https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/vibration-measurement-and-condition-monitoring-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Sensors & Instrumentation
Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring Patents
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. Annual filings rose from 11 in 2017 to a peak of 45 in 2024, but the 2022 midpoint of 16 shows growth was flat for years before that peak — this is a mature field with a late surge, not a steadily expanding one.
  • G01H dominates the claim map. 411 of 570 families sit in G01H (measuring vibrations & sound) versus 254 in G01M (machine/structure testing) — most contested ground is signal acquisition and characterisation, not mechanical test rigs.
  • The US anchors filing activity. United States receiving-office volume (172) outpaces Europe (112), China (63) and India (61) combined with WIPO — a rare case where the PCT/China wave has not yet overtaken the US-first filing pattern.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
570
Published Records
18%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+41%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (32 records) with 2024 (45) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 570 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine vibration measurement or condition-monitoring claims with specific technical elements — accelerometer design, envelope analysis, bearing-fault detection, displacement/velocity sensing or trend analysis — classified under G01H (vibration and sound measurement), G01M (testing of machines and structures) and G01N29 (material analysis by wave propagation). It captures 570 published families, the unit best suited to comparing filing strategies across jurisdictions without over-counting continuations or PCT national-phase duplicates.

Vibration monitoring patents cluster around rotating-machinery diagnostics: bearing fault signatures, sensor packaging, and the software layer that turns raw signal into a maintenance decision. Publication lags actual filing by roughly 18 months, so recent-year counts — including 2024's reported peak — understate true filing activity closer to the data cut-off.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT31
  2. 2ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG25
  3. 3GENERAL ELECTRIC CO17
  4. 4COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS INC15
  5. 5FLENDER FINLAND OY15
  6. 6PRUTECHNIK DIETER BUSCH AG14
  7. 7MICATU13
  8. 8ROCKWELL AUTOMATION TECH INC12
  9. 9CURTISS WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL CORP11
  10. 10SIEMENS AG10
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 570-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings split across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings climbed unevenly from 11 in 2017 to a mid-period plateau of 16 in 2022, then rose to a peak of 45 in 2024 before the partial, still-incomplete 2026 count of 4. Read the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling — publication lag means later filings are still arriving.

Filing trend, 2017–2026013253850112017201820192020202120222023452024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

G01H (411 records) and G01M (254) together account for the bulk of the corpus, confirming that most claims are written around vibration signal measurement and mechanical test methodology rather than the downstream data layer. G05B (control systems, 54), G01P (velocity/acceleration, 36) and G06F (digital data processing, 34) mark smaller but distinct clusters where sensing meets control logic and analytics.

IPC subclass compositionG01H · Measuring vibrations & sound41172.1%G01M · Testing machine & structure ba…25444.6%G01N · Material analysis & testing7413.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems549.5%G01P · Velocity & acceleration366.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…346.0%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording295.1%G08B · Signalling & alarm systems254.4%Other48284.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 570 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about vibration measurement and condition monitoring and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Foundational filings and the most-cited prior art

Representative record
US5069071A1991-12-03

US5069071A — Vibration monitoring in the frequency domain with a capacitive accelerometer

VTI HOLDING OY

A vibration monitoring system employing a capacitive accelerometer determines the energy associated with one or more frequency components within the frequency spectrum of the vibration signal. The capacitive accelerometer operates as a mixer due to its time-varying capacitance, which provides a measure of the vibration. When the accelerometer is excited by an AC signal, the output comprises beat frequencies from the mixing of the time-varying capacitance and the AC signal; changing the AC signal's frequency shifts the location of the beat frequencies in the frequency domain.Filed by VTI Holding Oy, this 1991 filing predates the dataset window but remains a foundational reference for capacitive-accelerometer frequency-domain monitoring cited by later applicants.

US5069071A — patent drawing 1US5069071A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7093492B2Configurable vibration sensor869
2US6298308B1Diagnostic network with automated proactive local experts328
3US5602757AVibration monitoring system283
4US6301572B1Neural network based analysis system for vibration analysis and condition monitoring279
5US20140067289A1Integrated vibration measurement and analysis system242
6US10168248B1Vibration measurement and analysis220
7US9435684B2Integrated vibration measurement and analysis system185
8US20020032544A1Diagnostic network with automated proactive local experts182
9US4903245ADownhole vibration monitoring of a drillstring163
10US20050204820A1Configurable vibration sensor160

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this searched corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.

Concentration
411 of 570
families in G01H

Signal measurement is the crowded lane

G01H alone accounts for nearly three-quarters of the corpus. New accelerometer or transducer designs are filing into dense prior art; freedom-to-operate work here needs to be granular, down to sensor packaging and mounting geometry rather than the broad concept of vibration sensing.

IPC composition, G01H vs. total
Plateau
16 → 45
filings, 2022 → 2024

Growth arrived late and unevenly

The jump from a 2022 midpoint of 16 to a 2024 peak of 45 suggests a recent wave of interest — likely tied to predictive-maintenance and IIoT adoption — after years of flat activity. Whether that wave continues past 2024 is not yet visible in the data because of publication lag.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Jurisdiction
172 vs. 112
US vs. EPO filings

US-first filing still leads

United States receiving-office volume outpaces Europe, and China's 63 and India's 61 are smaller than either. For a global filing strategy, the US remains the primary battleground for vibration-monitoring claims, with WIPO PCT filings (48) as the main multi-jurisdiction bridge.

Receiving office counts
Collaboration
2
co-assignee pairs identified

Filers work alone

Only two co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, both involving the same corporate assignee paired with named individual inventors. Co-filing between separate organisations is essentially absent — most patent strategy in this field is executed by single entities rather than joint ventures.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to vibration measurement and condition monitoring, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Filing activity concentrates among a small group of industrial equipment and instrumentation companies, with a long tail of single-filing entrants including universities and component specialists.

Industrial bearings & rotating machinery
0 in latest year
momentum vs. peak filers

SKF and peer bearing manufacturers

Bearing and rotating-equipment manufacturers such as SKF hold a strong historical position in bearing-fault detection and envelope analysis claims, reflecting their stake in the diagnostic methods tied directly to their own hardware. None of the tracked leading assignees show filings in the latest year, consistent with the broader publication-lag effect rather than a pullback.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Industrial automation & controls
G05B · 54 records
control-systems overlap

Automation vendors bridge sensing and control

Companies with automation and control-systems portfolios sit at the intersection of G01H sensing claims and G05B control-logic claims, positioning them to file across both the measurement and the response layer of condition monitoring.

IPC cross-composition
Power generation & energy equipment
US 172 filings
lead receiving office

Energy equipment makers filing US-first

Assignees tied to turbines, generators and energy conversion equipment file predominantly through the US receiving office, matching the corpus-wide pattern where the US outpaces Europe, China and India individually.

Receiving office distribution
Academic & long-tail filers
Long tail
single-filing entrants

Universities and component specialists

Institutions such as technical universities appear as isolated filers rather than repeat applicants, typically protecting a single sensing method or algorithm rather than building a portfolio — a pattern worth checking before assuming a name is a serious competitive threat.

Assignee ranking, long tail
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with comparatively thin claim density relative to the core G01H/G01M cluster
Wireless self-powered vibration nodesMulti-axis MEMS bearing-fault fusionEdge-computed envelope analysisTrend-analysis alarm thresholdingDisplacement-velocity cross-calibrationAcoustic-emission bearing prognostics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SKF0
ABB (Switzerland) Ltd.0
General Electric Company0
Moventas Gears Oy0
Mikatu0
Prüftechnik Dieter Busch AG0
Computational Systems, Inc.0
Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a mature core and a thinner set of adjacent branches — the next step depends on whether you are clearing freedom-to-operate or looking for open claim space.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on G01H claims

With 411 of 570 families sitting in vibration/sound measurement, any new accelerometer or sensor-packaging design should be checked against this subclass specifically, not the corpus as a whole.

Explore vibration sensing prior art

Track the post-2024 filing wave as it publishes

The rise from a 2022 midpoint of 16 to a 2024 peak of 45 may continue; publication lag means 2025-2026 filings are still arriving. Revisit this trend in 6-12 months.

Monitor recent filings

Look outside the US-first pattern

China (63) and India (61) trail the US and Europe today, but if predictive-maintenance adoption in manufacturing accelerates there, filing strategy in those jurisdictions may shift.

Compare jurisdictional filing strategy
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on vibration measurement patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Vibration Measurement and Condition Monitoring in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole vibration measurement and condition monitoring corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.