https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/vector-quantization-for-retrieval-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Vector Quantization for Retrieval
Vector Quantization for Retrieval: Patents Behind Product Quantization and Codebook Compression
  • Concentrated at the top. The five leading assignees hold 44.9% of all 1,327 records in scope, and the ranked leaders extend to 100 companies with a long tail below them.
  • Growth has cooled, not stopped. Filings ran from 43 in 2021 to 32 in 2024, a -26% shift over that span, with the true 2025-2026 picture still filling in due to publication lag.
  • Video and audio codecs dominate the classification mix. H04N pictorial communication touches 41.8% of records and G10L speech/audio a further 19.6%, showing quantization claims are anchored in media compression more than in generic search infrastructure.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,327
Published Records
45%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-26%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (43 records) with 2024 (32) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,327 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent activity where product quantization, vector compression and residual quantization intersect with practical concerns like codebook training, exact reranking, quantization error and distance approximation — the mechanics that make compressed vector representations usable for retrieval at scale. The corpus spans 1,327 records published between 2015 and mid-2026.

Much of the underlying technique originates in video and audio codec work, where lattice and trellis-coded quantization first solved the problem of compressing signals without losing the ability to compare them cheaply. That lineage still shows up strongly in the classification mix, even as the same math gets repurposed for embedding search and approximate nearest-neighbour retrieval.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1M&K HLDG238
  2. 2FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV119
  3. 3HUAWEI TECH CO LTD92
  4. 4LG ELECTRONICS INC88
  5. 5QUALCOMM INC59
  6. 6DOLBY INTERNATIONAL AB47
  7. 7MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP39
  8. 8GOOGLE LLC35
  9. 9SAP SE27
  10. 10INTEL CORP20
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vector Quantization for Retrieval covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,327 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked in 2018 at 73 and have since drifted down, with 2021 at 43 and 2024 at 32 records — a -26% change over that three-year window. The 2025 and 2026 figures are undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months; they should not be read as a continued decline.

Filing trend, 2017-2026020406080662017732018201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H04N (pictorial communication) appears in 41.8% of records and G10L (speech and audio) in 19.6%, confirming the field's roots in media codecs. G06F (13.2%) and H03M (12.6%) reflect the general data-processing and coding layers, while G06N (7.3%) marks the smaller but growing overlap with AI-model-based approaches. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total.

IPC subclass compositionH04N · Pictorial communication (video…55541.8%G10L · Speech & audio analysis/synthe…26019.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…17513.2%H03M · Coding & code conversion16712.6%G06N · Computing based on AI models977.3%H04B · Transmission (general)725.4%G06T · Image data processing & genera…685.1%H04L · Digital information transmissi…594.4%Other35626.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,327 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vector Quantization for Retrieval covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Vector Quantization for Retrieval with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about vector quantization for retrieval and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior art

Most-cited records

Representative filing
US6944257B22005-09-13

US6944257B2 — Phase error cancellation circuit and method for fractional frequency dividers

KABEN RESEARCH INC.

A frequency divider circuit applies a variable division-ratio control signal alongside a residual quantization error signal to cancel phase error in the divided output, with both signals dithered to smooth the correction.Filed by Kaben Research Inc.; illustrates how residual quantization error terms surface even in circuit-level frequency-division work, well outside retrieval systems.

US6944257B2 — patent drawing 1US6944257B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation patents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5297170ALattice and trellis-coded quantization298
2US20100223237A1Lossless data compression and real-time decompression284
3US5490247AVideo subsystem for computer-based conferencing system275
4US5434913AAudio subsystem for computer-based conferencing system262
5US5515296AScan path for encoding and decoding two-dimensional signals254
6US5488570AEncoding and decoding video signals using adaptive filter switching criteria242
7US20040217956A1Method and system for processing, compressing, streaming, and interactive rendering of 3D color image data220
8US5684920AAcoustic signal transform coding method and decoding method having a high efficiency envelope flattening meth…197
9US20040042549A1Architecture and method for fine granularity scalable video coding193
10US6125398ACommunications subsystem for computer-based conferencing system using both ISDN B channels for transmission192

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within this corpus — treat them as markers of foundational influence, not current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vector Quantization for Retrieval covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for strategy

Three read-outs from the dataset that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Concentration
44.9%
of 1,327 records held by top 5

The field is led, not fragmented

The five leading assignees combined account for 44.9% of all 1,327 records in scope, and the top 10 extend that to 57.6%. A ranked list of 100 companies exists below them, but the tail thins quickly — most of those 100 hold only a handful of families each.

Source: assignee ranking, 100 companies
Momentum
-26%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Activity has eased from its post-2018 pace

Filings fell from 43 in 2021 to 32 in 2024, a -26% move over that span, continuing a slide from the 2018 peak of 73. Recent-year momentum data shows several of the largest historical filers posting zero or sharply reduced output in the latest tracked year, though 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2026
Composition
41.8%
of records classified under H04N

Codec heritage still shapes the claim space

H04N (pictorial communication) and G10L (speech and audio) together touch the majority of records, meaning most active claim territory still frames quantization as a media-compression problem rather than a retrieval-system one. G06N's smaller 7.3% share marks where AI-model framing is starting to enter.

Source: IPC subclass composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to vector quantization for retrieval, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Where filings cluster jointly
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.GAO YANG6
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.WIEGAND THOMAS4
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.SCHWARZ HEIKO3
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.SYCHEV MAXIM BORISOVITCH3
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.WINKEN MARTIN2
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.HINZ TOBIAS2
Qualcomm Inc.YANG WEI2
Qualcomm Inc.WU LIANGMING2

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data, with the strongest linking a major Chinese electronics filer to an individual inventor at 6 shared records — a pattern typical of in-house inventor-assignee collaboration rather than cross-company joint filing.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vector Quantization for Retrieval covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The leading assignees span consumer electronics, telecom infrastructure and standards-adjacent codec research, with the ranked field extending to 100 companies before the tail becomes sparse.

Leader
238
records

A single filer well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 238 records, more than four times the count at fifth place (59). That gap suggests a deliberate, sustained filing programme rather than opportunistic patenting.

Source: assignee ranking
Mid-field
59 → 20
records, 5th to 10th place

A steep drop after the top five

Record counts fall from 59 at fifth place to 20 at tenth, and the top 10 combined still represent 57.6% of all 1,327 records in scope. Below tenth place, the ranking spreads across many single- and low-digit filers.

Source: assignee ranking
Momentum
-75% to -100%
YoY, latest year

Even leading filers have gone quiet recently

Several of the largest historical assignees show zero filings or year-over-year declines of -75% to -100% in the latest tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this likely overstates any real slowdown, but it is a signal worth confirming rather than ignoring.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas that sit outside the dense H04N/G10L codec core, where claim density is lower relative to the techniques' apparent applicability.
Codebook training for embedding searchAsymmetric distance computation at query timeCache-locality-aware quantized index layoutsResidual quantization for multi-vector retrievalCompression-ratio/accuracy tradeoff tuning
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Inc.1-75%
M&K Holdings Inc.0—
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.0-100%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0-100%
LG Electronics Inc.0-100%
Dolby International AB0-100%
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0—
Google LLC0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vector Quantization for Retrieval covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking or identifying open claim space.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top holders

With 57.6% of records held by the top 10 assignees, any new filing in codebook training or distance approximation should be checked against those portfolios first.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka →

Watch for a shift toward AI-model framing

G06N's 7.3% share is small today but represents the branch most likely to grow as quantization techniques get reframed for embedding-based retrieval rather than media codecs.

Track emerging IPC shifts in Eureka →

Validate the 2025-2026 dip before acting on it

Recent-year momentum figures showing declines at major assignees are affected by publication lag; confirm with filing-date data before concluding the field is cooling.

Run a filing-date trend check in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vector Quantization for Retrieval covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vector Quantization for Retrieval covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Vector Quantization for Retrieval in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole vector quantization for retrieval corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.