Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-backed look at cryogenic valve seal patents: who leads filings, how the technology composition breaks down across IPC classes, and where filing white space remains through 2026.
Filing growth = 2021 (3 records) → 2024 (4); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 140 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
A cryogenic valve seal patent typically claims the sealing interface, seat geometry, or material composition that lets a valve hold a leak-tight boundary at temperatures low enough to liquefy gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen or LNG. The engineering problem is narrower than it sounds: most elastomers and many metals lose sealing compliance well before the temperatures these valves operate at, so claims cluster around seat design, thermal contraction compensation, and bi-directional sealing under pressure cycling. The dataset in scope covers 140 published records filed or published between 2015 and the August 2026 cut-off, drawn from a search combining title/abstract hits on the term with claim-level language tying cryogenic operation to valve seals under the F16K valves-and-taps classification.
Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity — treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional floors, not a slowdown.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
The two views below use the same 140-record scope: one tracks filings by year, the other breaks records down by IPC subclass. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the composition shares add up to more than 100%.
Filings peaked at 10 in 2019, dropped through the early 2020s, then grew 33% from 3 records in 2021 to 4 in 2024 — the most recent year that can be read as a complete count before publication lag takes hold.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
F16K (valves and taps) covers 92.9% of the 140 records, confirming this is fundamentally valve-design art. The secondary classes — F17C pressure vessels (11.4%), F25B refrigeration (7.9%), F16L pipe fittings (6.4%) — mark where cryogenic-specific claims cross into adjacent systems rather than the seal mechanism itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 140 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about valves & flow control: cryogenic valve seal patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled in 1981, this record predates the current filing window but anchors the field's foundational seal geometry for cryogenic service. Its presence in a 2015-2026 scoped search reflects how often modern applicants cite or build on early bi-directional and thermal-compensation seal designs rather than starting from a clean sheet.Dates and assignee are drawn directly from the record; no claim text is reproduced here.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20050151107A1 | Fluid control system and stem joint | 139 |
| 2 | US5566712A | Fueling systems | 108 |
| 3 | US3260496A | Thermal responsive high pressure butterfly valve seal means | 60 |
| 4 | US3650508A | Bi-directional valve for cryogenic fluids | 59 |
| 5 | US20140264135A1 | Valve seat apparatus for use with fluid valves | 50 |
| 6 | US5441234A | Fuel systems | 40 |
| 7 | US4513765A | Arrangement on a butterfly valve | 38 |
| 8 | US4080106A | Purged valve assembly and method of sealing | 35 |
| 9 | US4582080A | Bidirectional cryogenic valves | 28 |
| 10 | US20080203346A1 | Fluid control system | 27 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Filing concentration, receiving-office spread and co-assignment patterns each point to a different part of the competitive picture — who has staked claims, where they filed to protect them, and how rare true collaboration is in this space.
The leading assignee holds 18 records against a fifth-place figure of 8 and a tenth-place figure of 4 — a steep drop-off that leaves the bulk of the 57 ranked companies as single- or low-volume filers.
The United States leads at 43 filings, ahead of the EPO at 23, Australia at 16, WIPO/PCT at 15, the UK at 13 and Canada at 9 — a spread consistent with LNG, industrial gas and aerospace markets rather than a single dominant jurisdiction.
Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and none repeats beyond a single filing — cryogenic valve seal art is overwhelmingly filed by single entities rather than joint ventures or shared R&D programmes.
F17C pressure-vessel and F25B refrigeration classifications, though minority shares, are the classes that actually require cryogenic-specific claim language — F16K's 92.9% share is the valve-mechanism baseline almost every record touches.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to valves & flow control: cryogenic valve seal patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The figures above establish where filing activity sits today. The next step for an R&D or IP team is usually to pressure-test specific claim language against freedom-to-operate questions.
Run the specific seat geometry, seal material or thermal-compensation mechanism your team is developing against the most-cited records to see how close prior art sits.
Explore in Eureka →Concentration at the top means a small set of filers shape the claim space; monitoring their newest publications flags emerging design-around risk early.
Set up monitoring in Eureka →One assignee leads with 18 records in this 140-record dataset, well ahead of the fifth-ranked company at 8 and the tenth-ranked at 4. That steep drop-off means the top five assignees together account for 39.3% of all records, while the remaining ranked companies (57 in total) each hold comparatively few filings. Practically, this means a small number of entities have shaped the core claim space, but there is still a broad tail of smaller filers worth checking for niche prior art.
The overwhelming majority, 92.9% of the 140 records, carry an F16K classification, covering valves and taps generally. Secondary classes point to where cryogenic engineering specifically matters: F17C (pressure vessels and gas storage) appears in 11.4% of records, F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) in 7.9%, and F16L (pipe fittings) in 6.4%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to more than 100% and should be read as overlapping technology touches, not a strict breakdown.
Filings grew 33% from 3 records in 2021 to 4 in 2024, the most recent year that can be treated as a complete count. The field peaked earlier at 10 filings in 2019 before dropping and then recovering through the early 2020s. Figures for 2025 and 2026 appear lower only because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so those years are still filling in rather than showing a genuine slowdown.
AU532980B, filed by Posi-Seal International in 1981 and titled simply 'Cryogenic valve seal', is one of the earliest records associated with this search and predates the 2015-2026 filing window covered by the rest of the dataset. It matters as a reference point for foundational seal geometry and thermal-compensation approaches that later filings build on or work around. Anyone evaluating freedom to operate in this space should check how a proposed design's seat and seal mechanism relates to this early claim scope, even though the patent itself is decades old.
The United States receives the most filings in this dataset at 43, followed by the European Patent Office at 23, Australia at 16, WIPO/PCT applications at 15, the United Kingdom at 13, and Canada at 9. This spread lines up with major LNG, industrial gas and aerospace markets rather than concentrating in a single jurisdiction. A moderate PCT count of 15 suggests some applicants pursue broad international protection, but it is not yet the default filing route for most assignees in this field.
Go past this page: query the whole valves & flow control: cryogenic valve seal patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.