO JEANNIE2
  7. 7GRIMBERG ERNEST2
  8. 8KOHIN MARGARET2
  9. 9UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE AS REPRESENTED BY THE SEC OF THE ARMY1
  10. 10NAT CHIAO TUNG UNIV1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 46-record dataset: the year-by-year filing count, and the IPC subclasses those records claim into. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, the composition shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose to a peak of 7 records in 2018, then declined; the most recent two years should be read as undercounts because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017–2026024683201772018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition (share of 46 records)

G01J (radiation and light measurement) appears in 93.5% of records, confirming this dataset is centred on the sensing measurement itself; H04N (37.0%) and H01L (28.3%) show how much of the claim activity extends into imaging systems and semiconductor device structure around that sensing core.

IPC subclass composition (share of 46 records)G01J · Radiation & light measurement4393.5%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…1737.0%H01L · Semiconductor devices1328.3%H10N · Other electric solid-state dev…817.4%B81B · Microstructural devices (MEMS)48.7%C23C · Coating & surface deposition12.2%G01N · Material analysis & testing12.2%G01Q · Scanning-probe & nanometric me…12.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 46 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about uncooled microbolometer detectors and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this dataset

Representative Filing
US10184839B12019-01-22

Nanostructured vanadium oxide uncooled bolometers and method of fabrication (US10184839B1)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR OF NASA

The present invention relates to uncooled microbolometers which can be integrated in future thermal instruments engaged in land imaging on future observatories. The present invention includes: (1) developing and characterizing a microstructured VOx thin film, and, (2) fabricating an uncooled microbolometer array over the 8-14 micron spectral band.Filed by the United States as represented by the Administrator of NASA, granted 2019-01-22.

US10184839B1 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Highest-citation records, uncooled microbolometer detectors
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2005015143A2Radiometry using an uncooled microbolometer detector92
2US20080210872A1Radiometry Using an Uncooled Microbolometer Detector88
3US20070176104A1Multi-spectral uncooled microbolometer detectors37
4US20160178444A1Uncooled microbolometer pixel and array for configurable broadband and multi-frequency terahertz detection27
5US20140166882A1Uncooled microbolometer detector and array for terahertz detection20
6US8274050B2Radiometry using an uncooled microbolometer detector18
7US7491938B2Multi-spectral uncooled microbolometer detectors13
8US20200068145A1Multi-resolution uncooled microbolometer focal plane array8
9WO2005094460A2Multi-spectral uncooled microbolometer detectors8
10WO2018190933A1Thermal protection mechanisms for uncooled microbolometers7

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the assignee ranking, filing trend and IPC composition are read together.

Concentration
18 vs 2
leader vs fifth place, in records

One filer set the pace, then the field thinned fast

The gap between the top-ranked assignee's 18 records and the fifth-placed assignee's 2 is steep. That is typical of a field where early, broad claims were staked by one or two well-resourced filers — often defense or national-lab programs — while later entrants file narrowly around specific fabrication or readout details rather than contesting the core sensing claims.

Assignee ranking, 11 companies
Timing
2018 peak, 7 records
highest single year in the trend

Filing has not returned to its 2018 peak

Activity crested in 2018 and has since run below that level. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last two years in the trend understate true filing activity, but the multi-year plateau before that lag window still points to a maturing rather than accelerating claim environment.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Claim geography
8.7% B81B
share of 46 records claiming MEMS structure directly

Imaging-side claims outnumber MEMS-structure claims

H04N pictorial-communication claims appear in 37.0% of records versus 8.7% for B81B microstructural device claims. Most filers are protecting how the bolometer output feeds an imaging system rather than the physical microelectromechanical thermal-isolation structure itself, which is where a differentiated fabrication approach may face less prior art.

IPC composition, 46 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to uncooled microbolometer detectors, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the map still has room

The ranked leaders are a mix of defense-systems integrators, a national optics institute, individual named inventors acting as co-assignees, and a university. Recent-year momentum across the visible leaders is flat.

Leader
18 records
top-ranked assignee

Broadest filer in the ranking

The top-ranked assignee's record count is more than triple the next tier, consistent with an early, systems-integrator style of filing that covers sensing, packaging and readout together rather than a single narrow improvement.

Assignee ranking
Mid tier
2 records
fifth-place assignee

A thin middle tier

Fifth place in the ranking holds only 2 records, and the pattern continues down to single-record filers at tenth place. This is a field with one clear leader and a long tail rather than several competing platform holders.

Assignee ranking
Momentum
0 in latest year
across the visible leading assignees

No leader shows recent-year filing activity

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest year of the window. Given the publication lag on recent applications, this likely understates real activity, but it also means no single filer currently shows visible acceleration.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth scanning before filing
Branches of the IPC composition with low record counts relative to the field's core — these carry lighter prior art density, not lower technical relevance.
MEMS thermal-isolation leg geometry (B81B)surface-coating deposition for absorber layers (C23C)scanning-probe calibration methods (G01Q)material-analysis test protocols for VOx films (G01N)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
OPGAL0
BAE Systems Information and Electronic Systems Integration Inc.0
Raytheon Company0
Institut National d'Optique0
KOHIN MARGARET0
GRIMBERG ERNEST0
GENECZKO JEANNIE0
BLACKWELL RICHARD0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next questions rather than a single conclusion — each depends on what decision is being made.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's claim set

With one assignee holding 18 of the 46 records, any new filing on core sensing structure should be checked against that portfolio specifically before broader prior-art work begins.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Scope a filing into the under-claimed branches

B81B, C23C and G01Q each carry single-digit record shares against a 46-record base — worth a targeted prior-art pull before assuming the space is open.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the next 18 months of publications

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 filing count shown here will rise as pending applications publish; re-check the trend before concluding activity has slowed.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on uncooled microbolometer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Uncooled Microbolometer Detectors in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole uncooled microbolometer detectors corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.