Book a demo

Vehicle-to-Grid Residential Energy Patent Landscape

Vehicle-to-Grid Residential Energy Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Vehicle-to-Grid System for Residential Energy Patent Landscape in 2026

The residential vehicle-to-grid patent space is highly concentrated, with Toyota Motor Corporation and TAE Technologies together accounting for the majority of filings among the top ranked applicants. The field is in a growth stage on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent filing years remain understated by publication lag.

44
Patent families in scope
58%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+560%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Toyota leads a concentrated, automaker-dominated field

Toyota Motor Corporation holds the top position among all applicants, followed by TAE Technologies Inc as a close challenger. The top five filers collectively account for 58% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers, signaling a field where a small number of players have staked early, substantial positions.

The tier gap between the top two filers and the rest is pronounced: the third through fifth ranked applicants each hold three or fewer patent families, compared with twelve for the leader. Below rank five, most applicants hold only one or two patent families, indicating a long tail of early-stage or one-off filings.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Toyota Motor Corporation12
2TAE Technologies Inc9
3Audi AG3
4Toyota Motor North America Inc3
5Mitsubishi Electric Corporation2
6TOYOTA MOTOR ENG & MFG NORTH AMERICA INC2
7Schneider Electric USA Inc2
8Honda Motor Co Ltd2
9BMW AG (Bayerische Motoren Werke AG)2
10Jayanand B2
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Robert Bosch GmbH1
12Dr K Selvakumar1
13Mercedes-Benz Group AG1
14IoTecha Corp1
15Zappass NV1
16Volvo Car Corporation1
17Dr Selvabharathi D1
18Dr D Karthikeyan1
19Eaton Intelligent Power Ltd1
20Ford Global Technologies LLC1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Toyota’s lead, reinforced by the separate presence of Toyota Motor North America Inc and Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America Inc, suggests a deliberate, coordinated portfolio strategy across multiple filing entities. TAE Technologies’ strong second-place position reflects a specialist focus on power conversion hardware rather than system-level grid integration.

The most recent filing years are further understated by standard patent publication lag, so apparent activity in 20242025 should be read as a floor, not a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Rapid growth from 2022 with power and EV propulsion dominating the technology mix

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that mobilized quickly in 2022–2023 and is anchored in grid-power and EV-propulsion engineering, with ancillary branches in power conversion, battery management, and digital commerce remaining comparatively sparse.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2019, then accelerated sharply into 2022 and peaked in 2023 at 15 patent families before stepping down in 2024 and 2025. The step-down in the two most recent years should be interpreted cautiously: publication lag routinely suppresses counts for the trailing 18–24 months, so the true recent-year totals are likely higher than shown.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 15 in 2023.0201702018220192202012021820221520231020246202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) are the dominant branches, together covering the large majority of records. H02M (power conversion) and H01M (batteries and fuel cells) form a secondary tier. Branches such as G06Q (business and commerce data processing), G05B (control and regulating systems), B60W (hybrid vehicle control), and G01C (navigation and distance) each represent a small fraction of records, pointing to areas of relative sparsity within an otherwise power-engineering-centric corpus.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 43; B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion 33.H02J · Power supply & gr…43B60L · Electric vehicle …33H02M · Power conversion …11H01M · Batteries, cells …9G06Q · Business, commerc…4G05B · Control & regulat…3B60W · Hybrid/joint vehi…2G01C · Distance, navigat…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20230256847A1Published 2023-08-17

Charging system for an electric home energy storag…

Audi AG

A charging system for an electrical home energy storage feeding a home alternating current supply network, which is connected across an AC-DC converter to the home alternating current supply network, comprises a coupling device for the direct charging of the home energy storage from at least one electrical motor vehicle energy accumulator of a motor… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Charging system for an electric home energy storag… — patent drawingCharging system for an electric home energy storag… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Bidirectional DC wallbox for electric vehicles12
2Health-based energy distribution using vehicle bat…4
3Energy storage optimization4
4Bidirectional DC wallbox for electric vehicles4
5Systems, devices, and methods for module-based cas…3
6Vehicle battery life management for energy solutions2
7Power conversion system and cable relay2
8Energy transfer by electric vehicles1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations — maturity stage, competitive concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic spread — shape the risk and opportunity calculus for any new entrant or incumbent seeking to build a defensible position.

Growth

Growth stage, with annual pace easing from a 2023 peak

The field is classified as Growth, with the recent three-year filing window sitting well above the prior three-year window. However, annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak, consistent with an early-growth phase that mobilized quickly and has not yet reached sustained plateau levels. Publication lag means the genuine recent-period output is understated, so the growth stage designation is unlikely to be revised downward in the near term.

Life-cycle: Growth
Concentration

Top two filers hold a commanding share; rest of field is fragmented

The top five filers account for 58% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, and the top two — Toyota Motor Corporation and TAE Technologies — are separated from the rest of the field by a large margin. This concentration means IP freedom-to-operate analysis should start with these two portfolios. The long tail of single-family filers also signals that many organizations are testing the space without committing to broad coverage.

High concentration
Collaboration

No co-applicant filings identified in this corpus

The collaboration evidence is pending: no co-applicant patent families were returned for this corpus. This absence is notable in an application area where automakers, energy utilities, and residential technology providers might be expected to co-develop. It may reflect the early-stage nature of the field, where parties are still establishing proprietary positions before entering joint development agreements, or it may reflect the narrow scope of the current corpus.

No co-filings detected
Geography

United States is the dominant filing jurisdiction

The United States accounts for the largest share of filing activity, followed at a distance by Europe via the EPO, India, and smaller showings in Australia, Canada, Germany, WIPO/PCT, Austria, and the United Kingdom. The US dominance reflects both the location of key applicants and the strategic priority placed on the American residential energy market. The relatively limited PCT and EPO coverage by some filers leaves potential freedom-to-operate in non-US markets.

US-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle classification, collaboration data, and jurisdiction distribution in the evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Toyota and TAE Technologies lead, with divergent technology emphasis

The two leading filers have built their positions through distinct technical routes: Toyota Motor Corporation concentrates on grid integration and power supply systems, while TAE Technologies focuses on power conversion hardware and EV propulsion interfaces.

Leader · Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Motor Corporation holds 12 patent families, the largest position in this corpus, with its technology emphasis concentrated in H02J 3 (grid-connected power supply systems), H02J 9 (uninterruptible power supply and backup systems), and B60L 53 (EV charging infrastructure). Its applicant momentum is classified as a new entrant on a multi-year trajectory, reflecting the recency of its coordinated push into residential V2G. The presence of two additional Toyota-affiliated entities in the top ten suggests a deliberate multi-entity filing strategy to broaden coverage.

families: 12
Challenger · TAE Technologies Inc

TAE Technologies Inc

TAE Technologies Inc holds 9 patent families and is classified as a new entrant on momentum metrics, having placed all of its recent filings within the current measurement window. Its technology emphasis is anchored in H02M 7 (AC/DC power conversion) and B60L 50 and B60L 58 (electric vehicle propulsion and battery management), positioning it as a hardware-layer specialist rather than a grid-systems integrator. The most-cited patent in the corpus — a bidirectional DC wallbox for electric vehicles with 12 citations — aligns closely with TAE’s power conversion focus.

families: 9
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 applicants, including Audi AG, Mitsubishi Electric, Schneider Electric, Honda, BMW, and Robert Bosch.
Audi AGMitsubishi Electric Corporation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
TAE Technologies Inc9▲ new entrant
Toyota Motor Corporation7▲ new entrant
Audi AG1▲ new entrant
Toyota Motor North America Inc3▲ new entrant
Honda Motor Co Ltd2▲ new entrant
Schneider Electric USA Inc1▲ new entrant
BMW AG (Bayerische Motoren Werke AG)2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking and technology emphasis from IPC focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant power-engineering core

Several IPC branches appear at low share within this corpus and sit adjacent to the dominant H02J and B60L core. These are observations of relative sparsity; their value as entry points depends on technical fit and competitive context.

G05B · Control and Regulating Systems

G05B accounts for only 3 patent records and roughly 3% of the branch distribution, making it one of the least-covered technical areas in the corpus. Intelligent control logic — adaptive charging schedules, demand-response algorithms, and predictive grid management — is a plausible technical need for residential V2G systems that improves both user experience and grid stability. Toyota Motor North America’s filing activity includes G05B 13 (adaptive control), suggesting the branch has technical traction, but coverage remains thin and an applicant with deep control-systems expertise could find limited prior art blocking.

Search this in Eureka →

G06Q · Business, Commerce and Administrative Data Processing

G06Q appears in only 4 patent records, representing approximately 4% of branch coverage, making it one of the sparser areas relative to the engineering-heavy core. Residential V2G systems require energy trading, billing, incentive management, and prosumer settlement mechanisms — all of which map to G06Q. The branch has plausible technical value as grid operators and energy retailers seek to monetize bidirectional flows, but current filer attention is minimal. Entrants from the energy software or utility sector, rather than automotive OEMs, may be better positioned to develop this adjacent layer.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See detailed branch-level gap analysis across all 13 IPC classes, including B60W hybrid vehicle control and G01C navigation-integrated charging.
B60W · Hybrid and joint vehicle controlG01C · Navigation and distance measurement+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is measured by patent-record count and share within the corpus; low share indicates relative under-filing, not absence of technical need.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsB60L 53 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 55 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 58 · Electric vehicle propulsionH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systems
TAE Technologies IncStrong · 7AbsentAbsentStrong · 7Moderate · 2
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 7Moderate · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Schneider Electric USA IncStrong · 2Strong · 2Strong · 2AbsentModerate · 1
Toyota Motor North America IncStrong · 3AbsentStrong · 2AbsentAbsent
Audi AGAbsentStrong · 2AbsentAbsentStrong · 3
BMW AG (Bayerische Motoren Werke AG)Strong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own V2G patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.