Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (75 records) with 2024 (51) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,297 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent families whose title or abstract names a vacuum pump, dry screw vacuum pump or liquid ring vacuum pump, combined with claim language around ultimate pressure, pumping speed, corrosive gas handling, power consumption or condensable vapor — restricted to the IPC groups covering rotary-piston and positive-displacement pump mechanisms. That combination isolates the mechanical and performance claims that determine whether a pump design can be sold into semiconductor, chemical or vacuum-process markets without infringement risk.
The corpus spans 1,297 patent families filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years understate actual filing activity and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
The filing curve and the IPC breakdown together show where claim density has built up and where it has started to thin out.
Filings rose from 42 in 2017 to a peak of 75 in 2021, then eased back to 51 by 2022 and continued lower toward the present partial year. That pattern is consistent with a technology whose core mechanical claims — screw geometry, ring-liquid staging, motor integration — are largely staked out, pushing new filers toward narrower performance or control claims rather than new base architectures.
F04C (rotary-piston pumps) covers 980 of the 1,297 records, more than double F04B (positive-displacement pumps, 470) and five times F04D (non-positive-displacement pumps, 193). Smaller but present clusters in H01J, B01D and H02K point to claims that bridge pump mechanics with electron-tube processing, separation stages and motor design — often where the more specific, defensible claims sit.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,297 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about vacuum pump technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA pump set comprising a compressor followed by a liquid ring vacuum pump, with the two pumps matched so that a relatively small liquid ring vacuum pump can draw and maintain vacuum under 40 Torr.Filed by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, granted 1980-09-30 — illustrates how early staged-compressor-plus-liquid-ring architectures set the template that later ultimate-pressure claims build on.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5944049A | Apparatus and method for regulating a pressure in a chamber | 290 |
| 2 | US5846062A | Two stage screw type vacuum pump with motor in-between the stages | 166 |
| 3 | US6122921A | Shield to prevent cryopump charcoal array from shedding during cryo-regeneration | 154 |
| 4 | US20080267790A1 | Electronically Controlled Vacuum Pump | 112 |
| 5 | US5616015A | High displacement rate, scroll-type, fluid handling apparatus | 94 |
| 6 | US6022195A | Electronically controlled vacuum pump with control module | 88 |
| 7 | US5871336A | Thermal transpiration driven vacuum pump | 80 |
| 8 | US4523897A | Two stage vacuum pump | 80 |
| 9 | US4757689A | Cryopump, and a method for the operation thereof | 78 |
| 10 | US6056510A | Multistage vacuum pump unit | 71 |
Citation counts favour older, foundational filings within a searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence rather than of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three figures from this dataset matter more than the raw family count when deciding where to file next.
The 2021 peak of 75 families was not sustained; by the 2022 midpoint filings had already fallen to 51 and the decline continues toward the present. Treat this as a mature claim space where incremental filings compete against dense prior art rather than open ground.
Three out of four records sit under rotary-piston pump classification. Any new filing on screw or vane-type mechanisms is entering the most heavily claimed segment of this landscape, raising the bar for novelty.
China now receives more filings in this space than the United States, with Europe, Japan, WIPO and the UK trailing behind. Freedom-to-operate analysis needs to weight the Chinese register at least as heavily as the US register going forward.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the corpus, and the strongest links all involve the same corporate family filing jointly with related entities and individual inventors. Most other assignees file solo, which limits opportunities to track joint-venture signals.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to vacuum pump technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year filing activity across the named assignees below shows zero new families in the latest year for every one of them, which either reflects genuine pullback or the reporting lag typical of the most recent filing year.
Every assignee with tracked recent-year momentum — including established vacuum equipment manufacturers — shows zero families in the latest year, with one showing a -100% YoY change. Given the 18-month publication lag, this is as likely to reflect reporting delay as a genuine stop in filing.
The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links two entities within the same Ebara corporate group at eight shared families, with a second link to an individual inventor and a third to Toshiba. Collaboration in this landscape is the exception, not the norm.
China and the United States lead, Europe and Japan follow at meaningfully lower volumes, and WIPO PCT filings sit below all four major national/regional offices. A design freed to operate in China and the US still faces meaningful exposure in Europe and Japan.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Edwards Limited | 0 | -100% |
| Ebara Corporation | 0 | — |
| The BOC Group plc | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Lambert Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| ULVAC, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Agilent Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Pfeiffer Vacuum GmbH | 0 | — |
The filing curve and IPC composition point to a landscape with occupied core claims and thinner adjacent branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or new filing.
With 980 of 1,297 records in F04C, any new screw or vane-type pump design should be checked against this cluster specifically, not the corpus as a whole.
Explore in EurekaChina's lead over the US at the receiving office (300 vs. 284) suggests the newest claim language is appearing there first; monitoring should follow accordingly.
Explore in EurekaCondensable-vapor handling and corrosive-gas seal geometries show thinner density than the core mechanism classes and may offer more defensible claim space.
Explore in EurekaThis landscape identifies 1,297 patent families filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from title and abstract language naming vacuum pumps, dry screw vacuum pumps or liquid ring vacuum pumps combined with performance claim terms like ultimate pressure or corrosive gas handling. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts understate true filing activity and will rise as more records publish. Treat the 2021 peak of 75 families as the clearest recent high point rather than the endpoint of the trend.
Rotary-piston pump mechanisms, classified under IPC group F04C, account for 980 of the 1,297 records in this corpus — more than double the 470 records under general positive-displacement pump classification F04B. This means screw-type and vane-type rotary mechanisms are the most heavily claimed segment of the field, and new filings there face the densest prior art. Smaller clusters under F01C, H01J, B01D and H02K show where pump mechanics intersect with adjacent fields like separation processes and motor design.
Filing activity peaked at 75 families in 2021, up from 42 in 2017, but had already fallen to 51 by the 2022 midpoint and continues to decline toward the present partial year. This pattern points to a maturing claim landscape rather than one still expanding, with core mechanical architectures largely staked out and newer filings likely concentrating on narrower performance or control claims. The apparent recent drop should be read partly as publication lag rather than a genuine stop.
China leads with 300 filings at its receiving office, ahead of the United States at 284, followed by the European Patent Office at 228, Japan at 127, WIPO PCT filings at 84 and the United Kingdom at 83. This ordering suggests that recent claim activity in ultimate-pressure and pumping-speed language is shifting toward the Chinese patent office, and freedom-to-operate reviews should weight China at least as heavily as the US going forward.
US4225288A, assigned to Siemens Aktiengesellschaft and granted in 1980, claims a pump set combining a compressor with a liquid ring vacuum pump, sized so a relatively small liquid ring pump can draw and hold vacuum under 40 Torr. It is a representative early example of staged compressor-plus-liquid-ring architecture rather than the most-cited patent in this corpus. Its relevance today is as a template: later claims on staged vacuum systems and ultimate-pressure control build directly on this compressor-matching approach, so designs using a similar staged configuration should check its claim scope and expiry status.
The comparatively thin filing density in condensable-vapor handling for dry screw pumps, corrosive-gas-resistant seal geometries, and motor-integrated multistage staging suggests these branches are less occupied than the core rotary-piston mechanism claims. Power-consumption control electronics specific to vacuum pumps also shows lighter coverage relative to the mechanical claim clusters. These are not guaranteed-clear areas, but they warrant a closer novelty search before assuming the space is as crowded as the core F04C claims.
Go past this page: query the whole vacuum pump technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.