Book a demo

Vehicle-to-Grid System for Utility Grid Patent Landscape

Vehicle-to-Grid System for Utility Grid Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Vehicle-to-Grid System for Utility Grid Patent Landscape in 2026

The vehicle-to-grid utility space spans 365 patent families and is in an active growth phase, with filings rising sharply over the multi-year window and the United States holding the lead jurisdiction. The field is moderately concentrated, with Beta Air LLC and Delta Electronics leading a fragmented top tier that includes automakers, power-electronics specialists, and utility operators across multiple geographies.

365
Patent families in scope
26%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+91%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Beta Air and Delta Electronics lead a broadly distributed field

Beta Air LLC holds the top position with 23 patent families, edging Delta Electronics Inc at 22, followed by Toyota Jidosha KK and Huawei Technologies each at 15, and Toyota Motor North America at 13. The top five filers’ share of the hundred largest filers stands at 26%, indicating that no single player commands a dominant share.

The 26% concentration among the top five of the top hundred filers confirms a fragmented competitive structure. The gap between the leader (23 patent families) and the sixth-ranked Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau (10 patent families) is noticeable but not insurmountable, suggesting the second tier could close ground through sustained filing activity.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Beta Air LLC23
2Delta Electronics Inc22
3Toyota Motor Corporation15
4Huawei Technologies Co Ltd15
5Toyota Motor North America Inc13
6Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau, Guangdong Power Grid Co Ltd10
7Fermata Energy II LLC9
8TAE Technologies Inc9
9Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co Ltd9
10Volvo Car Corporation8
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited7
12Hyundai Mobis Co Ltd7
13Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd7
14Cummins Inc6
15Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation5
16Hyundai Motor Co Ltd5
17GM Global Technology Operations LLC5
18NEC Energy Solutions Inc5
19InductEV Inc4
20Honda Motor Co Ltd4
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The diversity of entity types at the top — an aviation-focused EV charging specialist, a power-electronics manufacturer, two Toyota entities, and a major telecoms-turned-energy conglomerate — reflects that V2G technology sits at the intersection of multiple industries, and R&D investment is not yet converging around a single dominant stack.

Filing data for the most recent 18–24 months is subject to publication lag and will undercount activity; the apparent plateau in 20252026 data should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings have grown sharply since 2019 and the technology mix is anchored by power and EV classes

Annual filing volume accelerated from single digits in 2017–2018 to a sustained run above 39 families per year from 2020 onward, with a 91% growth rate over the recent window. The technology composition is dominated by two classes that together cover the core V2G interaction, with a long tail of adjacent branches pointing to expanding application contexts.

Annual filing trend

Filings jumped sharply from 2019 (26 families) through 2023–2024 (71 and 75 families respectively), consistent with the 91% recent-window growth rate. The 2025 figure of 39 and the near-zero 2026 count reflect publication lag rather than a real deceleration; the underlying growth trajectory remains intact on a multi-year basis.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 75 in 2024.920176201826201941202039202156202271202375202439202532026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) together account for the overwhelming share of classified records, confirming that bidirectional power management and EV charging control are the field’s technical core. H02M (power conversion) forms a meaningful secondary cluster, while H01M (batteries), G06Q (business and data processing), and B64F (aircraft ground installations) are notable but sparsely filed adjacent branches.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 360; B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion 267.H02J · Power supply & gr…360B60L · Electric vehicle …267H02M · Power conversion …93H01M · Batteries, cells …33G06Q · Business, commerc…29B64F · Ground installati…13G05B · Control & regulat…10G06N · Computing based o…10↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US9630511B2Published 2017-04-25

Vehicle-to-grid system with power loss compensation

Nissan Motor CO., LTD.

A vehicle-to-grid system connected to a power grid includes a first vehicle group of one or more vehicles connected to the power grid, a second vehicle group of one or more vehicles connected to the power grid, and a vehicle-to-grid controller. The vehicle-to-grid controller causes each vehicle from the second vehicle group to supply electrical power to the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Vehicle-to-grid system with power loss compensation — patent drawingVehicle-to-grid system with power loss compensation — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Methods and systems for an integrated charging sys…203
2Method and apparatus for charging and discharging53
3Charging system for electric vehicles45
4Vehicle-Solar-Grid Integration for Back up Power43
5Module of suppressing inrush current, method of co…39
6Methods for using temperature data to protect elec…34
7一种基于风光柴储微网的双向充电桩系统32
8Energy storage based countermeasure for a delayed …32

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The V2G utility grid space combines a growth-stage filing curve with moderate fragmentation, creating both room for differentiated entry and risk of rapid crowding in core classes. Four structural reads follow.

Growth

Growth stage — annual volume still rising

The lifecycle is classified as Growth, with annual filings still rising and the 2024 peak of 75 families not yet showing an eased trend. The 91% recent-window growth rate confirms this is not a mature, saturated field. R&D teams entering now can still build meaningful portfolio positions without facing the cost structure of a late-stage crowded space.

Growth stage
Concentration

Fragmented top tier — no single dominant assignee

The top five filers hold 26% of the top hundred filers’ combined total, a moderate concentration level that means no single player can set de-facto standards through patent density alone. The top-ranked applicant holds 23 patent families, only one ahead of the second-placed challenger at 22. New entrants with focused filing strategies in under-served sub-classes can carve defensible positions.

Fragmented
Collaboration

Limited co-filing — Toyota entities are the primary co-applicant pair

The only documented co-filing relationship in evidence is between Toyota Motor North America and Toyota Jidosha KK, with one jointly filed patent family. This intra-corporate pairing reflects coordinated IP strategy between a parent and its North American entity rather than cross-industry collaboration. The near-absence of cross-company co-filings suggests that formal R&D alliances have not yet materialized in the patent record, leaving open the possibility of ecosystem partnerships as a differentiator.

Low collaboration
Geography

US leads, China and Europe are active secondary markets

The United States accounts for the highest number of patent records, followed by China and Europe (EPO). India and WIPO (PCT) filings are also present, indicating that applicants are beginning to protect V2G technology in emerging EV markets. Germany and Canada round out the coverage. Teams seeking global freedom-to-operate should prioritize US, CN, and EP prosecution as the core three jurisdictions.

US-led, global
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Toyota Motor North America IncToyota Motor Corporation1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction data in evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Beta Air and Delta Electronics lead distinct technical routes at the top

The two leading applicants approach V2G from different angles — one rooted in aviation-linked EV charging infrastructure, the other in power-conversion electronics — and their momentum profiles diverge sharply in the recent period.

Leader · Beta Air LLC

Beta Air LLC

Beta Air LLC holds the top position with 23 patent families and a flat recent trajectory (0% change vs. prior period), indicating a stable but not accelerating filing pace. Its technical emphasis runs across power supply and grid systems (H02J 7), EV propulsion and charging (B60L 53), and notably aircraft ground installations (B64F 1), reflecting its aviation-linked eVTOL charging infrastructure focus. This distinctive B64F footprint distinguishes Beta Air from conventional automotive V2G players.

families: 23
Challenger · Delta Electronics Inc

Delta Electronics Inc

Delta Electronics Inc sits at 22 patent families with a modest decline in recent filings (-9% vs. prior period). Its portfolio is concentrated in power conversion — H02J 7 (grid systems), H02M 1, and H02M 7 (AC/DC conversion) — signalling a power-electronics-first approach to V2G hardware rather than a vehicle-integration strategy. As a high-volume power electronics manufacturer, Delta’s V2G IP directly supports charger and inverter product lines serving utility-scale deployments.

families: 22
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology emphasis, and momentum trends in the complete landscape report.
Toyota Motor North America IncHuawei Technologies Co Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Beta Air LLC11▬ 0%
Delta Electronics Inc10▼ -9%
Huawei Technologies Co Ltd3▼ -75%
Toyota Motor North America Inc11▲ new entrant
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd (CATL)4▲ new entrant
Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau, Guangdong Power Grid Co Ltd10▲ new entrant
Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co Ltd5▲ new entrant
Toyota Motor Corporation8▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards cite patent family counts from the applicant ranking; momentum from recent vs. prior filing analysis.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches worth watching in V2G utility grid IP

Several IPC branches sit at the margins of the dominant H02J/B60L core with low filing counts relative to technical relevance. These represent observations of relative sparsity; they warrant further diligence before being treated as investment opportunities.

G06N · AI-based computing models

G06N (computing based on AI models) carries only 10 patent records against a total corpus anchored in the hundreds for the core classes. Given that AI-driven grid dispatch, predictive state-of-charge management, and demand-response optimization are increasingly discussed in V2G literature, the sparse filing count suggests the IP has not yet followed the technical conversation. An entrant with demonstrated AI-for-grid algorithms and a credible V2G integration path could build a differentiated position here before the class becomes crowded.

Search this in Eureka →

G06Q · Business and commerce data processing

G06Q has 29 patent records — meaningful in absolute terms but representing only 3% of classified records in this corpus. V2G business models involving energy trading, aggregation platforms, and utility billing are commercially significant but appear under-protected in patent form. This may reflect a preference for trade-secret or software-copyright protection in the business-model layer, or simply an early-stage IP strategy gap. Teams developing V2G market-settlement software or EV-fleet aggregation platforms should assess whether G06Q claims provide a viable protection route.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level analysis including filing density, key assignees, and entry-path assessment for all adjacent IPC classes.
G05B · Control and regulating systemsH01M · Batteries, cells and fuel cells+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches identified by low filing share relative to the dominant H02J and B60L classes.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technical route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systemsB60L 53 · Electric vehicle propulsionH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsB60L 55 · Electric vehicle propulsionH02M 7 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)
Beta Air LLCStrong · 23Strong · 19AbsentModerate · 5Absent
Huawei Technologies Co LtdStrong · 17Strong · 10AbsentAbsentModerate · 7
Delta Electronics IncStrong · 12Moderate · 6Moderate · 4AbsentStrong · 8
Toyota Motor North America IncStrong · 5Strong · 6Strong · 9Moderate · 4Absent
Volvo Car CorporationAbsentStrong · 6Strong · 8Strong · 8Absent
Cummins IncStrong · 6Strong · 6AbsentStrong · 6Moderate · 3
Guangzhou Power Supply Bureau, Guangdong Power Grid Co LtdAbsentStrong · 9Strong · 10AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own V2G technology landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.