Book a demo

Water & Environmental Tech Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Water & Environmental Tech Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/water-and-environmental-technologies-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Water & Environmental Technologies
Water and environmental technology patents: who holds the ground and where it is still open
  • No single filer dominates. the leader holds 890 records but the top five combined reach only 4.2% of all 73,901 records in scope — this is a fragmented field, not a gatekept one.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2018 peak. activity ran 814 in 2021 down to 586 in 2024, a 28% pullback over that span, though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in under publication lag.
  • Treatment and separation carry the field. C02F (water & wastewater treatment) and B01D (separation processes) cover 15.8% and 8.2% of all records respectively — everything else sits in single digits.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
73.9K
Published Records
4%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-28%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (814 records) with 2024 (586) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 73,901 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape draws on 73,901 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, gathered under a search string that pairs core water-treatment and pollution-control terms with adjacent domains: environmental monitoring, desalination, air pollution control, soil remediation, stormwater management and nature-based solutions. The scope is broad by design, spanning both hard treatment infrastructure and the sensing and control layers wrapped around it.

Reading the results as patent families rather than raw document counts matters here, because continuation practice and multi-jurisdiction filing can inflate a single invention into several records. The concentration and trend figures below use the family-level ranking the dataset provides, and the most recent one to two years should be read as provisional given the usual 18-month gap between filing and publication.

Filing trend and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1XYLECO INC890
  2. 2EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC767
  3. 3MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD564
  4. 4TORAY INDUSTRIES INC447
  5. 5VEOLIA WATER SOLUTIONS & TECHNOLOGIES SUPPORT SAS406
  6. 6KEMIRA OY392
  7. 7STRONG FORCE IOT PORTFOLIO 2016 LLC372
  8. 8BASF CORPORATON367
  9. 9BASF MOBILE EMISSIONS CATALYSTS LLC358
  10. 10BASF SE346
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 73,901-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than the record total — that is expected and reflects genuinely overlapping claim scope.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Volume ran 814 in 2017 to a peak of 966 in 2018, then eased through the following years to 814 again in 2021 and 586 by 2024 — a 28% decline over that three-year window. The 2025 and 2026 figures (57 for the partial latest year) understate true filing activity because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months.

Filing trend, 2017-202602505007501,000814201796620182019202020212022202320242025572026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C02F (water & wastewater treatment) leads at 15.8% of all 73,901 records, with B01D (separation processes such as filtration) second at 8.2%. Everything past those two — catalysis (B01J), analysis and testing (G01N), mixing (B01F), inorganic compounds (C01B), microorganism-based methods (C12N) and control systems (G05B) — sits at or below 2.3% of records, marking them as thinner, more specialised claim territory rather than core ground.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC02F · Water & wastewater treatment11,65115.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…6,0848.2%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …1,7302.3%G01N · Material analysis & testing8621.2%B01F · Mixing & stirring8061.1%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…7681.0%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…5620.8%G05B · Control & regulating systems5600.8%Other15,62621.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 73,901 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about water & environmental technologies patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative claim and the most-cited records

Representative record
US20110262331A12011-10-27

Air pollution control system and air pollution control method — US20110262331A1

MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.

Filed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and published in 2011, this record describes an air pollution control system built around a boiler, NOx removal equipment, a desulfurizer that uses an absorbent to reduce sulfur oxides in flue gas, and a downstream waste-water treatment device with a solid-liquid separating unit that splits desulfurized waste water into solid and liquid fractions.Abstract text drawn directly from the published filing.

US20110262331A1 — patent drawing 1US20110262331A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20190339688A1Methods and systems for data collection, learning, and streaming of machine signals for analytics and mainten…974
2US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials860
3US20200348662A1Platform for facilitating development of intelligence in an industrial internet of things system733
4US20210157312A1Intelligent vibration digital twin systems and methods for industrial environments716
5US20180284758A1Methods and systems for industrial internet of things data collection for equipment analysis in an upstream o…600
6US6949196B2Methods and systems for improved dosing of a chemical treatment, such as chlorine dioxide, into a fluid strea…591
7US5972196AElectrochemical production of ozone and hydrogen peroxide588
8US20200225655A1Methods, systems, kits and apparatuses for monitoring and managing industrial settings in an industrial inter…563
9US20200103894A1Methods and systems for data collection, learning, and streaming of machine signals for computerized maintena…514
10US7121342B2Thermal processes for subsurface formations428

Citation counts inside this corpus skew toward older filings and reflect influence within the searched set, not current commercial importance — several of the top-cited records here relate to industrial IoT platforms rather than treatment chemistry itself.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once volume, concentration and class distribution are read together: this is a wide field with no single choke point, most of the claim density sits in two IPC subclasses, and the trend line needs the publication lag factored in before anyone calls it a slowdown.

Concentration
4.2%
of 73,901 records held by the top 5 assignees

No single company controls the field

The leading assignee holds 890 records and the tenth-ranked holds 346, but even combined, the top five reach only 4.2% of all records in scope and the top ten only 6.6%. For a new entrant, this means freedom to operate is rarely blocked by one dominant portfolio — the risk is a long tail of narrow, overlapping claims rather than a single gatekeeper.

Based on the 100-company ranked assignee list.
Filing momentum
-28%
change from 2021 (814) to 2024 (586)

Volume has pulled back from its 2018 peak

After peaking at 966 filings in 2018, the field's filing volume eased to 814 by 2021 and to 586 by 2024 — a documented 28% decline over that three-year window. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures are not yet reliable evidence of a continued slide; the honest read is a cooling from peak, not a collapse.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Technology weighting
15.8%
of records classified under C02F

Treatment chemistry, not sensing, is the dense ground

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) and B01D (separation processes) together anchor the field at 15.8% and 8.2% of all 73,901 records. Control and monitoring classes such as G05B and G01N sit under 1.5% each, suggesting the sensing and automation layer around treatment infrastructure is comparatively open relative to the treatment chemistry itself.

Class shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to water & environmental technologies patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked assignee list runs 100 companies deep and spans large industrial conglomerates, specialty chemical firms and IoT-platform entrants — a mix that itself signals how the field has broadened past traditional treatment engineering into sensing and analytics.

Leader
890
records

A wide industrial base, not a narrow specialist pool

The top-ranked assignee's 890 records sit well ahead of fifth place (406) and tenth place (346), but the drop-off is gradual rather than a cliff — consistent with a field built by large diversified filers (heavy industry, chemicals, water-technology specialists) rather than a handful of pure-play water companies.

Ranking covers 100 companies at the family level.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Co-assignee activity is thin and mostly intra-group

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest links — an oil major paired with an industrial engineering partner, and a heavy-industries parent paired with its own engineering subsidiary — read more as corporate-group filing structure than open cross-company collaboration.

Strongest pair recorded at 43 shared filings.
Recent momentum
Mixed
YoY change among tracked assignees

Momentum is uneven even among active filers

Recent-year movement among tracked assignees ranges from a filer up 100% YoY on a small base to others down 50-67% YoY, and several established names show zero filings in the latest year — a pattern consistent with the broader publication-lag effect rather than firms exiting the space outright.

Latest-year counts are provisional pending further publication.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Classes below 1.5% of records carry far less claim density than C02F or B01D, and several sit directly adjacent to core treatment infrastructure.
Microorganism-based remediation (C12N)Control & regulating systems for treatment plants (G05B)Mixing/stirring equipment for dosing (B01F)Inorganic sorbent materials (C01B)Sensor-driven analysis & testing (G01N)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Evoqua Water Technologies LLC2+100%
Strong Force IoT Portfolio 2016 LLC1-67%
The Regents of the University of California1-50%
Xyleco, Inc.0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.0
Kemira Oyj (Finland)0
Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support SAS0-100%
Alstom Technology Ltd0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking or identifying open claim space.

Check freedom to operate against the dense classes

C02F and B01D carry the highest claim density in this field, so any new filing touching wastewater treatment chemistry or separation/filtration hardware should be checked against that concentration before drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch the under-claimed control layer

Sensing, analytics and control classes remain thin relative to treatment chemistry, which is where a first-mover claim is more likely to stand on open ground rather than crowded prior art.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track assignee momentum past the publication lag

Recent-year swings by individual assignees need to be read against the 18-month publication lag before concluding a company has slowed or exited a technology area.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Water & Environmental Technologies Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole water & environmental technologies patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.