https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/valves-and-flow-control-cryogenic-valve-seal-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Valves & Flow Control
Cryogenic valve seal patents: who holds the claim space and where it's still open

A data-backed look at cryogenic valve seal patents: who leads filings, how the technology composition breaks down across IPC classes, and where filing white space remains through 2026.

140
Published Records
39%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+33%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (3 records) → 2024 (4); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 140 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What a cryogenic valve seal patent actually covers

A cryogenic valve seal patent typically claims the sealing interface, seat geometry, or material composition that lets a valve hold a leak-tight boundary at temperatures low enough to liquefy gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen or LNG. The engineering problem is narrower than it sounds: most elastomers and many metals lose sealing compliance well before the temperatures these valves operate at, so claims cluster around seat design, thermal contraction compensation, and bi-directional sealing under pressure cycling. The dataset in scope covers 140 published records filed or published between 2015 and the August 2026 cut-off, drawn from a search combining title/abstract hits on the term with claim-level language tying cryogenic operation to valve seals under the F16K valves-and-taps classification.

Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity — treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional floors, not a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1ENGINEERED CONTROLS INT18
  2. 2GOODWIN INT10
  3. 3FISHER CONTROLS INT LLC10
  4. 4KITZ CORP9
  5. 5CSIC PRIDE (NANJING) CRYOGENIC TECHNOLOGY CO LTD8
  6. 6BOC GROUP INC6
  7. 7FMC CORP4
  8. 8SATODA YOZO4
  9. 9WESTAD ARMATURFAB4
  10. 10POSI SEAL INT INC4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Valves & Flow Control: Cryogenic Valve Seal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below use the same 140-record scope: one tracks filings by year, the other breaks records down by IPC subclass. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the composition shares add up to more than 100%.

A modest but real rebound in filings

Filings peaked at 10 in 2019, dropped through the early 2020s, then grew 33% from 3 records in 2021 to 4 in 2024 — the most recent year that can be read as a complete count before publication lag takes hold.

A modest but real rebound in filings03581002017201810201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Sealing claims sit almost entirely inside F16K

F16K (valves and taps) covers 92.9% of the 140 records, confirming this is fundamentally valve-design art. The secondary classes — F17C pressure vessels (11.4%), F25B refrigeration (7.9%), F16L pipe fittings (6.4%) — mark where cryogenic-specific claims cross into adjacent systems rather than the seal mechanism itself.

Sealing claims sit almost entirely inside F16KF16K · Valves & taps13092.9%F17C · Pressure vessels & gas storage1611.4%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps117.9%F16L · Pipes & pipe fittings96.4%G01F · Flow, level & volume measuring64.3%F16J · Pistons, seals & gaskets42.9%H01L · Semiconductor devices42.9%B64D · Aircraft equipment32.1%Other2820.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 140 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Valves & Flow Control: Cryogenic Valve Seal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Valves & Flow Control: Cryogenic Valve Seal Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about valves & flow control: cryogenic valve seal patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art and a representative early filing

Representative Filing
AU532980B1981-03-19

AU532980B — Cryogenic valve seal (Posi-Seal International, 1981)

POSI-SEAL INTERNATIONAL INC.

Filed in 1981, this record predates the current filing window but anchors the field's foundational seal geometry for cryogenic service. Its presence in a 2015-2026 scoped search reflects how often modern applicants cite or build on early bi-directional and thermal-compensation seal designs rather than starting from a clean sheet.Dates and assignee are drawn directly from the record; no claim text is reproduced here.

View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20050151107A1Fluid control system and stem joint139
2US5566712AFueling systems108
3US3260496AThermal responsive high pressure butterfly valve seal means60
4US3650508ABi-directional valve for cryogenic fluids59
5US20140264135A1Valve seat apparatus for use with fluid valves50
6US5441234AFuel systems40
7US4513765AArrangement on a butterfly valve38
8US4080106APurged valve assembly and method of sealing35
9US4582080ABidirectional cryogenic valves28
10US20080203346A1Fluid control system27

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Valves & Flow Control: Cryogenic Valve Seal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and geography say about strategy

Filing concentration, receiving-office spread and co-assignment patterns each point to a different part of the competitive picture — who has staked claims, where they filed to protect them, and how rare true collaboration is in this space.

Concentration
39.3% / top 5
of 140 records

A leader with real distance, then a long tail

The leading assignee holds 18 records against a fifth-place figure of 8 and a tenth-place figure of 4 — a steep drop-off that leaves the bulk of the 57 ranked companies as single- or low-volume filers.

Top 10 combined reach 55.0% of all 140 records.
Geography
US 43 · EPO 23
receiving-office filings

US and Europe dominate filing destinations

The United States leads at 43 filings, ahead of the EPO at 23, Australia at 16, WIPO/PCT at 15, the UK at 13 and Canada at 9 — a spread consistent with LNG, industrial gas and aerospace markets rather than a single dominant jurisdiction.

PCT filings at 15 suggest moderate but not universal appetite for broad international protection.
Collaboration
3 co-assignee pairs
across 140 records

Co-filing is rare in this field

Only three co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and none repeats beyond a single filing — cryogenic valve seal art is overwhelmingly filed by single entities rather than joint ventures or shared R&D programmes.

The strongest pairs link corporate assignees to named individual inventors, not two companies.
Technology mix
F17C 11.4%
of 140 records

Storage and refrigeration classes mark where cryogenic engineering bites

F17C pressure-vessel and F25B refrigeration classifications, though minority shares, are the classes that actually require cryogenic-specific claim language — F16K's 92.9% share is the valve-mechanism baseline almost every record touches.

H01L semiconductor overlap (2.9%) hints at niche use in cryo-cooled electronics or quantum systems.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to valves & flow control: cryogenic valve seal patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Valves & Flow Control: Cryogenic Valve Seal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above establish where filing activity sits today. The next step for an R&D or IP team is usually to pressure-test specific claim language against freedom-to-operate questions.

Map claim language against your own designs

Run the specific seat geometry, seal material or thermal-compensation mechanism your team is developing against the most-cited records to see how close prior art sits.

Explore in Eureka →

Track the leading assignees' recent activity

Concentration at the top means a small set of filers shape the claim space; monitoring their newest publications flags emerging design-around risk early.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Valves & Flow Control: Cryogenic Valve Seal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about cryogenic valve seal patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Valves & Flow Control: Cryogenic Valve Seal Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Valves & Flow Control: Cryogenic Valve Seal Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole valves & flow control: cryogenic valve seal patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.