Virus-Retentive Filtration Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Fully concentrated field. The two ranked assignees account for all 12 records in scope — no long tail of smaller filers appears in this dataset.
- Growth through 2024, not decline. Filings rose from 3 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, a +67% increase, with later years still filling in under the usual publication lag.
- Filtration is never claimed alone. Every record carries a B01D filtration classification, and half also carry a C07K protein-purification classification, pointing to system-level claims rather than standalone filter claims.
Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
Why virus-retentive filtration patents matter now
Virus-retentive filtration sits at a chokepoint in biologics manufacturing: every antibody or recombinant protein batch has to clear a viral-safety step before it can move downstream, and the patent record in this space is unusually concentrated. Across the 12 records in scope, filtration claims almost never stand alone — they are paired with chromatography or purification claims, which means the competitive question is less about who owns a filter membrane and more about who owns the system architecture that connects filtration to the rest of the purification train.
That matters for anyone designing a continuous manufacturing line today: the claim that currently attracts the most citations in this set describes a specific inline configuration, not a generic filtration method, and the two ranked assignees between them account for the entire dataset. A freedom-to-operate review here has to look at system-level claims, not just filter media or membrane chemistry.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
The filing record for virus-retentive filtration is small and concentrated, but it shows a clear architecture pattern: filtration claims are almost always paired with protein-purification or sterilisation claims rather than filed alone.
Filing activity: growth concentrated in recent years
Filings rose from 3 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, a +67% increase over that span, with 2024 the peak year recorded so far. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts shown are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown.
Technology composition by IPC subclass
Every one of the 12 records in scope carries a B01D separation-process classification, and half also carry a C07K peptide/protein classification, showing that virus-retentive filtration in this dataset is claimed as part of a purification workflow rather than as a standalone filter technology. Sterilising (A61L), medicinal preparation (A61K) and microorganism/genetic-engineering (C12N) classes each appear in a minority of records, and single-record classes such as A47J, A61P and C12M mark narrow, largely unclaimed apparatus branches.
Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about viral clearance processing — virus-retentive filtration patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited record in this dataset
Continuous virus retentive filtration
The present application provides methods and systems for viral clearance for purifying an antibody from a sample comprising one or more impurities including viral particles. The method is conducted in a system which includes a hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) column and a virus retentive filtration (VRF) system. The HIC column and the VRF system are connected inline in a continuous processing system, and the VRF system comprises at least two filter trains in parallel.US20220106358A1 — Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — published 2022-04-07


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20220106358A1 | Continuous virus retentive filtration | 1 |
Citation counts in a searched corpus favour older records; treat this as a signal of influence within the set, not a ranking of current importance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (1 of 1 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing record shows
Twelve records is a small corpus, but the pattern inside it is legible: claim density sits almost entirely on the filtration-plus-purification system architecture, and the two ranked assignees hold the whole of it.
No long tail in this dataset
The assignee ranking returns two companies, and together they cover every one of the 12 records in scope. There is no third-place filer visible in this dataset to point to as an emerging challenger.
Momentum through the last complete year
Filings climbed from 3 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, the peak year recorded so far. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025-2026 figures are not yet a reliable read on whether that momentum continued.
Filtration paired with purification, not standalone
Every record in scope carries a B01D separation-process classification, and half also carry a C07K peptide or protein classification. That pairing suggests filed claims tend to describe a purification workflow rather than an isolated filter mechanism.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to viral clearance processing — virus-retentive filtration patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space
The ranked assignee list for this search is short and fully concentrated: two companies account for all 12 records in scope, with no visible third-place filer. That leaves open questions about apparatus-level and single-use-format claims that neither ranked assignee appears to have staked out yet.
Concentrated leadership
The top-ranked assignee holds 7 of the 12 records in scope, giving it the clearest claim position on the inline filtration-plus-purification architecture that dominates this dataset's technology composition.
No long tail below the top two
Between them, the two ranked assignees cover every record in scope. Unlike broader biologics-manufacturing searches, this narrow technical combination has not yet attracted a visible third filer.
Momentum reads flat, not declining
Both ranked assignees show zero filings in the most recent recorded year, including a -100% year-over-year figure for one. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is most likely incomplete data rather than a genuine pullback in filing activity.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Amgen Inc. | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The filing data points to a narrow but fully claimed system architecture, with apparatus-level and single-use-format branches still comparatively open. The next steps depend on whether you are clearing a design or scouting where to file.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on system claims
Because the densest claim coverage sits at the system-architecture level — HIC plus inline VRF plus parallel filter trains — a design that changes any one of those elements may sit outside the lead patent's literal scope, but only a full claim-by-claim review confirms that.
Start a claim review in EurekaTrack the two ranked assignees' pipelines
With both ranked assignees showing zero filings in the latest recorded year, watch for a catch-up wave as 2025-2026 filings publish, given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaExplore the apparatus-level white space
Single-record branches such as bioreactor-embedded filtration and single-use vessel integration are candidates for a first claim, ahead of any of the two ranked filers moving to cover them.
Explore white space in EurekaFrequently asked questions
Virus-retentive filtration (VRF) is a physical size-exclusion step used in biologics manufacturing to remove viral particles from a protein sample without inactivating the product. It typically sits inline with chromatography steps such as hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) in a continuous purification train. In this dataset, every one of the 12 records in scope carries a B01D separation-process classification, confirming that filtration is the consistent technical core of the field regardless of which other purification steps a given patent also claims.
The assignee ranking for this dataset returns only two ranked companies, and together they account for all 12 records in scope — a fully concentrated field with no long tail of smaller filers showing up in the ranking. That said, this is a narrow, targeted search string covering a specific technical combination, not the entire viral clearance field, so the concentration reflects this dataset's scope rather than the industry as a whole. Readers should treat the ranked leader's position as a signal of where claim density is heaviest, not as a complete competitive map.
Filings grew from 3 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, a +67% increase over that three-year span, with 2024 standing as the peak year recorded so far. Filing counts for 2025 and into 2026 are lower, but that is expected: publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any patent trend are understated until later filings work through examination and publication. The honest read is growth through 2024 with an as-yet-unresolved tail, not a decline.
US20220106358A1, assigned to Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, covers a continuous processing system combining a hydrophobic interaction chromatography column connected inline to a virus retentive filtration system that itself comprises at least two filter trains arranged in parallel. This specific combination — HIC plus inline VRF plus parallel filter trains — is what the claim scope protects, not filtration or HIC in isolation. A team using a single filter train, a different upstream chromatography mode, or a batch rather than continuous architecture would sit outside this particular claim's literal scope, though a full freedom-to-operate review of the granted claims themselves is still necessary before relying on that distinction.
The technology composition data shows several IPC subclasses appearing in only a single record out of the 12 in scope: A47J (kitchen and cooking utensils, likely relevant to single-use vessel design), A61P (therapeutic activity), and C12M (bioreactors and enzyme apparatus). Apparatus-level claims that tie a specific single-use bioreactor or vessel design directly to an integrated virus-retentive filter train appear largely unclaimed in this dataset, in contrast to the dense claim coverage around the inline HIC-plus-VRF system architecture. That gap is where a first claim on apparatus integration, rather than on the filtration chemistry or system architecture itself, would have the most room to stand.
Research Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole viral clearance processing — virus-retentive filtration patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.