Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (71 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 770 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Viral inactivation methods sit at the intersection of process engineering and biologics safety: low pH holds, solvent-detergent treatment, and related inactivation kinetics used to clear viral contaminants from plasma-derived and recombinant products. This landscape covers 770 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, searched against terms spanning hold-time definition, scale-down validation, mixing homogeneity and detergent alternatives alongside the core inactivation methods themselves.
The scope pulls in both classic blood-product inactivation claims and newer continuous-processing and model-based control approaches, so the ranking reflects a field with a long filing history rather than a single emerging wave.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 770-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filings peaked at 97 in 2018 and have declined since, falling from 71 in 2021 to 10 in 2024 (-86%). Treat 2025 and 2026 counts as incomplete — publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so the most recent years understate actual filing activity rather than confirming a continued fall.
Medicinal preparations (A61K, 45.3% of records) and microorganism/genetic engineering claims (C12N, 38.3%) lead the composition, with peptide and protein chemistry (C07K, 37.4%) and sterilising/disinfecting methods (A61L, 35.8%) close behind. Because records carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to well over 100% and should be read against the 770-record total, not against each other.
Shares are the percentage of the 770 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about viral inactivation methods and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaProvided herein is a column-based continuous viral inactivation system, comprising one or both of a pH feedback controller to adjust feed flow rates and a minimum residence time (MRT) feedback controller to adjust feed flow rates. Methods of viral inactivation with the system are also provided.Filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology, published 2023-06-01 — representative of a shift toward continuous, feedback-controlled inactivation rather than static batch holds.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5418130A | Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants | 239 |
| 2 | US6187572B1 | Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants | 123 |
| 3 | US20120234694A1 | Electrochemical carbon nanotube filter and method | 109 |
| 4 | US5587490A | Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants | 109 |
| 5 | US5891705A | Method for inactivating a virus | 107 |
| 6 | US5559250A | Treating red blood cell solutions with anti-viral agents | 107 |
| 7 | US5691132A | Method for inactivating pathogens in red cell compositions using quinacrine mustard | 106 |
| 8 | US6136586A | Methods for the selective modification of viral nucleic acids | 102 |
| 9 | US6235508B1 | Method of inactivation of viral and bacterial blood contaminants | 97 |
| 10 | WO1996039818A1 | Treating red blood cell solutions with Anti-viral agents | 86 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — read them as a signal of foundational influence, not of present-day importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and citation data above.
The top five assignees account for 33.8% of all 770 records in scope, and the top ten for 53.8%. That leaves a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants working around a small set of dominant claim holders, particularly on blood-product and plasma-derived inactivation methods.
Filings peaked at 97 in 2018 and dropped from 71 in 2021 to 10 in 2024. The leading assignees by cumulative volume show zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with a field that has moved past its initial filing wave rather than one still accelerating.
The most-cited records in the corpus are solvent/detergent and blood-contaminant inactivation patents filed well before the current filing window. Their citation counts reflect decades of accumulated influence within the corpus, not current filing activity or unclaimed territory.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to viral inactivation methods, with the prior art for and against each one.
A small group of pharmaceutical and blood-product companies dominate cumulative filings, but the newest activity — where it exists — clusters around process-control and continuous-processing claims rather than the classic solvent-detergent or low-pH hold chemistry.
The leading assignee holds 100 of the 770 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-place assignee at 34 and tenth place at 27 — a steep drop-off rather than a gradual one.
The strongest co-assignee pairing shares 57 records, consistent with parent-subsidiary or joint R&D filing rather than arm's-length competition. This pattern repeats across several of the top pairs, suggesting consolidated corporate portfolios rather than fragmented ownership.
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including the top cumulative filer, recorded zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the broader -86% (2021-2024) filing decline, though publication lag means very recent activity may not yet be visible.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Baxalta Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | 0 | — |
| Baxalta US Inc. | 0 | — |
| Amgen Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Baxter International Inc. | 0 | — |
| Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. | 0 | — |
| Baxter Healthcare Corporation | 0 | — |
| NAJIT TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a mature core with narrow openings around process control and validation.
Feedback-controlled and column-based continuous inactivation, as represented by the MIT filing, sits apart from the batch-hold chemistry that dominates the top assignees' portfolios. This is worth a focused freedom-to-operate check before committing engineering resources.
Explore continuous inactivation claimsSeveral of the top filers file jointly with affiliated entities. Understanding which entity actually holds enforceable rights matters before entering a licensing or supply discussion.
Review assignee relationshipsScale-down validation and mixing homogeneity claims are comparatively thin relative to the core inactivation methods, and may offer more open claim space for process-analytics vendors.
Run a white space search in EurekaOne assignee leads the ranking with 100 of the 770 records in scope, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 34 and tenth place at 27. The top five assignees combined account for 33.8% of all records, and the top ten for 53.8%, showing a field where claim ownership is concentrated among a handful of established pharmaceutical and blood-product companies rather than spread evenly. Newer entrants mostly appear as single or few-filing entities in the long tail below that group.
Filings peaked at 97 in 2018 and have declined since, falling from 71 in 2021 to just 10 in 2024, an 86% drop over that three-year span. Because patent publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as confirming a continued decline on their own. Based on the complete years available, however, the trend through 2024 is clearly downward from the 2018 peak.
Medicinal preparations (IPC class A61K) appear in 45.3% of the 770 records in scope, followed by microorganism and genetic engineering claims (C12N) at 38.3%, peptide and protein chemistry (C07K) at 37.4%, and sterilising or disinfecting methods (A61L) at 35.8%. Because a single patent record can carry several IPC classes, these percentages add up to more than 100% and should each be read against the full 770-record total rather than against one another. Separation and filtration processes (B01D) are comparatively minor at 9.7%.
This MIT filing, published mid-2023, covers a column-based continuous viral inactivation system using a pH feedback controller and/or a minimum residence time feedback controller to adjust feed flow rates, along with associated inactivation methods. Anyone building a feedback-controlled continuous inactivation process using pH or residence-time control to adjust flow should review this filing's specific claim language closely, since it sits in a comparatively thin area of the landscape compared to batch-hold chemistry. It does not appear to cover static batch-hold inactivation methods, which are claimed elsewhere in the dataset by longer-established assignees.
Relative to the dense claim coverage on core low-pH and solvent-detergent batch inactivation, areas such as continuous-flow inactivation control, detergent-free clearance alternatives, scale-down model validation, and mixing homogeneity sensing show thinner claim density in this dataset. These are process-engineering and validation branches rather than new inactivation chemistries, so a first claim there would likely centre on control methodology, sensor integration or validation protocol rather than a new inactivating agent. Given the sharp filing decline in the core chemistry since 2018, these adjacent branches are a more promising area to search before committing R&D resources.
Go past this page: query the whole viral inactivation methods corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page