Book a demo

Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Patent Landscape 2026

Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Patent Landscape in 2026

V2G is in a confirmed growth phase, with a 49% rise in patent families over the recent multi-year window and no sign of structural deceleration through 2024. Honda Motor leads a moderately concentrated field where automakers, wireless-charging specialists, and grid operators each hold distinct technology positions.

6,823
Patent families in scope
26%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+49%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··8 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Honda leads a moderately concentrated V2G field with automakers and grid operators in distinct tiers

The V2G corpus covers 6,823 patent families globally. Honda Motor Co. Ltd. leads the applicant ranking with 329 patent families, followed closely by WiTricity AI Tech LLC (294) and Toyota Jidosha KK (288), with Qualcomm Inc. (209) and Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd. (198) rounding out the top five.

The top five filers account for 26% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers — a moderate concentration level indicating that no single player dominates the space and meaningful room exists for challengers. A visible tier gap separates the top five from the next cluster of mid-tier applicants, most of whom hold fewer than 200 families.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Honda Motor Co., Ltd.329
2WiTricity AI Tech LLC294
3Toyota Motor Corporation288
4Qualcomm Incorporated209
5Hyundai Motor Company198
6WiTricity Corporation189
7State Grid Corporation of China162
8Contemporary Amperex Technology (Hong Kong) Limited159
9ChargePoint, Inc.121
10Toyota Motor North America, Inc.121
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)113
12BYD Co., Ltd.103
13BMW AG92
14GM Global Technology Operations LLC78
15Ford Global Technologies LLC69
16State Grid Shanghai Municipal Electric Power Co.67
17Volvo Car Corporation67
18Nuvve Corporation66
19Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co., Ltd.59
20Auckland UniServices Ltd.55
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect divergent strategic emphases: Honda and Toyota anchor the automotive OEM tier, WiTricity AI Tech and Qualcomm concentrate on wireless power transfer, and Hyundai Motor bridges OEM charging and grid-interaction systems. This multi-axis structure means incumbency in one route does not automatically translate to dominance in another.

Applicant rankings and the 6,823-family corpus total are measured at the patent-family level. Technology-branch (IPC), jurisdiction, and route-matrix figures are at the patent-record level — a single family can carry multiple IPC codes or be filed in multiple offices, so those counts can exceed the family total and are not directly comparable to it. The most recent 18–24 months are under-counted due to publication lag; treat 2025–2026 filing volumes as provisional.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top 20 applicants ranked by patent families in the V2G corpus. Applicant family counts can overlap where a family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Annual filings still rising; EV propulsion and grid-power systems dominate the technology mix

Two views into the corpus reveal both the pace of activity and where technical effort is concentrated. The filing trend shows the multi-year growth trajectory; the IPC composition shows which technical branches carry the most patent-record weight.

Annual filing trend

Annual family counts rose from 333 in 2017 to a recorded peak of 1,185 in 2024, reflecting the Growth life-cycle stage with a 49% rise over the recent window. The apparent dip in 2025 (794) and the low 2026 figure (161) are artifacts of publication lag, not a real deceleration — final counts for those years will be substantially higher once pending applications publish.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,185 in 2024.333201738320185682019574202092420211,002202289920231,185202479420251612026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

At the patent-record level, B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion) and H02J (Power supply and grid systems) are by far the dominant branches, each carrying over 5,900 records, confirming that the field’s core is the charging interface between vehicle and grid. H02M (Power conversion), G06Q (Business and commerce data processing), and H01M (Batteries and cells) each account for roughly 650–1,050 records, representing active secondary branches. Deeper classes such as G06N (AI models), H04L (Digital transmission), and H02S (Solar/PV) carry 50–260 records each, signaling early-stage cross-disciplinary activity.

Technology compositionB60L · Electric vehicle propulsion leads with 6,367; H02J · Power supply & grid systems 5,990.B60L · Electric vehicle …6,367H02J · Power supply & gr…5,990H02M · Power conversion …1,046G06Q · Business, commerc…1,025H01M · Batteries, cells …659G06F · Electric digital …331G01R · Electric & magnet…322H01F · Magnets, inductor…270↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. IPC counts are at the patent-record level; one family can carry multiple IPC codes.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Foundational and most-cited patents

The most-cited families that anchor this space. Hover a row and click to open it in Eureka.

Featured patent
US20260005521A1Published 2026-01-01

Dynamic scheduling of electric vehicle bidirection…

International Business Machines Corporation

An exemplary system comprises a memory that stores and a processor that executes computer executable components stored in the memory, wherein the computer executable components comprise an optimizing component that generates a fleet-level solution for maintaining a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) system by a fleet of electric vehicles (EVs), and a scheduling… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Dynamic scheduling of electric vehicle bidirection… — patent drawingDynamic scheduling of electric vehicle bidirection… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Most-cited patents
#PatentCitations
1Smart electric vehicle (EV) charging and grid inte…1,035
2Wireless energy transfer between a source and a ve…1,006
3Wireless power antenna alignment adjustment system…735
4Smart electric vehicle (EV) charging and grid inte…583
5Wireless power transfer for chargeable devices556
6Method and apparatus for an electrical vehicle506
7Wireless energy transfer with variable size resona…500
8Wireless energy transfer and continuous radio stat…477

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts accrue over time, so this list favours older, broadly-cited patents and may include general-purpose work beyond the specific topic; treat it as foundational context rather than a current-activity ranking.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Most-cited patent families for this query, ranked by total forward citations.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What V2G’s structure means for R&D investment decisions

Reading concentration, life-cycle stage, collaboration patterns, and geographic spread together gives a clearer picture of where entry barriers are high and where white space remains actionable.

Growth

Confirmed Growth stage — annual volume has not yet peaked

The lifecycle evidence places V2G firmly in the Growth stage, with annual filings still rising and the 2024 recorded volume (1,185 families) representing the highest single-year figure in the dataset. A 49% multi-year growth rate confirms the field has not entered a consolidation or maturity phase. R&D investment made now enters a field where IP positions are still being established, but where the window for foundational claims in core charging protocols is narrowing.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a clear two-tier structure

The top five filers hold 26% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output — moderate rather than dominant concentration. A gap exists between the top five (198–329 families each) and the next tier (roughly 60–189 families each), indicating that catching the leaders in core B60L/H02J space requires sustained investment. However, in adjacent branches such as AI-based grid optimization (G06N) or wireless-power conversion (H02M), the concentration is lower and entry costs are structurally smaller.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Hyundai–Kia–Myongji University cluster is the most active co-filing network

The most active co-applicant pair is Hyundai Motor and Kia (181 joint filings), followed by Hyundai Motor with Myongji University (52) and Kia with Myongji University (48). On the Chinese side, BYD co-files frequently with Shenzhen Fangchengbao Automotive (44), and State Grid Corporation co-files with State Grid Beijing Electric Power (35), China Electric Power Research Institute (26), and State Grid Tianjin Marketing Service Center (16). CATL and Shenzhen Times Future Energy also show 31 joint filings. These clusters signal that tri-party OEM–automaker–university alliances and state-enterprise ecosystems are structurally important to V2G IP formation.

Active co-filing clusters
Geography

US and China together account for the majority of patent records; India and Japan are significant secondary offices

At the patent-record level, the United States leads with 2,550 records and China follows with 2,225, together representing the two primary filing jurisdictions. Europe (EPO) contributes 1,023 records and WIPO (PCT) adds 741, providing broad international coverage. India (524) and Japan (512) are notable secondary offices, and Germany (446) reflects the importance of European automotive manufacturing. Filers seeking broad protection should prioritize US, China, and EPO as the minimum portfolio, with India and Japan as high-value secondary targets given EV adoption trajectories.

US + China dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Hyundai Motor CompanyKia Corporation181
Hyundai Motor CompanyMyongji University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation52
Kia CorporationMyongji University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation48
BYD Co., Ltd.Shenzhen Fangchengbao Automotive Sales Co., Ltd.44
State Grid Corporation of ChinaState Grid Beijing Electric Power Co., Ltd.35
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)Shenzhen Times Future Energy Technology Co., Ltd.31
State Grid Corporation of ChinaChina Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.26
State Grid Corporation of ChinaState Grid Tianjin Electric Power Company Marketing Service Center16
Hyundai Motor CompanyKia Corporation14
State Grid Corporation of ChinaNARI Group Corporation10

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction and collaboration figures are at the patent-record level; lifecycle and concentration read from the family-level corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Honda anchors the OEM tier; Hyundai and Toyota are accelerating challengers

The top players differ meaningfully by technology emphasis and recent filing trajectory. Automakers concentrate on EV propulsion and grid interface protocols (B60L53, H02J3/7), while wireless-charging specialists (WiTricity, Qualcomm) emphasize inductive power transfer subclasses.

Leader · Honda Motor Co. Ltd.

Honda Motor Co. Ltd.

Honda holds 329 patent families, the largest portfolio in the corpus. Its technology emphasis spans EV charging infrastructure (B60L53), grid-connected power supply (H02J3), and battery management (H02J7). Despite the scale of its portfolio, its recent filing trend shows a sharp deceleration (down 85% in the most recent period versus the prior), suggesting the bulk of Honda’s foundational V2G claims were filed in earlier years and its current focus may have shifted toward prosecution and licensing rather than new primary filings.

families: 329
Challenger · Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.

Hyundai Motor Co. Ltd.

Hyundai holds 198 patent families and is one of the field’s most actively growing filers, with a recent filing trend up 41% versus the prior period. Its technology focus is concentrated in EV charging (B60L53), V2G grid services (B60L55), and battery power management (H02J7). Hyundai’s close co-filing partnership with Kia (181 joint filings) and Myongji University effectively amplifies its output, making the Hyundai-Kia-Myongji cluster collectively among the most active in the field.

families: 198
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of all 100+ V2G filers with family counts, momentum scores, and technology route breakdowns.
WiTricity AI Tech LLCToyota Jidosha KK+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Qualcomm Incorporated2▲ new entrant
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.33▼ -85%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)91▼ -36%
WiTricity Corporation12▼ -78%
Hyundai Motor Company100▲ +41%
Toyota Motor Corporation108▲ new entrant
State Grid Corporation of China41▲ +11%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player counts are patent families; technology emphasis is at the patent-record level (subclass counts).Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in power conversion, commerce, and battery management

The following IPC branches sit adjacent to the dominant B60L/H02J core and carry meaningfully lower patent-record counts relative to their technical relevance to V2G. They are observations of relative sparsity; whether each represents a viable entry point depends on a team’s existing capabilities and freedom-to-operate position.

H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)

H02M carries 1,046 patent records — roughly one-sixth the volume of the dominant B60L and H02J branches — despite being technically central to any bidirectional charger design. AC/DC and DC/DC conversion efficiency, topology selection, and switching control are prerequisites for commercially viable V2G hardware. The relative sparsity suggests that converter-level innovation (e.g., wide-bandgap device integration, adaptive topology switching for V2G duty cycles) may carry lower filing density than the system-level charging interface patents that dominate the corpus. Teams with power electronics expertise and existing H02M portfolios may find this branch offers more room for differentiated claims.

Search this in Eureka →

G06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing

G06Q has 1,025 patent records, placing it fourth by volume but still far below the vehicle and grid interface classes. This branch covers the commercial and transactional layer of V2G: energy market participation, dynamic pricing, demand-response contracts, and fleet aggregation business logic. As V2G moves from pilot to commercial deployment, the IP landscape for settlement protocols, virtual power plant software, and consumer-facing billing platforms is relatively open compared to the hardware charging layer. The technical entry path is software-dominant, which lowers hardware capital requirements but raises questions about patent eligibility in some jurisdictions.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all five adjacent branches with record counts, share data, and suggested search strings for deeper prior-art analysis.
H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsG01R · Electric & magnetic measurement+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; share figures are relative to total IPC records, not family total.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

Leaders differ sharply by technology route — wireless transfer vs. grid interface vs. battery management

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerB60L 53 · Electric vehicle propulsionH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systemsH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsB60L 55 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 11 · Electric vehicle propulsion
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Strong · 199Strong · 167Strong · 176Strong · 138Emerging · 28
Qualcomm IncorporatedAbsentStrong · 284AbsentAbsentStrong · 309
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)Moderate · 88Strong · 184Moderate · 40Emerging · 34Absent
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 100Strong · 102Strong · 54Moderate · 41Moderate · 34
WiTricity CorporationStrong · 122Strong · 109AbsentModerate · 25Moderate · 38
Hyundai Motor CompanyStrong · 160Moderate · 65AbsentModerate · 65Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Route-matrix counts are at the patent-record level; leaders’ subclass tallies are drawn from the top-10 applicant technology profiles.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own V2G patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.