Book a demo

V2X Communication Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

V2X Communication Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/vehicle-to-everything-v2x-communication-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Wireless Communications
Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication Patents
  • Filing has cooled since 2019. The peak year for V2X filings was 2019 at 436 records; by the most recent full year, volume has fallen well below that level, with 2026 still partial.
  • One IPC subclass dominates claim scope. H04W (wireless communication networks) appears in 2,212 of 2,351 records — almost every filing anchors its claims there, leaving H04L, G08G and smaller subclasses as secondary battlegrounds.
  • Momentum is pulling back across the board. The leading assignee filed 6 in the latest year, down 60% year-on-year, while several other major filers dropped to zero — a signal the field is consolidating rather than expanding.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,351
Published Records
57%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-68%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (320 records) with 2024 (104) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,351 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the V2X patent record actually shows

Vehicle-to-Everything communication sits at the intersection of cellular standards work and traffic-system engineering. The corpus behind this page — 2,351 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 — is built from claims that reference latency requirements, message sets, security credential management, DSRC coexistence or roadside units, filtered to the wireless-networking and traffic-control IPC classes. That combination captures the practical engineering layer of V2X rather than the broader connected-vehicle marketing category.

Filing activity rose sharply through the late 2010s as cellular V2X (C-V2X) standardisation work at 3GPP intersected with early roadside-unit deployments, peaked in 2019, and has since declined. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart understate real activity — but the shape of the decline from 2019 onward predates that lag window and reflects a genuine slowdown in new filing.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
  1. 1LG ELECTRONICS INC580
  2. 2QUALCOMM INC404
  3. 3HUAWEI TECH CO LTD187
  4. 4TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK89
  5. 5TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)81
  6. 6SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD78
  7. 7INTEL CORP72
  8. 8BLACKBERRY LTD54
  9. 9APPLE INC52
  10. 10INNOVATIVE TECH LAB CO LTD48
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,351-family corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filing trend

Filings ran 224 in 2017, rose to a peak of 436 in 2019, and by the 2022 midpoint sat at 318 — already below peak. The trajectory to 2026 (partial, 14 records) is a flat-to-declining line, not a growth curve.

Filing trend0125250375500224201720184362019202020212022202320242025142026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition

H04W (wireless communication networks) covers 2,212 of 2,351 records, with H04L (digital information transmission) a distant second at 779 and G08G (traffic control systems) at 410. B60W, G01S, G06F and G07C each cover under 100 records — these are the peripheral classes where V2X claims touch vehicle control, positioning, data processing and access control.

IPC compositionH04W · Wireless communication networks2,21294.1%H04L · Digital information transmissi…77933.1%G08G · Traffic control systems41017.4%H04B · Transmission (general)1185.0%B60W · Hybrid/joint vehicle control944.0%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning562.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…462.0%G07C · Time/attendance & checking dev…341.4%Other27911.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,351 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about vehicle-to-everything (v2x) communication and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records other filings build on

Representative filing
US20190110177A12019-04-11

US20190110177A1 — resource selection within a latency requirement

LG ELECTRONICS INC.

The present invention provides a vehicle-to-X (V2X) operation method performed by a V2X terminal in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: selecting a resource to be used for performing a V2X communication within a range satisfying a latency requirement; and performing a V2X communication on the basis of the selected resource.Filed by LG Electronics, published 2019-04-11 — a resource-selection method built explicitly around meeting a latency bound, a claim shape that recurs across the most-cited records in this corpus.

US20190110177A1 — patent drawing 1US20190110177A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing details
Most-cited V2X records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200029318A1Method and apparatus for high reliability transmission in vehicle to everything (V2X) communication501
2US20200029340A1Method and apparatus for NR v2x resource selection371
3US20200037343A1Method and apparatus for network controlled resource allocation in NR v2x259
4WO2019036578A1Selecting resources for sidelink communication based on GEO-location information194
5US20190174530A1Method for transmitting and receiving data in wireless communication system and apparatus therefor164
6US20180242190A1Congestion control for vehicular-to-anything services164
7US20220007403A1Uu based sidelink control for NR v2x161
8US20200280827A1V2x communications using multiple radio access technologies (multi-rat)152
9US20200342760A1Method and apparatus for vehicle maneuver planning and messaging148
10US20220039080A1Selecting Resources for Sidelink Communication Based on Geo-Location Information139

Citation counts reward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this searched corpus — read them as a marker of influence on subsequent drafting, not as a current importance score.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the corpus that matter more for strategy than the raw counts do on their own.

Citation concentration
501 citations
top-cited record

The highest-value claim territory is already staked

The single most-cited record, on high-reliability V2X transmission, carries 501 citations — more than double the next entry. Records built on resource selection and reliability sit at the centre of the citation graph, meaning new filings in that exact claim shape face the densest prior art.

Citation data covers this corpus only
Jurisdiction spread
1,017 US filings
vs. 508 EPO, 194 China

Filing is US-weighted but not US-exclusive

The United States receives more than double the filings of the EPO and over five times China's count in this dataset. WIPO/PCT filings (153) and India (143) show the technology is being routed for multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filed as a single-market play.

Receiving office counts, this corpus
Collaboration is thin
10 co-assignee pairs
across 2,351 families

Most filings are single-assignee, not joint ventures

Only 10 co-assignee pairs surface in the corpus, and the strongest of those links one major filer to individual named inventors rather than to another corporate assignee. Cross-company joint filing is the exception here, not the norm.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to vehicle-to-everything (v2x) communication, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and where the gaps sit

Filing volume concentrates at the top of the ranking, but the momentum data tells a different story: nearly every major name has pulled back in the latest year, not just the smaller filers.

Momentum leader
6 filings, -60% YoY
latest year

Even the top filer is decelerating

The leading assignee still filed more than any other name in the latest year, but its own volume fell 60% year-on-year — a pullback, not a pause, given the size of the drop relative to prior activity.

Latest full year of filing data
Zero-momentum cluster
0 filings, -100% YoY
four major assignees

Several large filers stopped filing entirely in the latest year

LG Electronics, Huawei, Samsung and Toyota each recorded zero filings in the most recent year after prior activity — consistent with core V2X claim territory being viewed internally as settled rather than still open.

Recent-year momentum, this corpus
Long tail
2,351 families
total corpus

A long tail of single-filing entrants sits below the concentrated top

Regional research institutes and vehicle-electronics specialists appear as single or low-count filers rather than repeat filers, suggesting narrower, defensive filings rather than sustained R&D programmes in this claim space.

Assignee ranking, full corpus
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where the IPC composition data shows thin coverage relative to the core wireless-networking claims
Radar-assisted positioning fusion for V2X (G01S overlap)Security credential management protocolsDSRC-to-C-V2X coexistence schemesRoadside-unit hardware architecturesJoint vehicle-control message sets (B60W overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Incorporated6-60%
LG Electronics Inc.0-100%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0-100%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson0
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea)0-100%
Toyota Motor Corporation0-100%
BlackBerry Limited0
Intel Corporation0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field consolidating around resource-selection and reliability claims while several adjacent branches stay thin. Two directions follow from that.

Map your own claim draft against the cited core

Before drafting around latency requirements or resource selection, check how closely your language sits to the most-cited records in this corpus — that claim shape is the most densely covered in the dataset.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches for freedom to operate

Security credential management and DSRC coexistence show materially lower record counts than core wireless-networking claims — worth a dedicated freedom-to-operate pass before committing R&D spend there.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on V2X patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole vehicle-to-everything (v2x) communication corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.