Book a demo

Virus-Retentive Filtration Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Virus-Retentive Filtration Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/viral-clearance-processing-virus-retentive-filtration-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Viral Clearance Processing
Virus-Retentive Filtration Patents: Who Holds the Continuous-Processing Claims
  • Fully concentrated field. The two ranked assignees account for all 12 records in scope — no long tail of smaller filers appears in this dataset.
  • Growth through 2024, not decline. Filings rose from 3 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, a +67% increase, with later years still filling in under the usual publication lag.
  • Filtration is never claimed alone. Every record carries a B01D filtration classification, and half also carry a C07K protein-purification classification, pointing to system-level claims rather than standalone filter claims.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
12
Published Records
+67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
IL
Leading Jurisdiction
2024
Peak Filing Year

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

Why virus-retentive filtration patents matter now

Virus-retentive filtration sits at a chokepoint in biologics manufacturing: every antibody or recombinant protein batch has to clear a viral-safety step before it can move downstream, and the patent record in this space is unusually concentrated. Across the 12 records in scope, filtration claims almost never stand alone — they are paired with chromatography or purification claims, which means the competitive question is less about who owns a filter membrane and more about who owns the system architecture that connects filtration to the rest of the purification train.

That matters for anyone designing a continuous manufacturing line today: the claim that currently attracts the most citations in this set describes a specific inline configuration, not a generic filtration method, and the two ranked assignees between them account for the entire dataset. A freedom-to-operate review here has to look at system-level claims, not just filter media or membrane chemistry.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.7
  2. 2Amgen Inc.5
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The filing record for virus-retentive filtration is small and concentrated, but it shows a clear architecture pattern: filtration claims are almost always paired with protein-purification or sterilisation claims rather than filed alone.

Filing activity: growth concentrated in recent years

Filings rose from 3 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, a +67% increase over that span, with 2024 the peak year recorded so far. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 counts shown are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity: growth concentrated in recent years013450201720182019202020212022202352024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

Every one of the 12 records in scope carries a B01D separation-process classification, and half also carry a C07K peptide/protein classification, showing that virus-retentive filtration in this dataset is claimed as part of a purification workflow rather than as a standalone filter technology. Sterilising (A61L), medicinal preparation (A61K) and microorganism/genetic-engineering (C12N) classes each appear in a minority of records, and single-record classes such as A47J, A61P and C12M mark narrow, largely unclaimed apparatus branches.

Technology composition by IPC subclassB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…12100.0%C07K · Peptides & proteins650.0%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting325.0%A61K · Medicinal preparations216.7%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…216.7%A47J · Kitchen & cooking utensils18.3%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…18.3%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus18.3%Other18.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about viral clearance processing — virus-retentive filtration patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited record in this dataset

Most-Cited Record
US20220106358A12022-04-07

Continuous virus retentive filtration

REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

The present application provides methods and systems for viral clearance for purifying an antibody from a sample comprising one or more impurities including viral particles. The method is conducted in a system which includes a hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) column and a virus retentive filtration (VRF) system. The HIC column and the VRF system are connected inline in a continuous processing system, and the VRF system comprises at least two filter trains in parallel.US20220106358A1 — Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — published 2022-04-07

US20220106358A1 — patent drawing 1US20220106358A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Most-cited virus-retentive filtration records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20220106358A1Continuous virus retentive filtration1

Citation counts in a searched corpus favour older records; treat this as a signal of influence within the set, not a ranking of current importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (1 of 1 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Data Insights

What the filing record shows

Twelve records is a small corpus, but the pattern inside it is legible: claim density sits almost entirely on the filtration-plus-purification system architecture, and the two ranked assignees hold the whole of it.

Concentration
100% of 12 records
top 2 combined share

No long tail in this dataset

The assignee ranking returns two companies, and together they cover every one of the 12 records in scope. There is no third-place filer visible in this dataset to point to as an emerging challenger.

Read against the full ranked list, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
Growth
+67%
2021 to 2024 filing growth

Momentum through the last complete year

Filings climbed from 3 in 2021 to 5 in 2024, the peak year recorded so far. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025-2026 figures are not yet a reliable read on whether that momentum continued.

Treat 2024 as the most recent complete year in this trend.
Composition
100% / 50%
B01D / C07K record share

Filtration paired with purification, not standalone

Every record in scope carries a B01D separation-process classification, and half also carry a C07K peptide or protein classification. That pairing suggests filed claims tend to describe a purification workflow rather than an isolated filter mechanism.

Class shares sum above 100% because records can carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to viral clearance processing — virus-retentive filtration patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who holds the claim space

The ranked assignee list for this search is short and fully concentrated: two companies account for all 12 records in scope, with no visible third-place filer. That leaves open questions about apparatus-level and single-use-format claims that neither ranked assignee appears to have staked out yet.

Leader
7 records
leader's filing count

Concentrated leadership

The top-ranked assignee holds 7 of the 12 records in scope, giving it the clearest claim position on the inline filtration-plus-purification architecture that dominates this dataset's technology composition.

Based on the full two-company ranking returned for this search.
Runner-up
12 of 12
top 2 combined share

No long tail below the top two

Between them, the two ranked assignees cover every record in scope. Unlike broader biologics-manufacturing searches, this narrow technical combination has not yet attracted a visible third filer.

Concentration reflects this dataset's scope, not the wider viral clearance field.
Momentum
0 latest year
both assignees, most recent year

Momentum reads flat, not declining

Both ranked assignees show zero filings in the most recent recorded year, including a -100% year-over-year figure for one. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is most likely incomplete data rather than a genuine pullback in filing activity.

Treat the latest year as provisional until later publications catch up.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches with only one or two records in this dataset, where claim space is comparatively open.
single-use bioreactor filter integrationsensor-triggered filter-train switchingkitchen/consumer-adjacent filtration apparatustherapeutic-activity-linked filtration methodsbioreactor-embedded viral clearance
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0
Amgen Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing data points to a narrow but fully claimed system architecture, with apparatus-level and single-use-format branches still comparatively open. The next steps depend on whether you are clearing a design or scouting where to file.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on system claims

Because the densest claim coverage sits at the system-architecture level — HIC plus inline VRF plus parallel filter trains — a design that changes any one of those elements may sit outside the lead patent's literal scope, but only a full claim-by-claim review confirms that.

Start a claim review in Eureka

Track the two ranked assignees' pipelines

With both ranked assignees showing zero filings in the latest recorded year, watch for a catch-up wave as 2025-2026 filings publish, given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka

Explore the apparatus-level white space

Single-record branches such as bioreactor-embedded filtration and single-use vessel integration are candidates for a first claim, ahead of any of the two ranked filers moving to cover them.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Viral Clearance Processing — Virus-Retentive Filtration Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole viral clearance processing — virus-retentive filtration patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.