Book a demo

Vibration Energy Harvesting Patent Landscape 2026

Vibration Energy Harvesting Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Vibration Energy Harvesting Patent Landscape in 2026

The vibration energy harvesting space is concentrated among a small set of academic and industrial filers, with Harbin Institute of Technology holding the top position and Chinese institutions collectively dominating filing volume. Annual activity has eased from its 2019 peak, though publication lag means the most recent periods remain undercounted.

155
Patent families in scope
29%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-19%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

A China-led field with a competitive but concentrated upper tier

The Boeing Company and Anhui University of Science and Technology, each with 18 patent records — a notably tight gap at the top of the ranking.

The top five filers account for 29% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, signaling moderate concentration: a dominant academic-industrial cluster exists, but the remainder of the field is distributed across many smaller players.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Harbin Institute of Technology23
2The Boeing Company18
3ANHUI UNIV OF SCI & TECH18
4Honeywell International Inc8
5China Jiliang University6
6Hanchett Entry Systems Inc6
7KOREA INST OF CERAMIC ENG & TECH6
8Massachusetts Institute of Technology5
9Changchun University of Technology5
10Zhejiang Gongshang University5
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11CLINGMAN & J4
12Xidian University4
13Beijing University of Technology4
14Jiangsu University4
15Oscilla Power Inc3
16Commonwealth of Australia3
17Jinwoo Soft Innovation3
18Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co Ltd3
19Jilin University3
20Ningbo University3
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The co-presence of Chinese universities, a major US aerospace prime (Boeing), and industrial specialists (Honeywell) in the top tier reflects both academic research intensity and applied engineering interest, particularly in aerospace and industrial sensing applications.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and should be treated as undercounts; final activity levels for 20242026 will be higher than currently recorded. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity has eased from its 2019 peak; electromagnetic conversion dominates the technology mix

The annual filing trend and IPC branch composition together reveal a field that peaked in 2019 and has since settled at a lower but non-negligible rate, with H02N (electric machines — other, covering piezoelectric and electrostatic transduction) overwhelmingly the largest technical category.

Annual filing trend

Filings reached a high of 25 in 2019, then fluctuated between 10 and 19 through 2023. Figures for 2024–2026 reflect publication lag and should not be read as a real decline; the underlying activity level for those years is incomplete.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 25 in 2019.1920171520182520191020201820211520221920239202417202582026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02N (electric machines — other) accounts for the largest share of IPC classifications by a wide margin, reflecting the prevalence of piezoelectric and electrostatic harvesting mechanisms. H10N (other electric solid-state devices) and H01L (semiconductor devices) form a secondary cluster, pointing to solid-state and MEMS-oriented approaches. H02K (electric motors and generators) and H02J (power supply and grid systems) are present at lower levels, indicating electromagnetic and power-management work as adjacent but smaller segments.

Technology compositionH02N · Electric machines (other) leads with 223; H10N · Other electric solid-state devices 69.H02N · Electric machines…223H10N · Other electric so…69H01L · Semiconductor dev…61H02K · Electric motors &…44H02J · Power supply & gr…24F03G · Spring/weight & m…20E05B · Locks & keys6G01R · Electric & magnet…5↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20050057123A1Published 2005-03-17

Piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting device a…

Wilcoxon RESEARCH, INC.

A piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting device which is made up of a base, a proof mass, and a cymbal stack disposed between the base and the proof mass. The cymbal stack has a piezoelectric element disposed between the base and the proof mass, a first cymbal-shaped cap disposed between the proof mass and the piezoelectric crystal, and a second… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting device a… — patent drawingPiezoelectric vibration energy harvesting device a… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting device92
2Strain energy shuttle apparatus and method for vib…57
3Piezomagnetoelastic structure for broadband vibrat…45
4Broadband energy harvester apparatus and method42
5Half-tube array vibration energy harvesting method…40
6Strain energy shuttle apparatus and method for vib…37
7宽频带多方向振动能量采集器33
8Broadband energy harvester apparatus and method33

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

The field’s lifecycle stage, applicant concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic spread each carry distinct implications for teams deciding where and how to invest.

Decline

Field in decline from 2019 peak — core mechanisms are established

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2019 peak of 25 records. Core piezoelectric and electromagnetic harvesting mechanisms are well-covered in the prior art. New entrants are more likely to find value in differentiated sub-domains — such as broadband, multi-directional, or application-specific harvesting — than in foundational transduction principles. Note that publication lag depresses the apparent 2024–2026 counts and the true rate of recent filing is higher than shown.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Moderate top-tier concentration with a long, fragmented tail

The top five filers hold 29% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, led by Harbin Institute of Technology at 23 patent records and two filers tied at 18. Below the top five, the field fragments rapidly across universities, niche industrials, and individual inventors. This structure means the top positions are defensible but not insurmountable: a focused entrant with a novel approach in an adjacent branch could establish a credible position without directly confronting the leaders.

Concentration: Moderate
Collaboration

Limited co-filing activity; one notable industry-institute pair identified

The only co-applicant relationship identified in the evidence is between SENBOOL and Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, with 5 co-filed records — the most active collaboration pair in the corpus. The broader field shows little evidence of systematic cross-institutional partnering, suggesting most filers work within single-organization programs. For new entrants, forming a university-industry partnership could be a structural differentiator in this largely solo-filing landscape.

Collaboration: Limited
Geography

China dominates filings; US and Korea offer secondary entry points

China accounts for 115 patent records — the largest single jurisdiction by a substantial margin — reflecting the concentration of academic filers there. The United States (33 records), South Korea (27 records), and India (25 records) form a meaningful secondary tier. WIPO PCT filings (16 records) and EPO filings (10 records) indicate some appetite for international protection but at relatively modest scale. Teams seeking freedom-to-operate or filing strategy guidance should prioritize China and the US as the primary examination jurisdictions.

Lead Office: China
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
SENBOOLKorea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and Technology5

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle assessment, collaboration data, and jurisdiction distribution from the evidence corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Harbin Institute of Technology leads on volume; Boeing and Honeywell define the industrial tier

The top of the ranking splits cleanly between Chinese academic institutions focused on electromagnetic transduction and Western industrial players emphasizing solid-state and piezoelectric approaches, each with distinct technology emphases.

Leader · Harbin Institute of Technology

Harbin Institute of Technology

Harbin Institute of Technology leads with 23 patent records, concentrated almost entirely in H02N 2 (electric machines — other), with secondary positions in aerospace-adjacent branches (B64C and B64D). However, momentum has declined sharply: recent filings are down 83% versus the prior three-year period, suggesting the institution’s primary research wave in this domain has passed. Its large prior-art position in H02N 2 makes it the most relevant reference point for freedom-to-operate analysis in electromagnetic harvesting.

patent records: 23
Challenger · Anhui University of Science and Technology

Anhui University of Science and Technology

Anhui University of Science and Technology holds 18 patent records and is classified as a new entrant in terms of momentum — meaning its filing activity is concentrated in the recent period rather than distributed across the full window. Its technology focus spans H02N 2 and H02K 35 (electric motors and generators), with a secondary position in G01R 31 (electric and magnetic measurement), suggesting an applied engineering orientation. As a rising academic filer, it represents a potential collaboration target or competitive monitor for teams active in electromagnetic harvesting.

patent records: 18
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top-100 filers, including momentum trends and IPC focus for each.
Honeywell International IncMassachusetts Institute of Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Harbin Institute of Technology3▼ -83%
Anhui University of Science and Technology10▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles draw on applicant ranking, technology focus data, and filing momentum from the evidence corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served routes in power management, mechanical actuation, and access control

Several IPC branches appear at notably lower filing densities relative to the dominant H02N cluster; these observations reflect relative sparsity and are presented as starting points for further technical due diligence rather than validated commercial opportunities.

H02J · Power supply and grid systems

H02J appears at a lower filing density relative to the dominant H02N cluster, with 24 patent records. This branch covers the power conditioning, storage, and grid-interface circuitry that sits downstream of the transducer — a critical but under-patented link in the harvesting chain. The technical value is clear: harvested energy is of limited use without efficient regulation and delivery. An entrant with expertise in ultra-low-power DC-DC conversion or energy-aware power management could establish a differentiated position here without directly competing in core transduction IP.

Search this in Eureka →

F03G · Spring, weight, and miscellaneous motors

F03G is sparsely covered with 20 patent records, representing mechanical energy storage and non-conventional motor architectures that can complement or replace purely electronic harvesting approaches. The branch has plausible technical value in low-frequency, high-amplitude vibration environments — such as industrial machinery or civil infrastructure — where conventional piezoelectric transducers underperform. Entry would require mechanical design expertise distinct from the semiconductor-oriented skills of the current leading filers, which may lower direct competitive overlap.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See patent density, citation velocity, and filing momentum across all identified adjacent branches.
E05B · Locks & keys (access control energy harvesting)G01R · Electric and magnetic measurement+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch observations are based on relative IPC filing density within the corpus and do not constitute validated commercial opportunity assessments.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by technology branch emphasis

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerH02N 2 · Electric machines (other)H10N 30 · Other electric solid-state devicesH01L 41 · Semiconductor devicesH02K 35 · Electric motors & generatorsF03G 7 · Spring/weight & misc. motors
Honeywell International IncStrong · 6Strong · 8Strong · 8Strong · 6Strong · 6
The Boeing CompanyAbsentStrong · 18Strong · 14AbsentAbsent
Harbin Institute of TechnologyStrong · 23AbsentAbsentEmerging · 2Absent
Anhui University of Science and TechnologyStrong · 18AbsentAbsentModerate · 5Absent
Korea Institute of Ceramic Engineering and TechnologyStrong · 6Moderate · 3Strong · 5AbsentAbsent
China Jiliang UniversityStrong · 6AbsentAbsentModerate · 2Absent
CLINGMAN & JAbsentStrong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map the patent landscape for your own technology focus

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.