Furnace Exhaust Heat Recovery Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
Filing growth compares 2021 (134 records) with 2024 (120) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,510 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Furnace exhaust heat recovery sits at the intersection of combustion equipment, steam generation and separation engineering: capturing sensible and latent heat from flue gas before it is vented, and turning it into steam, preheated combustion air, or process heat. The scope here spans 2,510 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from patents and applications that name furnace exhaust heat recovery directly or combine furnace, exhaust, heat and recovery language with waste-heat, industrial-heat or process-heat framing.
The picture that emerges is a mature but unconsolidated field: heavy filing activity concentrated in furnace and boiler hardware classes, a leader with a meaningful but not dominant lead, and a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants. Recent-year counts should be read as a floor, not a ceiling, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.
Filing trends and technology concentration
Three views of the same 2,510-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, which IPC subclasses carry the claim density, and where applicants are choosing to file.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Annual filings rose from 128 in 2017 to a peak of 163 in 2019, then eased to 120 by 2024 — a 10% decline over the 2021-2024 span. 2025 and 2026 figures are understated because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
Technology composition by IPC subclass
F27D (furnace details & accessories) covers 36.2% of all 2,510 records, well ahead of F23G incinerators (12.9%), F23J flue and residue handling (11.6%), and F22B steam generation (10.7%). Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,510 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Waste-Heat Recovery: Furnace Exhaust Heat Recovery Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about waste-heat recovery: furnace exhaust heat recovery patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patent that anchors this landscape
US9157336B2 — Waste heat recovery structure for steel making electric arc furnaces
Filed by JP Steel Plantech Co. and published 2015-10-13, the patent describes a waste heat recovery structure for electric arc furnace steelmaking: a first exhaust flow path feeding a waste heat boiler that generates saturated steam, a steam accumulator pooling output from multiple furnaces, a steam super-heater fed by a second exhaust path, and a third exhaust path for discharge. The architecture ties furnace-specific gas handling directly to steam conditioning rather than treating heat recovery as a bolt-on exchanger.Abstract condensed from the original filing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030066638A1 | Devices using a medium having a high heat transfer rate | 428 |
| 2 | US20030201098A1 | In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using one or more simulations | 310 |
| 3 | US20040020642A1 | In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using conductor-in-conduit heat sources with an elec… | 305 |
| 4 | US20030196789A1 | In situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation and upgrading of produced fluids prior to fu… | 297 |
| 5 | US20030079877A1 | In situ thermal processing of a relatively impermeable formation in a reducing environment | 297 |
| 6 | US20030146002A1 | Removable heat sources for in situ thermal processing of an oil shale formation | 278 |
| 7 | US20150143806A1 | Quintuple-Effect Generation Multi-Cycle Hybrid Renewable Energy System with Integrated Energy Provisioning, S… | 268 |
| 8 | US20040040715A1 | In situ production of a blending agent from a hydrocarbon containing formation | 237 |
| 9 | US20030080604A1 | In situ thermal processing and inhibiting migration of fluids into or out of an in situ oil shale formation | 227 |
| 10 | US20030155111A1 | In situ thermal processing of a tar sands formation | 220 |
Citation counts favour older filings and reflect influence within this searched corpus, not current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for a filing decision
Four figures worth acting on, each tied directly to the dataset rather than to general industry narrative.
No single company controls the space
The leader holds 60 records and the fifth-ranked assignee holds 26, yet the top 5 combined account for just 7.0% of all 2,510 records in scope. That is a fragmented ownership structure: freedom-to-operate risk is spread across many smaller portfolios rather than concentrated in one blocking estate.
Volume has eased from its 2019 peak, not collapsed
Filings peaked at 163 in 2019 and settled at 120 by 2024, a 10% pullback over the 2021-2024 window. That is a plateau after a growth phase, not a retreat from the technology — 2025-26 counts will rise as publication catches up.
Furnace hardware carries more claim weight than heat-exchange itself
F27D (furnace details & accessories) touches 36.2% of all records, more than the combined share of F28D heat-exchange apparatus (9.5%) and F01K steam power plants (8.1%). New filings aimed purely at exchanger design are entering a comparatively less crowded class than furnace-integrated recovery structures.
China is the dominant receiving office by a wide margin
China accounts for 1,349 records against 352 in Japan and 168 in the United States. A portfolio strategy built only around US or EPO filings will miss the majority of documented activity in this field.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to waste-heat recovery: furnace exhaust heat recovery patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.
Map freedom-to-operate against F27D specifically
With over a third of records touching furnace details and accessories, a claim chart against that subclass alone will surface more real conflicts than a generic heat-recovery search.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaTrack the 2025-26 filing catch-up
Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the apparent 2024 plateau needs revisiting once the most recent two years finish populating.
Set an alert for new filingsWatch the long tail, not just the leader
With the top 5 holding only 7.0% of records, most competitive signal sits among the many smaller filers rather than the top-ranked assignee.
Explore the full assignee ranking in EurekaCommon questions on furnace exhaust heat recovery patents
The ranked leader in this 2,510-record dataset holds 60 records, with the fifth-place assignee at 26. However, the top 5 combined account for only 7.0% of all records in scope, so no single company holds a controlling position. A freedom-to-operate review needs to look well past the top few names, since a meaningful share of filings sits with entities outside the ranked leaders.
Filings rose to a peak of 163 in 2019, then eased to 120 by 2024, a 10% decline over the 2021-2024 span. That reads as a plateau after a growth phase rather than a collapse. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags the actual filing date by roughly 18 months, so recent-year totals will rise before they can be judged.
F27D, covering furnace details and accessories, is the largest single class, touching 36.2% of all 2,510 records. F23G incinerators, F23J flue and residue handling, and F22B steam generation follow at roughly 9 to 13% each. Because a single patent can be classified under several IPC subclasses, these percentages overlap rather than summing to 100%, and any competitive search should query multiple classes together.
The smaller classes in this dataset — B01D separation processes at 8.4% and F01K steam and thermal power plants at 8.1% — carry meaningfully less claim density than F27D furnace hardware at 36.2%. That does not make them easy, but it does mean fewer prior filings occupy the space around separation-integrated or power-cycle-integrated heat recovery designs, which is where a narrower first claim is more likely to clear existing art.
China is the largest receiving office by a wide margin at 1,349 records, followed by Japan at 352 and the United States at 168. South Korea, the EPO and WIPO PCT filings trail further behind. A portfolio or clearance strategy limited to US and European filings will miss most of the documented activity, particularly the China-originated furnace and boiler hardware filings.
Research Waste-Heat Recovery: Furnace Exhaust Heat Recovery Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole waste-heat recovery: furnace exhaust heat recovery patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.