Book a demo

Under-Display Camera Patent Landscape 2026

Under-Display Camera Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Under-Display Camera Patent Landscape in 2026

The under-display camera field is expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak; Samsung Electronics holds a commanding lead with 1,815 patent families, dwarfing all other filers. Concentration is extreme, with the top five filers capturing 95% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, leaving very little room for challengers in core device-integration routes.

1,977
Patent families in scope
95%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+319%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung holds an overwhelming lead in a highly concentrated field

Samsung Electronics sits at the apex of the under-display camera landscape with 1,815 patent families, a figure that exceeds the rest of the ranked applicants combined by an enormous margin. Huawei Technologies ranks second at 23 patent families, followed closely by vivo Mobile Communication at 18, Qualcomm at 17, and Apple at 15.

The top five filers account for 95% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling one of the most concentrated competitive structures in consumer electronics. The tier gap between Samsung and the second-ranked player is so wide that no single challenger can credibly match Samsung’s portfolio breadth in the near term.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1,815
2Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.23
3vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.18
4Qualcomm Incorporated17
5Apple Inc.15
6ZTE Corporation13
7Ningbo Sunny Opotech Co., Ltd.12
8Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation9
9LG Display Co., Ltd.8
10Google LLC7
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.6
12POCONS Co., Ltd.5
13WaveTouch Denmark A/S4
14WaveTouch Ltd.4
15Molex LLC4
16Infineon Technologies AG4
17Adeia Imaging LLC3
18Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd.2
19Motorola Mobility LLC2
20Sony DepthSensing Solutions SA/NV2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Samsung’s position implies that any entrant or challenger faces a thicket of foundational patents spanning device integration, telephony, and antenna design. Selective specialisation in adjacent or sub-dominant technology branches is likely the more viable path for smaller players.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and therefore understate true recent activity; trend readings for 20242026 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Rapid growth from 2019, a 2023 peak, and a broad multi-technology footprint

Filings in this field were negligible before 2019 and then scaled sharply through a 2023 peak, reflecting the commercial race to embed cameras beneath full-screen displays. The technology mix spans device integration, telephony, and structural hardware, indicating that under-display camera development is a system-level engineering challenge rather than a single-component problem.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings rose from near zero in 2019 to a peak of 599 patent families in 2023, then fell to 349 in 2024 and 168 in 2025; 2026 shows only 29, but all figures from 2024 onward are heavily understated by publication lag and should not be read as a real decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 599 in 2023.02017020188201961202027420214892022599202334920241682025292026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Electric digital data processing (G06F) and telephonic communication (H04M) dominate the composition, consistent with smartphone-centric development; printed circuits (H05K) and antennas (H01Q) rank third and fourth, reflecting the structural integration challenges of embedding a camera beneath a display panel.

Technology compositionG06F · Electric digital data processing leads with 1,270; H04M · Telephonic communication 1,248.G06F · Electric digital …1,270H04M · Telephonic commun…1,248H05K · Printed circuits …460H01Q · Antennas323G09F · Displaying, adver…285H04N · Pictorial communi…187H04R · Loudspeakers & au…135G09G · Display control c…85↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2024053873A1Published 2024-03-14

A method and system for enhanced under-display cam…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD.

The present disclosure relates to a method and system for under-display camera imaging method for an electronic device. In particular, the present invention enables simultaneous use of a camera and display, such that user can capture images while the camera remains hidden, without compromising on quality of image. The present disclosure enables an enhanced… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

A method and system for enhanced under-display cam… — patent drawingA method and system for enhanced under-display cam… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Electronic device including antenna arrangement42
2Electronic device including flexible display31
3Electronic device including electronic component a…31
4Audio processing method and electronic device30
5Cover for foldable electronic device22
6Electronic device comprising image sensor16
7Electronic device including waterproof structure15
8Electronic device including friction reducing stru…14

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the landscape structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of extreme concentration, rapid multi-year growth, and a broad multi-branch technology footprint creates a distinctive risk-reward profile. Engineers and strategists need to navigate Samsung’s dominant position while identifying the sub-domains where portfolio gaps still exist.

Growth

Growth stage with annual volume easing from 2023 peak

The field is classified as Growth: the recent three-year filing window sits well above the prior three-year window, representing 319% growth on that basis. However, annual volume peaked in 2023 at 599 patent families and has eased since, suggesting the most explosive expansion phase has passed. Teams entering now must build differentiated positions rather than riding a broad rising tide.

Growth stage
Concentration

One dominant player; second tier is thin and fragmented

Samsung’s 1,815 patent families versus Huawei’s 23 at second place represents an unusually steep tier gap. The top five filers hold 95% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, leaving challengers with limited room to contest foundational patents. Defensive freedom-to-operate analysis against Samsung’s portfolio is a prerequisite for any new entrant targeting core device-integration claims.

Extreme concentration
Collaboration

Samsung co-files with Molex, POCONS, and Carnegie Mellon University

The most active co-filing pairs are Samsung Electronics with Molex (4 joint families), Samsung Electronics with POCONS (2 joint families), and Sony Semiconductor Solutions with Sony DepthSensing Solutions (2 joint families). Samsung also holds one joint family with Carnegie Mellon University, indicating selective academic engagement. Outside the Samsung ecosystem, co-filing activity is sparse, suggesting the broader field has not yet developed a rich collaborative network.

Limited ecosystem
Geography

Europe (EPO) leads filings; US and India are secondary markets

Europe via the EPO records the highest patent-record count at 1,016, followed by the United States at 528 and India at 134. Germany, China, and WIPO PCT filings also feature. The EPO lead is notable for a technology category dominated by Korean and Chinese device makers, and likely reflects Samsung’s deliberate European market-protection strategy. Teams targeting licensing or enforcement should map their coverage against these jurisdiction priorities.

EPO-led geography
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Molex LLC4
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.POCONS Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd.2
Sony Semiconductor Solutions CorporationSony DepthSensing Solutions SA/NV2
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Carnegie Mellon University1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration data reflects co-applicant pairs identified in the patent corpus; jurisdiction data is at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung dominates across system integration; challengers specialise narrowly

The applicant field is effectively a one-tier market at the portfolio level, with Samsung Engineering far ahead and a second tier of single-digit-to-low-double-digit family counts. Momentum signals show Samsung accelerating while some early movers have pulled back.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics holds 1,815 patent families and is filing at 5.5× the rate of its prior three-year window, indicating that its dominance is intensifying rather than plateauing. Its technology focus is concentrated on telephonic communication (H04M), electric digital data processing (G06F), and antennas (H01Q), covering the full system stack from device integration to RF performance.

patent families: 1,815
Challenger · Qualcomm

Qualcomm

Qualcomm holds 17 patent families and shows a declining trend at –58% versus its prior three-year window, suggesting a strategic pullback or portfolio consolidation. Its technology focus is anchored in telephonic communication (H04M) and pictorial communication (H04N), reflecting a chipset- and camera-processing angle rather than a full device-integration play.

patent families: 17
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of all applicants, including emerging entrants and regional players, with filing momentum and technology emphasis.
vivo Mobile CommunicationApple Inc.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1,376▲ 5.5× vs prior 3-yr
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.3▼ -85%
vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.15▲ new entrant
Qualcomm Incorporated5▼ -58%
Apple Inc.7▲ new entrant
ZTE Corporation4▲ new entrant
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation4▲ new entrant
LG Display Co., Ltd.3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant rankings and momentum are measured at the patent-family level.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant device-integration cluster

Several IPC branches sit at lower relative share within the under-display camera corpus and show potential technical relevance that is not yet fully exploited. These observations of relative sparsity do not automatically indicate commercial opportunity, but they identify areas where new filing activity would face less established prior art.

H04R · Loudspeakers & audio transducers

H04R accounts for 135 patent-record classifications in this corpus, a 3% share — modest relative to the dominant G06F and H04M branches. Under-display audio (integrating speakers or piezoelectric transducers beneath the same display surface as the camera) is a technically adjacent challenge that shares structural and acoustic-interference constraints with under-display camera design. Teams with expertise in acoustic-display integration could find this branch less crowded and potentially synergistic with existing under-display camera IP.

Search this in Eureka →

G09G · Display control circuits

G09G covers display control circuits and appears at 85 patent-record classifications, representing a 2% share. Adaptive display-transparency control — dynamically managing pixel transmission to balance image capture quality against display brightness in the camera zone — is a core engineering challenge for under-display cameras that sits naturally in this branch. The relative sparsity suggests that display-driver and pixel-circuit specialisation has not yet attracted broad filing activity from outside the dominant players, potentially offering a targeted entry path for display-IC and panel-maker teams.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete adjacent-branch analysis with filing density, claim-scope mapping, and entry-path assessment for all identified under-served IPC branches.
G02B · Optical elements & systemsH10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; lower share relative to dominant branches indicates relative sparsity, not absence of prior art.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH04M 1 · Telephonic communicationG06F 1 · Electric digital data processingH01Q 1 · AntennasG09F 9 · Displaying, advertising & signsG06F 3 · Electric digital data processing
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 1,148Strong · 1,100Moderate · 321Moderate · 263Moderate · 258
vivo Mobile Communication Co., Ltd.Strong · 13Strong · 14AbsentModerate · 7Moderate · 3
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.Strong · 15Moderate · 6AbsentModerate · 6Absent
Qualcomm IncorporatedStrong · 17AbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 5
Apple Inc.AbsentStrong · 8AbsentAbsentStrong · 8
Ningbo Sunny Opotech Co., Ltd.Strong · 12AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
ZTE CorporationStrong · 11AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own under-display camera patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.