Book a demo

Urban Rail & Metro Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Urban Rail & Metro Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/urban-rail-and-metro-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Rail & Transit Systems
Urban Rail and Metro Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Claims
  • 29.5% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees combined hold 119 of the 404 records in scope — a leader at 34 filings followed by a fast drop to single digits further down the ranking.
  • Traction power and control dominate the IPC mix. B60M, H02J and B61L each cover roughly a fifth to a quarter of all 404 records, showing the field is still organised around power delivery and signalling rather than data or onboard processing.
  • Filing has plateaued, not fallen. 2021 to 2024 — the last year with a complete publication picture — moved from 34 to 32 filings, a -6% change that reads as a steady field rather than a declining one.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
404
Published Records
29%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-6%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (34 records) with 2024 (32) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 404 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent activity at the intersection of urban rail and metro systems and the technical subsystems that keep trains moving and located: traction power supply, wheel-rail contact, track condition monitoring and train position determination. The 404 records in scope span filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, drawn from receiving offices led by China, with meaningful volume also filed at the EPO, USPTO, in Germany, via the PCT route, and in India.

The technology composition sits heavily on power and control engineering — power lines for electric traction, power supply and grid systems, and railway traffic control together account for the largest IPC subclasses in the dataset — with a smaller but present layer of digital data processing and electric vehicle propulsion claims layered on top.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIV34
  2. 2CASCO SIGNAL LTD30
  3. 3BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIV29
  4. 4TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY14
  5. 5ZHUZHOU CSR TIMES ELECTRIC CO LTD12
  6. 6LI QUNZHAN11
  7. 7Beijing Jiaotong University Yangtze Delta Research Institute11
  8. 8ZHENJIANG DAQO SECHERON TRACTION POWER11
  9. 9CRRC TANGSHAN CO LTD11
  10. 10TRAFFIC CONTROL TECH CO LTD10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 404-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 34 in 2017 to a peak of 56 in 2023, before easing off. 2024 is the last year with a largely complete publication record; 2025 and 2026 figures will keep rising as later filings publish, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017-2026015304560342017201820192020202120225620232024202562026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

B60M (power lines for electric traction) leads at 23.0% of the 404 records, closely followed by H02J (power supply and grid systems) at 22.8% and B61L (railway traffic control) at 20.8%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100% and should be read individually against the 404-record base, not against each other as a pie.

IPC subclass compositionB60M · Power lines for electric tract…9323.0%H02J · Power supply & grid systems9222.8%B61L · Railway traffic control8420.8%G06F · Electric digital data processi…389.4%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion348.4%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement348.4%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)307.4%B61C · Locomotives & railcars245.9%Other24761.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 404 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about urban rail & metro patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this landscape

Representative Filing
US20260054756A12026-02-26

Network automatic train supervision system for urban rail transit based on a cloud platform

CASCO SIGNAL LTD.

A network automatic train supervision (NATS) system disposed in a network center cloud platform that collects line ATS data for analysis and provides network-level operation management: running command, operation index analysis, fully automated mapping, network and line collaborative command, transport organisation and aided decision functions, aimed at giving a network centre overall command and dispatching visibility across full road networks for large cities.Filed by CASCO SIGNAL LTD., published 2026-02-26 — a recent illustration of the shift from line-level ATS toward network-level, cloud-based supervision.

US20260054756A1 — patent drawing 1US20260054756A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7966945B1Isolation and support structures for hydrogen hybrid locomotives and hydrogen hybrid locomotives using the sa…52
2CN107895960A基于强化学习的城轨交通地面式超级电容储能系统能量管理方法48
3CN111311017A城市轨道交通列车运营时刻表和速度运行曲线优化方法47
4US6250442B1Ground power supply for electric vehicle with earth connection45
5CN104881527A城市轨道交通列车ATO速度命令优化方法36
6US7971538B1Power management systems for hydrogen hybrid locomotives and hydrogen hybrid locomotives using the same35
7CN110053521A城市轨道交通牵引供电系统及车-网配合参数优化方法32
8US20220227402A1Train autonomous control system and method based on train-to-train communication29
9WO2014166062A1城市轨道交通列车防撞信息系统28
10CN112906299A城轨供电系统的数字孪生仿真的数据计算方法、系统26

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current technical relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Reading the concentration, trend and IPC data together points to where claim space is already occupied and where a new filer still has room to move.

Concentration
29.5% held by top 5
of 404 records

A leader well ahead, then a steep drop

The leading assignee holds 34 records against a fifth-place figure of 12 and a tenth-place figure of 10. That gap means the very top of the field is genuinely occupied, but the ranking flattens quickly after the first few names, leaving room for new entrants below the leader tier.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Technology mix
23.0% B60M
of 404 records

Power delivery still anchors the field

B60M, H02J and B61L together describe a field still centred on getting power to trains and controlling their movement safely, rather than on the data layer. G06F, at 9.4%, is the largest software-adjacent class and remains well behind the power and control subclasses.

IPC subclass shares, record-level
Filing trend
-6% (2021→2024)
complete-year comparison

A steady field, not a shrinking one

Filing volume moved from 34 in 2021 to 32 in 2024, essentially flat over three complete years after a 2023 peak of 56. Because 2025-2026 filings are still publishing, any apparent recent decline should not be read as the field cooling off.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Collaboration
10 co-assignee pairs
identified in scope

Filing partnerships cluster around a few institutions

The strongest co-assignee pairing appears eleven times, and two further pairings recur five times each, all anchored around university-affiliated inventors and rail electrification specialists rather than spread evenly across the field.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to urban rail & metro patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum is shifting

The ranking spans 100 companies counted by record, from a clear leader down to a long tail of single-digit and single-filing entrants. Momentum in the most recent tracked year has cooled across nearly every named assignee, consistent with the publication-lag effect rather than a genuine pullback.

Leader
34 records
top-ranked assignee

A university-anchored leader

The top-ranked assignee holds 34 of the 404 records in scope, nearly three times the fifth-place figure of 12, making it the single most concentrated position in the ranking.

Assignee ranking
Momentum
0% YoY
leader's latest-year change

Flat, not falling, at the top

The leading assignee recorded 2 filings in the latest tracked year against a 0% year-on-year change, while several other named assignees show a 0% or -100% figure for the same year — again best read as publication lag rather than a real drop in activity.

Recent-year momentum tracking
Collaboration
11 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Institution-inventor pairings drive the densest links

The strongest recurring co-assignee relationship in the dataset pairs a university with a named individual inventor, appearing eleven times — a pattern that suggests close, long-running research partnerships rather than broad industry consortia.

Co-assignee pair analysis
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches sit below the density of the core power-and-control classes and are worth a freedom-to-operate check before committing claim language.
Hydrogen hybrid locomotive isolation structuresGround-power earth-connection safety systemsReinforcement-learning energy management for supercapacitor storageNetwork-level cloud ATS beyond line-level systemsATO speed-command optimisation for metro operation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Southwest Jiaotong University20%
CASCO Signal Ltd.0-100%
Beijing Jiaotong University0-100%
Tsinghua University0
Zhenjiang Daqo Secheron Traction Power Co., Ltd.0
Beijing Jiaotong University Yangtze Delta Research Institute0
CRRC Tangshan Co., Ltd.0
LI QUNZHAN0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The landscape data points to specific questions worth running deeper before committing R&D or filing budget.

Check freedom-to-operate around the leader's core claims

With one assignee holding 34 of 404 records, a targeted claim-scope review of that portfolio before filing in adjacent traction-power or train-control subclasses can avoid a costly overlap.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches directly

Network-level cloud ATS and reinforcement-learning-based energy management show far lower filing density than core B60M and B61L claims, making them worth watching for early movers.

Monitor white space in Eureka

Re-run the trend once 2025-2026 filings finish publishing

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the current 2025-2026 figures will rise; revisiting the trend in a future cycle will give a truer read on whether the 2023 peak was a high point or a plateau.

Set a filing trend alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on urban rail and metro patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Urban Rail & Metro Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole urban rail & metro patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.