Book a demo

Warehouse & Logistics Automation Patent Landscape

Warehouse & Logistics Automation Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Warehouse & Logistics Automation Patent Landscape in 2026

Warehouse and logistics automation is a mature, crowded field with 14,566 patent families on record and activity plateaued near its 2021 peak, though the most recent filing years reflect normal publication lag. iRobot leads the ranked field, but the top five filers hold only 21% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling a fragmented competitive structure with no single dominant player.

14,566
Patent families in scope
21%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-7%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

iRobot leads a fragmented field with no runaway dominant player

iRobot Corporation holds the top position with 572 patent families, followed closely by Toyota Motor Corporation (425), Toshiba (414), Murata Machinery (384), and Crown Equipment Corporation (382). The ranking spans established industrial automation incumbents, Japanese conglomerates, and Chinese e-commerce-driven entrants such as Beijing Jingdong Qianshi Technology and Hangzhou Hikrobot.

The top five filers account for 21% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — a moderate concentration level that indicates no single organization has locked up the technology space. A second tier of challengers including Beijing Geekplus Technology, Fanuc, Boston Dynamics, and. The Boeing Company each hold between 202 and 247 patent families, keeping competitive pressure broad.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1iRobot Corporation572
2Toyota Motor Corporation425
3Toshiba Corporation414
4Murata Machinery Ltd.384
5Crown Equipment Corporation382
6Beijing Jingdong Qianshi Technology Co., Ltd.333
7Hangzhou Hikrobot Technology Co., Ltd.247
8NEC Corporation238
9Toyota Industries Corporation237
10Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd.223
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Fanuc Ltd.220
12Boston Dynamics Inc.202
13The Boeing Company202
14LG Electronics Inc.193
15Hitachi Ltd.180
16Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.175
17Canon Inc.171
18Kawasaki Heavy Industries Ltd.170
19Omron Corporation158
20Sick AG152
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The spread of leadership across US, Japanese, and Chinese applicants reflects geographically distributed R&D investment. Japanese incumbents dominate by sheer breadth of portfolio, while Chinese entrants concentrate on specific operational subsystems, suggesting different strategic postures within the same technology space.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a slowdown in underlying R&D activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Annual volume plateaued after a 2021 peak; autonomous navigation dominates the technology mix

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that grew rapidly through 2021 and has since stabilized, with R&D effort concentrated in autonomous control and robotic manipulation while adjacent branches remain comparatively sparse.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew sharply from 2017 to 2021, reaching a peak of 2,202 patent families in that year, then fluctuated in a narrower band through 2023. Figures for 2024 and 2025 reflect publication lag and should not be read as a real decline — a large share of applications filed in those years will not yet have appeared in public databases.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2,202 in 2021.90420171,21020181,86720191,82020202,20220211,92420222,03920231,493202497520251322026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G05D (control of non-electric variables) is by far the dominant branch with 11,852 patent records, reflecting the centrality of autonomous navigation and motion control across all platform types. B25J (manipulators and robots) and B65G (conveying and material handling) form a strong second tier. Lower-density branches — including G06Q (business and commerce data processing), G01C (navigation and positioning), and G05B (control and regulating systems) — represent adjacent areas that are active but proportionally underserved relative to the core.

Technology compositionG05D · Control of non-electric variables leads with 11,852; B25J · Manipulators & robots 5,676.G05D · Control of non-el…11,852B25J · Manipulators & ro…5,676B65G · Conveying & mater…5,162G06Q · Business, commerc…1,531G01C · Distance, navigat…1,216G05B · Control & regulat…1,112B66F · Jacks & lifting d…1,106G01S · Radar, sonar & po…815↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20250100797A1Published 2025-03-27

Autonomous Mobile Robot Scissor Lift and Robot Arm

NISHAR, Somil Jayesh

The present invention discloses an autonomous mobile robot (AMR) scissor lift and robot arm. This is done by incorporating a robotic arm or collaborative robot (cobot) onto an autonomous mobile robot or automated guided vehicle via the use of a scissor lift mechanism. The scissor lift mechanism facilitates height adjustment, enabling the robot arm or cobot… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Autonomous Mobile Robot Scissor Lift and Robot Arm — patent drawingAutonomous Mobile Robot Scissor Lift and Robot Arm — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Robotic end effector system and method1,392
2Companion robot for personal interaction981
3Method and system for controlling a remote vehicle848
4Mobile Robot Providing Environmental Mapping for H…764
5Fully automated and computerized conveyor based ma…713
6Mobile robots and their control system694
7Navigational control system for an autonomous vehi…660
8Mobile Robot System643

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural observations — maturity stage, competitive concentration, ecosystem collaboration, and geographic filing emphasis — shape where R&D capital can most efficiently be deployed.

Maturity

Field is in late-growth/maturity with volume eased from its 2021 peak

Annual filings have plateaued near their 2021 peak of 2,202 patent families and have not returned to that level, placing the field in a maturity stage. This implies that broad foundational patents are already held by incumbents and new entrants face a thicker prior-art landscape. R&D differentiation through narrower, application-specific claims or novel system integrations is more likely to yield protectable positions than broad platform filings.

Lifecycle: Maturity
Concentration

Moderate concentration opens room for focused challengers

With the top five filers holding 21% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, no single applicant controls a decisive share. The second tier — ranging from Beijing Jingdong Qianshi Technology at 333 patent families down to Sick AG at 152 — is densely packed, meaning a focused filing program in a specific subsystem can close the gap with leaders relatively quickly. Entrants with deep expertise in a single branch (e.g., lifting devices or positioning) can build defensible positions without competing across the full stack.

Competitive structure
Collaboration

Intra-group co-filing dominates; cross-industry partnerships are sparse

The most active co-filing pair is Toshiba and Toshiba Infrastructure Systems & Solutions Corporation with 129 joint patent families, followed by Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor (a related entity) at 91, and Toyota Motor Corporation with Toyota Industries Corporation at 27. iRobot Corporation and Irobot-affiliated entity Intouch Technologies account for 16 co-filings. The dominant pattern is intra-corporate-group collaboration rather than cross-industry partnerships, suggesting that open ecosystem co-development remains an underexploited strategy for organizations outside these conglomerates.

Ecosystem
Geography

China, the US, and Japan form a near-equal three-way lead in filing volume

China leads jurisdiction filings with 4,619 patent records, closely followed by the United States at 4,313 and Japan at 4,032. Europe (EPO) accounts for 2,224 records and WIPO (PCT) for 1,499, indicating meaningful cross-border protection strategies among top filers. Germany and South Korea form a secondary tier. Markets such as India (288 records) and Southeast Asia remain thin filing destinations relative to their manufacturing importance, pointing to potential enforcement gaps in those regions.

Geography
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Toshiba CorporationToshiba Infrastructure Systems & Solutions Corporation129
Toyota Motor CorporationToyota Motor Corporation91
Toyota Motor CorporationToyota Industries Corporation27
Toyota Industries CorporationToyota Motor Corporation27
iRobot CorporationIntouch Technologies Inc.16
Toyota Motor CorporationMeidensha Corporation15
NEC CorporationNippon Sharyo Ltd.7
Toshiba CorporationToshiba Engineering Corporation6
Murata Machinery Ltd.Keio University6
Toyota Industries CorporationMeidensha Corporation6

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts reflect co-applicant patent families; jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

iRobot and Toshiba lead on opposite trajectories; Chinese challengers accelerating

The top ranked applicants split into decelerating Western/Japanese incumbents and accelerating Chinese challengers, creating an evolving competitive balance at the front of the field.

Leader · iRobot Corporation

iRobot Corporation

iRobot leads the ranked field with 572 patent families, concentrated in G05D autonomous control (447 sub-class records), B25J robotic manipulation (153), and A47L cleaning appliances (138) — reflecting its consumer and service robot roots applied to logistics navigation. Recent momentum shows a sharp decline of -64% versus the prior three-year period, suggesting a strategic shift away from aggressive patent filing, possibly linked to its acquisition context. Its large installed portfolio remains a defensive asset but new claim generation has slowed materially.

families: 572
Challenger · Hangzhou Hikrobot Technology

Hangzhou Hikrobot Technology

Hangzhou Hikrobot Technology holds 247 patent families and is among the fastest-growing applicants in the ranked field, with recent filing momentum of +44% versus the prior period. Its technology focus spans G05D autonomous control (108 records) and B65G conveying and material handling (107 records) in near-equal measure, alongside G06Q business data processing (26 records) — a profile consistent with an AMR platform vendor integrating warehouse management software. This balanced hardware-software coverage and rising trajectory make it a structurally significant challenger to Japanese incumbents.

families: 247
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology emphasis, and momentum scores for all top 100 filers in warehouse and logistics automation.
Crown Equipment CorporationBeijing Geekplus Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
iRobot Corporation34▼ -64%
Toyota Motor Corporation101▬ -4%
Toshiba Corporation109▲ +30%
Murata Machinery Ltd.79▲ +25%
Crown Equipment Corporation35▼ -68%
Hangzhou Hikrobot Technology Co., Ltd.92▲ +44%
NEC Corporation33▼ -64%
Toyota Industries Corporation8▼ -53%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Family counts are from the applicant ranking; momentum reflects recent three-year filing volume versus prior three-year period.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring for white-space entry

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant control and robotics core show lower filing density relative to their technical relevance to warehouse automation — these are observations of relative sparsity, and entry feasibility depends on each organization’s existing capabilities.

G06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing

With a 4% share among the top branches, G06Q (warehouse management systems, order orchestration, and logistics data processing) is proportionally sparse relative to the physical automation layers above it. Most top filers show only light coverage here — Hangzhou Hikrobot and Beijing Jingdong Qianshi Technology are exceptions with 26 and 29 sub-class records respectively. Organizations with software and operations-research capabilities may find this branch accessible, particularly for claims covering multi-robot fleet scheduling or dynamic slotting algorithms that sit above the navigation layer.

Search this in Eureka →

B66F · Jacks & lifting devices

B66F (lifting and elevating equipment including forklifts and vertical transport in automated storage) accounts for a 3% share in the branch composition, despite being a core physical subsystem in most warehouse deployments. Crown Equipment Corporation stands out as the only ranked applicant with a deep focus here (167 B66F9 records), and most others show minimal coverage. For mechanical and mechatronics-focused entrants, this branch represents an adjacent area where prior-art density is lower than in the navigation and manipulation branches, and where integration with autonomous vehicle platforms offers a plausible technical entry path.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See density scores, key holders, and recommended search strings for all identified adjacent branches across warehouse and logistics automation.
G01C · Distance, navigation & gyroscopesG05B · Control & regulating systems+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are computed against the top patent-record branch counts; lower share indicates relative sparsity, not absence of activity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How top applicants differ in their technology route emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerG05D 1 · Control of non-electric variablesB65G 1 · Conveying & material handlingB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsB25J 5 · Manipulators & robotsB25J 19 · Manipulators & robots
iRobot CorporationStrong · 447AbsentModerate · 153Moderate · 109Emerging · 81
Toshiba CorporationStrong · 256Strong · 152AbsentAbsentAbsent
Murata Machinery Ltd.Strong · 209Strong · 180AbsentAbsentAbsent
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 316AbsentAbsentEmerging · 50Absent
Crown Equipment CorporationStrong · 329AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Boston Dynamics Inc.AbsentAbsentStrong · 121Moderate · 56Moderate · 48
Toyota Industries CorporationStrong · 221AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own warehouse automation patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.