Book a demo

Virtual Synchronous Machine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Virtual Synchronous Machine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/virtual-synchronous-machine-control-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Power Electronics & Grid
Virtual Synchronous Machine Control Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Ground
  • Filings peaked in 2025 at 141 after climbing from 31 in 2017, but the leading assignee's own filings have fallen 100% year-on-year, suggesting the initial claim rush has already passed.
  • The top 5 assignees hold just 25.6% of the 664 records in scope, and the top 10 only 40.2% — this is a field with a visible leader but a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • 92.6% of records sit in H02J power supply and grid systems, while AI-based control (G06N, 3.2%) and business/admin layers (G06Q, 2.7%) remain comparatively thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
664
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+12%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (74 records) with 2024 (83) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 664 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What virtual synchronous machine control covers, and why filings cluster here

Virtual synchronous machine (VSM) control makes a power-electronic converter — in a wind turbine, battery storage inverter or grid-tied HVDC link — behave like a spinning synchronous generator, synthesising the inertia and damping that inverter-based resources otherwise lack. As grids add wind, solar and storage capacity and lose rotating mass, tuning the virtual inertia and damping parameters that stop frequency nadir events becomes a control-engineering problem with direct grid-code consequences, which is why most claims sit inside grid and converter control rather than in the underlying hardware. The dataset covers 664 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from state grid operators, wind OEMs, power research institutes and universities.

Filing activity rose steadily from 2017 through a 2025 peak of 141 records, though the most recent year is necessarily undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Reading the curve at face value would overstate how much fresh activity has actually stopped; reading it against assignee-level momentum, where several leading filers show sharp year-on-year declines, gives a more grounded picture of a field moving from initial claim-staking toward consolidation.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA43
  2. 2VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS AS37
  3. 3NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIV36
  4. 4GENERAL ELECTRIC RENOVABLES ESPANA SL30
  5. 5GUILIN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY24
  6. 6HITACHI ENERGY LTD24
  7. 7SOUTHEAST UNIV22
  8. 8CHINA ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE CO LTD20
  9. 9HEFEI UNIV OF TECH16
  10. 10XIAN THERMAL POWER RES INST CO LTD15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Synchronous Machine Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 664 records: the year-by-year filing trend, and the IPC subclasses those records fall into.

Filings climbed to a 2025 peak, then flattened

Annual filings rose from 31 in 2017 to a peak of 141 in 2025, with the midpoint year (2022) at 58 — a trajectory that grew steadily rather than in a single burst, and one that is still rising through most of the window covered.

Filings climbed to a 2025 peak, then flattened0387511315031201720182019202020212022202320241412025232026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Grid-side control dominates; AI and commercial layers are thin

H02J (power supply and grid systems) appears in 92.6% of the 664 records, with motor/generator control (H02P, 11.0%) and power conversion (H02M, 10.4%) as the next-largest classes. Records touching AI-based computing (G06N, 3.2%) or business/admin data processing (G06Q, 2.7%) are comparatively rare, and since a record can carry several IPC codes these shares add up to more than 100%.

Grid-side control dominates; AI and commercial layers are thinH02J · Power supply & grid systems61592.6%H02P · Control of motors & generators7311.0%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)6910.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…527.8%F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)274.1%G05B · Control & regulating systems233.5%G06N · Computing based on AI models213.2%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…182.7%Other517.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 664 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Synchronous Machine Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Virtual Synchronous Machine Control with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about virtual synchronous machine control and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative filing and the most-cited records

Representative record
US20230178996A12023-06-08

Power Supporting Arrangement for a Power Grid Operated as a Virtual Synchronous Machine

HITACHI ENERGY LTD.

A method controls a voltage source converter to act as a virtual synchronous machine: it obtains a measured power level, runs that measurement through a differential equation of the machine's angular velocity to derive a control contribution, sets the converter's phase angle from that contribution, and continuously monitors whether the converter's ability to act as a virtual synchronous machine remains sufficient, adjusting control if it is not.Filed by Hitachi Energy Ltd., published 2023-06-08 as US20230178996A1.

US20230178996A1 — patent drawing 1US20230178996A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2022036787A1一种利用自适应虚拟参数提高风电并网一次调频性能的方法92
2CN107465189A基于自适应旋转惯量的虚拟同步发电机控制方法70
3CN111541274A一种基于虚拟同步发电机特性的孤岛微电网控制策略49
4CN110277803A一种储能变流器的虚拟同步发电机控制方法及控制装置49
5CN109586343A基于虚拟同步发电机控制的光伏-储能发电系统及方法48
6CN106208159A基于虚拟同步发电机的柴储混合独立微网动态功率补偿方法45
7US20190222026A1Reconfiguration of Inertia, Damping and Fault Ride-Through for a Virtual Synchronous Machine44
8CN112994098A一种基于前馈控制的并联虚拟同步机功率解耦方法43
9CN105978042A用于虚拟同步机的故障保护和穿越控制系统及方法43
10CN107591834A基于虚拟同步机的组串式无储能光伏发电系统控制方法39

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate them; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Synchronous Machine Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about the field's shape

Three signals worth reading together: where filings concentrate, where they sit technically, and where activity is actually filed geographically.

Concentration
25.6% / 40.2%
top 5 / top 10 share of 664 records

A leader, then a long tail

The single leading assignee holds 43 records outright, but the top 5 combined hold only 25.6% of the 664 records in scope and the top 10 only 40.2%. That gap between a visible leader and a wide field of smaller filers means freedom-to-operate work has to look well beyond the household names.

Based on the 100-company ranked assignee list
Technology mix
92.6% H02J
share of records classed in power supply & grid systems

Grid-side control is the dominant claim territory

Nearly all records touch H02J, but a meaningful minority also reach into motor/generator control (H02P) and power conversion (H02M), showing that VSM claims routinely span control theory and the converter hardware it runs on rather than sitting in either alone.

Shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes
Geography
505 CN filings
of 664 records filed via the China receiving office

Filing activity is heavily China-weighted

China accounts for the large majority of receiving-office filings, with the United States, EPO, India, WIPO and the UK each receiving a much smaller share. Strategies built only around US or EPO prior art will miss most of the documented activity.

Receiving office counts, all 664 records
Momentum
-100% YoY
latest-year filings for several leading assignees

Leading filers are pulling back

Several of the assignees with the deepest filing histories show sharp year-on-year drops in the latest year, including full pullbacks to zero. Combined with the 18-month publication lag, this points to a field where the initial land-grab is largely done rather than one still accelerating.

Latest full year vs prior year, selected assignees
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to virtual synchronous machine control, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Synchronous Machine Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

The ranked assignee list spans state grid operators, wind OEMs, power research institutes and universities, with concentration modest enough that smaller and newer filers still have room to establish position.

Grid operators & research institutes
43 records
leading assignee's record count

State-affiliated grid research leads by volume

The single largest filer sits well ahead of fifth place (24 records) and tenth place (15), reflecting a national grid operator's research arm rather than a single product team. Co-assignee pairings in the data show these entities frequently filing jointly with affiliated research institutes.

Assignee ranking, 664 records
Wind & converter OEMs
27 records
F03D (wind motors) share of 664 records

Wind OEMs anchor the converter-hardware side

Wind turbine manufacturers and converter suppliers appear consistently across the ranked list, with F03D classification touching 4.1% of records — a smaller but strategically important slice tied directly to grid-code compliance for wind assets.

IPC subclass F03D
Universities
Multiple institutions
among the ranked 100 assignees

Academic filers are numerous but individually small

Several universities appear in the ranked list, each typically contributing a handful of records rather than dozens, consistent with the long tail below the top 10's 40.2% combined share.

Assignee ranking, 664 records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show thinner IPC density relative to the core grid-control claims, based on the composition data above.
AI-based inertia/damping parameter estimationBusiness-layer grid-services monetisationDigital-twin frequency nadir predictionMulti-converter interaction/stability controlSynthetic inertia for storage-only microgrids
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Guilin University of Technology1-91%
Southeast University1-50%
State Grid Corporation of China0-100%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S0
North China Electric Power University0-100%
General Electric Renovables Espana SL0-100%
China Electric Power Research Institute Co., Ltd.0-100%
Hitachi Energy Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Synchronous Machine Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The trend and composition data point to a field consolidating around grid-side control, with adjacent branches still open.

Check freedom-to-operate against the long tail

With the top 10 holding only 40.2% of records, a clearance search limited to the largest filers will miss most of the field's documented prior art.

Run a clearance search in Eureka

Track the pullback among leading filers

Several top assignees show sharp year-on-year declines in the latest year; watching whether this reflects a genuine slowdown or the publication lag matters for timing a filing strategy.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka

Explore the under-claimed branches

AI-based parameter tuning and business-layer grid-services claims remain thin relative to core H02J grid control, leaving room for differentiated claims.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Synchronous Machine Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about virtual synchronous machine control patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Virtual Synchronous Machine Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Virtual Synchronous Machine Control in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole virtual synchronous machine control corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.