Book a demo

Virtual Power Plant Simulation Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Virtual Power Plant Simulation Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/virtual-power-plant-simulation-and-modeling-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Smart Grid & Energy Systems
Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling Patents
  • Filing only started in earnest after 2022 and the dataset's peak year (23 families) is the most recent full year on record — this is an early-innings field, not a settled one.
  • One jurisdiction dominates the filings China accounts for 38 of the 44 records, with South Korea and the United States each contributing a handful — a strong signal for where prior art risk concentrates.
  • Business-process claims outnumber grid-hardware claims G06Q (business/commerce data processing) appears in 38 records versus 28 for H02J (power grid systems), meaning market and dispatch logic is more heavily claimed than the underlying grid control itself.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
44
Published Records
32%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+1100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (12) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 44 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

Virtual power plant (VPP) simulation and modeling patents describe how distributed energy resources — batteries, EV chargers, rooftop solar, demand-response loads — are aggregated, forecast and dispatched through a software layer that behaves like a single power plant to the grid. This landscape isolates filings that combine power system or market simulation with aggregation modeling or digital-twin techniques, rather than VPP hardware or grid-control patents generally. The scope is narrow by design: it captures the modeling and simulation layer specifically, which is where forecasting accuracy, market-clearing logic and digital-twin fidelity get contested.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, though recent-year counts are understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Even with that lag built in, the shape of the curve — near-zero activity through 2022, then a sharp climb — is unusually late and steep for a smart-grid sub-field.

Filing activity by year
  1. 1STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA5
  2. 2IND ACADEMIC COOPERATION FOUND HONAM UNIV3
  3. 3STATE GRID HENAN ELECTRIC POWER2
  4. 4CHINA ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE CO LTD2
  5. 5BANPU INNOVATION & VENTURES LLC2
  6. 6SHENZHEN INST OF ADVANCED TECH CHINESE ACAD OF SCI2
  7. 7JIANGSU VOCATIONAL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS2
  8. 8中建投新能(上海)电气有限公司1
  9. 9KAIFENG POWER SUPPLY COMPANY STATE GRID HENAN ELECTRIC POWER1
  10. 10湖北楚之屹新能源科技有限公司1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 44-family dataset: when the filings happened, and which technical classes they touch.

A late, steep ramp

Filings sat at zero in 2017 and had reached only 1 by the 2022 midpoint. The climb to 23 in the peak year shows the field accelerating rather than maturing — most of the claim space was staked out in the last few years, which means freedom-to-operate analysis needs to weight recent filings heavily rather than relying on older, more-cited records.

A late, steep ramp0613192502017201820192020202120222023202423202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Business logic leads, grid hardware follows

G06Q (business, commerce and administrative data processing) touches 38 of 44 records, ahead of H02J (power supply and grid systems) at 28 and G06N (AI-based computing) at 20. Smaller counts in B60L, G06T, G05B and G01R mark adjacent branches — EV propulsion integration, visualization, control-loop specifics and measurement — that are present but thin.

Business logic leads, grid hardware followsG06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…3886.4%H02J · Power supply & grid systems2863.6%G06N · Computing based on AI models2045.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1636.4%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion36.8%G06T · Image data processing & genera…36.8%G05B · Control & regulating systems24.5%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement12.3%Other511.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 44 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about virtual power plant simulation and modeling and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records

Representative filing
US20250079836A12025-03-06

ML-optimized VPP controller for battery-powered EV charging networks (US20250079836A1)

BANPU INNOVATION & VENTURES LLC

Filed by Banpu Innovation & Ventures LLC, this patent describes a VPP controller that manages an EV charging station, a battery storage system and an independent power plant together. It trains a machine-learning model to predict the independent power plant's output over a forecast horizon, then reconciles that prediction against charging demand and available power from the grid, battery and plant to decide dispatch in real time.One of the few US-filed records in the set and the highest-cited non-Chinese filing.

US20250079836A1 — patent drawing 1US20250079836A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation filings in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN115954933A电网数字孪生系统构建方法、装置、电子设备和存储介质25
2CN114169856A一种综合能源协同管控系统12
3CN120409220A一种融合数字孪生与强化学习的虚拟电厂绿能消纳协同方法及系统5
4US20250079836A1ML-optimized VPP controller for battery powered ev charging networks5
5CN120879809A一种实现新能源消纳的虚拟电厂调控方法及系统4
6CN120638336A基于数字孪生的虚拟电厂智能调度方法及系统4
7CN120150262A基于数字孪生的虚拟电厂多层级协同优化控制方法4
8CN121097697A一种虚拟电厂综合管理系统3
9CN119918869A一种虚拟电厂行为特征个性化预测方法及系统3
10CN120450339A基于交能融合大模型的移动虚拟电厂动态协同优化方法2

Citation counts favor older filings simply because they've had more time to accumulate references inside the searched corpus — read them as markers of influence, not of current technical importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say

Four read-throughs from the filing trend, technology mix and citation pattern above.

Filing momentum
0 → 4 (2017-2026)
families, with a peak of 23

The field is compounding, not plateauing

A midpoint of just 1 family in 2022 followed by a peak of 23 shows most of the technical positions in this dataset were staked within the last few filing years. Anyone benchmarking against 2020-era filings is looking at a nearly empty field.

Recency caveat applies: the current year's 4 is almost certainly an undercount.
Jurisdiction concentration
38 of 44
records filed via China's receiving office

Prior art risk is not evenly distributed

South Korea and the United States each account for only 3 records. A search or clearance exercise that skips Chinese-language filings will miss the majority of the relevant art in this specific niche.

Receiving office counts, not family nationality — some overlap is expected.
Claim layering
G06Q 38 · H02J 28 · G06N 20
records touching each IPC subclass

Business and AI logic sit on top of thinner grid claims

The three leading subclasses overlap heavily inside individual filings, meaning many patents claim the market/dispatch logic and the underlying grid interaction together. Isolated hardware-only claims in H02J without the business layer are less common.

Subclass counts overlap; a single record can touch multiple classes.
Co-filing pattern
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair filed jointly twice

Collaboration is thin and utility-led

Co-assignee activity centers on a state grid operator and its research institute, with single-count pairings to regional supply bureaus. There is no dense cross-company R&D cluster yet — collaboration filings are the exception, not the norm.

Based on shared-assignee pairs within the 44-record set.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to virtual power plant simulation and modeling, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps are

Assignee activity is led by Chinese state-grid entities and research institutes, with momentum recently shifting toward newer, smaller filers even as established players show flat or declining recent-year counts.

Momentum leader
2 in latest year
Jiangsu Business and Trade Vocational College

New entrants are picking up where incumbents paused

While the largest historical filer shows a -100% YoY drop to zero in the latest year, a smaller institutional filer posted 2 filings in the same period — a sign the field's center of gravity may be shifting away from the earliest movers.

Recent-year counts are provisional given publication lag.
Incumbent pattern
-100% YoY
across several established filers

Several early leaders went quiet in the latest year

State Grid Corporation of China, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd. all show 0 filings in the latest year after prior activity. This could reflect a genuine pause, a publication-lag gap, or a strategic shift to adjacent filing categories not captured by this search string.

Zero counts may reflect pending publications rather than a stop in R&D.
Collaboration hub
2 joint filings
strongest co-assignee pair

State grid and its research arm anchor the collaboration graph

State Grid Corporation of China and China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd. form the only pair with more than one joint filing; the remaining co-assignee pairs are single instances involving regional supply-company subsidiaries.

10 co-assignee pairs total across the dataset.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before you file
Smaller IPC branches inside this dataset suggest technical space that is touched but not yet densely claimed.
EV-fleet-integrated VPP dispatch (B60L overlap)Digital-twin visualization layers (G06T overlap)Closed-loop control tuning for aggregated DERs (G05B)Real-time measurement feedback for aggregation accuracy (G01R)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Jiangsu Business and Trade Vocational College2
State Grid Corporation of China0-100%
Hunan University Industry-Academia Cooperation Group0
State Grid Henan Electric Power Company0
Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences0-100%
China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.0-100%
BANPU INNOVATION & VENTURES LLC0
Chongqing Sanxia Water Conservancy and Electric Power (Group) Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The trend and composition data point to a field still being staked out. Two practical next steps follow from that.

Run a freedom-to-operate check weighted toward 2023-2026 filings

Because the peak year sits at 23 families against a 2022 midpoint of just 1, older art is a poor proxy for current claim density. Any clearance search should weight the last two to three filing years heavily and treat the current year's count as a floor, not a ceiling.

Explore filings in Eureka

Prioritize Chinese-language prior art in any search strategy

With 38 of 44 records filed via China's receiving office, an English-only search of this niche will systematically undercount the relevant art. Machine-translated full-text search against Chinese filings is not optional here.

Search full-text in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Virtual Power Plant Simulation and Modeling in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole virtual power plant simulation and modeling corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.