Book a demo

Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/vanadium-redox-flow-batteries-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Emerging Battery Chemistries
Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Patents: Who Files, Where, and What Is Still Open
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 79 families, then declined through the midpoint year — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • H01M dominates with 647 of 650 records, while adjacent IPC subclasses like C07D, H02J and B60L carry fewer than 30 records each, marking thin but present cross-domain activity.
  • The strongest co-assignee pair files 18 shared records, well ahead of the next pairs at 4 — collaboration in this field is rare and concentrated.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
650
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-77%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the vanadium redox flow battery patent record shows

Vanadium redox flow battery patenting sits almost entirely inside H01M — batteries, cells and fuel cells — with 647 of 650 published families touching that subclass. The search corpus spans electrolyte concentration, membrane crossover, stack design, energy-power decoupling and shunt current: the mechanical and electrochemical problems that separate a working flow battery from a lab demonstration. Filing rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2021, and has since fallen back toward the level seen at the start of the window, a pattern consistent with a chemistry that has moved from open invention into narrower, defensive claiming around specific stack and membrane configurations.

Receiving-office data shows the United States and the EPO carrying the bulk of filings, with WIPO PCT applications and Australian, Indian and Canadian filings forming a second tier — evidence of deliberate multi-jurisdiction protection rather than single-market filing. Publication lags actual filing by roughly 18 months, so the drop-off visible in the most recent one or two years understates real filing activity; it should not be read as a sudden stop.

Annual filings, 2017–2026 (partial)
  1. 1ESS TECH INC101
  2. 2SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD83
  3. 3ENERVAULT CORP44
  4. 4CMBLU ENERGY AG33
  5. 5LOCKHEED MARTIN ADVANCED ENERGY STORAGE LLC25
  6. 6UOP LLC25
  7. 7THE KANSAI ELECTRIC POWER CO18
  8. 8LOTTE CHEM CORP14
  9. 9STANDARD ENERGY INC13
  10. 10VENTURE LENDING & LEASING VII INC AKA WTI13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 650-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those families distribute across IPC subclasses beyond the core battery classification.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Annual filings ran from 59 in 2017 to a peak of 79 in 2021, easing to 44 by the midpoint year of 2022 and continuing to decline into the partial final year. Read the tail years as understated, not as a genuine collapse in activity.

Filing trend, 2017–2026020406080592017201820192020792021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

H01M accounts for 647 of 650 records, confirming this is a tightly scoped battery-hardware search. Smaller counts in C07D, H02J, C07C, B60L, G01R, C01B and C07G point to electrolyte chemistry, grid integration, EV propulsion and measurement work that touches flow battery patents without being centred on them.

IPC subclass distributionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells64799.5%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds294.5%H02J · Power supply & grid systems253.8%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds243.7%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion192.9%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement101.5%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…81.2%C07G · Undetermined-structure compoun…81.2%Other8513.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 650 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about vanadium redox flow batteries and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited prior art and a representative recent filing

Representative Filing
EP4053951A12022-09-07

SYSTEM UND VERFAHREN ZUM AUSGLEICHEN EINER VANADIUM-REDOX-FLOW-BATTERIE (EP4053951A1)

AARHUS UNIVERSITET

A method for chemical reduction of an oxidised vanadium redox flow battery during operation by adding an organic reductant, where the same redox-active vanadium solution occupies both the cathode and anode tanks. The method monitors state of charge during charge and discharge configurations and applies the reductant to rebalance the electrolyte, addressing capacity loss from side reactions without requiring a separate rebalancing cell.Filed by Aarhus Universitet, 2022-09-07 — an example of university-originated electrolyte-rebalancing IP rather than a commercial stack patent.

EP4053951A1 — patent drawing 1EP4053951A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20110223450A1Cascade Redox Flow Battery Systems227
2US20100003545A1Redox Flow Battery System for Distributed Energy Storage205
3US20100323264A1Fuel system using redox flow battery202
4US6764789B1Redox flow battery142
5US20160268621A1Fuel system using redox flow battery112
6US20150129081A1Fuel System Using Redox Flow Battery110
7US20160013507A1Fuel system using redox flow battery107
8US5851694ARedox flow type battery107
9US9293781B2Fuel system using redox flow battery104
10WO2010118060A1Fuel system using redox flow battery100

Citation counts favour older, foundational filings inside a searched corpus — treat them as a measure of influence on later claim drafting, not as a signal that these are the most commercially active patents today.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern implies for R&D and IP strategy

The numbers point to a chemistry where the foundational stack and electrolyte claims are already staked out, and where remaining opportunity sits in narrower configurations and adjacent integration.

Filing momentum
79 → 2 in 2026
peak year vs. partial latest year

Volume has already crested

Filings peaked in 2021 at 79 and eased through the 2022 midpoint of 44 before declining further. Combined with the 18-month publication lag, this reads as a chemistry settling into narrower claiming rather than one in early growth.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Claim concentration
647 of 650 in H01M
records tagged to core battery IPC

Almost all activity sits in one subclass

With 647 of 650 families in H01M, the dataset confirms this is squarely a battery-hardware search. The handful of records reaching into C07D, C07C and C01B chemistry subclasses suggest electrolyte additive work is a smaller, more specialised slice.

IPC subclass distribution
Jurisdictional strategy
US 233, EPO 128, PCT 87
leading receiving offices

Protection is deliberately multi-jurisdiction

The United States and Europe carry the largest shares, with a substantial PCT tier and secondary filing in Australia, India and Canada. That spread signals applicants treating flow battery IP as globally defensible, not confined to a home market.

Receiving office counts
Collaboration pattern
18 vs. 4
strongest co-filing pair vs. next tier

Co-assignment is rare and lopsided

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the corpus, and the strongest pair files far more jointly than any other combination. Most applicants in this space patent alone.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to vanadium redox flow batteries, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits for new entrants

Recent-year momentum has cooled across the named assignees tracked in this corpus, with only one showing any filing in the latest partial year — consistent with the broader decline visible in the filing trend.

Momentum leader
1 filing
latest-year activity

UOP (Universal Oil Products) is the only assignee still filing

Among the tracked assignees, Universal Oil Products shows one filing in the latest year while every other named assignee — including ESS Tech, Sumitomo Electric, Invinity Energy Systems, Kemiwatt and Lockheed Martin Advanced Energy Storage — shows none in that window.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Deepest collaboration
18 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

Sumitomo Electric and Kansai Electric Power file jointly at scale

The Sumitomo Electric–Kansai Electric Power pair files together far more than any other combination in the dataset, pointing to a long-running utility-and-manufacturer partnership around grid-scale deployment.

Co-assignee pairs
Historic influence
227 citations
top-cited record

Cascade and distributed-storage system patents anchor the field

The most-cited records in the corpus describe cascade redox flow battery systems and distributed-energy-storage architectures, filed years before the 2021 peak — later applicants are building claims that sit downstream of this foundational IP.

Most-cited records
🔍
Where claim space is thinner
Sub-areas with fewer records relative to core stack and electrolyte claims — worth checking before assuming the space is closed.
Organic-reductant electrolyte rebalancingShunt-current mitigation in multi-stack systemsGrid-integration control (H02J overlap)EV-adjacent flow battery propulsion (B60L overlap)Membrane crossover diagnostics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Universal Oil Products (UOP)1
ESS Tech, Inc.0
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.0
Invinity Energy Systems0
Kemiwatt0
Lockheed Martin Advanced Energy Storage, LLC0
UNIENERGY TECHNOLOGIES LLC0
Biaoneng Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing decline and thin cross-subclass activity both raise questions that a static table cannot answer on its own.

Check freedom-to-operate before scaling a stack design

With citation leaders concentrated in cascade and distributed-storage architectures, a new stack configuration should be checked against those foundational claims before committing to tooling.

Run a freedom-to-operate check

Track the assignees still active in the latest year

Only one named assignee shows filing activity in the most recent partial year — worth monitoring for signs of renewed investment or a pivot to a different chemistry.

Set up assignee monitoring

Probe the under-claimed adjacent subclasses

C07D, H02J and B60L each carry fewer than 30 records — enough to indicate interest, not enough to indicate saturation. A targeted search inside these subclasses may surface open claim space.

Explore adjacent IPC subclasses
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about vanadium redox flow battery patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole vanadium redox flow batteries corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.