Water & Environmental Tech Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- No single filer dominates. the leader holds 890 records but the top five combined reach only 4.2% of all 73,901 records in scope — this is a fragmented field, not a gatekept one.
- Filing has cooled from its 2018 peak. activity ran 814 in 2021 down to 586 in 2024, a 28% pullback over that span, though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in under publication lag.
- Treatment and separation carry the field. C02F (water & wastewater treatment) and B01D (separation processes) cover 15.8% and 8.2% of all records respectively — everything else sits in single digits.
Filing growth compares 2021 (814 records) with 2024 (586) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 73,901 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape draws on 73,901 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, gathered under a search string that pairs core water-treatment and pollution-control terms with adjacent domains: environmental monitoring, desalination, air pollution control, soil remediation, stormwater management and nature-based solutions. The scope is broad by design, spanning both hard treatment infrastructure and the sensing and control layers wrapped around it.
Reading the results as patent families rather than raw document counts matters here, because continuation practice and multi-jurisdiction filing can inflate a single invention into several records. The concentration and trend figures below use the family-level ranking the dataset provides, and the most recent one to two years should be read as provisional given the usual 18-month gap between filing and publication.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 73,901-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than the record total — that is expected and reflects genuinely overlapping claim scope.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Volume ran 814 in 2017 to a peak of 966 in 2018, then eased through the following years to 814 again in 2021 and 586 by 2024 — a 28% decline over that three-year window. The 2025 and 2026 figures (57 for the partial latest year) understate true filing activity because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months.
Technology composition by IPC subclass
C02F (water & wastewater treatment) leads at 15.8% of all 73,901 records, with B01D (separation processes such as filtration) second at 8.2%. Everything past those two — catalysis (B01J), analysis and testing (G01N), mixing (B01F), inorganic compounds (C01B), microorganism-based methods (C12N) and control systems (G05B) — sits at or below 2.3% of records, marking them as thinner, more specialised claim territory rather than core ground.
Shares are the percentage of the 73,901 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about water & environmental technologies patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative claim and the most-cited records
Air pollution control system and air pollution control method — US20110262331A1
Filed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and published in 2011, this record describes an air pollution control system built around a boiler, NOx removal equipment, a desulfurizer that uses an absorbent to reduce sulfur oxides in flue gas, and a downstream waste-water treatment device with a solid-liquid separating unit that splits desulfurized waste water into solid and liquid fractions.Abstract text drawn directly from the published filing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20190339688A1 | Methods and systems for data collection, learning, and streaming of machine signals for analytics and mainten… | 974 |
| 2 | US20160045841A1 | New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials | 860 |
| 3 | US20200348662A1 | Platform for facilitating development of intelligence in an industrial internet of things system | 733 |
| 4 | US20210157312A1 | Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments | 716 |
| 5 | US20180284758A1 | Methods and systems for industrial internet of things data collection for equipment analysis in an upstream o… | 600 |
| 6 | US6949196B2 | Methods and systems for improved dosing of a chemical treatment, such as chlorine dioxide, into a fluid strea… | 591 |
| 7 | US5972196A | Electrochemical production of ozone and hydrogen peroxide | 588 |
| 8 | US20200225655A1 | Methods, systems, kits and apparatuses for monitoring and managing industrial settings in an industrial inter… | 563 |
| 9 | US20200103894A1 | Methods and systems for data collection, learning, and streaming of machine signals for computerized maintena… | 514 |
| 10 | US7121342B2 | Thermal processes for subsurface formations | 428 |
Citation counts inside this corpus skew toward older filings and reflect influence within the searched set, not current commercial importance — several of the top-cited records here relate to industrial IoT platforms rather than treatment chemistry itself.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once volume, concentration and class distribution are read together: this is a wide field with no single choke point, most of the claim density sits in two IPC subclasses, and the trend line needs the publication lag factored in before anyone calls it a slowdown.
No single company controls the field
The leading assignee holds 890 records and the tenth-ranked holds 346, but even combined, the top five reach only 4.2% of all records in scope and the top ten only 6.6%. For a new entrant, this means freedom to operate is rarely blocked by one dominant portfolio — the risk is a long tail of narrow, overlapping claims rather than a single gatekeeper.
Volume has pulled back from its 2018 peak
After peaking at 966 filings in 2018, the field's filing volume eased to 814 by 2021 and to 586 by 2024 — a documented 28% decline over that three-year window. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures are not yet reliable evidence of a continued slide; the honest read is a cooling from peak, not a collapse.
Treatment chemistry, not sensing, is the dense ground
C02F (water and wastewater treatment) and B01D (separation processes) together anchor the field at 15.8% and 8.2% of all 73,901 records. Control and monitoring classes such as G05B and G01N sit under 1.5% each, suggesting the sensing and automation layer around treatment infrastructure is comparatively open relative to the treatment chemistry itself.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to water & environmental technologies patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
The ranked assignee list runs 100 companies deep and spans large industrial conglomerates, specialty chemical firms and IoT-platform entrants — a mix that itself signals how the field has broadened past traditional treatment engineering into sensing and analytics.
A wide industrial base, not a narrow specialist pool
The top-ranked assignee's 890 records sit well ahead of fifth place (406) and tenth place (346), but the drop-off is gradual rather than a cliff — consistent with a field built by large diversified filers (heavy industry, chemicals, water-technology specialists) rather than a handful of pure-play water companies.
Co-assignee activity is thin and mostly intra-group
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest links — an oil major paired with an industrial engineering partner, and a heavy-industries parent paired with its own engineering subsidiary — read more as corporate-group filing structure than open cross-company collaboration.
Momentum is uneven even among active filers
Recent-year movement among tracked assignees ranges from a filer up 100% YoY on a small base to others down 50-67% YoY, and several established names show zero filings in the latest year — a pattern consistent with the broader publication-lag effect rather than firms exiting the space outright.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Evoqua Water Technologies LLC | 2 | +100% |
| Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC | 1 | -67% |
| The Regents of the University of California | 1 | -50% |
| Xyleco, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Kemira Oyj (Finland) | 0 | — |
| Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support SAS | 0 | -100% |
| Alstom Technology Ltd | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking or identifying open claim space.
Check freedom to operate against the dense classes
C02F and B01D carry the highest claim density in this field, so any new filing touching wastewater treatment chemistry or separation/filtration hardware should be checked against that concentration before drafting.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaWatch the under-claimed control layer
Sensing, analytics and control classes remain thin relative to treatment chemistry, which is where a first-mover claim is more likely to stand on open ground rather than crowded prior art.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack assignee momentum past the publication lag
Recent-year swings by individual assignees need to be read against the 18-month publication lag before concluding a company has slowed or exited a technology area.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
The ranked assignee list covers 100 companies at the family level, with the leader holding 890 records and the fifth-ranked holding 406. The field is not dominated by a single filer: the top five combined reach only 4.2% of all 73,901 records in scope, and the top ten reach 6.6%. That spread means the leading names set direction in specific sub-areas like separation hardware or catalysis rather than controlling the field as a whole, so a competitive scan needs to look beyond just the top few names.
Filing volume peaked at 966 records in 2018 and has since eased, running at 814 in 2021 and down to 586 by 2024 — a documented 28% decline over that three-year span. The years after 2024 show much lower counts, but that is largely an artefact of publication lag, since patent publication typically trails filing by around 18 months. The honest reading is a cooling from a 2018 peak rather than a collapse, and the most recent two years should not be treated as reliable evidence either way.
C02F, covering water and wastewater treatment, is the largest single class at 15.8% of all 73,901 records, followed by B01D, separation processes including filtration, at 8.2%. Every other class in the dataset — catalysis, material testing, mixing equipment, inorganic compounds, microorganism-based methods and control systems — sits at or below 2.3% of records. Because a record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to more than 100%, which reflects genuine overlap in claim scope rather than double-counting error.
The thinnest classes relative to the field's core — control and regulating systems (G05B), microorganism-based remediation (C12N), mixing/dosing equipment (B01F) and inorganic sorbent materials (C01B) — each sit under 1.5% of all records, compared with 15.8% for core treatment chemistry. That gap suggests the sensing, dosing and biological-remediation layers around treatment infrastructure carry meaningfully less claim density than the treatment chemistry itself, making them a more promising area to search before drafting a new application.
US20110262331A1, filed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, describes an air pollution control system that chains a boiler, NOx removal equipment, a desulfurizer using an absorbent, and a downstream waste-water treatment device with a solid-liquid separating unit. It is a useful reference point for the specific architecture of linking flue-gas desulfurization to waste-water solid-liquid separation, but it does not cover water treatment methods generally. Anyone filing in adjacent air-pollution or desulfurization waste-stream handling should review its claims specifically, rather than assume it blocks unrelated treatment approaches.
Research Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole water & environmental technologies patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.