Book a demo

Vacuum Skin Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Vacuum Skin Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/vacuum-skin-packaging-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Packaging
Vacuum Skin Packaging Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Heading

A patent landscape review of vacuum skin packaging: filing trends since 2015, the leading assignees, technology composition by IPC class, and where white space remains for new entrants.

787
Published Records
73%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-52%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (23 records) → 2024 (11); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 787 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the vacuum skin packaging patent record shows

Vacuum skin packaging (VSP) sits at the intersection of film lamination and food-contact packaging engineering: a thermoformable film draws tightly over a product and bonds to a rigid or semi-rigid base, producing the tight, form-fitting skin seen on fresh meat, cheese and hard goods. The 787 records in scope span 2015 through the current filing year, with classification concentrated in container and packaging structures (B65D) and packaging process claims (B65B), overlapping heavily with laminate construction (B32B). That overlap is the tell: much of the contested ground is not the vacuum-forming step itself but the multi-layer film stack that makes the seal peelable, printable and food-safe.

Ownership of this space is unusually top-heavy. A single legacy packaging-film assignee accounts for the majority of records, and the concentration figures below make clear that new entrants are filing into a field with an entrenched leader rather than a genuinely open race.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015 to present
  1. 1CRYOVAC INC410
  2. 2WR GRACE & CO CONN82
  3. 3CURWOOD INC44
  4. 4EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO25
  5. 5ULMA PACKAGING TECHCAL CENT S COOP11
  6. 6MYLAR SPECIALTY FILMS U S LLP10
  7. 7STONE CONTAINER CORP10
  8. 8FLEXOPACK SA9
  9. 9BEMIS COMPANY INC9
  10. 10LINPAC PACKAGING LIMITED8
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vacuum Skin Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 787-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing rose to a 2017 peak, then eased

Annual filings climbed to a peak of 70 records in 2017. The 2021-to-2024 window, the last stretch unaffected by publication lag, fell 52% from 23 to 11 records — a real cooling, not an artefact, though 2025 and 2026 figures will rise as later-published applications catch up.

Filing rose to a 2017 peak, then eased0204060807020172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Container structure and packaging process dominate

B65D (containers & packaging) touches 66.1% of the 787 records and B65B (packaging & wrapping) 57.6%, the two core subclasses for any VSP filing. B32B (layered products) still reaches 36.2%, confirming that film-laminate construction is claimed almost as often as the packaging step itself, while polymer-composition classes (C08L, C08J) and food-preservation classes (A23B, A23L) sit in the single digits — present, but clearly secondary.

Container structure and packaging process dominateB65D · Containers & packaging52066.1%B65B · Packaging & wrapping45357.6%B32B · Layered products & laminates28536.2%B29C · Shaping of plastics749.4%C08L · Polymer compositions516.5%A23B · Food preservation344.3%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages324.1%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions222.8%Other10613.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 787 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vacuum Skin Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Vacuum Skin Packaging Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about vacuum skin packaging patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The patents setting the terms of the field

Representative Filing
US8047368B22011-11-01

US8047368B2 — Vacuum skin packaging laminate, package and process for using same

CURWOOD, INC.

The patent claims a vacuum skin packaging laminate built from a first film, a second film, an adhesive bonding them, and a deliberately adhesive-free interfacial section between the two. The construction gives a flat first-film surface for product markings and a thermoformable second-film surface that conforms to the product shape, plus the packages and packaging processes built from that laminate.Filed by Curwood, Inc. — published 2011-11-01.

US8047368B2 — patent drawing 1US8047368B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5346735APeelable barrier film for vacuum skin packages and the like188
2US4889731APackage having peelable film143
3US5491009AAmorphous nylon composition and films135
4US5427807AMethod of packaging food products128
5US4886690APeelable barrier film for vacuum skin packages and the like127
6US4933193AMicrowave cooking package113
7US3950919AApparatus and process for vacuum skin packaging112
8WO1997032663A1Desiccant entrained polymer99
9US3835618AApparatus for producing vacuum skin packages in multiples99
10US4611456AProcess for making a vacuum skin package and product formed thereby94

Citation counts favour older filings inside any searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vacuum Skin Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings that change how a team should read this field before drafting or licensing around it.

Concentration
72.7%
of 787 records held by top 5

One leader, then a steep drop-off

The leading assignee alone holds 410 records against a fifth-place figure of only 11. That gap is the story: this is not a field of comparable rivals but one incumbent with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants below it.

Top 10 combined reach 78.5% of all 787 records.
Filing momentum
-52%
2021 to 2024 filings (23 → 11)

Activity has cooled from its 2017 peak

Annual filings peaked at 70 in 2017 and the last fully comparable window shows a real decline. Read the 2025-26 near-zero figures with caution — publication lag of roughly 18 months means those years are still filling in, not evidence of a sudden stop.

Peak year: 2017 at 70 records.
Claim surface
36.2%
of records also classed B32B

Laminate construction is a parallel battleground

Over a third of records carry a layered-products (B32B) class alongside the core packaging classes, meaning film-stack claims — adhesive layers, peelability, barrier properties — are contested almost as heavily as the vacuum-forming process itself.

B65D 66.1%, B65B 57.6% of the 787-record set.
Geography
123
US receiving-office records

Filing offices cluster in a handful of jurisdictions

The United States (123), Europe (118) and Australia (100) lead receiving-office counts, with China (58) and Canada (54) following. That spread suggests VSP protection strategies still prioritise established food-packaging markets over broad global filing.

NZ 61 records complete the top tier.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to vacuum skin packaging patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing is rare but concentrated
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Cryovac, Inc.PALUMBO RICCARDO6
Cryovac, Inc.W.R. Grace & Co.3
Cryovac, Inc.LIPEROTI ANTONIO3
Cryovac, Inc.GRANILI ANDREA3
Cryovac, Inc.CIOCCA MAURIZIO3
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. (USA)CHEN JOHN CHU3
Cryovac, Inc.RIZZI JVANOHE2
Cryovac, Inc.RICCIO MARINA2

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing recurs across a small cluster of related filings — co-invention here looks more like internal cross-crediting within one organisation than genuine external partnership.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vacuum Skin Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated, cooling field with a specific open branch in film-laminate construction. Two directions follow from that.

Map the laminate sub-claims before drafting

With B32B touching 36.2% of records, a new filing that only addresses the vacuum-forming step without mapping adhesive-layer and interfacial-section claims risks sitting on top of existing laminate art rather than beside it.

Explore the claim space in Eureka

Watch the 2025-26 figures as they fill in

The apparent drop to near-zero in the most recent years is a publication-lag artefact, not a real stop in filing. Re-check the trend in twelve months before concluding the field has gone quiet.

Track filing trends in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vacuum Skin Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Questions practitioners ask about this field

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vacuum Skin Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Vacuum Skin Packaging Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole vacuum skin packaging patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.