Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (32 records) with 2024 (45) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 570 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine vibration measurement or condition-monitoring claims with specific technical elements — accelerometer design, envelope analysis, bearing-fault detection, displacement/velocity sensing or trend analysis — classified under G01H (vibration and sound measurement), G01M (testing of machines and structures) and G01N29 (material analysis by wave propagation). It captures 570 published families, the unit best suited to comparing filing strategies across jurisdictions without over-counting continuations or PCT national-phase duplicates.
Vibration monitoring patents cluster around rotating-machinery diagnostics: bearing fault signatures, sensor packaging, and the software layer that turns raw signal into a maintenance decision. Publication lags actual filing by roughly 18 months, so recent-year counts — including 2024's reported peak — understate true filing activity closer to the data cut-off.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 570-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings split across IPC subclasses.
Filings climbed unevenly from 11 in 2017 to a mid-period plateau of 16 in 2022, then rose to a peak of 45 in 2024 before the partial, still-incomplete 2026 count of 4. Read the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling — publication lag means later filings are still arriving.
G01H (411 records) and G01M (254) together account for the bulk of the corpus, confirming that most claims are written around vibration signal measurement and mechanical test methodology rather than the downstream data layer. G05B (control systems, 54), G01P (velocity/acceleration, 36) and G06F (digital data processing, 34) mark smaller but distinct clusters where sensing meets control logic and analytics.
Shares are the percentage of the 570 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about vibration measurement and condition monitoring and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA vibration monitoring system employing a capacitive accelerometer determines the energy associated with one or more frequency components within the frequency spectrum of the vibration signal. The capacitive accelerometer operates as a mixer due to its time-varying capacitance, which provides a measure of the vibration. When the accelerometer is excited by an AC signal, the output comprises beat frequencies from the mixing of the time-varying capacitance and the AC signal; changing the AC signal's frequency shifts the location of the beat frequencies in the frequency domain.Filed by VTI Holding Oy, this 1991 filing predates the dataset window but remains a foundational reference for capacitive-accelerometer frequency-domain monitoring cited by later applicants.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US7093492B2 | Configurable vibration sensor | 869 |
| 2 | US6298308B1 | Diagnostic network with automated proactive local experts | 328 |
| 3 | US5602757A | Vibration monitoring system | 283 |
| 4 | US6301572B1 | Neural network based analysis system for vibration analysis and condition monitoring | 279 |
| 5 | US20140067289A1 | Integrated vibration measurement and analysis system | 242 |
| 6 | US10168248B1 | Vibration measurement and analysis | 220 |
| 7 | US9435684B2 | Integrated vibration measurement and analysis system | 185 |
| 8 | US20020032544A1 | Diagnostic network with automated proactive local experts | 182 |
| 9 | US4903245A | Downhole vibration monitoring of a drillstring | 163 |
| 10 | US20050204820A1 | Configurable vibration sensor | 160 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.
G01H alone accounts for nearly three-quarters of the corpus. New accelerometer or transducer designs are filing into dense prior art; freedom-to-operate work here needs to be granular, down to sensor packaging and mounting geometry rather than the broad concept of vibration sensing.
The jump from a 2022 midpoint of 16 to a 2024 peak of 45 suggests a recent wave of interest — likely tied to predictive-maintenance and IIoT adoption — after years of flat activity. Whether that wave continues past 2024 is not yet visible in the data because of publication lag.
United States receiving-office volume outpaces Europe, and China's 63 and India's 61 are smaller than either. For a global filing strategy, the US remains the primary battleground for vibration-monitoring claims, with WIPO PCT filings (48) as the main multi-jurisdiction bridge.
Only two co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, both involving the same corporate assignee paired with named individual inventors. Co-filing between separate organisations is essentially absent — most patent strategy in this field is executed by single entities rather than joint ventures.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to vibration measurement and condition monitoring, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing activity concentrates among a small group of industrial equipment and instrumentation companies, with a long tail of single-filing entrants including universities and component specialists.
Bearing and rotating-equipment manufacturers such as SKF hold a strong historical position in bearing-fault detection and envelope analysis claims, reflecting their stake in the diagnostic methods tied directly to their own hardware. None of the tracked leading assignees show filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader publication-lag effect rather than a pullback.
Companies with automation and control-systems portfolios sit at the intersection of G01H sensing claims and G05B control-logic claims, positioning them to file across both the measurement and the response layer of condition monitoring.
Assignees tied to turbines, generators and energy conversion equipment file predominantly through the US receiving office, matching the corpus-wide pattern where the US outpaces Europe, China and India individually.
Institutions such as technical universities appear as isolated filers rather than repeat applicants, typically protecting a single sensing method or algorithm rather than building a portfolio — a pattern worth checking before assuming a name is a serious competitive threat.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SKF | 0 | — |
| ABB (Switzerland) Ltd. | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Moventas Gears Oy | 0 | — |
| Mikatu | 0 | — |
| Prüftechnik Dieter Busch AG | 0 | — |
| Computational Systems, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a mature core and a thinner set of adjacent branches — the next step depends on whether you are clearing freedom-to-operate or looking for open claim space.
With 411 of 570 families sitting in vibration/sound measurement, any new accelerometer or sensor-packaging design should be checked against this subclass specifically, not the corpus as a whole.
Explore vibration sensing prior artThe rise from a 2022 midpoint of 16 to a 2024 peak of 45 may continue; publication lag means 2025-2026 filings are still arriving. Revisit this trend in 6-12 months.
Monitor recent filingsChina (63) and India (61) trail the US and Europe today, but if predictive-maintenance adoption in manufacturing accelerates there, filing strategy in those jurisdictions may shift.
Compare jurisdictional filing strategyThe corpus is led by established industrial equipment and instrumentation companies with a stake in rotating-machinery diagnostics, including bearing manufacturers and automation vendors. None of the top-ranked assignees show filings in the most recent tracked year, which reflects publication lag rather than reduced activity. Below this leading group sits a long tail of single-filing entrants, including universities and smaller component specialists, each typically holding one or two families rather than a broad portfolio.
Filing volume is uneven rather than steadily rising: it moved from 11 filings in 2017 to a midpoint of 16 in 2022, essentially flat over five years, before climbing to a peak of 45 in 2024. That late surge likely reflects growing interest in predictive maintenance and industrial IoT, but the 2025-2026 figures are too recent and too affected by publication lag to confirm whether the growth continues.
G01H, the IPC subclass for measuring vibrations and sound, covers 411 of the 570 families in this dataset, making it the dominant classification by a wide margin. G01M, covering testing of machines and structures, follows with 254. Smaller but distinct clusters appear in G05B (control systems), G01P (velocity and acceleration) and G06F (digital data processing), marking the boundary between sensing and the software layer.
US5069071A describes a vibration monitoring system using a capacitive accelerometer that operates as a mixer, producing beat frequencies whose position in the frequency domain can be shifted by changing an AC excitation signal. Filed by VTI Holding Oy, it predates most of this dataset but is a foundational reference for frequency-domain, capacitive-sensing approaches. Anyone designing a capacitive or mixer-based accelerometer for frequency-domain vibration analysis should review it directly rather than relying on later citing patents alone, since foundational claims of this type are often broad.
Core signal-measurement claims under G01H are dense, but adjacent areas show thinner claim density, including wireless self-powered sensor nodes, multi-axis MEMS-based bearing-fault fusion, and edge-computed envelope analysis that pushes diagnostic processing onto the sensor itself rather than a central system. These branches sit at the intersection of established mechanical sensing methods and newer computing or power architectures, which is typically where under-claimed space appears in a mature field like this one.
The United States leads with 172 filings by receiving office, ahead of the European Patent Office at 112, China at 63, India at 61, WIPO/PCT filings at 48, and the United Kingdom at 38. This US-first pattern is somewhat unusual compared with other sensor technology areas where China has overtaken the US in volume, and it suggests the commercial center of gravity for vibration-monitoring IP is still weighted toward North American and European industrial equipment makers.
Go past this page: query the whole vibration measurement and condition monitoring corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.