Book a demo

UV Stabilizers & Polymer Weathering Patents: Top Companies 2026

UV Stabilizers & Polymer Weathering Patents: Top Companies 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/uv-stabilizers-and-polymer-weathering-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Polymers & Resins
UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering Patents: Who Holds the Claim Space
  • Filing has cooled since 2020. the peak year for new families, with 2022's mid-point count roughly a third of that, pointing to a market where core additive chemistry is largely staked out.
  • C08K dominates almost completely. 626 of 628 records sit in the additives-for-polymers subclass, meaning nearly every filer is claiming through the same IPC gate regardless of end use.
  • Co-filing is rare and concentrated. only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the whole dataset, with one pairing accounting for 20 joint filings — most applicants file alone.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
628
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-32%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (19 records) with 2024 (13) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 628 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent landscape covers

This landscape maps 628 patent families filed against UV stabilizer chemistry and polymer weathering performance — hindered amine light stabilizers, benzotriazole and benzophenone UV absorbers, and the antioxidant synergy and migration-control claims that sit around them. The search spans records tagged with accelerated weathering testing, yellowing, migration or outdoor service life, and filtered to C08K5, C09K15 and C08L101 — the additive, functional-material and polymer-composition classes where this chemistry is actually claimed.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend line understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than final.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1CYTEC IND INC51
  2. 2CLARIANT INT LTD34
  3. 3MITSUBISHI POLYESTER FILM GMBH34
  4. 4GENERAL ELECTRIC CO25
  5. 5OMYA INT AG21
  6. 6CIBA HOLDING INC20
  7. 7BASF SE19
  8. 8SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV17
  9. 9CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS HOLDING INC17
  10. 10BASELL NORTH AMERICA INC16
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 628-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families distribute across the IPC subclasses that structure this field.

A peak in 2020, then a decline

Annual filings rose from 6 in 2017 to a peak of 41 in 2020, then fell back toward 14 by 2022 — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. Read the final one to two years as undercounts given publication lag.

A peak in 2020, then a decline01325385062017201820194120202021202220232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Additive claims dominate the IPC mix

C08K (additives in polymers) covers 626 of 628 records, essentially the whole dataset. C08L (polymer compositions) and C08J (processing/solutions) form the next tier, with B32B laminates, C08F vinyl polymers, C09D coatings, C09K functional materials and C08G condensation polymers appearing as secondary, more specialised overlays.

Additive claims dominate the IPC mixC08K · Use of additives in polymers62699.7%C08L · Polymer compositions36057.3%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions14623.2%B32B · Layered products & laminates9314.8%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)7712.3%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks7511.9%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…599.4%C08G · Condensation polymers508.0%Other40564.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 628 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about uv stabilizers and polymer weathering and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
US20210189604A12021-06-24

Poly(acrylonitrile-co-methyl acrylate) compositions with a hindered amine light stabilizer

GLEN RAVEN, INC.

Poly(acrylonitrile-co-methyl acrylate) compositions comprising a hindered amine light stabilizer are described herein. A poly(acrylonitrile-co-methyl acrylate) composition may be in the form of a fiber, thread, yarn, and/or fabric. Also described herein are methods of making and using the poly(acrylonitrile-co-methyl acrylate) compositions and articles comprising poly(acrylonitrile-co-methyl acrylate) compositions as described herein.Filed by Glen Raven, Inc. — illustrates how HALS chemistry is being claimed at the fiber/fabric level rather than only in bulk resin.

US20210189604A1 — patent drawing 1US20210189604A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4315848A2-[2-Hydroxy-3,5-di-( alpha , alpha -dimethylbenzyl)-phenyl]-2H-benzotriazole and stabilized compositions269
2US4278589A2-[2-Hydroxy-3,5-di-( alpha , alpha -dimethylbenzyl)phenyl]-2H-benzotriazole and stabilized compositions266
3US4839405AUltraviolet stabilizer compositions, stabilized organic materials, and methods204
4US6353042B1UV-light stabilization additive package for solar cell module and laminated glass applications143
5US20060111481A1Stabilized aliphatic polyester compositions127
6WO1999005206A2UV light stabilization additive package for solar cell module and laminated glass applications99
7US6110566AStabilization of fluorescent dyes in vinyl articles using hindered amine light stabilizers75
8US20050209379A1Stabilized polyolefin compositions73
9US5447576AComposition and method for encapsulating a solar cell which minimizes thermal discoloration71
10US5190710AMethod for imparting improved discoloration resistance to articles67

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and are skewed toward older filings; a high count signals foundational prior art, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

The dataset points to a field where the core chemistry was staked out early and volume has since cooled, while jurisdiction and co-filing patterns reveal where the real competitive pressure sits.

Filing Trajectory
41 → 14
peak (2020) vs. 2022 count

Volume peaked in 2020 and has not recovered

Six filings in 2017 built to 41 in 2020, then fell to 14 by 2022. That trajectory is consistent with a chemistry base — benzotriazole/HALS additive packages — that got claimed early, leaving later filers to work formulation tweaks and application-specific packaging rather than new base molecules.

Read 2025–2026 counts as provisional due to publication lag.
Jurisdiction Spread
US 164 · EPO 129
lead receiving offices

Filing is concentrated in the US and Europe

The United States (164) and the European Patent Office (129) receive far more filings than WIPO/PCT (58), Canada (44), China (39) or Japan (34). Freedom-to-operate work for this chemistry should prioritise US and EP prosecution history before treating other jurisdictions as secondary.

PCT filings (58) suggest a minority of applicants are pursuing broad multi-jurisdiction protection.
Collaboration Pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings in dataset

Co-filing is the exception, not the rule

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across 628 families, and one pairing accounts for 20 of those joint filings. Most applicants file solo, which means licensing or M&A diligence should focus on single-owner portfolios rather than expecting joint-venture structures.

The strongest pairing links a specialty-chemicals filer with a minerals/fillers partner.
Technology Concentration
626 / 628
records touching C08K

Nearly every filing runs through the same additive class

C08K's near-total coverage means differentiation happens inside that class — via specific stabilizer combinations, antioxidant synergy claims, or delivery formats — rather than through claiming an entirely separate IPC gate.

Secondary classes (C08L, C08J, B32B) mark where application-specific overlays concentrate.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to uv stabilizers and polymer weathering, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where momentum has stalled

Recent-year filing counts across named assignees are low across the board, and several established filers show no activity in the latest year — a pattern more consistent with a maturing claim landscape than with new entrants pushing volume.

Momentum Leaders
2 filings
latest-year count, joint top

Two specialty-chemical filers hold the current lead

Clariant International and OMYA International each show 2 filings in the latest year — modest in absolute terms, but the highest recent-year count in the dataset. Their existing co-filing relationship (20 joint families) suggests continued formulation work around mineral-filled or coated polymer systems.

Both also anchor the strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset.
Stalled Incumbents
0 filings, -100% YoY
latest-year activity

Several historical filers show zero recent activity

Cytec Industries, General Electric, Mitsubishi Chemical Polyester Film, and Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding all register zero filings in the latest year, with Cytec down -100% year-over-year. This does not mean these portfolios are inactive commercially, but it does mean their claim positions are not being extended.

Older Ciba and Cytec filings still anchor much of the most-cited prior art.
Portfolio Consolidation
20 joint filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Legacy specialty-chemical names persist under related entities

Names like Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding and Ciba Geigy AG, or Clariant International and Clariant Masterbatch, reflect decades of corporate restructuring in the additives industry. Diligence on any single 'assignee' should trace the full family of related entity names before concluding a portfolio is dormant.

Co-assignee data is the clearest signal of which corporate families are linked.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin coverage relative to the core additive claims — starting points for freedom-to-operate scouting, not guaranteed white space.
Fiber/fabric-level HALS incorporationAntioxidant synergy in condensation polymers (C08G)Migration-resistant stabilizer packages for laminatesUV stabilizer delivery via coating layers (C09D)Weathering-grade additive packages for solar/glass laminates
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Clariant International Ltd.2
OMYA International AG2
Cytec Industries0-100%
General Electric Company0
Mitsubishi Chemical Polyester Film, Ltd.0
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding Inc.0
Covestro Deutschland AG0
CIBA HOLDING INC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or R&D scoping.

Map claim boundaries around the most-cited patents

US4315848A, US4278589A and US4839405A anchor decades of benzotriazole and HALS stabilizer claims. Any new formulation work should be checked against their claim scope before assuming open space.

Explore citation network in Eureka

Track the stalled incumbents' broader portfolios

Zero recent filings from names like Ciba Specialty Chemicals Holding or Cytec Industries does not mean the underlying IP is expired or abandoned. Confirm status and successor entities before treating that space as available.

Run assignee portfolio check in Eureka

Scope the under-claimed application branches

Fiber-level HALS incorporation and coating-delivered UV stabilizer packages show thinner coverage than bulk resin claims. These are reasonable starting points for new filing strategy.

Draft a claim scope in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about UV stabilizer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research UV Stabilizers and Polymer Weathering in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole uv stabilizers and polymer weathering corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.